UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant                               Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

Oracle Corporation

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 

(5)

 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 

(2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 

(3)

 

Filing Party:

 

     

 

(4)

 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGO

500 Oracle Parkway

Redwood City, California 94065LOGO

September 28, 201718, 2020

To our Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Oracle Corporation. Our Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 15, 2017,4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time,Time. In light of the COVID-19 outbreak, for the safety and well-being of our stockholders, directors and employees, and taking into account the protocols of local, state and federal governments, we have determined that this year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only. At our virtual Annual Meeting, stockholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions via the Oracle Conference Center, located at 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California.Internet. Our goal is to continue to serve the needs of our stockholders without significant disruption while closely monitoring developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic to keep our stockholders, directors and employees safe.

We describe in detail the actions we expect to take at the Annual Meeting in the attachedfollowing Notice of 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement. We have also made available a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.2020. We encourage you to read the Form 10-K, which includes information on our operations, products and services, as well as our audited financial statements.

This year, we will again be using the “Notice and Access” method of providing proxy materials to stockholders via the Internet. We believe that this process provides stockholders with a convenient and quick way to access the proxy materials and vote, while allowing us to conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing the proxy materials. We will mail to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and the Form 10-K and vote electronically via the Internet. This notice will also contain instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders who doare not receivesent a notice, or who otherwise request, will receivebe sent a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic copy of the proxy materials by email. See “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 7778 for more information.

Please use this opportunity to take part in our corporate affairs by voting your shares on the business to come before this meeting.Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone, or, if you requested paper copies of the proxy materials, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.See “How Do I Vote?” on page 56 of the proxy statement for more details. Voting electronically, by telephone or by returning your proxy card does NOT deprive you of your right to attend the virtual meeting and to vote your shares in personduring the meeting for the matters acted upon at the meeting. If you cannot attend the virtual meeting, in person, we invite you to watchlisten to a recording for up to seven days following the meeting via webcast by going towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 or our website at www.oracle.com/investor.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Lawrence J. Ellison

Chairman and Chief Technology Officer




LOGO

LOGO

500 Oracle Parkway

Redwood City, California 94065

 

NOTICE OF 20172020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

TIME AND DATE

 

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday, November 15, 20174, 2020

PLACELOCATION

 

Oracle Conference Center,

350 Oracle Parkway,

Redwood City, CA 94065This year the meeting will be held in a virtual format only. Please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020

LIVE WEBCASTREPLAY

 

AvailableA recording of the meeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 and on our website atwww.oracle.com/investor, starting at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday, following the Annual Meeting through November 15, 201711, 2020.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

 

(1)

  

To elect 1214 director nominees to serve on the Board of Directors until our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

(2)

  

To hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

(3)

  

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

(4)

To approve the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

(5)(4)

  

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.2021.

 

(6)(5)

  

To consider and act on threetwo stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

 

(7)(6)

  

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

RECORD DATE

 

September 18, 20178, 2020

PROXY VOTING

 

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You can vote your shares electronically via the Internet, by telephone or by completing and returning the proxy card or voting instruction card if you requested paper proxy materials. Voting instructions are provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or, if you requested printed materials, the instructions are printed on your proxy card and included in the accompanying proxy statement. You can revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the proxy statement.

MEETING ADMISSION

 

You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 and entering the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card (if you requested printed materials), or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You will only be entitled to vote and submit questions at the Annual Meeting if you are a stockholder as of the close of business on September 18, 2017,8, 2020, the record date. More details on how to participate in this year’s virtual meeting can be found on pages 6 and 7 and in the “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 78. In the event of a technical malfunction or other situation that at the discretion of the Chairman of the Board of Directors may affect the ability of the Annual Meeting to satisfy the requirements for a meeting of stockholders to be held, the Chairman or Corporate Secretary of Oracle will convene the meeting at 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on the same date or hold a valid proxyand at the location specified above solely for the meeting.In order to be admitted topurpose of holding the Annual Meeting,you must present proof of ownership of Oracle common stockadjourned meeting at this later time. Under the foregoing circumstances, we will post information regarding the announcement on the record date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on September 18, 2017, the NoticeInvestors page of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee. Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present the proxy card, properly executed, and a copy of the proof of ownership.Stockholders and proxy holdersOracle’s website at must also present a form of photo identificationwww.oracle.com/investor such as a driver’s license.We will be unable to admit anyone who does not present identification or refuses to comply with our security procedures..

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Dorian DaleyBrian S. Higgins

Executive Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary

September 28, 201718, 2020




TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Statement Summary

   1 

How Do I Vote?

   56 

Board of Directors

   68 

Nominees for Directors

   68 

Board Meetings

   1114 

Committees, Membership and Meetings

   1114 

Director Compensation

   1417 

Corporate Governance

   1721 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

��  1721 

Proxy Access and Director Nominations

   1722 

Majority Voting Policy

   1822

Prohibition on Speculative Transactions and Pledging Policy

23 

Board and Committee Performance Evaluations

   1924 

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Senior Officers

   19

Share Pledging and Our Prohibition on Speculative Transactions

1925 

Board Leadership Structure

   2025 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   2026 

Board of Directors and Director Independence

   2127 

Director Tenure, Board Refreshment and Diversity

   2227 

Stockholder Outreach

   2228 

Communications with the Board

   2229 

Employee Matters

   2329 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

   2430 

Executive Compensation

   2632 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2632 

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of DirectorsReport

   4246 

Fiscal 20172020 Summary Compensation Table

   4347 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 20172020

   4549 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172020 Fiscal Year-End

   4650 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 20172020

   4751 

Fiscal 2017 2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

   4752 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   4853 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

   4954

CEO Pay Ratio

55 

Transactions with Related Persons

   5055 

Legal Proceedings

   52

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

52

No Incorporation by Reference

5257 

Management Proposals

   5359 

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

   5359 

Proposal  No. 2: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

   5460 

Proposal  No. 3: Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

57

Proposal No.  4: Approval of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan

   5862 

Proposal  No. 5:4: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   6670 

Report of the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

   6871 

Stockholder Proposals

   6972

Proposal No. 5: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Report

72 

Proposal No. 6: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions ReportIndependent Board Chair

   69

Proposal No. 7: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Report

71

Proposal No. 8: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Proxy Access Reform

7375 

Stockholder Proposals for the 20182021 Annual Meeting

   7677 

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting

   7778

No Incorporation by Reference

83 

Other Business

   8283 

Householding

   8283 

Appendix  A:Appendix: Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan

   A-1 

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGOLOGO


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. For more complete information about these topics, please review our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20172020 and the entirecontents of this Proxy Statement. Fiscal 20172020 began on June 1, 20162019 and ended on May 31, 2017.2020. Fiscal 20182021 began on June 1, 20172020 and ends on May 31, 2018.2021.

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, this Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, including an Internet link to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017,2020, were first made available to stockholders on or about September 28, 2017.18, 2020.

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

 

Date and Time

Wednesday, November 15, 20174, 2020

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time

 

PlaceLocation

Oracle Conference Center

350 Oracle Parkway

Redwood City, CA 94065

Online via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ ORCL2020

Record Date

September 18, 20178, 2020

 

Live WebcastReplay

AvailableA recording of the meeting will be available on our website atwww.oracle.com/investor, starting and at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday,www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com
/ORCL2020
following the Annual Meeting through November 15, 201711, 2020.

 

Attendance

You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 and entering the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card (if you requested printed materials), or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You will only be entitled to vote and submit questions at the Annual Meeting if you are a stockholder as of the close of business on September 18, 2017,8, 2020, the record date, or hold a valid proxy for the meeting.If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to provide photo identification, such as a driver’s license, and proof of ownership of Oracle common stock as of September 18, 2017 in order to be admitted. We will be unable to admit anyone who does not present identification or refuses to comply with our security procedures.date.

 

Voting Roadmap

 

  Agenda Item

 

Board Recommendation

  Page    

    Election of 1214 directors

For Each Nominee

 53For Each Nominee

59    

    Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs)

For

 54For

Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs

  

One Year

60     
57

    Approval of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan

For

 58For

62    

    Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20182021

For

 66For

70    

     Stockholder proposals

 

 

Against

 

  

6972    

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

 

  LOGO

Board of Directors
 Stockholder proxy access right adopted in June 2016Rights and
Engagement
Governance Best Practices

  LOGOLOGO    Ongoing Board refreshment: 2 new directors added in fiscal 2020, for a total of 6 directors added in the last 6 fiscal years

  LOGO    Separate Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) roles

  LOGO    Lead independent director

  LOGO    Majority of independent directors (8(9 out of 12) and14)

  LOGO    100% independent Board committees

 LOGO

33%

  LOGO    36% of Board members are women or come from a diverse background

 LOGO

  LOGO    Annual director elections

  LOGO    Director majority voting policy

  LOGO    Annual Board and committee performance evaluations, including individual director interviews

 Ongoing Board refreshment, with new independent directors added in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015

  LOGOLOGO    Single class of voting stock

  LOGO    No supermajority voting provisions

  LOGO    Stockholder proxy access

  LOGO    Right to call a special meeting (20%)

  LOGO    Stockholder right to act by written consent

  LOGO    Active stockholder outreach and engagement program

  LOGO

Annual director elections

  LOGO

Director majority voting policy

  LOGO

Separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles

  LOGO

 

Lead independent director  LOGO    Pledging policy adopted in January 2018 with quarterly risk reviews

 LOGO

Single class of voting stock and no supermajority voting provisions

  LOGO

Annual Board and committee performance evaluations

  LOGO

LOGO    Robust director and senior officer stock ownership guidelines

 LOGO

  LOGO    Anti-hedging policy applicable to all employees and directors

  LOGO

Stockholders representing at least 20% of the outstanding votes have the right to call a special meeting

  LOGO

Stockholder right to act by written consent



 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGOLOGO   1


Director Nominees

In Proposal No. 1, we are asking you to vote FOR each of the 1214 director nominees listed below. Each director attended at least 75% of all Board meetings and applicable committee meetings during fiscal 2017.2020.

 

Nominee Age Director
Since
 Independent Current Committees

Jeffrey S. Berg

Chairman of Northside Services, LLC; Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), International Creative Management, Inc.

 70 1997 

 

LOGO

 

   Independence (Chair)

   Governance

Michael J. Boskin*

Tully M. Friedman Professor of Economics and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow, Stanford University

 71 1994 

 

LOGO

 

   Finance and Audit (Chair)

Safra A. Catz

CEO, Oracle Corporation

 55 2001  

Bruce R. Chizen

Senior Adviser to Permira Advisers LLP; Venture Partner, Voyager Capital; Former CEO, Adobe Systems Incorporated

 62 2008 

 

LOGO

 

   Governance (Chair)

   Finance and Audit

George H. Conrades

Chairman and former CEO, Akamai Technologies, Inc.; Venture Partner, Longfellow Venture Fund

 78 2008 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation

   Independence

Lawrence J. Ellison

Chairman, Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and Founder, Oracle Corporation

 73 1977  

Hector Garcia-Molina

Leonard Bosack and Sandra Lerner Professor, Departments of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University

 63 2001 

 

LOGO

 

   Independence

Jeffrey O. Henley

Vice Chairman of the Board, Oracle Corporation

 72 1995  

Mark V. Hurd

CEO, Oracle Corporation

 60 2010  

Renée J. James

Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group; Former President, Intel Corporation

 53 2015 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation (Chair)

   Finance and Audit

Leon E. Panetta

Co-founder and Chairman, Panetta Institute for Public Policy; Former U.S. Secretary of Defense; Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

 79 2015 

 

LOGO

 

   Governance

Naomi O. Seligman

Senior Partner, Ostriker von Simson, Inc.

 79 2005 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation (Vice Chair)

* Current lead independent director. See “Corporate Governance—Board Leadership Structure” on page 20 for more information.

Active and Engaged Board

We have an active and engaged Board that is committed to fulfilling its fiduciary duty to act in good faith in the best interests of our company and all of our stockholders. The number of Board and committee meetings held in fiscal 2017 is set forth below.

  Nominee Age Director
Since
 Independent Current Committees

Jeffrey S. Berg

Chairman of Northside Services, LLC; Former Chairman and CEO, International Creative Management, Inc.

 73 1997 

 

LOGO

 

   Independence (Chair)

   Finance and  Audit

   Governance

Michael J. Boskin*

Tully M. Friedman Professor of Economics and Wohlford Family Hoover Institution Senior Fellow, Stanford University

 74 1994 

 

LOGO

 

   Finance and Audit (Chair)

Safra A. Catz

CEO, Oracle Corporation

 58 2001 

 

 

 

Bruce R. Chizen

Senior Adviser to Permira Advisers LLP; Venture Partner, Voyager Capital; Former CEO, Adobe Systems Incorporated

 65 2008 

 

LOGO

 

   Governance (Chair)

   Finance and  Audit

George H. Conrades

Executive Advisor and Former Chairman and CEO, Akamai Technologies, Inc.; Managing Partner, Longfellow Venture Partners

 81 2008 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation  (Chair)

   Independence

Lawrence J. Ellison

Chairman, Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and Founder, Oracle Corporation

 76 1977 

 

 

 

Rona A. Fairhead

Former Minister of State, U.K. Department for International Trade; Former Chair of the BBC Trust; Former Chair and CEO, Financial Times Group

 59 2019 

 

LOGO

 

   Finance and  Audit

Jeffrey O. Henley

Vice Chairman of the Board, Oracle Corporation

 75 1995 

 

 

 

Renée J. James

Chairman and CEO, Ampere Computing LLC; Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group; Former President, Intel Corporation

 56 2015 

 

 

 

Charles W. Moorman IV

Senior Advisor and Former CEO, Amtrak; Former CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation

 68 2018 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation

   Independence

Leon E. Panetta

Co-founder and Chairman, Panetta Institute for Public Policy; Former U.S. Secretary of Defense; Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

 82 2015 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation

   Governance

William G. Parrett

Former CEO, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 75 2018 

 

LOGO

 

   Governance

Naomi O. Seligman

Senior Partner, Ostriker von Simson, Inc.

 82 2005 

 

LOGO

 

   Compensation (Vice Chair)

Vishal Sikka

Founder and CEO, Vianai Systems, Inc.; Former CEO and Managing Director, Infosys Limited

 53 2019  

 

  

 

 

LOGO

*

Current lead independent director. See “Corporate Governance—Board Leadership Structure” on page 25 for more information.



 

2  LOGO   2017LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Stockholder Outreach and Board Responsiveness

We have a long tradition of engaging with our stockholders to solicit their views on a wide variety of issues, including corporate governance, environmental and social matters, executive compensation and other issues.

Independent Director Engagement. On a regular basis, certain of our independent directors travel to the U.S. East Coast for in-person meetings with a number of our large institutional stockholders at their offices. Our independent directors also hold meetings with stockholders in-person at Oracle headquarters or telephonically. Ourour stockholders. The meetings tend to be among our largest institutional investors and members of our Compensation Committee, with the Chair of our Governance Committee joining if the agenda warrants his attendance. Neither our Chairman nor our Chief Executive Officer participate in these meetings to ensure investors are able to provide candid feedback to our directors. We provide an open forum to our investors to discuss and comment on any aspects of our executive compensation program and governance matters. The Board believes these meetings are important because they foster a relationship of accountability between ourthe Board and our stockholders and help us better understand and respond to our stockholders’ priorities and perspectives.

 

Fiscal 2018 – 3 independent directors held meetings with 10 institutional stockholders representing approximately 22% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares

Fiscal 2017 – 4 independent directors held meetings with 9 institutional stockholders representing approximately 18% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares, and offered to meet with stockholders representing an additional 4% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares

In fiscal 2020, certain of our independent directors held meetings with ten institutional stockholders representing approximately 30% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares (based on data available as of June 30, 2020).

Thus far in fiscal 2021, we reached out to stockholders representing approximately 31% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares (based on data available as of June 30, 2020) to set up meetings with members of the Compensation Committee. The full Compensation Committee has already held video conference meetings with four institutional stockholders. We have continued to engage with our stockholders despite the challenges posed by the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Executive Director Engagement. As part of our regular Investor Relations engagement program, our executive directors hold meetings with a number of our institutional stockholders throughout the year. We also typically hold an annual financial analyst meeting at Oracle OpenWorld in San Francisco where analysts are invited to hear presentations from key members of our management team, including our executive directors. We held our fiscal 2020 analyst day at Oracle OpenWorld on September 19, 2019. In fiscal 2017,2020, our executive directors held meetings with stockholders representing approximately 43%21% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares. (All percentages calculated basedshares (based on data available as of June 30, 2017.)2020). As a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, we have cancelled our in-person analyst day which was originally expected to occur in fiscal 2021.

Legal and Investor Relations Engagement. Members of our Legal and Investor Relations team also engage with stockholders throughout the year. After the proxy statement is filed there is a further attempt to re-engage with stockholders in order to discuss matters on the annual stockholder meeting agenda and solicit feedback. When appropriate, independent directors join these discussions.

Say-on-Pay Vote Outcome and Board Responsiveness. Stockholders approved our advisory say-on-pay proposal at our 2019 Annual Meeting with 58% of the votes cast voting in favor, up from the prior year approval of 54%. While the Board was pleased to achieve these majority votes, it was disappointed by the low support. Members of the Compensation Committee actively sought to understand what actions the Compensation Committee could take to address stockholder concerns. Below is a summary of recentthe Board’s response to the most critical feedback we have received from our stockholders and our Board’s response.investors.



 

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   3


What We Heard

 OurThe Board’s Response

Equity awards should not vest based onlyExecutive Compensation

(See page 34

for details on the passage of time

LOGOPSOs)

 

100% of NEO Equity Compensation Granted  Front loaded grants, such as the performance stock options (PSOs) granted to Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz in FY18 is Performance-Based.In fiscal 2018, each currently employed named executive officer (NEO) received an equity award consisting entirely of performance-based stock options (Performance Options) that may be earned only upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals over a five-year performance period. See pages 29 to 30 for details on the Performance Options.are uncommon.

Performance metrics should better align with stockholder value

 

LOGO  There is concern about the rigor of the goals selected for the PSOs.

  Although the compensation of Oracle’s top executives was lowered, there is still concern that the PSOs will pay out at a high amount during the 5-year performance period.

  There is an expectation from certain of our largest stockholders that Oracle will honor its commitment not to (1) change the performance metrics of the PSOs midstream, even if internal projections show no vesting, or (2) grant any additional awards to Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz during the 5-year performance period of the PSOs.

  There should be a strong link between company performance and executive compensation.

 

New Rigorous Performance Goals Tied  Following the 2019 Annual Meeting, the Compensation Committee considered the concerns from stockholders regarding the PSOs and discussed possible approaches to Oracle’s Cloud Growthaddressing such concerns with its independent compensation consultant. After considering the benefits and Returning Valuedisadvantages of cancelling or revising the PSOs to Stockholders.Sixset new long-term performance measures for Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz, the Compensation Committee determined that, on balance, the approach that would be most responsive to stockholder concerns would be to maintain the existing terms applicable to the outstanding PSOs and continue to honor the commitment made to our stockholders not to grant any additional equity to the PSO holders for the duration of the seven Performance Option tranches mayPSO performance period.

  In reaching this decision, the Compensation Committee gave weight to the following considerations: (1) no portion of the PSOs have vested to date resulting in no additional pay to Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz, (2) internal projections continue to demonstrate that the performance goals are rigorous and not easily attainable during the performance period, (3) if the PSOs do vest, stockholders will have achieved significant long-term value, and (4) assurances have been given to investors that no changes or additional grants will be earned only if Oracle satisfies a combinationmade to Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz during the 5-year performance period of (1) an operational performance goal tied to significant growth of Oracle’s cloud businessand (2) a substantial increase in Oracle’s market capitalization. The seventh Performance Option tranche may be earned only upon significant growth in Oracle’s stock price. Thus, even ifthe PSOs.

  Oracle’s cloud business grows,has become an important part of the Performance Options will not vest unless Oracle delivers significant valuecompany’s long-term success and the PSOs were carefully designed to stockholdersdrive performance in the formareas that would be most beneficial to our stockholders. As such, after taking into consideration stockholders’ feedback, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that the current design of stock pricethe PSO program directly links the long-term incentive compensation of our most senior executives with company performance and market capitalization growth.stockholder value.

NEO compensation is high

LOGOCorporate Governance

 

Significant Decrease in Equity Compensation Value. The Performance Options will result in a decrease in equity compensation value  Board pay remains high, particularly for the currently employed NEOs. When the grant date fair value of the awards is annualized over the five-year performance period, it represents a47% decreasefrom fiscal 2017 equity award values for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd and a59% decrease from fiscal 2017 equity award value for Mr. Kurian.committee chairs.

Long-term equity awards should have a minimum three-year performance period

 

LOGO  The Board should be comprised primarily of independent directors who are not overly deferential to the Chairman and Founder of Oracle.

  The system of rotating the lead independent director is uncommon and stockholders want assurances that it is effective.

  Stockholders appreciate that Oracle has a female Chief Executive Officer and 4 women on the Board but want to see an ongoing commitment to diversity at the Board level.

 

Five-Year Performance Period. The Performance Options may be earned over a five-year performance period. The Performance Options were granted with  In fiscal 2020, the expectation that no additionalBoard approved significant reductions to non-employee director compensation. Effective May 31, 2020, committee chair equity awards will be grantedwere eliminated, and the grant value of each of the annual and initial equity awards was reduced from $400,000 to $350,000. See page 17 for details on director compensation.

  The Board believes it is desirable to maintain a mix of longer-tenured, experienced directors and newer directors with fresh perspectives. In furtherance of this objective, the Board worked diligently to identify and interview qualified candidates. The Board elected Dr. Sikka and Mrs. Fairhead in fiscal 2020, Mr. Moorman and Mr. Parrett in fiscal 2018, Ms. James in fiscal 2016 and Secretary Panetta in fiscal 2015.

  After receiving feedback from stockholders, the Board also reexamined our system of rotating the lead independent director on an annual basis among the chairs of the F&A Committee, the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Board determined that the directors filling this role take it very seriously and believes the position is strengthened by the particular insights and diversity of viewpoints that the different committee chairs bring to the currently employed NEOs until 2022 atposition. This structure also provides a broader group of directors the earliest.

Although the Board has a significant percentage of women, continueopportunity to focus on Board diversityserve in an additional leadership role.

 

LOGO

  Presently, Actively Seeking Women and Minority36% of our Board Candidates. In fiscal 2017, the Board amended its Corporatemembers are women or come from a diverse background. The Governance GuidelinesCommittee continues to affirm that the Governance Committeeconsider potential director candidates on an ongoing basis and is committed to actively seeking women and minority candidates for the pool from which director candidates are selected. Presently 33% of Board members are women or come from a diverse background. Three of our 12 Board members are women, including one of our CEOs.

Add directors to the Board to maintain a mix of new and longer-tenured directors

 

LOGO

Board Refreshment. The Board elected Ms. James and Secretary Panetta as directors in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. The Governance Committee is continuing to meet with potential director candidates on an ongoing basis.

Fiscal 2018 Stockholder Feedback. In our recent meetings with stockholders, we received positive feedback regarding the Performance Options and our continued stockholder engagement. Specifically, our stockholders were pleased that all equity granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2018 was 100% performance-based with robust performance goals, and the equity will only be earned if stockholders also benefit. Stockholders also appreciated the reduction in equity compensation value for the NEOs.



 

20174  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   3


Executive Compensation Highlights

 

Year-Over-Year Decreases in Reported

CEO Compensation at a Glance

 

  Our CEO’s compensation is predominantly performance-based

  In fiscal 2020, Ms. Catz earned less than $1 million in total compensation, consisting of:

$950,000 in salary, and

$14,055 in other compensation

The aggregate compensation of our Chairman and CTO (as reportedCompensation Committee’s independent consultant provided data showing market pay in the Summary Compensation Table) has decreased57% fromrange of $20-$35 million for similarly situated CEOs

  During fiscal 2012 through2020, Ms. Catz received:

No increase in her salary

No bonus

No new equity grant and

No performance-based equity vesting based on fiscal 2017. The aggregate reported compensation of our CEOs has decreased23% from fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 and21% from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017. In the same period (fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017), our five-year absolute total stockholder return was83%.2020 performance

   LOGO

Fiscal 2020

Named Executive Officers (NEOs)

  Lawrence J. Ellison, Chairman and CTO*

  Safra A. Catz, CEO*

  Mark V. Hurd, Former CEO*

  Dorian E. Daley, Executive Vice President and General Counsel

  Jeffrey O. Henley, Vice Chairman

  William Corey West, Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

*  We have included Mr. Ellison as an NEO for fiscal 2020 on a voluntary basis in the interest of transparency. Ms. Catz also serves as our principal financial officer. Mr. Hurd passed away on October 18, 2019.

 

 

 

Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd

 

Below is an excerpt of our fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) showing the total compensation for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd. See page 47 for the full SCT and related footnotes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West

 

 

LOGO

 
   Name 

Fiscal

Year

 

  

Salary

($)

 

  

All Other

Compensation ($)

 

  

Total ($)

 

     
 

 Lawrence J. Ellison

 

 

2020

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1,716,114        

 

 

 

1,716,115

 

   
 

 Safra A. Catz

 

 

2020

 

 

 

  950,000

 

 

 

14,055        

 

 

 

964,055

 

   
 

 Mark V. Hurd

 

 

2020

 

 

 

356,653

 

 

 

370,791        

 

 

 

727,444

 

   
          

LOGO

Significant Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback

In fiscal 2018, each currently employed NEO received an equity award consisting entirely of Performance Options that may be earned only upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals over a five-year performance period. When the grant date fair value of Performance Options is annualized over the five-year performance period, it represents a47%decrease from fiscal 2017 equity award values for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd and a59% decrease from fiscal 2017 equity award value for Mr. Kurian.

Compensation Best Practices

 

LOGOLOGO Best Practices We Employ

 

LOGO    LowLOGO    High proportion of compensation for our CEO and CTO is performance-based and aligned with stockholders

LOGO    Caps on maximum payout of bonuses and performance-based equity awards

LOGO    Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO    Disciplined dilution rates from equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO    Compensation recovery (clawback) policy for cash bonuses in the event of a financial restatement

 

LOGO    Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO    Caps on maximum payout of bonus and PSU awards

LOGOLOGO    Annual risk assessment of compensation programs

 

LOGOLOGO    Independent compensation consultant and independent compensation committee

 

LOGO    High proportion of NEO compensation is at-riskLOGO    Anti-hedging policy applicable to all employees and performance-baseddirectors

LOGO    Anti-pledging policy with limited exceptions

    

LOGOLOGO Practices We Avoid

 

LOGOLOGO    No severance benefit plans or agreementsarrangements except as provided under our equity incentive plan to employees generally or as required by law

 

LOGOLOGO    No single-trigger change in control vesting of equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO    No change in control acceleration of performance-based cash bonuses

LOGO    No minimum guaranteed vesting for performanceperformance-based equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO    No discretionary cash bonuses for NEOsCEO and CTO

 

LOGOLOGO    No “golden parachute” tax gross-ups for NEOs

 

LOGOLOGO    No payout or settlement of dividends andor dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO    No supplemental executive retirement plans, executive pensions or excessive retirement benefits

 

LOGOLOGO    No repricing, cash-out or exchange of “underwater” stock options without stockholder approval



 

4  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   5


LOGOLOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

We are providing these proxy materials in connection with Oracle Corporation’s 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice), this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, including an Internet link to our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, were first made available to stockholders on or about September 28, 2017.18, 2020. This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.

HOW DO I VOTE?

 

Your vote is important. You may vote on the Internet, by telephone, by mail or by attending the Annual Meeting, and voting by ballot, all as described below. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders by use of a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card or voting instruction card.Telephone and Internet voting facilities are available now and will be available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 14, 2017. 3, 2020.

Vote on the Internet

If you are a stockholder of record, you may submit your proxy by going towww.voteproxy.comwww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided in the Notice. If you requested printed proxy materials, you may follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card. If your shares are held with a broker, you will need to go to the website provided on your Notice or voting instruction card. Have your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction card in hand when you access the voting website. On the Internet voting site, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can also request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.

Vote by Telephone

If you are a stockholder of record, you can also vote by telephone by dialing 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437).1-800-690-6903. If your shares are held with a broker, you can vote by telephone by dialing the number specified on your voting instruction card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts will allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Have your proxy card or voting instruction card in hand when you call.

Vote by Mail

If you have requested printed proxy materials, you may choose to vote by mail, by marking your proxy card or voting instruction card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If the envelope is missing, and you are a stockholder of record, please mail your completed proxy card to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219.Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If the envelope is missing and your shares are held with a broker, please mail your completed voting instruction card to the address specified therein. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by mail.

Please note that if you received a Notice, youcannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by Internet and how to request paper copies of the proxy materials.

Voting at the Annual Meeting

The method or timing of your vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. However, if your shares are held inon the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. You should allow yourself enough time prior to the Annual Meeting to obtain this proxy from the holder of record.

virtual meeting platform. The shares voted electronically, telephonically, or represented by the proxy cards received, properly marked, dated, signed and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting.

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only. The accompanying proxy materials and the meeting’s website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 include instructions on how to participate in the meeting and how you may vote your shares of Oracle’s stock. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting online, vote and submit questions during the meeting, you must enter the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card (if you requested printed materials), or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

2017

6  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   5


The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Participants should also give themselves enough time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will start 15 minutes before the meeting on November 4, 2020. If you have difficulty accessing the meeting, please call 1-800-586-1548 (toll free) or 303-562-9288 (international). We will have technicians available to assist you.

Q&A at the Annual Meeting

During the question and answer session, we will include questions submitted in advance of, and questions submitted live during, the Annual Meeting. You may submit a question in advance of the meeting at www.proxyvote.com after logging in with the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card (if you requested printed materials), or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Questions may be submitted during the Annual Meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020. Please identify yourself when submitting a question. We will endeavor to answer as many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits that comply with the meeting rules of conduct. We reserve the right to edit any inappropriate language and to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or Oracle’s business. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition in the interest of time and fairness to all stockholders.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   7


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Nominees for Directors

Our Board of Directors (the Board) consists of 1214 directors, all13 of whom stood for election at our last annual meeting of stockholders. We refer to these directorsThe Board unanimously elected Vishal Sikka as a director effective as of December 10, 2019, and Dr. Sikka will stand for election at the “incumbent directors” in this proxy statement.Annual Meeting along with our other 13 directors.

Director Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines (described in detail in “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines” on page 17)21) contain Board membership qualifications that apply to Board nominees recommended by the Nomination and Governance Committee (the Governance Committee).Committee. The Governance Committee strives for a mix of skills, experience and perspectives that will help create an outstanding, diverse, dynamic and effective Board to represent the interests of stockholders.Board. In selecting nominees, the Governance Committee assesses the independence, character and acumen of candidates and endeavors to collectively establish areas of core competency of the Board, including, among others, industry and technical knowledge and experience; management, accounting and finance expertise; and demonstrated business judgment, leadership and strategic vision. The Governance Committee values a diversity of backgrounds, experience, perspectives and leadership in different fields when identifying nominees. As noted in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance Committee is committed to actively seeking women and minority candidates for the pool from which director candidates are chosen.

The Governance Committee also takesdirector tenure into consideration when making director nomination decisions and believes that it is desirable to maintain a mix of longer-tenured, experienced directors and newer directors with fresh perspectives. The Governance Committee and the Board also believe that longer-tenured, experienced directors are a significant strength of the Board, given the large size of our company, the breadth of our product offerings and the international scope of our organization. See “Corporate Governance—Director Tenure, Board Refreshment and Diversity” on page 2227 for more information.

Below we identify the key experiences, qualifications and skills our director nominees bring to the Board and that the Board considers important in light of Oracle’s businesses and industry.

 

  

Industry Knowledge and Experience. We seek to have directors with experience as executives or directors or in other leadership positions in the particular technology industries in which we compete because our success depends on developing and investing in innovative products and technologies. This experience is critical to the Board’s ability to understand our products and business, assess our competitive position within the technology industry and the strengths and weaknesses of our competitors, maintain awareness of technology trends and innovations, and evaluate potential acquisitions and our acquisition strategy.

 

  

Management, Oversight of Complex Organizations, Accounting and Finance Expertise. We believe that an understanding of management practices, oversight of complex organizations, and accounting/finance and financial reporting processesexpertise is important for our directors. We value management experience in our directors as it provides a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategies, risk management and the methods to drive change and growth that permit the Board to, among other things, identify and recommend improvements to our business operations, sales and marketing approaches and product strategy. We also seek to have at least one independent director who qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, and we expect all of our directors to be financially knowledgeable.

 

  

Business Judgment, Leadership and Strategic Vision. We believe that directors with experience in significant leadership positions are commonly required to demonstrate excellent business judgment, leadership skills and strategic vision. We seek directors with these characteristics as they bring specialimportant insights to Board deliberations and processes.

The Board evaluates its own composition in the context of the diverse experiences and perspectives that the directors collectively bring to the boardroom. Their backgrounds provide the Board with vital insights in areas such as:

 

Finance and

Accounting

Technology

Industry

 

Technology

Industry

Cybersecurity and

Risk Management

 

Mergers and

Acquisitions

Operation of

Global Organizations

Computer

Science

 

Governmental Affairs

Computer

Science

and Regulation

 

Governmental

Affairs

Strategic

Transformation

International Tax and

Monetary Policy

Intellectual

Property

 

Intellectual

Property

Executive Leadership and

Talent Development

 

Customer

Perspective

 

6  LOGO   20178  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


The experiences, qualifications and skills of each director that the Board considered in his or her nomination are included below the directors’ individual biographies on the following pages. The Board concluded that each nominee should serve as a director based on the specific experience and attributes listed below and the direct personal knowledge of each nominee’s previous service on the Board, including the insight and collegiality each nominee brings to the Board’s functions and deliberations. The age of each director is provided as of September 18, 2017,8, 2020, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

 

    

Jeffrey S. Berg

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 7073

Director since 1997

 

Board Committees:

Independence (Chair),

Finance and Audit,

Governance

  

 

Mr. Berg has been an agent in the entertainment industry for over 3540 years. Mr. Berg has served as Chairman of Northside Services, LLC, a media and entertainment advisory firm, since May 2015. Mr. Berg was Chairman of Resolution, a talent and literary agency he founded, from January 2013 until April 2015. Between 1985 and May 2012, he was the Chairman and CEO of International Creative Management, Inc. (ICM), a talent agency for the entertainment industry. He has served as Co-Chair of California’s Council on Information Technology and was President of the Executive Board of the College of Letters and Sciences at the University of California at Berkeley. He previously served on the Board of Trustees of the Anderson School of Management at the University of California at Los Angeles.

 

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of ICM, Mr. Berg brings to the Board over 25 years of leadership experience running one of the world’s preeminent full service talent agencies in the entertainment industry. Mr. Berg’s prior experience as CEO and as a representative of some of the world’s most well-known celebrities offers the Board a unique perspective with respect to managing a global brand in rapidly-changingrapidly changing industries and in management, compensation and operational matters.

  
    

 

    

Michael J. Boskin

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 7174

Director since 1994

 

Board Committees:

Finance and Audit (Chair)

  

 

Dr. Boskin is the Tully M. Friedman Professor of Economics and Wohlford Family Hoover Institution Senior Fellow at Stanford University, where he has been on the faculty since 1971. He is CEO and President of Boskin & Co., Inc., a consulting firm. He was Chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers from February 1989 until January 1993. Dr. Boskin also currently serves as director of Bloom Energy Corporation and previously served as a director of Exxon Mobil Corporation.

 

Qualifications:    Dr. Boskin is recognized internationally for his research on world economic growth, tax and budget theory and policy, U.S. saving and consumption patterns and the implications of changing technology and demography on capital, labor, and product markets. He brings to the Board significant economic and financial expertise and provides the Board with a unique perspective on a number of challenges faced by Oracle due to its global operations, including, for example, questions regarding international tax and monetary policy, treasury functions, currency exposure and general economic and labor trends and risks. In addition, Dr. Boskin’s experience as CEO of his consultancy firm and as a former director of another large, complex global organization provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

  
    

 

    

Safra A. Catz

        

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

Age: 5558

Director since 2001

  

 

Ms. Catz has been our CEO since September 2014. She served as our President from January 2004 to September 2014 and as our CFOChief Financial Officer (CFO) most recently from April 2011 until September 2014. Ms. Catz was previously our CFO from November 2005 until September 2008 and our Interim CFO from April 2005 until July 2005. Prior to being named President, she held various other positions with us since joining Oracle in 1999. Ms. Catz alsois currently a director of The Walt Disney Company and previously served as a director of HSBC Holdings plc. She also serves on the U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.

 

Qualifications:    In her current role at Oracle, Ms. Catz is primarily responsible for all operations at Oracle other than product development sales and marketing, consulting, supportengineering. As our CEO and Oracle’s industry-specific global business units. Ms. Catz also leads the execution offormer CFO, our acquisition strategy and integration of acquired companies and products. Our Board benefits from Ms. Catz’s many years with Oracle and her unique expertise regarding Oracle’s strategic vision, management and operations. Prior to joining Oracle, Ms. Catz developed deep technology industry experience as a managing director with the investment banking firm Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette from 1986 to 1999 covering the technology industry. With this experience, Ms. Catz brings valuable insight regarding the technology industry generally, and in particular in the execution of our acquisition strategy. In addition, Ms. Catz’s prior service as a director of anotherother large, complex global organizationorganizations provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

  
    



 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   7LOGO   9


    

Bruce R. Chizen

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 6265

Director since 2008

 

Board Committees:

Governance (Chair),

Finance and Audit

  

 

Mr. Chizen is currently an independent consultant and has served as Senior Adviser to Permira Advisers LLP (Permira), a private equity firm, since July 2008, and as a Venture Partner at Voyager Capital, a venture capital firm, since August 2009. He has also served as an Operating Partner for Permira Growth Opportunities, a private equity fund, since June 2018. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Chizen served asin a strategic adviser tonumber of positions at Adobe Systems Incorporated (Adobe), a provider of design, imaging and publishing software, for print, Internet and dynamic media production, from November 2007 through November 2008. From December 2000including CEO (2000 to November 2007, Mr. Chizen served as CEO of Adobe and as its2007), President from April 2000(2000 to January 2005. He also served as Adobe’s2005), acting CFO from November 2006(2006 to February 2007. From August 19982007) and strategic adviser (2007 to April 2000 he was Adobe’s Executive Vice President, Products and Marketing.2008). Mr. Chizen joined Adobe Systems in August 1994 and held various positions in its Consumer Products Division and Graphics Products Division. He served as a director of Adobe from December 2000 to April 2008. Mr. Chizen also currently serves as a director of Synopsys, Inc.

 

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of Adobe, Mr. Chizen brings to the Board first-hand experience in successfully leading and managing a large, complex global organization in the technology industry. In particular, Mr. Chizen’s experience in heading the extension of Adobe’s product leadership provides the Board with a perspectiveperspectives applicable to challenges faced by Oracle. In addition, Mr. Chizen’s current roles at Permira and Voyager Capital require him to be very familiar with companies driven by information technology or intellectual property, which providesallows him to provide the Board with valuable insights in its deliberations regarding Oracle’s acquisition and product strategies. The Board also benefits from Mr. Chizen’s financial expertise and significant audit and financial reporting knowledge, including his experience as the former acting CFO of Adobe. Mr. Chizen’s service as a director of a large, complex global organization, as well as smaller private companies, provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

  
    

    

George H. Conrades

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 7881

Director since 2008

 

Board Committees:

Compensation (Chair),

Independence

  

 

Mr. Conrades has served as Chairman ofan Executive Advisor to Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Akamai), a servicecontent delivery network services provider for acceleratingmedia and improving thesoftware delivery of content and applications over the Internet,cloud security solutions, since May 2005.June 2018. He previously served as Akamai’s CEO from 1999 to 2005 and Chairman from 1999 to March 2018. Mr. Conrades currently serves as a Managing Partner at Longfellow Venture Partners, a private venture fund advising and investing in early stage healthcare and technology companies. He also served as a Venture Partner at Polaris Venture Partners, an early stage investment company, from August 1998 to 2012 and is currently Partner Emeritus. Mr. Conrades was Chairmancurrently serves as a director of Cyclerion, Inc. and CEO of Akamai Technologies from April 1999 to May 2005. He previously served as a director of Akamai Technologies, Inc., Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Harley-Davidson, Inc.

 

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of Akamai, Mr. Conrades brings to the Board first-hand experience in successfully leading and managing a large, complex global organization in the technology industry. Mr. Conrades’ experience provides the Board with a perspective applicable to challenges faced by Oracle. In addition, Mr. Conrades’ current role at Longfellow Venture Partners requires him to be very familiar with growth companies, including those driven by information technology or intellectual property, which providesallows him to provide the Board with valuable insights in its deliberations regarding Oracle’s acquisition and product strategies. Mr. Conrades’ service as a director of a large, complex global organization,organizations, as well as smaller private companies, provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

  
    

    

Lawrence J. Ellison

        

 

Chairman, Chief Technology
Officer and Founder

 

Age: 7376

Director since 1977

  

 

Mr. Ellison has been our Chairman of the Board and CTO since September 2014. Mr. Ellison served as our CEO from June 1977, when he founded Oracle, until September 2014. He previously served as our Chairman of the Board from May 1995 to January 2004. Mr. Ellison currently serves as a director of Tesla, Inc.

 

Qualifications:    Mr. Ellison is Oracle’s founderFounder and served as our CEO since we commenced operations in June 1977 through September 2014. He is widely regarded as a technology visionary and one of the world’s most successful business executives. Mr. Ellison’s familiarity with and knowledge of our technologies and product offerings are unmatched. He continues to lead and oversee our product engineering, technology development and strategy. For over 40 years he has successfully steered Oracle in new strategic directions in order to adapt to and stay ahead of our competition and changing industry trends. Mr. Ellison is our largest stockholder, beneficially owning approximately 28%38.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, directly aligning his interests with those of all of our stockholders.

  
    



 

8  LOGO   201710  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


    

Hector Garcia-MolinaRona A. Fairhead

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 6359

Director since 20012019

 

Board Committees:

IndependenceFinance and Audit

  

 

Mr. Garcia-Molina has been the Leonard BosackMrs. Fairhead served as Minister of State for Trade and Sandra Lerner ProfessorExport Promotion, Department of International Trade in the Departments of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering at Stanford University since October 1995 andUnited Kingdom from September 2017 to May 2019. She previously served as ChairmanChair of the Department of Computer ScienceBritish Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) Trust from January 2001October 2014 to December 2004. He has been a professor at Stanford University since January 1992.April 2017. From August 1994 until December 1997, he2006 to 2013, Mrs. Fairhead was the DirectorChair and CEO of the Computer Systems LaboratoryFinancial Times Group Limited, which was a division of Pearson plc, and, prior to that, she served as Pearson plc’s CFO. Before joining Pearson plc, Mrs. Fairhead held a variety of leadership positions at Stanford University.Bombardier Inc. and Imperial Chemical Industries plc. Mrs. Fairhead previously served as a director of Pearson plc, HSBC Holdings plc and PepsiCo, Inc. Mrs. Fairhead is a member of the U.K. House of Lords.

 

Qualifications:    Widely regarded as an expert in computer science, Mr. Garcia-MolinaMrs.  Fairhead brings to the Board extensive international experience in finance, risk management and global operations gained from her leadership roles at the BBC Trust, the Financial Times Group, Pearson plc and other multinational companies. She also contributes significant technical expertise in government affairs from her experience as the fieldsU.K. Minister of computer science, generally,State for Trade and database technology, specifically. He is the author of numerous books, journal articles, papers and reports documenting his researchExport Promotion. Mrs. Fairhead also offers her valuable perspectives on a variety of technology subjects, including distributed computing systems, digital libraries and database systems. Mr. Garcia-Molina is a Fellowrisk management resulting from her experiences serving as chair of the Association for Computing Machineryrisk committee and the American Academyfinancial system vulnerabilities committee of ArtsHSBC Holdings plc and Sciences and from 1997 to 2001 was a memberas chair of the President’s Information Technology AdvisoryU.K. Government’s Cabinet Office Audit and Risk Committee. He also serves as a Venture Advisor for Onset VenturesIn addition, Mrs. Fairhead brings to the Board global marketplace insights and is a member of technical advisorycustomer perspectives developed through her prior service on the boards of numerous private companies. In these roles, and as a former director of otherdirectors at multinational public companies Mr. Garcia-Molina has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other technology companies and brings a valuable technical and industry-specific perspective to the Board’s consideration of Oracle’s product strategy, competitive positioning and technology trends.across multiple industries.

  
    

    

Jeffrey O. Henley

        

 

Vice Chairman

 

Age: 7275

Director since 1995

  

 

Mr. Henley has served as our Vice Chairman of the Board since September 2014. Mr. Henley previously served as our Chairman of the Board from January 2004 to September 2014. He served as our Executive Vice President and CFO from March 1991 to July 2004.

 

Qualifications:    Our Board benefits from Mr. Henley’s many years with Oracle and his significantdeep expertise and knowledge regarding our strategic vision, management and operations. Mr. Henley meets regularly with significant Oracle customers and is instrumental in closing major commercial transactions worldwide. This role allows Mr. Henley to remain close to our customers and the technology industry generally. Mr. Henley also brings to the Board significant financial and accounting expertise from his service as our former CFO and in other finance positions prior to joining Oracle.

  
    

Mark V. Hurd

Chief Executive Officer

Age: 60

Director since 2010

Mr. Hurd has been our CEO since September 2014. He served as our President from September 2010 to September 2014. Prior to joining us, he served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Hewlett-Packard Company from September 2006 to August 2010 and as CEO, President and a member of the Board of Directors of Hewlett-Packard Company from April 2005 to August 2010. From 2007 to 2010, Mr. Hurd served as a member of the Board of Directors of Newscorp, Inc. and served on the Governance Committee of Newscorp.

Qualifications:    In his current role at Oracle, Mr. Hurd is responsible for sales and marketing, consulting, support and Oracle’s industry-specific global business units. Our Board benefits from Mr. Hurd’s insight as he guides Oracle’s sales and marketing efforts, manages our support and consulting organizations and acts as a primary contact for our customers. As the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard Company and NCR Corporation, Mr. Hurd brings to the Board first-hand experience in successfully leading and managing large, complex global sales, support and consulting organizations in the technology industry. In addition, Mr. Hurd’s prior experience as Chairman of Hewlett-Packard Company’s board and as a director of another large, public company provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

 



2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   9


    

Renée J. James

        

 

IndependentNon-Employee Director

 

Age: 5356

Director since 2015

Board Committees:

Compensation (Chair),

Finance and Audit

  

 

Ms. James is currently the Chairman and CEO of Ampere Computing LLC (Ampere), a company she founded in 2017 that produces high-performance semiconductors for hyperscale cloud, storage, and edge computing. Ms. James also has served as an Operating Executive for The Carlyle Group, a global alternative asset manager, since February 2016. In this role, Ms. James evaluates new technology investments for the firm and advises portfolio companies on their strategic direction and operational efficiency. In January 2016, Ms. James concluded a 28-year career with Intel Corporation (Intel), where she most recently served as President. In her tenure at Intel, she oversaw the company’s strategic expansion into providing proprietary and open source software and services for applications in enterprise, security and cloud-based computing. Ms. James is Chair of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee to the President of the United States. She also serves as a director of Citigroup Inc., Sabre Corporation and Vodafone Group Plc, and she previously served as a director of VMware, Inc.Plc.

 

Qualifications:    As a seasoned technology executive, Ms. James brings to the Board extensive, international experience managing large, complex global operations in the technology industry. In her distinguished career at Intel, Ms. James held a variety of positions in research and development leadership in both software and hardware and the management of global manufacturing. Our Board benefits from the leadership, industry and technical expertise Ms. James acquired in the positions she held at Ampere and Intel and through her service on the boards of public and private companies in the technology and financial services industries. In addition, Ms. James brings to the Board expansive knowledge of cybersecurity gained through the positions she has held at Intel and as Chair of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee to the President of the United States.

  
    


2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   11


    

 Charles W. Moorman IV

Independent Director

Age: 68

Director since 2018

Board Committees:

Compensation,

Independence

Mr. Moorman is currently a Senior Advisor to Amtrak, where he previously served as President and CEO from August 2016 to January 2018. Mr. Moorman was previously CEO (from 2005 to 2015) and Chairman (from 2006 to 2015) of Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern), a transportation company. From 1975 to 2005, he held various positions in operations, information technology, and human resources at Norfolk Southern. Mr. Moorman serves as a director of Chevron Corporation, and previously served as a director of Duke Energy Corporation and Norfolk Southern.

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of Norfolk Southern, Mr. Moorman brings to the Board extensive experience leading and managing the operations of a large, complex Fortune 500 company. Mr. Moorman’s forty-year career with Norfolk Southern included numerous senior management and executive positions requiring expertise in engineering, technology, finance and risk management. Mr. Moorman also brings to the Board significant regulatory expertise and familiarity with environmental affairs gained through his leadership roles at both Amtrak and Norfolk Southern. In addition, Mr. Moorman’s service as a director of other large public companies provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.

    

Leon E. Panetta

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 7982

Director since 2015

 

Board Committees:

Compensation,
Governance

  

 

Secretary Panetta served as U.S. Secretary of Defense from 2011 to 2013 and as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 2009 to 2011. Prior to that time, Secretary Panetta was a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1977 to 1993, served as Director of the Office of Management and Budget from 1993 to 1994 and served as President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997. He is the co-founder and Chairman of the Panetta Institute for Public Policy and currently serves as moderator of the Leon Panetta Lecture Series, a program he created. Secretary Panetta previously served as Distinguished Scholar to Chancellor Charles B. Reed of the California State University System and professor of public policy at Santa Clara University.

 

Qualifications:    With a distinguished record of public service at the highest levels of government, Secretary Panetta brings to the Board robust, first-hand knowledge of government affairs and public policy issues. Secretary Panetta’s 16 years of experience in the U.S. House of Representatives and service in the administrations of two U.S. Presidents allow him to advise the Board on a wide range of issues related to Oracle’s interactions with governmental entities. In addition, Secretary Panetta’s service as a leader of large and complex government institutions, including the U.S. Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of Management and Budget, provides the Board with important perspectives on Oracle’s operational practices and processes, as well as risk management and oversight.oversight expertise.

  
    

    

William G. Parrett

Independent Director

Age: 75

Director since 2018

Board Committees:

Governance

Mr. Parrett served as the CEO of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a multinational professional services network, from 2003 until 2007. He joined Deloitte in 1967 and served in a series of roles of increasing responsibility until his retirement in 2007. Mr. Parrett serves as a director of The Blackstone Group L.P. and the Eastman Kodak Company. He previously served as a director of Conduent Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UBS Group AG and iGate Corporation. Mr. Parrett is a Certified Public Accountant with an active license.

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Mr. Parrett brings to the Board significant experience leading and managing the operations of a large, complex global organization. Mr. Parrett is highly skilled in the fields of auditing, accounting and internal controls, and risk management, and he brings valuable financial expertise to the Board. In addition, Mr. Parrett’s service as a director of other public companies in the technology and financial services sectors provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.



12  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


    

Naomi O. Seligman

        

 

Independent Director

 

Age: 7982

Director since 2005

 

Board Committees:

Compensation (Vice Chair)

  

 

Ms. Seligman is a senior partner at Ostriker von Simson, Inc., a technology research firm which chairs the CIO Strategy Exchange. Since 1999, this forum has brought together senior executives in four vital quadrants of the IT sector. From 1977 until June 1999, Ms. Seligman served as a co-founder and senior partner of the Research Board, Inc., a private sector institution sponsored by 100 chief information officers from major global corporations. She also currently serves as a director of Akamai Technologies, Inc. Ms. Seligman previously served as a director of Akamai Technologies, Inc., iGate Corporation and The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.

 

Qualifications:    As a senior partner at Ostriker von Simson, Inc. and, a co-partner of the CIO Strategy Exchange, and in her prior role as a co-founder and former senior partner of the Research Board, Inc., Ms. Seligman is recognized as a thought leader in the technology industry. Ms. Seligman also serves as an independent advisor to some of the largest multinational corporations where she helps oversee global strategy and operations, which providesallows her to provide our Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes. The Board also benefits from Ms. Seligman’s unique experience and customer-focused perspective and the valuable insights gained from the senior-level relationships she maintains throughout the technology industry.

  
    

 

Vishal Sikka

Non-Employee Director

Age: 53

Director since 2019

Dr. Sikka is the founder and CEO of Vianai Systems, Inc., a startup company that provides advanced software and services in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Previously, he was the CEO and Managing Director of Infosys Limited, a multinational IT services company, from 2014 to 2017. From 2002 to 2014, Dr. Sikka was at SAP SE, a multinational software company, where he served on the Executive Board from 2010 to 2014. Dr. Sikka holds a PhD in computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence from Stanford University. He serves on the Supervisory Board of BMW Group and on the Advisory Council for the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

Qualifications:    As the former CEO of Infosys Limited and a former member of the Executive Board at SAP SE, Dr. Sikka brings to the Board extensive leadership experience managing the operations of large, multinational enterprise information technology companies. The Board also benefits from Dr. Sikka’s expertise in the fields of artificial intelligence, information management, distributed systems and related areas. In addition, Dr. Sikka’s service as a director of other multinational companies provides the Board with important perspectives in its evaluation of Oracle’s practices and processes.



 

10  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   13


Recommendations of Director Candidates

The Governance Committee will consider all properly submitted candidates recommended by stockholders for Board membership. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines (available on our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov) set forth the Governance Committee’s policy regarding the consideration of all properly submitted candidates recommended by stockholders as well as candidates recommended by current Board members and others.

Any stockholder wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration for nomination by the Governance Committee must provide a written notice to Dorian Daley, Executive Vice President, General Counsel andthe Corporate Secretary of Oracle by email (Corporate_Secretary@oracle.com) with a confirmation copy sent by mail at 500 Oracle Parkway, Mailstop 5op7, Redwood City, California 94065, or by94065. Our offices in California are currently closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic so we encourage you to communicate via email (Corporate_Secretary@oracle.com) withat this time; however, we continue to check physical mail on a confirmation copy sent by mail.periodic basis. The written notice must include the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications and a written consent from the candidate agreeing to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if nominated and elected. By following these procedures, a stockholder will ensure consideration ofhave properly submitted a submitted candidate by the Governance Committee.for consideration. However, there is no guarantee that the candidate will be nominated.

Potential director candidates for directors are generally suggested to the Governance Committee by current Board members and stockholders and are evaluated at meetings of the Governance Committee. In evaluating such candidates, every effort is made to complement and strengthen skills within the existing Board. The Governance Committee seeks Board approval of the final candidates recommended by the Governance Committee. The same identifying and evaluatingevaluation procedures apply to all candidates for director, whether submitted by stockholders or otherwise.

Information regarding procedures for the stockholder submission of director nominations to be considered at our next annual meeting of stockholders may be found in “Corporate Governance—Proxy Access and Director Nominations” on page 1722 and “Stockholder Proposals for the 20182021 Annual Meeting” on page 76.77. Submissions must follow the requirements set forth in our bylaws.

Board Meetings

Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of ourthe Board. Members of ourthe Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Chairman, Vice Chairman, CEOs,CEO, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and other officers and employees, by reviewing materials provided to them by visiting our offices and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.

During fiscal 2017,2020, the Board met eightseven times (four regularly scheduled meetings and fourthree special meetings).Each director attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings in fiscal 2017.2020. Board members are expected to attend our annual meeting of stockholders, and all of our directors serving on the Board at the time of our last annual meeting of stockholders in November 20162019 attended that meeting.

 

Committees, Membership and Meetings

 

Number of Board and Committee Meetings
Fiscal 2020

LOGO

The current standing committees of the Board are the Finance and Audit Committee (F&A Committee), the Nomination and Governance Committee, (Governance Committee), the Compensation Committee and the Committee on Independence Issues (Independence Committee).

Number of Board and Committee Meetings Fiscal 2017

 

LOGO

Each committee reviews its charter at least annually, or more frequently as legislative and regulatory developments and business circumstances warrant. Each of the committees may make additional recommendations to our Board for revision of its charter to reflect evolving best practices. The charters for the F&A, Governance, Compensation and Independence Committees were most recently revised as of August 6, 2020 and are posted on our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.

 

201714  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   11


Committee Membership

The table below identifies committee membership as of September 18, 2017,8, 2020, the record date of the Annual Meeting.

 

  Director    Finance and Audit    Compensation    Governance    Independence

  Jeffrey S. Berg

    LOGO         

    LOGOLOGO         LOGOLOGO  Chair

  Michael J. Boskin

    LOGOLOGO  Chair    

    

    

  Safra A. Catz

    

    

    

    

  Bruce R. Chizen

    LOGOLOGO         

    LOGOLOGO  Chair    

  George H. Conrades

    

    LOGO     LOGO  Chair    

    LOGO     LOGO      

  Lawrence J. Ellison

    

    

    

    

  Hector Garcia-MolinaRona A. Fairhead

    LOGO          

    

    LOGO     

  Jeffrey O. Henley

    

 Mark V. Hurd

    

    

    

  Renée J. James

    LOGO     

    LOGO  Chair

    

    

  Charles W. Moorman IV

LOGO     

LOGO     

  Leon E. Panetta

    

    LOGO          LOGOLOGO          

  William G. Parrett

LOGO     

  Naomi O. Seligman

    

    LOGOLOGO  Vice Chair    

  Vishal Sikka

     

The Board has determined that all directors who served during fiscal 20172020 on the Compensation, F&A, Governance and Independence Committees were independent under the applicable New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards.standards during the periods they served on those committees. The Board has also determined that all directors who served during fiscal 20172020 on the Compensation and F&A Committees satisfied the applicable NYSE and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) heightened independence standards for members of compensation and audit committees during the periods they served on those committees. See “Corporate Governance—Board of Directors and Director Independence” on page 2127 for more information.

The Finance and Audit Committee

The F&A Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit and integrity of our financial statements, assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding audit, finance, accounting, cybersecurity, tax and legal compliance and risk, and evaluates merger and acquisition transactions and investment transactions proposed by management. In particular, the F&A Committee is responsible for overseeing the engagement, independence, compensation, retention and services of our independent registered public accounting firm. The F&A Committee’s primary responsibilities and duties are to:

 

act as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control over financial reporting;

 

review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

receive regular updates from Oracle’sour internal audit department regarding Oracle’sour internal audit plan and compliance with various policies and operational processes across all of Oracle’s lines of business;

 

evaluate our quarterly financial performance at earnings review meetings;

 

oversee management’s establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices;

 

oversee our compliance with laws and regulations and Oracle’sour Code of Ethics and Business Conduct;

 

provide an open avenue of communication between the Board and the independent registered public accounting firm, General Counsel, financial and senior management, Chief Compliance & Ethics Officer and the internal audit department;

review and discuss with management privacy and data security risk exposures;

 

review and, if within its delegated range of authority, approve merger and acquisition and financial transactions proposed by our management; and

 

produce the Report of the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board, included elsewhere in this proxy statement, as required by SEC rules.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   15


The F&A Committee held executive sessions with our independent registered public accounting firm on four occasions in fiscal 2017.2020. The Board has determined that Renée J. James qualifiesDr. Boskin and Mrs. Fairhead each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules.

12  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s primary functions of the Compensation Committeeresponsibilities and duties are to:

 

review and setapprove all compensation arrangements, including, as applicable, base salaries, bonuses and equity awards, of our CEOs,CEO and our other executive officersofficers;

review and our independent directors;approve non-employee director compensation, subject to ratification by the Board;

 

lead the Board in its evaluation of the performance of our CEOs;CEO;

 

review and discuss the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) portion of our proxy statement with management and determine whether to recommend to the Board that the CD&A be included in our proxy statement;

 

review the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in thisour proxy statement, as required by SEC rules;

 

review, approve and administer our stock plans, and approve equity awards to certain equity awards;participants;

 

annually assess the risks associated with our compensation practices, policies and programs applicable to our employees to determine whether thesuch risks arising from such practices, policies and programs are appropriate or reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Oracle; and

 

oversee our 401(k) Plan Committee and have responsibility for amendments toamend the Oracle Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (the 401(k) Plan). when appropriate.

The Compensation Committee helps us to attract and retain talented executive personnel in a competitive market. In determining any component of executive or director compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the aggregate amounts and mix of all components in its decisions. Our legal department, human resources department and Corporate Secretarythe independent compensation consultant support the Compensation Committee in its work. For additional details regarding the Compensation Committee’s role in determining executive compensation, including its engagement of an independent compensation consultant, refer to “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26.32. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—OtherElements of our Executive Compensation Policies—Program—Equity Awards and Grant Administration” on page 4239 for a discussion of the Compensation Committee’s role as the administrator of our stock plans and for a discussion of our policies and practices regarding the grant of our equity awards.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with management and Compensia, Inc. (Compensia), the committee’s independent compensation consultant, has assessed the compensation policies and practices applicable to our executive officers and other employees and concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Oracle. The Compensation Committee conducts this assessment annually.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of Oracle or of any of our subsidiaries or affiliates. During the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity, any officers of which served either on our Board or on our Compensation Committee.

The Nomination and Governance Committee

The Governance Committee has responsibilityCommittee’s primary responsibilities and duties are to:

review and evaluate the size, composition, function and duties of the Board consistent with its needs;

identify, consider, recommend and assist in recruiting qualified candidates for monitoringelection to the Board;

review and reassess the adequacy of our corporate governance matters,policies and procedures, including periodically reviewingour Corporate Governance Guidelines;

review the composition and performance of the Board and its committees (including reviewing the performance of individual directors), reviewing;

review and assessingassess the adequacy of our policies, plans and procedures regarding succession planning,planning;

oversee compliance with our Policy on Pledging Oracle Securities (see page 23 for details) and overseeing our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Governance Committee also considersrisks related to pledging arrangements; and recommends qualified candidates for election

oversee risks related to the Board.sustainability and climate change.

16  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


The Committee on Independence Issues

The Independence Committee is charged with reviewing and approving individual transactions, or a series of related transactions, involving amounts in excess of $120,000 between us (or any of our subsidiaries) and any of our affiliates, such as an executive officer, director or owner of 5% or more of our common stock. The Independence Committee’s efforts are intended to ensure that each proposed related person transaction is on terms that, when taken as a whole, are fair to us. If any member of the Independence Committee would derive a direct or indirect benefit from a proposed transaction, he or she is excused from the review and approval process with regard to that transaction. The role of the Independence Committee also encompasses the monitoring of related person relationships as well as reviewing proposed transactions and other matters for potential conflicts of interest and possible corporate opportunities in accordance with our Global Conflict of Interest Policy. TheIn addition, the Independence

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   13


Committee also evaluates and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the independence of each non-managementnon-employee director as defined byunder the applicable NYSE listing standards. See “Corporate Governance—Board of Directors and Director Independence” on page 21 for more information.

Director Compensation

Highlights

Significant reductions in director compensation in fiscal 2020, including:

Eliminating committee chair equity awards

Reducing the grant value of annual and initial equity awards

No per-meeting fees

Emphasis on equity to align director compensation with our stockholders’ long-term interests

Stockholder-approved limits on equity awards

No retirement benefits or perquisites

Robust stock ownership guidelines (see page 25 for details)

Overview

Our directors play a critical role in guiding our strategic direction and overseeing the management of Oracle. Ongoing developments in corporate governance, executive compensation design and oversight, and financial reporting have resulted in an increased demand for highly qualified and productive public company directors. Further,In addition, Oracle’s active acquisition program ourand expansion into new lines of business and rapid changes in the technology industrycan demand substantial time commitments from our directors.

These considerable time commitments and the many responsibilities and risks of being a director of a public company of Oracle’s size, complexity and profile require that we provide adequatereasonable incentives for our non-employee directors’ continued performance by paying compensation commensurate with our directors’their qualifications and significant workload. Our non-employee directors are compensated based uponon their respective levels of Board participation and responsibilities, including service on Board committees. Several of our directors serve on more than one committee. Our non-employee directors display a high level of commitment and flexibility in their service to Oracle. Several of our directors serve on more than one committee. In addition to engaging with our senior management, our non-employee directors also personally attend and participate in important customer-relatedcustomer and employee events, such as Oracle OpenWorld and Oracle PresidentPresident’s Council forums, and meet with our stockholders throughout the year to better understand and respond to their concerns and perspectives. Annual cash retainers and equity award grantsawards granted to our non-employee directors are intended to correlate towith the qualifications, responsibilities and time commitments of each such director.

Our employee directors, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz Mr. Hurd and Mr. Henley, do not receive no separate compensation for serving as directors of Oracle.

Reductions in Director Compensation

Effective as of April 2016, our Board approved significant reductions to our non-employee director compensation structure, including:

Eliminating the F&A Committee Vice Chair cash retainer and equity award grant;

Reducing the amount of equity granted in the annual equity award grant for Board service by 25%;

Reducing the amount of equity granted in the initial equity award grant for new directors by 25%;

Reducing the amount of equity granted annually for committee chair service by 25%; and

Delivering all equity awards in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) that vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

14  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   17


Fiscal 2020 Reductions in Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews non-employee director compensation on at least an annual basis, taking into account peer company data, best practices, the external environment for compensation and stockholder feedback, and makes recommendations to the Board.

In fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2018, based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendations, the Board approved reductions to non-employee director compensation.

Continuing this pattern, in fiscal 2020 based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendation, the Board approved further significant reductions to non-employee director compensation.

Effective May 31, 2020:

  The grant value of each of the annual and initial equity awards for Board service was reduced from $400,000 to $350,000; and

  Committee chair equity awards were eliminated which resulted in:

  a $200,000 reduction in equity grant value to our F&A Committee Chair and Compensation Committee Chair; and

  a $65,000 reduction in equity grant value to our Governance Committee Chair and Independence Committee Chair.

Cash Retainer and Meeting FeesAnnual Equity Grant for Directors

During fiscal 2017, each of our non-employeeNon-employee directors received (1) an annual cash retainer of $52,500 for serving as a director of Oracle (prorated for directors who did not serve on the Board for the full year) and (2) each of the applicable retainers and fees set forth below for serving as a chair or as a member of one or more of the committees of the Board (with retainers prorated for directors who served as chairs or committee members for less than a full year).

  Annual Committee Member Retainers

 

F&A and Compensation Committees

  $25,000 

Governance and Independence Committees

  $15,000 

  Additional Annual Retainers for Committee Chairs

     

F&A and Compensation Committees

  $25,000 

Governance and Independence Committees

  $15,000 

  Fee per Board Meeting

     

Regular Meeting

  $3,000 

Special Meeting

  $2,000 

  Fee per Committee Meeting

     

F&A Committee (other than earnings review meetings)

  $3,000 

F&A Committee (earnings review meetings)

  $2,000 

Compensation Committee (other than equity award meetings, where no meeting fee is paid)

  $3,000 

Governance and Independence Committees

  $2,000 

In addition, in fiscal 2016 and 2017, Mr. Conrades, Ms. James and Secretary Panetta served on a Special Committee of the Board (the Special Committee) which evaluated, assessed and approved the acquisition of NetSuite Inc. on behalf of the Board. See “Transactions with Related Persons—Acquisition of NetSuite Inc.” on page 51 for details. Each Special Committee member received a per meeting fee of $2,000. Each Special Committee member also received a one-time fee of $15,000 for Special Committee service, which was distributed upon the conclusion of the committee’s activities in fiscal 2017. No equity awards were provided for Special Committee service.

Equity Compensation for Directors

Non-employee directors also participate in our Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan (the Directors’ Stock Plan), which sets forth stockholder-approved limits on annual equity awards for service on the Board and as a committee chair service. Asas described above, the Board approved significant reductions to our non-employee director compensation program effective as of April 2016, including reductions in equity compensation. Below is a summary of the stockholder-approved limits on annual equity awards set forth in the Directors’ Stock Plan and the number of RSUs actually granted to directors on May 31, 2017.below.

 

  PositionGrant Type Stockholder-Approved Director Plan
Equity Award Limits (#)
Equity Actually Granted
on May 31, 2017 (#)
% Reduction from
Stockholder-Approved Limits

  Board Annual Grant

 45,000 options (or 11,250 RSUs)
    8,438 RSUsLOGO    25%

  F&A Committee Chair

 45,000 options (or 11,250 RSUs)
    8,438 RSUsLOGO    25%

  F&A Committee Vice Chair

 30,000 options (or 7,500 RSUs)
        — (1)LOGO  100%

  Compensation Committee Chair

 45,000 options (or 11,250 RSUs)
    8,438 RSUsLOGO    25%

  Governance Committee Chair

 15,000 options (or 3,750 RSUs)
    2,813 RSUsLOGO    25%

  Independence Committee Chair

 15,000 options (or 3,750 RSUs)    2,813 RSUsLOGO    25%

(1)

As noted above, the annual equity award for service as F&A Committee Vice Chair was eliminated in fiscal 2016.

The Directors’ Stock Plan provides that non-employee directors may receive grants of stock options or RSUs of an equivalent value, as determined on any reasonable basis by the Board, in lieu of all or some of the stock option limits set forth in the plan.plan, non-employee directors may receive grants of RSUs of an equivalent value, as determined on any reasonable basis by the Board. The Board determined that a ratio of four stock options to one RSU should be used, consistent with its approach for equity awards granted to Oracle employees. As noted above, effective as of April 2016, the Board determinedemployees, and that all non-employee director equity awards willwould be delivered in the form of RSUs that are granted on May 31 of each year and fully vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

For a number of years, the Board has provided that that each equity award will be limited to the lesser of the stockholder-approved equity award limits set forth in the Directors’ Stock Plan or a specified grant value, and has granted equity awards with a value significantly below such stockholder-approved equity award limits. As noted above, in fiscal 2020, the Board approved further changes to our non-employee director compensation program in fiscal 2020, including reductions in the size of equity awards and the elimination of committee chair equity awards.

2017

18  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   15


Below is a summary of the grant value limit on annual equity awards effective May 31, 2020 and the number of RSUs actually granted to non-employee directors on May 31, 2020. As noted above, no equity awards were granted to committee chairs.

  Grant Type Stockholder-Approved
Equity Award Limits
 Dollar Value
Effective May 31, 2020
 Equity Actually
Granted on
May 31, 2020 (1)
 

% Reduction from

  Stockholder-Approved  

Limits (2)

  Board Annual Grant

 45,000 options (or 11,250 RSUs)  $350,000   6,509 RSUs   LOGO     42%        

(1)

Calculated by dividing the grant value by the closing price of Oracle common stock on the date of grant ($53.77 per share), rounding down to the nearest whole share.

(2)

Percentage reduction in the number of RSUs actually granted on May 31, 2020 compared to stockholder-approved equity award limits.

Initial Equity Grant for New Directors

The Directors’ Stock Plan also provides for an initial equity grantaward of not more than 45,000 stock options (or 11,250 RSUs) for new non-employee directors, prorated based upon the number of full calendar months remaining in the fiscal year.year of the director’s appointment. In accordance with the reductions to our non-employee director compensation effective as of April 2016,described above, any newnon-employee director will receive an initial equity award equal to the lesser of 11,250 RSUs or RSUs with a total value of $350,000 (calculated by dividing the grant value by the closing price of 8,438 RSUs (constituting a 25% reduction fromOracle common stock on the stockholder-approved limit indate of grant, rounding down to the Directors’ Stock Plan)nearest whole share), prorated based upon the number of full calendar months remaining in the fiscal year.year of the director’s appointment.

Cash Retainer Fees for Directors

In fiscal 2020, each of our non-employee directors received (1) an annual cash retainer fee of $52,500 for serving as a director of Oracle (prorated for directors who did not serve on the Board for the full fiscal year) and (2) each of the applicable retainer fees set forth in the table below for serving as a chair or as a member of one or more of the committees of the Board (prorated for directors who served as chairs or committee members for less than the full fiscal year).

Annual Committee Member Retainer Fees

 

   

F&A and Compensation Committees

  $25,000 

Governance and Independence Committees

  $15,000 

Additional Annual Retainer Fees for Committee Chairs

 

F&A and Compensation Committees

  $25,000 

Governance and Independence Committees

  $15,000 

Board members do not receive fees for meetings they attend.

Fiscal 20172020 Director Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information regarding the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors in fiscal 2017.2020.

 

Name    Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
    Stock Awards
(1) (2) ($)
    Total ($)    Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
     Stock Awards
(4) (5) ($)
     All Other
Compensation ($)
     Total ($) 

Jeffrey S. Berg

    133,500    502,245    635,745     122,500      343,740            466,240 

H. Raymond Bingham (3)

    155,337               —    155,337

Michael J. Boskin

    155,423    753,345    908,768     102,500      343,740            446,240 

Bruce R. Chizen

    157,500    502,245    659,745     107,500      343,740            451,240 

George H. Conrades

    169,500    376,672    546,172     117,500      343,740            461,240 

Hector Garcia-Molina

      93,500    376,672    470,172

Rona A. Fairhead (1)

     57,264      671,471            728,735 

Hector Garcia-Molina (2)

     26,148                  26,148 

Renée J. James

    161,370    439,436    600,806     52,500      343,740            396,240 

Charles W. Moorman IV

     85,495      343,740            429,235 

Leon E. Panetta

    130,500    376,672    507,172     92,500      343,740            436,240 

William G. Parrett

     70,179      343,740            413,919 

Naomi O. Seligman

    115,500    376,672    492,172     77,500      343,740            421,240 

Vishal Sikka (3)

     24,952      507,527      282,000      814,479 

 

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   19


(1)

Mrs. Fairhead joined the Board on July 31, 2019, and her fiscal 2020 cash compensation was prorated accordingly. As a new director, in accordance with our Directors’ Stock Plan, Mrs. Fairhead received two equity grants during fiscal 2020: an initial one-time prorated equity grant of 5,920 RSUs on the effective date of her appointment, and the annual grant received by all non-employee directors on May 31, 2020.

(2)

Mr. Garcia-Molina did not stand for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. He passed away on November 25, 2019. His fiscal 2020 cash compensation was prorated, and he did not receive a fiscal 2020 equity grant.

(3)

Dr. Sikka joined the Board on December 10, 2019, and his fiscal 2020 cash compensation was prorated accordingly. As a new director, in accordance with our Directors’ Stock Plan, Dr. Sikka received two equity grants during fiscal 2020: an initial one-time prorated equity grant of 2,985 RSUs on the effective date of his appointment, and the annual grant received by all non-employee directors on May 31, 2020. Prior to Dr. Sikka joining the Board, Oracle entered into a consulting agreement with Hang Ten Systems LLC (“Hang Ten”), a company wholly owned by Dr. Sikka. Under the agreement, Hang Ten provided consulting services and sales support to Oracle for three months. The amount shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for Dr. Sikka includes payments made for these consulting services, and no further payments are due.

(4)

The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of RSUs computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718,Compensation-StockCompensation—Stock Compensation (FASB ASC 718). The non-employee directors have not presently realized a financial benefit from these awards because none of the RSUs granted in fiscal 20172020 have vested. For information on the valuation assumptions used in our stock-based compensation computations, see Note 1413 of Notes to our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.2020.

 

(2)(5)

The following table provides additional information concerning the stock awards (in the form of RSUs) and stock options held by our non-employee directors as of the last day of fiscal 2017.2020.

 

Name  Total Unvested RSUs
Outstanding at
Fiscal 2017 Year End (#)
  RSUs Granted During
Fiscal 2017 (a) (#)
  Total Option
Awards Outstanding at
Fiscal 2017  Year End (#)
    Total Unvested RSUs
Outstanding at
Fiscal 2020 Year End (#)
 RSUs Granted During
Fiscal 2020 (b) (#)
 

Total Option
Awards Outstanding at  

Fiscal 2020 Year End (#)  

  

 

Jeffrey S. Berg

  14,064  11,251  405,000    6,509  6,509  157,500 

 

Michael J. Boskin

  22,501  16,876  600,000    6,509  6,509  300,000 

 

Bruce R. Chizen

  16,876  11,251  431,250    6,509  6,509   

 

George H. Conrades

  11,251    8,438  168,750    6,509  6,509  67,500 

 

Hector Garcia-Molina

  11,251    8,438  315,000  

Rona A. Fairhead

  12,429  12,429   

 

Hector Garcia-Molina (a)

       

 

Renée J. James

  11,602    9,844      9,375    6,509  6,509  9,375 

 

Charles W. Moorman IV

  6,509  6,509   

 

Leon E. Panetta

  11,251    8,438    37,500    6,509  6,509  37,500 

 

William G. Parrett

  6,509  6,509   

 

Naomi O. Seligman

  11,251    8,438  292,500    6,509  6,509  112,500 

 

Vishal Sikka

  9,494  9,494   

 

 

 (a)

Mr. Garcia-Molina’s unvested RSUs were forfeited upon his death.

(b)

The RSUs reported in this column were granted on May 31, 20172020 and vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

(3)

Mr. Bingham retired from the Board on March 15, 2017. Accordingly, Mr. Bingham’s fiscal 2017 cash compensation was prorated and he did not receive a fiscal 2017 equity grant.grant (May 31, 2021).

 

16  LOGO   201720  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

We regularly monitor developments in corporate governance and review our processes and procedures in light of such developments. As part of those efforts, we review federal laws affecting corporate governance, as well as rules adopted by the SEC and NYSE. We believe we have in place corporate governance procedures and practices that are designed to enhance our stockholders’ interests.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has approvedadopted Corporate Governance Guidelines for Oracle (the Guidelines). The Guidelines, which address the following matters:

 

director qualifications;

 

director majority voting policy;

 

director responsibilities, including risk oversight;

 

executive sessions and leadership roles;

 

director conflicts of interest;

 

Board committees;

 

director access to officers and employees;

director compensation;

 

director orientation and continuing education;

 

director and executive officer stock ownership;

 

CEO evaluation;evaluations;

 

stockholder communications with the Board; and

 

performance evaluationevaluations of the Board and its committees.committees; and

management succession.

 

 

The Guidelines require that all members of the F&A, Compensation, Governance and Independence Committees mustto be independent, each in accordance with or as defined in the rules adopted by the SEC and NYSE. The Independence Committee and the Board make this determination annually for all non-employee directors.

The Board and each committee have the power to hire legal, accounting, financial or other outside advisors as they deem necessary in their best judgment without the need to obtain the prior approval of any officer of Oracle. Directors have full and free access to officers and employees of Oracle and may ask questions and conduct investigations as they deem appropriate to fulfill their duties.

Conflict of interest expectations for our non-employee directors are addressed in ourthe Guidelines and provide that each non-employee director must:

annuallymust disclose to our General Counsel Counsel:

all of his or her executive, employment, board of directors, advisory board or equivalent positions in other organizations;organizations annually;

 

disclose any such proposed positions with a public company before they become effective and any such positions with a private company promptly following his or her appointment to such entity; and

 

disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from time to time with respect to matters under consideration of the Board.

The General Counsel must report all such disclosures to the Independence Committee, and the Board must consider such disclosures and other available information and take such actions as it considers appropriate. All directors are expected to comply with Oracle’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, except that for our non-employee directors, the provisions regarding conflicts of interest in the Guidelines supersede these same provisions in the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.

The Guidelines provide for regular executive sessions to be held by non-employee directors. The Guidelines also provide that the Board or Oracle will establish orprovide access to appropriate orientation programs or materials for the benefit of newly elected directors, including presentations from senior management and visits to Oracle’s facilities.

Under the Guidelines, the Board periodically evaluates the appropriate size of the Board and may make any changes it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee is required under the Guidelines to conduct an annual review of our CEOs’CEO’s performance and compensation, and the Board reviews the Compensation Committee’s report to ensure the CEOs areCEO is providing the best leadership for Oracle in the short and long term.

The Guidelines are posted on, and we intend to disclose any future amendments to the Guidelines on, our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   21


Proxy Access and Director Nominations

In June 2016, our Board adopted amendments to our Bylaws to implement proxy access. Under our proxy access bylaw, a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) owning at least 3% of Oracle’s outstanding shares continuously for at least three

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   17


years may nominate and include in Oracle’s annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the stockholders and the nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws.

The Board spent significant time evaluating the adoption of a proxy access bylaw. In crafting the bylaw, the Board considered a variety of views on proxy access, including the Council of Institutional Investors’ Proxy Access Best Practices and the feedback received from extensive discussions with our stockholders and independent advisors with expertise in corporate governance, as well as the approval of a stockholder proposal on proxy access at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. A number of our stockholders have expressed support for proxy access provisions limiting the number of stockholders in a nominating group to 20 and limiting the number of proxy access nominees to up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, and the Board believes those limitations are in the best interest of all stockholders.

See “Stockholder Proposals for the 20182021 Annual Meeting” on page 7677 for information on the requirements for stockholders who wish to submit a director nomination for inclusion in our 20182021 proxy statement or submit a director nomination to be presented at our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders (but not for inclusion in our proxy statement).

Majority Voting Policy

The Guidelines set forth our majority voting policy for directors, which states that, in an uncontested election, if any director nominee receives an equal or greater number of votes WITHHELD from his or her election as compared to votes FOR such election (a Majority Withheld Vote) and no successor has been elected at such meeting,the director nominee must tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote.

The Governance Committee must promptly consider the resignation offer and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that led to the Majority Withheld Vote, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Governance Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers appropriate and relevant, including, but not limited to:

 

the stated reasons, if any, why stockholders withheld their votes;

 

possible alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes;

 

the director’s tenure;

 

the director’s qualifications;

 

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Oracle; and

 

the overall composition of the Board.

The Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. Thereafter, the Board will promptly publicly disclose in a report furnished to the SEC its decision regarding the tendered resignation, including its rationale for accepting or rejecting the tendered resignation. The Board may accept a director’s resignation or reject the resignation. If the Board accepts a director’s resignation, or if a nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is not an incumbent director, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board, in each case pursuant to our Bylaws. If a director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board, such director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected, or his or her earlier resignation or removal.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this policy may not participate in the Governance Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. However, if a majority of the members of the Governance Committee received a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote must appoint a committee among themselves to consider any resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept such resignation offers.

Through this policy, the Board seeks to be accountable to all stockholders and respects the rights of stockholders to express their views through their votes for directors. However, the Board also deems it important to preserve sufficient flexibility to make sound evaluations based on the relevant circumstances in the event of a greater than or equal to 50% WITHHELD vote against a specific director. For example, the Board may wish to assess whether the sudden resignations of one or more directors would materially impair the effective functioning of the Board. The Board’s policy is intended to allow the Board to react to situations that could arise if the resignation of multiple directors would prevent a key committee from achieving a quorum. The policy also would allow the Board to assess whether a director was targeted for reasons unrelated to his or her Board performance at Oracle. The policy imposes a short time frame for the Board to consider a director nominee’s resignation.resignation and make its decision public.

 

18  LOGO   201722  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Board and Committee Performance Evaluations

The Board and each of its committees conduct annual self-evaluations to determine whether they are functioning effectively and whether any changes are necessary to improve their performance.Every year, the Chair of the Governance Committee and other members of the Governance Committee interview each director and certain members of management to obtain his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and the committees, director performance and Board dynamics. The Chair of the Governance Committee then reports the results of these interviews at meetings of the Governance Committee and the Board, where the results are discussed. In addition, the chair of each committee guides an annual committee self-evaluation discussion among the committee members. The results of the committee self-evaluations are also reported to the Board for review and discussion.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Senior Officers

Non-employee members of our Board and senior officers are required to own shares of Oracle common stock. The Governance Committee sets and periodically reviews and makes changes to these ownership requirements, which we refer to as the Stock Ownership Guidelines. The current Stock Ownership Guidelines were adopted in July 2011 and amended in April 2015.

Under the Stock Ownership Guidelines, our non-employee directors and senior officers must own the following number of shares of Oracle common stock within five years from the date such person became a director or senior officer:

   TitleMinimum Number of Shares 

  Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

250,000

  Chief Executive Officers

250,000

  Presidents

100,000

  Executive Vice Presidents who are Section 16 Officers

50,000

  All other Executive Vice Presidents

25,000

  All other Section 16 Officers

10,000

  Non-employee directors

10,000

Each person promoted from within the senior officer positions has one year from the date of his or her promotion to comply with any increased ownership requirement. Shares of Oracle common stock counted toward the Stock Ownership Guidelines include any shares held directly or through a trust or broker; shares held by a spouse; shares held through our 401(k) Plan and our Oracle Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP); and shares underlying vested but unexercised stock options, with 50% of the “in-the-money” value of such options being used for this calculation. Full-value awards, including RSUs and PSUs, do not count toward the Stock Ownership Guidelines until they vest.

We believe all of our non-employee directors and senior officers are currently in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Share Pledging and Our Prohibition on Speculative Transactions and Pledging Policy

Prohibition on Speculative Transactions. Our insider trading policyInsider Trading Policy prohibits all of our employees, including our executive officers, and our non-employee directors, from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, short sales, puts, collars, straddles and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to or have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Oracle securities. The prohibition does not apply to the exercise of any employee stock options granted by Oracle.

The Board,Pledging Policy. In January 2018, the Governance Committee adopted a Policy on Pledging Oracle Securities (the Pledging Policy). The Pledging Policy prohibits Oracle directors, executive officers and the Compensation Committee regularly review the extent to which any executive officer or non-employee director has pledged shares oftheir immediate family members from:

holding Oracle common stocksecurities in a margin account; and

pledging Oracle securities as collateral to secure or guarantee indebtedness, subject to two exceptions:

pledges of securities of a target company that are in place at the time Oracle acquires such company are permitted; and

Oracle’s Founder may continue to pledge Oracle securities as collateral to secure or guarantee indebtedness, but he may not hold Oracle securities in a margin account.

The Pledging Policy also requires the Governance Committee to review all pledging arrangements, assess any personal or other indebtedness, with a focus on any potential riskrisks to Oracle and its stockholders.stockholders and report on the arrangements to the F&A Committee and the Board. The Pledging Policy provides that all pledges must comply with Oracle’s Insider Trading Policy and must be pre-cleared as specified in Oracle’s Trading Pre-clearance Procedures. The Governance Committee may periodically seek outside advice and counsel in connection with its oversight of pledging arrangements.

Review of Pledging Arrangements. As set forth under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” on page 24, as of September 18, 2017,8, 2020, Mr. Ellison, ourOracle’s Founder, Chairman, CTO founder and largest stockholder, had pledged 260,000,000317,000,000 shares of Oracle common stock as collateral to secure certain personal indebtedness. Mr. Ellison’s pledged shares secure personal term loans only; none of his shares are pledged as collateral for margin accounts. The pledged shares are not used to shift or hedge any economic risk in owning Oracle common stock. Currently, noNo other executive officer or non-employee director, or any of their immediate family members, holds shares of Oracle common stock that have been pledged to secure any personal or other indebtedness.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   19


Every fiscal quarter, the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee reviewreviews Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements from a risk management perspective and provideregularly provides a report to the Board on the arrangements. In reviewing Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements, the BoardF&A Committee and the committees consider:Board. In accordance with the Pledging Policy, the Governance Committee considers the following when reviewing the pledging arrangements:

 

historical information and trends regarding Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements;

 

the key terms of the loans under which shares of Oracle common stock have been pledged as collateral;

 

the magnitude of the aggregate number of shares of Oracle common stock that are pledged in relation to:

 

the total number of shares of Oracle common stock outstanding; and

 

the total number of shares of Oracle common stock owned by Mr. Ellison;

 

the market value of Oracle common stock;

 

Mr. Ellison’s independent ability to repay any loans without recourse to the already-pledged shares; and

 

any other relevant factors.

In addition,

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   23


Board and Committee Performance Evaluations

The Board and each of its committees conduct annual self-evaluations to determine whether they are functioning effectively and whether any changes are necessary to improve their performance. The Board believes that the multi-step evaluation process outlined below allows for a constructive review of the Board and is essential to maintaining Board effectiveness.

Multi-Step Evaluation Process

LOGO

24  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Senior Officers

Non-employee directors and senior officers are required to own shares of Oracle common stock to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Governance Committee sets and periodically reviews and makes changes to these ownership requirements, which we refer to as the Compensation Committee periodically seek outside adviceStock Ownership Guidelines. The current Stock Ownership Guidelines were adopted in July 2011 and counselamended in connectionApril 2015.

Under the Stock Ownership Guidelines, our non-employee directors and senior officers must own the following number of shares of Oracle common stock within five years from the date such person becomes a director or senior officer:

  TitleMinimum Number of Shares 

  Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

250,000        

  Chief Executive Officer

250,000        

  President

100,000        

  Executive Vice Presidents who are Section 16 Officers

50,000        

  All other Executive Vice Presidents

25,000        

  Non-employee directors

10,000        

Each person promoted from within the senior officer positions has one year from the date of his or her promotion to comply with their oversightany increased ownership requirement. Shares of Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements. In this regard,Oracle common stock that count toward satisfying the Governance CommitteeStock Ownership Guidelines include any shares held directly or through a trust or broker; shares held by a spouse; shares held through our 401(k) Plan and the Chairour Oracle Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP); deferred, vested RSUs; and shares underlying vested but unexercised stock options, with 50% of the Compensation Committee met“in-the-money” value of such options being used for this calculation. Full-value awards, such as RSUs, do not count toward the Stock Ownership Guidelines until they vest.

As of September 8, 2020, we believe all of our non-employee directors and senior officers are currently in compliance with independent advisorsthe Stock Ownership Guidelines or have additional time to comply, and many of them maintain holdings of Oracle common stock significantly in July 2017 to reviewexcess of the Committee’s policiesminimum required number of shares. Consistent with our objective of aligning the interests of our directors and proceduresofficers with regard to pledging.the long-term interests of stockholders, many of our directors and officers do not sell their shares of Oracle common stock when their RSUs vest.

Board Leadership Structure

The roles of Chairman of the Board Chair and CEO are currently filled by separate individuals. Since September 2014, Mr. Ellison has served as our Chairman, and Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd havehas served as our CEOs.CEO (Mark Hurd also served as CEO from September 2014 through September 2019). Previously, Mr. Henley served as Chairman and Mr. Ellison served as CEO.

The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the ChairmanChair and CEOsCEO is appropriate at this time because it allows our CEOsCEO to focus primarily on Oracle’s business strategy, operations and corporate vision. However, as described in further detail in our Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy mandating the separation of the roles of Chairman and CEO. OurThe Board elects our ChairmanChair and our CEOs,CEO, and each of these positions may be held by the same person or by different people. We believe it is important that the Board retain flexibility to determine whether these roles should be separate or combined based upon the Board’s assessment of the company’s needs and Oracle’s leadership at a given point in time.

We believe that independent and effective oversight of Oracle’s business and affairs is maintained through the composition of ourthe Board, the leadership of our independent directors and Board committees and our governance structures and processes already in place.processes. The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent directors, and the Board’s Compensation, F&A, Governance and Independence Committees are composed solely of independent directors.

While we currently do not have a policy mandating an independent lead director, the Board believes that a number of non-employee directors fulfill the lead independent director role at various times, including during executive sessions, depending upon the particular issues involved. As set forth in our Guidelines, on an annual rotating basis, the chairs of the F&A Committee, the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee serve as the lead independent director at executive sessions of the Board. The lead independent director serves as a liaison between our independent directors and our executive directors and performs such additional duties as ourthe Board determines.Currently, Dr. Boskin serves as the lead independent director.director. The directors filling this role take it very seriously and the Board believes the position is strengthened by the particular insights and diversity of viewpoints that the different committee chairs bring to the position. This structure also provides a broader group of directors the opportunity to serve in an additional leadership role.

 

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   25


The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

 

While managementManagement is responsible for assessing and managing risks to Oracle, ourand, in turn, the Board is responsible for overseeing management’s efforts to assess and manage risk. The Board’s risk oversight areas include, but are not limited to:

 

  leadership structure and succession planning for management and the Board;

 

  strategic and operational planning, including with respect to significant acquisitions, the evaluation of our capital structure and long-term debt financing and Oracle’s long-term growth;

 

  information technology and cybersecurity;

  risks and opportunities related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

  diversity and inclusion; and

 

  legal and regulatory compliance.

   

 

Cybersecurity Risk Oversight

 

Cybersecurity risk oversight is a top priority for ourthe Board. Oracle’s head of Global Information Security and its Chief Privacy Officer regularly brief the F&A Committee on Oracle’s information security program and its related priorities and controls. In turn, the F&A Committee reports to the full Board regarding the committee’s cybersecurity risk oversight activities.

 

 

 

20  LOGO   2017 Annual MeetingThe Board has been receiving regular updates from Oracle’s executives regarding the impact and risks of Stockholdersthe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on Oracle’s business. The Board has also been updated on the steps Oracle has taken to provide critical technologies, programs and support to individuals and organizations to navigate, adjust and continue their operations in light of the unique demands and constraints imposed by the pandemic. For decades, Oracle has developed, delivered and supported products and services that enable telecommunication companies to keep people connected; retailers to provide food and other necessities; researchers to identify solutions; hospitals to provide care; airlines to ensure travel; banks to help people access funds; insurers to provide benefits; governments to keep people safe and informed; utilities to supply power and water; and many other critical functions. Oracle has proactively sought, supported, donated to, partnered and engaged with organizations globally that provide critical medicines, research, goods and services to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.


While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for Oracle’s risk management policies and processes, various committees of the Board also have the following responsibilities for risk oversight:oversight.

 

theF&A Committee oversees risks associated with our financial statements and financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm, our internal audit function, tax issues, mergers and acquisitions, credit and liquidity, information technology and cybersecurity, legal and regulatory matters, and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct compliance;

F&A     Committee    

Oversees risks associated with our financial statements and financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm, our internal audit function, tax issues, mergers and acquisitions, credit and liquidity, information technology, privacy and cybersecurity, legal and regulatory matters, and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct compliance.

Compensation      Committee    

Considers the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices, with respect to executive compensation, director compensation and employee compensation generally, as well as human capital management, including talent acquisition and retention.

Governance      Committee    

Oversees risks associated with our overall governance practices and the leadership structure of management and the Board, as well as risks related to the pledging of Oracle securities and risks related to sustainability and climate change.

In accordance with our Pledging Policy, the Governance Committee regularly reviews Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements from a risk management perspective and provides a report to the F&A Committee and the Board, as described in “Prohibition on Speculative Transactions and Pledging Policy” on page 23.

The Governance Committee also periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of our policies, plans and procedures with respect to succession planning for Oracle’s key executive officers, including the CEO and the CTO. At least annually, the Board holds an executive session with each of the CEO and the CTO to discuss potential successors and the performance, strengths and weaknesses of any such candidates.

Independence      Committee    

Reviews risks arising from transactions with related persons and director independence issues.

 

26  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


theCompensation Committee considers the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices, with respect to both executive compensation and employee compensation generally;

theGovernance Committee oversees risks associated with our overall governance practices and the leadership structure of the Board; and

theIndependence Committee reviews risks arising from transactions with related persons and director independence issues.

Both the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee review risks associated with the pledging of Oracle securities by Mr. Ellison, as described above in “Share Pledging and Our Prohibition on Speculative Transactions” on page 19.

OurThe Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and other activities via regular reports of the committee chairs to the full Board. For example, with respect to acquisitions and depending on the size of the acquisition meeting a threshold figure, the F&A Committee performs the initial review of the proposed transaction—taking into consideration any risks associated with the transaction—and determines whether to recommend that the Board approve the transaction. The F&A Committee also reviews completed acquisitions on a quarterly basisperiodically to determine whether the acquired companies have performed as expected.

In addition, the Board plays an active oversight and risk mitigation role through itsregular review of Oracle’s strategic direction. While management is responsible for setting Oracle’s strategic direction, the directors review Oracle’s strategy at every regular meeting of the Board. One Board meeting each year is held off-site and is exclusively dedicated to strategy.strategy and has historically been held off-site. The Board engages in candid discussions with management with respect to Oracle’s strategic direction. We believe this Board oversight helps identify and mitigate risks associated with our overall business strategy.

The Board has also assessed the risks associated with Oracle’s current leadership structure (consisting, in part, of two CEOs who serve on the Board and a founder and significant stockholder who serves as Chairman and CTO). The Board believes that each executive has distinct strengths, and this leadership structure functions well. In addition, the executives are subject to the independent oversight of our majority independent Board and fully independent committees, which, the Board believes, provides an effective counterbalance to the current leadership structure.

Board of Directors and Director Independence

Each of our directors stands for election every year.We do not have a classified or staggered board.board. If the director nominees are elected at the Annual Meeting, the Board will continue to be composed of fourthree employee directors (Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz Mr. Hurd and Mr. Henley) and eight eleven non-employee directors.

Upon the recommendation of the Independence Committee, the Board determined that each of the following eightnine current directors is independent (as defined by applicable NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines): Mr. Berg, Dr. Boskin, Mr. Chizen, Mr. Conrades, Mrs. Fairhead, Mr. Garcia-Molina, Ms. James,Moorman, Secretary Panetta, Mr. Parrett and Ms. Seligman. The Board also determined, upon recommendation of the Independence Committee, that Mr. Bingham,Garcia-Molina, who retired fromdid not stand for re-election at the Board on March 15, 2017,2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, was determined to be independent during the time he served on the Board.Board in fiscal 2020. Therefore, all directors who served during fiscal 20172020 on the Compensation, F&A, Governance and Independence Committees were independent under the applicable NYSE listing standards.standards and SEC rules. The Board alsofurther determined, upon recommendation of the Independence Committee, that all directors who served during fiscal 20172020 on the Compensation and F&A Committees satisfied the applicable NYSE and SEC heightened independence standards for members of compensation and audit committees.

In making the independence determinations, the Board and the Independence Committee considered all facts and circumstances relevant under the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.rules, including any relationships between Oracle and entities affiliated with the directors. In particular, the following relationships were considered:

 

Dr. Boskin and Mr. Garcia-Molina are bothis employed by Stanford University, which has received donations from both Oracle and various Board members. In addition, certain Board members serve on advisory or oversight boards at Stanford University or are otherwise employed part-time by Stanford University. Mr. Garcia-Molina was also employed by Stanford University until he passed away in November 2019. Mr. Garcia-Molina served on the Board from 2001 until his death. During his 18 years on the Board, he provided valuable technical and industry-specific perspectives.

 

The total amount Oracle donated to Stanford University constituted less than 0.01% of Oracle’s total revenues in fiscal 2017.2020. Predominately all of the funds Oracle donated were contributed directly to Stanford Hospital and Clinics. Based on a review of publicly available data, we believe the contributions represented less than 0.03% of Stanford University’s total revenues in its last fiscal year. The contributions fall within NYSE prescribed limits and guidelines.

The independent members of our Boardnon-employee directors held an executive session following each of the regularly scheduled Board meetings, for a total of four meetings in fiscal 2017.2020.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   21


The F&A Committee has adopted a requirement that if an F&A Committee member wishes to serve on more than three audit committees of public companies, the member must obtain the approval of the F&A Committee, which will determine whether the director’s proposed service on the other audit committee(s) will detract from his/her performance on our F&A Committee. No F&A Committee member currently serves on more than three audit committees of public companies.

Director Tenure, Board Refreshment and Diversity

We believe it is desirable to maintain a mix of longer-tenured, experienced directors and newer directors with fresh perspectives. In furtherance of this objective, the Board elected Dr. Sikka and Mrs. Fairhead in fiscal 2020,

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   27


Mr. Moorman and Mr. Parrett in fiscal 2018, Ms. James and Secretary Panetta as directors in fiscal 2016 and Secretary Panetta in fiscal 2015, respectively. for a total of 6 directors added in the last 6 fiscal years.

However, we do not impose director tenure limits or a mandatory retirement age. The Board has considered the concerns raised byperspectives of some stockholders regarding longer-tenured directors, but believes that longer-serving directors with experience and institutional knowledge bring critical skills to the boardroom. In particular, the Board believes that given the large size of our company, the breadth of our product offerings and the international scope of our organization, longer-tenured directors are a significant strength of the Board. The Board also believes that longer-tenured directors have a better understanding of the challenges Oracle is facing and are more comfortable speaking out and challenging management. Accordingly, while director tenure is taken into consideration when making nomination decisions, the Board believes that imposing arbitrary limits on director tenure would arbitrarily deprive it of the valuable contributions of its most experienced members.

 

Board Diversity

 

33%36% of our Board   members are women  

or come from a

diverse background

 

   

 

The Board and the Governance Committee value diversity of backgrounds, experience, perspectives and leadership in different fields when identifying nominees.As notedset forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance Committee, acting on behalf of the Board, is committed to actively seeking women and minority candidates for the pool from which director candidates are chosen.selected. Presently, 33%36% of our Board members are women or come from a diverse background (three(4 of our 1214 Board members are women, including one of our CEOs)CEO).

 

 

Stockholder Outreach

 

We have a long tradition of engaging with our stockholders to solicit their views on a wide variety of issues, including corporate governance, environmental and social matters, executive compensation and other issues.

Independent Director Engagement. On a regular basis, certain of our independent directors travel to the U.S. East Coast for in-person meetings with a number of our large institutional stockholders at their offices. Our independent directors also hold meetings with stockholders in-person at Oracle headquarters or telephonically. Our Board believes theseour stockholders. The meetings are important because they foster atend to be among our largest institutional investors and members of our Compensation Committee, with the Chair of our Governance Committee joining if the agenda warrants his attendance.

     

 

Voting Rights:Accountability:

One Share, One Vote

 

Oracle has asingle class of voting stock, with each share entitled to one vote. Our executives, including our founder,Founder, are thus held accountable to stockholders, who have voting power in proportion to their economic interest in our stock.

 

 

relationship of accountability between our Board and stockholders and help us better understand and respond to our stockholders’ priorities and perspectives. In fiscal 2018, three independent directors held meetings with ten institutional stockholders representing approximately 22% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares. In fiscal 2017, four independent directors held meetings with nine institutional stockholders representing approximately 18% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares, and offered to meet with stockholders representing an additional 4% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares.


Neither our Chairman nor our Chief Executive Officer participate in these meetings to ensure investors are able to provide candid feedback to our directors. We provide an open forum to our investors to discuss and comment on any aspects of our executive compensation program and governance matters. The Board believes these meetings are important because they foster a relationship of accountability between the Board and our stockholders and help us better understand and respond to our stockholders’ priorities and perspectives.

In addition,fiscal 2020, certain of our independent directors held meetings with ten institutional stockholders representing approximately 30% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares (based on data available as of June 30, 2020).

Thus far in fiscal 2021, we reached out to stockholders representing approximately 31% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares (based on data available as of June 30, 2020) to set up meetings with members of the Compensation Committee. The full Compensation Committee has already held video conference meetings with four institutional stockholders. We have continued to engage with our stockholders despite the challenges posed by the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Executive Director Engagement. As part of our regular Investor Relations engagement program, our executive directors hold meetings with a number of our institutional stockholders throughout the year. We also typically hold an annual financial analyst meeting at Oracle OpenWorld in San Francisco where analysts are invited to hear presentations from key members of our management team, including our executive directors. We held our fiscal 2020 analyst day at Oracle OpenWorld on September 19, 2019. In fiscal 2017,2020, our executive directors held meetings with stockholders representing approximately 43%21% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares. (All percentages calculated basedshares (based on data available as of June 30, 2017.)2020). As a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, we have cancelled our in-person analyst day which was originally expected to occur in fiscal 2021.

28  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Legal and Investor Relations Engagement. Members of our Legal and Investor Relations team engage with stockholders throughout the year. However, after the proxy statement is filed there is a push to re-engage with stockholders in order to discuss matters on the annual stockholder meeting agenda and solicit feedback. When appropriate, independent directors join these discussions.

The feedback received from our stockholder outreach efforts is communicated to and considered by the Board, and, when appropriate, the Board implements changes in response to stockholder feedback. See “Proxy Statement Summary—Stockholder Outreach and Board Responsiveness” on pagepages 3 and 4 for a summary of the recent feedback we have received from our stockholders and ourthe Board’s response to this feedback.

Communications with the Board

Any person wishing to communicate with any of our directors, including our independent directors, regarding Oracle may send an email to Corporate_Secretary@oracle.com or may write to the director, c/o the Corporate Secretary of Oracle at 500 Oracle Parkway, Mailstop 5op7, Redwood City, California 94065, or may send an94065. Our offices in California are currently closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic so we encourage you to communicate via email at this time; however, we continue toCorporate_Secretary@oracle.com. check physical mail on a periodic basis. The Corporate Secretary will forward theserelevant communications directly to the director(s) specified or, if none is specified, to the Chairman of the Board. In addition, we present all such communications, as well as draft responses,

22  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


at meetings of our Governance Committee. These communications and draft responses are also provided to the appropriate committee or group of directors based on the subject matter of the communication; for example, communications regarding executive compensation are provided to our Compensation Committee, in addition to our Governance Committee.

Employee Matters

Code of Conduct. In 1995, we adopted and have since continually maintained a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the Code of Conduct)., which is periodically reviewed and amended by the Board. We require all employees, including our senior officers and our employee directors, to read and to adhere to the Code of Conduct in discharging their work-related responsibilities. Our Compliance and Ethics Program, involves the administration of training regarding and enforcement of the Code of Conduct and is under the direction of our Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer.Officer, administers training on and enforces the Code of Conduct. We have also appointed Regional Compliance and Ethics Officers to oversee the application of the Code of Conduct in each of our geographic regions. We provide mandatory web-based general training with respect to the Code of Conduct, and we also provide additional live and web-based training on specific aspects of the Code of Conduct from time to time to certain employees. Employees are expected to report any conduct they believe in good faith to be a violation of the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct is posted on and weour website at www.oracle.com/goto/corpgov. We intend to disclose on our website any future amendments toof the Code of Conduct or any waivers granted to our executive officers from aany provision toof the Code of Conduct on, our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.Conduct.

Compliance and Ethics Reports. With oversight from the F&A Committee, we have established several different reporting channels employees may use to seek guidance or submit reports concerning compliance and ethics matters, including accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. These reporting channels include Oracle’s Integrity Helpline, which may be accessed either over the phone or by way of a secure Internet site. Employees may contact the helpline 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Interpreters are provided to helpline callers who want to communicate in languages other than English, and employees using the online system may file a report in the language of their choice. Employees who contact the helpline, whether over the phone or online, generally may choose to remain anonymous. Certain countries other than the United States, however, limit or prohibit anonymous reporting; employees who identify themselves as being from an affected country are alerted if special reporting rules apply to them.

Global Conflict of Interest Policy. Our Global Conflict of Interest Policy (the Conflict of Interest Policy), which supplements the Code of Conduct, is applicable to all Oracle employees. The Conflict of Interest Policy is designed to help employees identify and address situations that may give rise to potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest. Employees are required to disclose any conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest in accordance with the Conflict of Interest Policy. On an annual basis, each senior officer of Oracle is required to submit a Conflicts of Interest Questionnaire and Affirmation disclosing any actual or potential conflicts of interest and affirming that the senior officer has read, understands and is in compliance with the Conflict of Interest Policy. The Conflict of Interest Policy

Corporate Citizenship Report. Information regarding our workforce, charitable activities, environmental policy and global sustainability initiatives and solutions is posted on, and we intend to disclose any future amendments to or waivers granted toavailable in our executive officers from a provision of the Conflict of Interest PolicyCorporate Citizenship Report published on our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgovcorporate/citizenship. The information posted on or accessible through our website, including the Corporate Citizenship Report, is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement (see “No Incorporation by Reference” on page 83).

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   23LOGO   29


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table provides information, as of September 18, 2017,8, 2020, the record date of the Annual Meeting, with respect to the beneficial ownership of Oracle common stock by: (1) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (2) each director or nominee; (3) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table;Table (other than Mr. Hurd, who passed away in October 2019); and (4) all current executive officers and directors as a group. Except as set forth below, the address of each stockholder is 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California 94065.

 

   Name of Beneficial Owner  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership  (1)
   

  Percent  

  of Class  

 

  Lawrence J. Ellison (2)

   1,169,596,417    28

  500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065

    

  Jeffrey S. Berg (3)

   555,300    * 

  Michael J. Boskin (4)

   429,454    * 

  Safra A. Catz (5)

   29,337,013    * 

  Bruce R. Chizen (6)

   203,985    * 

  George H. Conrades (7)

   167,500    * 

  John F. Fowler (8)

   137,295    * 

  Hector Garcia-Molina (9)

   293,750    * 

  Jeffrey O. Henley (10)

   4,934,516    * 

  Mark V. Hurd (11)

   21,079,044    * 

  Renée J. James (12)

   18,652    * 

  Thomas Kurian (13)

   11,462,940    * 

  Leon E. Panetta (14)

   30,000    * 

  Naomi O. Seligman (15)

   294,895    * 

  All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons) (16)

   1,240,424,751    29
  Name of Beneficial Owner  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership  (1)
     Percent  
  of Class  
 

  Directors and NEOs

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  Lawrence J. Ellison (2)

   1,164,232,353    38.3

  Jeffrey S. Berg (3)

   358,955    * 

  Michael J. Boskin (4)

   371,653    * 

  Safra A. Catz (5)

   21,118,592    * 

  Bruce R. Chizen (6)

   60,002    * 

  George H. Conrades (7)

   111,666    * 

  Dorian E. Daley (8)

   975,458    * 

  Rona A. Fairhead

   5,920    * 

  Jeffrey O. Henley (9)

   4,847,121    * 

  Renée J. James (10)

   50,752    * 

  Charles W. Moorman IV (11)

   48,920    * 

  Leon E. Panetta (12)

   76,467    * 

  William G. Parrett

   16,466    * 

  Naomi O. Seligman (13)

   165,112    * 

  Vishal Sikka (14)

       * 

  William Corey West (15)

   509,647    * 

  All current executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons) (16)

   1,198,512,261    39.1
           

  Other More Than 5% Stockholders

          

  The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 (17)

   169,500,078    5.6

 

*

Less than 1%

 

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated below, each stockholder listed had sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws, if applicable.

 

(2)

Includes 45,375,00025,500,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date and 260,000,000317,000,000 shares pledged as collateral to secure certain personal indebtedness, including various lines of credit. See “Corporate Governance—Share Pledging and Our Prohibition on Speculative Transactions”Transactions and Pledging Policy” on page 1923 for more information on Board and committee oversight of Mr. Ellison’s pledging arrangements.

 

(3)

Includes 5,000 shares owned by Mr. Berg’s spouse, 81,517128,861 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Berg and his family, 86,28367,594 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust for the benefit of Mr. Berg and his family and 382,500157,500 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(4)

Includes 405,000300,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(5)

Includes 28,750,0001,118,592 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Ms. Catz and her family and 20,000,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(6)

Includes 5,000 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Chizen and his spouse and 180,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.family.

 

30  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(7)

Includes 146,25067,500 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(8)

Ownership information provided asIncludes 212,958 shares held in trusts for the benefit of August 2, 2017, the date Mr. Fowler resigned from his position. Includes 95,235 earned PSUs (including accrued dividend equivalents) for which Mr. Fowler elected to defer settlement.

(9)

Includes 277,500Ms. Daley and her family and 762,500 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

24  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(10)(9)

Includes 1,800,5691,813,174 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Henley and his spouse,family, 31,000 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Henley’s children, and 102,947 shares held in a trust by the J&J Family Foundation and 3,000,0002,900,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

(10)

Includes 9,375 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(11)

Includes 20,750,0002,454 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 daysheld in trusts for the benefit of the record date.Mr. Moorman’s family.

 

(12)

Includes 2,34338,967 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Panetta’s family and 37,500 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(13)

Includes 10,595,7007,397 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 daysowned by Ms. Seligman’s spouse of the record datewhich she disclaims beneficial ownership and 833,707 earned PSUs (including accrued dividend equivalents) for which Mr. Kurian elected to defer settlement.

(14)

Includes 18,750112,500 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(14)

Dr. Sikka joined the Board on December 10, 2019. He has been granted RSUs, none of which have vested or will vest within 60 days of the record date.

(15)

Includes 7,397 shares owned by Ms. Seligman’s spouse of which she disclaims beneficial ownership and 270,000400,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date.

 

(16)

Includes all shares described in the notes above. Also includes (a) 105,6602,388,811 additional shares of Oracle common stock, (b) 1,903,1253,000,000 shares subject to currently exercisable stock options or stock options exercisable within 60 days of the record date, and (c) 12,500174,366 vested RSUs that will vest within 60 days of the record date,(including dividend equivalents) for which settlement has been deferred, in each case held by an executive officersofficer who areis not named in the table.

 

(17)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) on behalf of itself, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that as of December 31, 2019, Vanguard had sole voting power with respect to 3,383,433 shares, shared voting power with respect to 705,477 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 165,621,830 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 3,878,248 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

2017

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   25LOGO   31


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

This section provides information on our executive compensation program and our compensation philosophy for our named executive officers (NEOs), who in fiscal 2017 were:

  Lawrence J. Ellison, Chairman and CTO

  Safra A. Catz, CEO

  Mark V. Hurd, CEO

  Thomas Kurian, President, Product Development

  John F. Fowler, Former Executive Vice President, Systems

Fiscal 2017 began on June 1, 2016 and ended on May 31, 2017.

Fiscal 2020 Named Executive SummaryOfficers

 

Oracle’s Cloud TransformationLawrence J. Ellison

Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

 

Our customers are increasingly electing to run their IT environments using our suite of Oracle Cloud offerings. We have aggressively pursued the opportunities presented by this shift in customer preferences from on-premise to cloud offerings.Safra A. Catz

Chief Executive Officer

 

Our Oracle Cloud offerings provide a comprehensiveMark V. Hurd

Former Chief Executive Officer

Dorian E. Daley

Executive Vice President and fully integrated stack of application, platform, compute, storage and networking services in all three primary layersGeneral Counsel

Jeffrey O. Henley

Vice Chairman of the cloud: SoftwareBoard

William Corey West

Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and

Chief Accounting Officer

Fiscal 2020 began on June 1, 2019 and ended on May 31, 2020.

We have included Mr. Ellison as an NEO for fiscal 2020 on a Service (SaaS), Platformvoluntary basis in the interest of transparency. See the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) on page 47 for additional information.

Ms. Catz serves as a Service (PaaS)our principal executive officer and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). We believe this places us in a strong position relative toprincipal financial officer.

Mr. Hurd passed away on October 18, 2019. He was one of our competitors. Over the last five years, we have delivered a 46% compound annual growth rate in revenue from our SaaS offerings, and a 25% compound annual growth rate in revenue from our PaaS and IaaS offerings.Chief Executive Officers during fiscal 2020.

 

 

LOGO

Significant Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes

Looking forward, we intend to capitalize on our cloud momentum by setting ambitious goals to be achieved over the next five fiscal years. In fiscal 2018, we granted each currently employed NEO an equity award consisting entirely ofperformance-based stock options(Performance Options) that may be earned only upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals over afive-year performance period. No time-based equity was granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2018. When the grant date fair value of Performance Options is annualized over the five-year performance period, it represents a47% decrease from fiscal 2017 equity award values for our CTO and CEOs.

The Performance Options are divided intoseven equal tranches that are eligible to be earned based on the achievement of the following goals over the five-year performance period. See pages 29 to 30 for details.

1 tranche may be earned if Oracle’s average stock price equals or exceeds $80 for 30 calendar days

6 tranches may be earned based on achievement of both (1) market capitalization goals and (2) operational goals

(one goal of each type must be satisfied in order for a tranche to be earned)

CEO Compensation at a Glance

 

LOGO  Our CEO’s compensation is predominantly performance-based

  In fiscal 2020, Ms. Catz earned less than $1 million in total compensation, consisting of:

$950,000 in salary, and

$14,055 in other compensation

  The Compensation Committee’s independent consultant provided data showing market pay in the range of $20-$35 million for similarly situated CEOs

  During fiscal 2020, Ms. Catz received:

  No increase in her salary

  No bonus

No new equity grant and

No performance-based equity vesting based on fiscal 2020 performance

 

 

LOGO

Six Market Capitalization Goals

  Increase Oracle’s market capitalization from
a baseline market capitalization of $207
billion by:

  $16.6 billion

  $33.3 billion

  $50 billion

  $66.6 billion

  $83.3 billion

  $100 billion

  Shares issued in connection with a material acquisition will be excluded from the calculation of market capitalization

   

Six Operational GoalsOracle in Fiscal 2020

  Become the largest enterprise SaaS company as measured by an independent third-party report$22.3 billion returned to stockholders

  Attain $20$19.2 billion in non-GAAP total cloud revenues in a fiscal yearrepurchases of common stock

  Attain $10$3.1 billion in non-GAAP total SaaS revenues in a fiscal yeardividends paid

  Attain $10 billion in non-GAAP total PaaS and IaaS revenues in a fiscal yearEarnings per share of $3.08

  Attain non-GAAP SaaS grossOperating margin of 80%36%

  Maintain non-GAAP PaaS/IaaS gross marginOperating income of at least 30% for three$13.9 billion

  Total revenues of the five fiscal years in the performance period$39.1 billion

  Cloud services and license support revenues plus cloud license and on-premise revenues of $32.5 billion

 


26  LOGO   201732  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Financial HighlightsReturning Value to Stockholders

In fiscal 2017, Oracle delivered strong financial results (all results in U.S. GAAP):

    Total revenues of$37.7 billion (2%LOGO increase from fiscal 2016)

    Total cloud revenues of$4.6 billion (60%LOGO increase from fiscal 2016)

    Operating income of$12.7 billion (1%LOGO increase from fiscal 2016)

    Net income of$9.3 billion (5%LOGO increase from fiscal 2016)

    Diluted earnings per share of$2.21 (7%LOGO increase from fiscal 2016)

$6.1 billion returned to stockholders in fiscal 2017:

•   $3.5 billion in repurchases of common stock

•   $2.6 billion in dividends paid to stockholders

Absolute Total Stockholder Return (TSR)

1-Year5-Year

14%                     83%

TSR represents cumulative stock price appreciation adjusted for dividends. The 1-Year and 5-Year TSR amounts are measured based on the fiscal year periods ending May 31, 2017.

Year-Over-Year Decreases in Reported Compensation

Over the past five fiscal years, although our absolute total stockholder return has increased, we have reduced reported aggregate compensation for our Chairman and CTO and CEOs.

The aggregate compensation of our Chairman and CTO (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table) has decreased 57% from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017. The aggregate reported compensation of our CEOs has decreased 23% from fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 and 21% from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017.

In the same period (fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017), our five-year absolute total stockholder return was 83%.

CTO and CEO Reported Compensation and TSR

LOGO

Notes

(1)

The Compensation Committee reduced Mr. Ellison’s target fiscal 2015 PSU award by 187,500 PSUs and cancelled 750,000 shares of his fiscal 2015 stock option grant after he became our Chairman and CTO in September 2014. The compensation reported for Mr. Ellison in fiscal 2015 reflects the grant date fair value of these cancelled awards in accordance with SEC rules. These cancelled equity awards comprised 24% of Mr. Ellison’s reported fiscal 2015 compensation.

(2)

In fiscal 2015, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd each received a one-time special equity award of 125,000 PSUs and a stock option grant for 500,000 shares. The Compensation Committee determined these awards were appropriate because Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd assumed new responsibilities as our CEOs.



2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   27


Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Program: Emphasis on Variable, At-Risk Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes we employ some of the most talented senior executives in our industry. While our NEOs’ total incentive compensationopportunities may be high, the amounts they ultimatelyrealize are contingent on their ability to achieve our primary business objectives and create sustainable long-term value for our stockholders.

In fiscal 2017, an average of97% of our NEOs’ total compensation (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 43) wasat-risk.

LOGO

Fiscal 2017 Pay Outcomes: Pay-for-Performance

  Pay Element Executive Fiscal 2017 Outcome Reason  

PSUs

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

Mark V. Hurd

    Quick Reference Guide  2017 PSUs (1st tranche) earned at75% of target (out of a maximum possible payment of 150% of target)

  Oracle’s revenue growth was significantly greater than the weighted average revenue growth of the PSU Comparator Companies (as defined below), resulting in a payout of150% for this metric

  Oracle’s operating cash flow growth was among the lower growth rates of the PSU Comparator Companies, resulting in a payout of0% for this metric

 

 
   

  2016 PSUs (2nd tranche) earned at50% of target (out of a maximum possible payment of 150% of target)

Fiscal 2020 Executive Compensation Highlights for Other Named Executive Officers

 

  2015 PSUs (3rd tranche) earned at50% of target (out of a maximum possible payment of 150% of target)

  Oracle’s revenue growth was greater than the weighted average revenue growth of the PSU Comparator Companies, resulting in a payout of100%In fiscal 2020, similar to Ms. Catz’s compensation, for this metricMr. Ellison and Mr. Hurd:

 

  Oracle’s operating cash flow growthBase salaries remained unchanged

No bonuses were earned

  No new equity was amonggranted

No performance-based equity awards vested based on fiscal 2020 performance

  In fiscal 2020, for the lower growth ratesother NEOs (Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West):

  Modest base salary increases for Ms. Daley and Mr. West

No bonuses were earned

  Each received a restricted stock unit grant

  The total compensation mix for these 3 NEOs is heavily weighted toward equity-based awards, thus aligning their compensation with the interests of the PSU Comparator Companies, resulting in a payout of0% for this metricour stockholders

 

  

Executive Summary

32 Thomas Kurian

     Five-Year Performance-Based Stock Options

34

     Fiscal 2020 Compensation for Top 3 NEOs

35

     Fiscal 2020 Compensation for All Other NEOs

36

     Stockholder Outreach and Responsiveness

36

     Fiscal 2020 Pay Outcomes

37

Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

37

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

38

     Long-Term Incentive Compensation

38

     Annual Cash Bonus

39

     Base Salary, Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

40

Determination of Executive Compensation Amounts

42

Other Factors in Setting Executive Compensation

44

2019 Stockholder Advisory Vote

46

Compensation Committee Report

46

Compensation Tables

47 

  2017 PSUs (1st tranche), 2016 PSUs (2nd tranche) and 2015 PSUs (3rd tranche) earned at110% of target (the maximum possible payment)

 

 

  Oracle’s cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings experienced strong year-over-year revenue growth

 

    John F. Fowler* 

  2017 PSUs (1st tranche), 2016 PSUs (2nd tranche) and 2015 PSUs (3rd tranche) earned at50% of target (out of a maximum possible payment of 110% of target)

  Year-over-year revenue declined for our Oracle Engineered Systems and storage products

  
  

Stock Options

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

Mark V. Hurd

Thomas Kurian

John F. Fowler*

  Intrinsic value of stock options increased because Oracle’s stock price increased

  Oracle’s stock price increased by 23% in the one-year period following the stock option grant date

  
 

Annual

Performance-

BasedCash

Bonus

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

Mark V. Hurd

Thomas Kurian

  Earned at 41% of the target bonus amount

  Oracle’s non-GAAP pre-tax profits grew by approximately $353 million; however, this did not meet our internal expectations, resulting in a below-target payout

  

 

*

Mr. Fowler resigned from his position effective as of August 2, 2017. Upon resignation, he forfeited his outstanding unvested stock options and his outstanding unearned and unvested PSUs.



28  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Significant Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback

The Compensation Committee engages in rigorous discussions and deliberations both internally and with its independent compensation consultant about our compensation philosophy and design alternatives for our executive compensation program. Our directors also regularly seek feedback from our principal unaffiliated stockholders regarding executive compensation and related governance matters (see “Proxy Statement Summary—Stockholder Outreach and Board Responsiveness” on page 3). After considering stockholder feedback and the results of our November 2016 stockholder advisory vote on NEO compensation, the Compensation Committee has made significant changes to the equity component of our fiscal 2018 executive compensation program.Best Practices

 

Fiscal 2018 Performance-Based Stock OptionsLOGO Best Practices We Employ

 

In fiscal 2018,LOGO    High proportion of compensation for CEO and CTO is performance-based and aligned with stockholders

LOGO    Caps on maximum payout of bonuses and performance-based equity awards

LOGO    Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO    Disciplined dilution rates from equity awards

LOGO    Compensation recovery (clawback) policy for cash bonuses in lieuthe event of PSUsa financial restatement

LOGO    Annual risk assessment of compensation programs

LOGO    Independent compensation consultant and time-based stock options, the Compensation Committee granted each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurdindependent compensation committee

LOGO    Anti-hedging policy applicable to all employees and Mr. Kurian an equity award consisting entirely of performance-based stock options (Performance Options) that may be earned only upon the attainment of stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals. These awards are intended to represent five years of equity compensation and were granteddirectors

LOGO    Anti-pledging policy with the expectation that no additional equity awards will be granted to these NEOs until 2022 at the earliest.

limited exceptions

  

Principal Elements of Fiscal 2018

NEO Compensation

  Long-term incentive compensation consisting of100% performance-based stock optionsLOGO Practices We Avoid

 

  Annual performance-based cash
bonus (no change from FY17)LOGO  No severance benefit arrangements except as provided under our equity incentive plan to employees generally or as required by law

 

  Base salary (noLOGO  No single-trigger change from FY17)in control vesting of equity awards

 

The Compensation Committee believes the Performance Options address our stockholders’ executive compensation concerns by better aligning pay with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Specifically:

LOGO  No change in control acceleration of performance-based cash bonuses

Long-term incentive compensation for these NEOs is now 100% performance-based. Payout is tied to significant stock price appreciation as well as the satisfaction of rigorous performance goals during a five-year performance period that, if achieved, should result in considerable stockholder returns.

 

The Performance Options will be earned only if Oracleboth (1) significantly grows its cloud businessLOGO  No minimum guaranteed vesting for performance-based equity awards

LOGO  No discretionary cash bonuses for CEO and (2) returns value to stockholders.CTO

LOGO  No “golden parachute” tax gross-ups Sixfor NEOs

LOGO  No payout or settlement of the seven Performance Option tranches may be earned only if Oracle satisfies a combinationdividends or dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards

LOGO  No supplemental executive retirement plans, executive pensions or excessive retirement benefits

LOGO  No repricing, cash-out or exchange of (1) an operational performance goal tied to significant growth of Oracle’s cloud businessand (2) a substantial increase in Oracle’s market capitalization. The seventh Performance Option tranche may be earned only upon growth in Oracle’s“underwater” stock price. Thus, even if Oracle’s cloud business grows, the Performance Options cannot be earned unless Oracle delivers significant value to stockholders in the form of stock price and market capitalization growth. See the following page for details.options without stockholder approval

The Performance Options will result in adecrease in equity compensation value. The grant date fair value of each award granted to Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd is $103.7 million.* When annualized over the five-year performance period, the grant date fair value of each award is $20.74 million, a47% decrease from the grant date fair value of each NEO’s 2017 equity awards (which consisted of a mix of PSUs and time-based options).

LOGO

The grant date fair value of Mr. Kurian’s Performance Option award is $69.38 million.* When annualized over the five-year performance period, the grant date fair value of Mr. Kurian’s award is approximately $13.9 million, a59% decrease from the grant date fair value of his 2017 equity awards.



 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   29LOGO   33


Five-Year Performance-Based Stock Options: A Rigorous Long-Term Equity Program Directly Linked to Performance Options – Key Featuresand Stockholder Value Creation

The Performance Options are intendedNo equity awards were granted to be the sole long-term incentive awards for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz or Mr. Hurd in fiscal 2020. In fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee granted each of these NEOs an equity award consisting entirely of PSOs. Consistent with the long-term nature of our transition toward our cloud business, the PSOs granted to each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Kurian overHurd are intended to represent five years of equity compensation and were granted with the next five years. The Performance Options haveexpectation that these NEOs will receive no additional equity awards until 2022 at the following key features:

17.5 million Performance Options were awarded to each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd, and 14 million Performance Options were awarded to Mr. Kurian

No additional equity awards are expected to be granted to these NEOs for five years, until 2022 at the earliest

Each individual’s award is divided into seven equal tranches eligible to be earned based on stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals

The stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals must be achieved within a five-year performance period for the options to be earned

Unearned tranches will be forfeited at the end of the five-year performance period (or earlier if the NEO’s employment with Oracle terminates)

Any Performance Options earned will expire if unexercised eight years fromearliest. Our cloud business has become an important part of our long-term success. With the initial grant date or earlier ifPSO program, the NEO’s employmentCompensation Committee sought to directly link the long-term incentive compensation of our most senior executives with Oracle terminates.

Performance Options – Metricsambitious goals related to our cloud offerings and stockholder return.

The Performance Options are divided intoseven equal tranches that are eligible toPSOs may be earned based ononly upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, operational and market capitalization performance goals within five yearsover a five-year performance period running from fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2022. Due to the rigor and long-term nature of the datePSO goals, none were achieved in fiscal 2020, 2019 or 2018, and thus no tranches of grant (if the NEO remains employed through the applicable vesting date)PSOs have been earned to date. Performance measured against the goals will be evaluated annually.

 

1 Tranche of the PSOs (1/7th)7th)

may be earned based on achievement of astock price goal

 

Oracle’s average stock price for 30 calendar days must equal or exceed $80 in order for the tranche to be earned

6 Tranches of the PSOs (6/7ths)7ths)

may be earned based on achievement of

both (1)market capitalization operational goals and (2)operational market capitalization goals

 

  One goal of each type (market capitalization(operational and operational)market capitalization) must be satisfied in order for a tranche (i.e., 1/7th of the award) to be earned

 

  If market capitalization goal(s) are satisfied but no operational goal(s) are satisfied (or vice versa), then no tranche will be earned until subsequent achievement of the other goal type occurs

LOGO

 

Six Market Capitalization Goals

   Increase Oracle’s market capitalization from a baseline market capitalization of $207 billion by:

  $16.6 billion

  $33.3 billion

  $50 billion

  $66.6 billion

  $83.3 billion

  $100 billion

  Shares issued in connection with a material acquisition will be excluded from the calculation of market capitalization

Six6 Operational Goals

  Become the largest enterprise SaaSSoftware-as-a-Service (SaaS) company as measured by an independent third partythird-party report

  Attain $20 billion in non-GAAP total cloud revenues in a fiscal year

  Attain $10 billion in non-GAAP total SaaS revenues in a fiscal year

  Attain $10 billion in non-GAAP total PaaSPlatform-as-a-Service (PaaS) and IaaSInfrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) revenues in a fiscal year

  Attain non-GAAP SaaS gross margin of 80%

  Maintain non-GAAP PaaS/IaaS gross margin of at least 30% for three of the five fiscal years in the performance period

In the event of a change in control, any unvested tranches subject to market capitalization goals and operational goals will be earned to the extent any unmatched market capitalization goals have been met. The unvested tranche subject to the stock price goal will only be earned if the stock price goal is achieved prior to the change in control.

 

6 Market Capitalization Goals

  Increase Oracle’s market capitalization from a baseline of $207 billion by:

  $16.7 billion

  $33.3 billion

  $50 billion

  $66.7 billion

  $83.3 billion

  $100 billion

  Shares issued in connection with a material acquisition would be excluded from the calculation of market capitalization



 

30  LOGO   201734  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


ExecutiveFiscal 2020 Compensation Program Evolutionfor Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd

OurThe Compensation Committee routinely engages with our principal unaffiliated stockholders regarding executive compensation matters and takes stockholder feedback seriously (see page 36 for details). We believe the fiscal 2020 compensation of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd addresses the feedback received from our stockholders because their compensation is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

Below is an excerpt of our fiscal 2020 SCT showing the total compensation for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd. See page 47 for the full SCT and related footnotes. This table is not a substitute for the information required to be contained in SCT.

   Name Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)
  Bonus ($)  Stock
Awards ($)
  Option
Awards ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
  All Other
Compensation ($)
  Total ($) 

 

  Lawrence J. Ellison

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,716,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,716,115

 

 

 

  Safra A. Catz

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,055

 

 

 

 

 

 

964,055

 

 

 

  Mark V. Hurd

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

356,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

370,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

727,444

 

 

In fiscal 2020, the principal elements of compensation for each of Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz were as follows:

Base Salary: $1 for Mr. Ellison (unchanged since fiscal 2011) and $950,000 for Ms. Catz (unchanged since fiscal 2012)

Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonus: No cash bonuses were earned in fiscal 2020

Long-Term Incentive Compensation:

No equity awards were granted in fiscal 2020 because PSOs granted in fiscal 2018 are intended to represent five years of equity compensation

No equity awards vested based on fiscal 2020 performance

Due to the rigor and long-term nature of the PSO goals, none were achieved in fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, and thus no tranches of the PSOs have been earned to date

The 4th and final tranche of the 2017 PSUs was not earned

In fiscal 2020, the principal elements of compensation of Mr. Hurd, who passed away in October 2019, were as follows:

Base Salary: Mr. Hurd received $356,653, representing a pro rata portion of his salary (unchanged since fiscal 2012)

Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonus: Mr. Hurd was not eligible to receive a cash bonus because executives must be employed by Oracle on the date of any bonus payment

Long-Term Incentive Compensation: At the time of his death, Mr. Hurd’s equity awards were treated in accordance with the terms of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the 2000 Equity Plan) and his equity award agreements

In accordance with his PSU grant agreement, all of Mr. Hurd’s unvested PSUs were forfeited upon his death

In accordance with his PSO grant agreement, his unvested PSOs were subject to the same vesting terms through the next vesting measurement date following his death; on August 4, 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that no performance goals had been achieved and 100% of Mr. Hurd’s PSOs were cancelled as of that date

In accordance with the 2000 Equity Plan (and consistent with how equity is treated for all Oracle employees at death), the last remaining unvested tranche of Mr. Hurd’s unvested time-based stock options was accelerated resulting in 562,500 stock options vesting (please see “Severance, Change in Control and Death Benefits” below for more information



2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   35


Fiscal 2020 Compensation for All Other NEOs

The principal elements of fiscal 2020 compensation for Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West were a base salary, a cash bonus opportunity and restricted stock units (RSUs), as described in further detail beginning on page 39.

The total compensation mix for these NEOs is heavily weighted toward equity-based awards, thus aligning their compensation with the interests of our stockholders. In the aggregate, approximately 90.4% of the fiscal 2020 total compensation (as reported in the SCT on page 47) for Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West was equity-based.

Elements of Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West

LOGO

Stockholder Outreach and Compensation Committee Responsiveness

The Compensation Committee actively solicits the views of our principal unaffiliated stockholders on executive compensation matters. On an annual basis, members of the Compensation Committee hold meetings with our unaffiliated stockholders at which executive compensation and other corporate governance matters are discussed at length. Thus far in fiscal 2021, we reached out to stockholders representing approximately 31% of our outstanding unaffiliated shares (based on data available as of June 30, 2020) to set up a meeting with members of the Compensation Committee, and the full Compensation Committee held video conference meetings with four institutional stockholders.

Stockholders approved our advisory say-on-pay proposal at our 2019 Annual Meeting with 58% of the votes cast voting in favor, up from the prior year approval of 54%. While the Board was pleased to achieve these majority votes, it was disappointed by the low support. Members of the Compensation Committee actively sought to understand what actions the Compensation Committee could take to address stockholder concerns. For a detailed summary of the Board’s response to the most critical feedback received from investors, see the table on page 4.

The most critical feedback from our investors on our executive compensation program reflectsrelated to the PSO awards. We understand and share our stockholders’ focus on maintaining a long-term incentive program with rigorous and meaningful performance goals that properly aligns our executives’ compensation with the interests of our stockholders. As we discussed with our investors during our engagement efforts, we believe that the five-year PSO grants achieve these goals.

While the grants resulted in a large amount of reported compensation in 2018, none of the PSOs have vested to date and no compensation has been realized from the awards—precisely because of the rigor of the goals.

As discussed in the description of the PSO program on page 34, we believe the goals associated with the PSOs are tailored to focus our executives on the long-term strategic and operational goals of the company. The PSOs were carefully designed to drive performance in the areas that would be most beneficial to our stockholders.

After considering investor concern and closely analyzing the effectiveness and appropriateness of the PSO program, the Compensation Committee has determined that given the long-term nature of the awards and the rigor of the goals, it will maintain the existing terms applicable to outstanding PSOs and adhere to its commitment not to issue any additional equity or other replacement awards to the named executive officers holding PSOs until the PSO performance period is over.



36  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Fiscal 2020 Pay Outcomes: Pay-for-Performance

A significant increase in performance-based compensation. In fiscal 2018,portion of the compensation amounts our currently employed NEOs were granted Performance Options in lieuultimately realize are contingent on the achievement of PSUsour primary business objectives and time-based stock options. The NEOs’ base salariesthe creation of short-term and annual performance-based cash bonus opportunities remain unchanged.long-term value for our stockholders. The table below compares key featuressummarizes the fiscal 2020 outcomes for our NEOs’ performance-based compensation. Details regarding the material elements of the fiscal 2017PSOs, PSUs and fiscal 2018 equitycash bonus awards grantedcan be found on pages 34 and 38 to our NEOs.40.

 

Program

Fiscal 2017 Equity Program  LOGO   Fiscal 2018 Equity Program

Form of Equity

50% Time-Based Stock Options

50% Performance-Based Stock Units

100% Performance-Based Stock Options

Performance Periods

PSUs have variable performance periods of 1, 2 and 3 years5-year performance period

Metrics

PSUs vest based on Oracle’s revenue growth and cash flow growth compared to the PSU Comparator CompaniesOracle’s attainment of stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals focused on cloud growth

Vesting

Time-Based Stock Options vest 25% per year over 4 years

Each tranche of PSUs may be earned at 0% to 150% of target, with no minimum vesting

No minimum or time-based vesting

Each tranche of Performance Options may be earned at 0% or 100% of the grant amount

Frequency of Grant

AnnualIntended to be the sole long-term incentive awards for the currently employed NEOs over the next 5 years

Compensation Best Practices

Pay ElementNEOFiscal 2020 OutcomeReason

PSOs

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

Mark V. Hurd

   No tranches of the PSOs granted in fiscal 2018 have been earned to date

   None of the stock price, market capitalization or operational performance goals of the PSOs were satisfied in year 1 (fiscal 2018), year 2 (fiscal 2019) or year 3 (fiscal 2020)

PSUs

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

   The 4th and final tranche of the 2017 PSUs was not earned

   Oracle’s revenue and operating cash flow growth was among the lower growth rates of the PSU Comparator Companies, resulting in no payout for the final tranche of the 2017 PSUs

Annual

Performance-Based Cash

Bonus

Lawrence J. Ellison

Safra A. Catz

Jeffrey O. Henley

LOGO Best Practices We Employ   No cash bonus earned

   While we were profitable in fiscal 2020, Oracle’s non-GAAP pre-tax profits did not grow year over year

 

LOGO     Low dilution rates from equity awards

LOGO     Compensation recovery (clawback) policy for cash bonuses in the event of a restatement

LOGO     Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO     Caps on maximum payout of bonus and PSU awards

LOGO     Annual risk assessment of compensation programs

LOGO     Independent compensation consultant and independent compensation committee

LOGO     High proportion of NEO compensation is at-risk and performance-based

 
 

LOGO Practices We AvoidDorian E. Daley

William Corey West

LOGO   No severance benefit plans or agreements except as provided under our equity incentive plancash bonus earned

   Oracle’s overall financial performance did not meet internal expectations required to employees generallyfund a bonus pool

LOGO      No single-trigger change in control vesting of equity awards

LOGO      No minimum guaranteed vesting for performance equity

LOGO      No discretionary cash bonuses for NEOs

LOGO      No tax gross-ups for NEOs

LOGO      No payout or settlement of dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards

LOGO      No supplemental executive retirement plans, pensions or excessive retirement benefits

LOGO      No repricing, cash-out or exchange of “underwater” stock options without stockholder approval



2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   31


Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

 

attract and retain highly talented and productive executive officers;

 

provide incentives for their superior performance; and

align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.stockholders; and

provide incentives for their superior performance.

The Compensation Committee believes we employ some of the most talented senior executives in our industry. Our senior executives are routinely recruited as candidates to lead other large, sophisticated technology companies. Given the strength of our NEO group, the Compensation Committee believes it is critical they receive total compensation opportunities that reflect their individual skills and experiences and are commensurate with the management of an organization of Oracle’s size, scope and complexity. Further, the Compensation Committee believes that our NEOs’ compensation levels must be appropriate to retain and properly motivate them. At the same time, however, the Compensation Committee alignsseeks to align our NEOs’ pay with the investment gains or losses of Oracle’s stockholders.

Within Oracle, executive compensation is weighted most heavily toward our most senior executive officers because they have the greatest impact on our business and financial results.



2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   37


Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

Each Element of the Program is Closely Linked to Our Business Objectives

Our executive compensation program consists of the three principal elements described in the table below. We weight our NEOs’believe this compensation mix to encourageencourages appropriate decisions that are consistent with our business strategy of constantly improving our performance and building sustainableshort-term and long-term stockholder value.

 

  Compensation Element Designed to Reward  Relationship to Business Objectives  At-Risk 

  1.  Long-Term  Long-TermIncentive  Incentive Compensation (see (page 32)38)

 

   Success in achieving sustainable long-term results

  

   Align our NEOs’ interests with long-term stockholder interests to increase overall stockholder value

 

   Motivate and reward our NEOs for achieving financial performance goals that contribute to sustainable long-term results

 

   Attract and retain talented NEOs in an increasinglya competitive market for talent

 

LOGO

LOGO  

  2. Annual Performance-Based Cash
 Bonus (see page 35)

(page 39)

 

   Success in achieving annual operating results

  

   Motivate and reward our NEOs for achieving or exceeding annual financial performance goals

 

   Share incremental profits earned by Oracle with our NEOs

  

LOGO  

LOGO

  3. Base Salary
(see page 36) (page 40)

 

   Experience, knowledge of the industry, duties and scope of responsibility

  

   Provide a minimum, fixed level of cash compensation to attract and retain talented NEOs who can successfully design and execute our business strategy

     

1. Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Our philosophy with regard to granting long-term incentive compensation is to:

 

be sensitive to the overall number and value of shares of Oracle common stock underlying the equity awards granted;

 

effectively manage the overall net dilution resulting from our use of equity as a compensation tool, by granting equity awards to a relatively small number of employees, with a focus on our senior executives, engineers developers and senior executives;high performers in other areas of our business; and

 

provide the largest awards to our top performers and individuals with the greatest responsibilities because they have the potential and ability to contribute the most to the success of our business and the creation of long-term stockholder value.

See “Proposal No. 4—ApprovalConsistent with this philosophy, our cumulative potential dilution since June 1, 2017 has been a weighted-average annualized rate of 1.5% per year. For details on the calculation of our cumulative potential dilution, see Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd

Fiscal 2020—No Equity Granted; No PSOs Earned/ No PSUs Earned

In fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee did not grant any equity awards to Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz or Mr. Hurd and no portion of the Oracle Corporation AmendedPSOs or PSUs vested.

Fiscal 2018—PSOs Granted

In fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee granted each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan”Mr. Hurd an equity award consisting entirely of PSOs that may be earned only upon the attainment of stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals. Due to the rigor and long-term nature of the underlying performance goals, none of the goals were achieved in fiscal 2020, 2019 or 2018, and thus no tranches of the PSOs have been earned to date. All of Mr. Hurd’s PSO were forfeited on page 58August 4, 2020, when the Compensation Committee certified that no performance conditions were met for details regarding our dilution, burn rate and equity overhang.the PSO performance period ending May 31, 2020 following Mr. Hurd’s death.

 

32  LOGO   201738  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Long-term incentive compensation for these NEOs is 100% performance-based. The PSOs will be earned only if Oracle both significantly grows its cloud business and increases its stock price and market capitalization by May 31, 2022. The PSOs are intended to represent five years of long-term incentive compensation. Performance measured against the goals is evaluated annually. See page 34 above for a description of these grants.

Fiscal 2017—PSUs Granted

In fiscal 2017, Equity Awards

Consistent with our “results-aligned” compensation philosophy, beginning in fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee made significant changes toa portion of the long-term incentive compensation programopportunities for our NEOs, providing that their annual equity awards would consistMr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd consisted of both PSUs, which are measured using two performance metrics: (1) 50% of the number of target PSUs is tied to relative growth in total consolidated U.S. GAAP revenues; and stock options.(2) 50% of the number of target PSUs is tied to relative growth in total consolidated U.S. GAAP net cash flows from operating activities. The Compensation Committee believes that our annual equity awards—which are designed to reward outstanding performance as measured against our long-term financial results—provide our NEOs with incentives to achieve our business objectives and drive increases in the market price of Oracle common stock, thus benefiting our stockholders as well as our NEOs.

PSU Award Design

The Compensation Committee engaged in a thoughtful and rigorous deliberation process to design the PSU awards. When the Compensation Committee initially considered the adoption of PSUs, it evaluated a number of alternative performance award designs over the course of numerous meetings, including special meetings called only for that purpose, with the assistance of Compensia, its compensation consultant, and solicited stockholder feedback. The Compensation Committee followed a similarly rigorous process for the design of the 2017 PSU awards. The Compensation Committee tailored the performance objectives of the 2017 PSU awards to the specific roles and responsibilities of each of our NEOs, as described below. The Compensation Committee established the target payout levels for the PSUs to encourage strong, focused performance. Given the economic and market conditions at the time the targets were set, the target payout levels were designed to be challenging but achievable, while payouts at the maximum levels were designed to be stretch goals.

Fiscal 2017 PSUs—Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd

For Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd, the 2017 PSUs are measured using two performance metrics:

   50% of the number of target PSUs is tied to relative growth in total consolidated revenues measured on a U.S. GAAP basis; and

   50% of the number of target PSUs is tied to relative growth in total consolidated net cash flows from operating activities measured on a U.S. GAAP basis.

PSU Comparator Companies

  Cisco Systems, Inc.

  EMC Corporation

  Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

  IBM Corporation

  salesforce.com, inc.

  SAP SE

  Workday, Inc.

Theseselected these metrics were selected because management analyzes revenue growth and operating cash flows as proxies for the creation of long-term stockholder value, and Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd are ultimately responsible for the continued success of Oracle as a whole. value.

The 2017 PSU awards arePSUs were divided into four equal annual tranches, each of which iswas eligible to be earned based on Oracle’s performance with respect to these two metrics as compared against the weighted average performance of the same metrics of seven companies (collectively, the PSU Comparator Companies, listed in the chart at right). The Compensation Committee selected the PSU Comparator Companies because they represent some of our primary competitors as well as companies to which our stockholders most often compare us.

The key features of the 2017 PSUs for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd are:

25% of the PSUs are eligible to be earned each year, so the target PSUs granted are distributed over four years (see chart below);

there is no minimum guaranteed number of PSUs that may be earned in any one year (the NEOs may earn 0% of the target number of PSUs);

the number of PSUs that may be earned in any year is capped at a maximum of 150% of the target number of PSUs allocated to that year, so the upside is limited;

if Oracle’s growth exceeds the growth of the PSU Comparator Companies but is negative, the maximum number of PSUs that may be earned with respect to that metric is 100% of the target number of PSUs; and

if Oracle’s growth is one of the two lowest percentage growth amounts among any of the PSU Comparator Companies for either metric with each company’s growth measured separately and ranked from largest to smallest, none (0%) of the number of PSUs allocated to that year will be earned with respect to that metric.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   33


One-fourth of the 2017 PSUs are eligible to be earnedsettled at the end of each of four separate, varying performance periods, as follows:

   Tranche Vesting Fiscal Year  % of PSU Award  Performance Metric

  2017

  25%  

 Fiscal 2017 weighted average comparator performance

  2018

  25%  

 Fiscal 2017 and 2018 weighted average comparator performance

  2019

  25%  

 Fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019 weighted average comparator performance

  2020

  25%  

 Fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020 weighted average comparator performance

Earnedbased on Oracle’s performance. None of the 2017 PSUs vest upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of achievement measured against the pre-established and quantifiable target levels for each performance metric. Upon vesting, each PSU is converted into one share of Oracle common stock.

Summary of PSUs Earned—Fiscal 2015 through Fiscal 2017

The following table shows the PSUswere earned for each ofby Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz or Mr. Hurd in fiscal 2020.

Long-Term Equity Compensation—Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. Hurd through the Annual Meeting record date, September 18, 2017.

   Grant and

   Performance Metric

 PSUs Granted to Each NEO (#) Weight Percentage Earned for Fiscal Year Total PSUs Earned by Each NEO as
of Record Date (#)
   2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 

  2015 PSUs

 

562,500 (Ellison)

687,500 (Catz and Hurd)

        

  Revenue Growth

  50% 100% 100% 100% TBD   

  Operating Cash Flow Growth

  50% 21.4% 100% 0% TBD   

  Total Earned

   60.7% 100% 50% TBD   296,294 (Ellison)
         362,138 (Catz and Hurd)

  2016 PSUs

 562,500 (Ellison, Catz and Hurd)        

  Revenue Growth

  50%  100% 100% TBD TBD  

  Operating Cash Flow Growth

  50%  100% 0% TBD TBD  

  Total Earned

    100% 50% TBD TBD  210,936 (Ellison, Catz and Hurd)

  2017 PSUs

 562,500 (Ellison, Catz and Hurd)        

  Revenue Growth

  50%   150% TBD TBD TBD 

  Operating Cash Flow Growth

  50%   0% TBD TBD TBD 

  Total Earned

     75% TBD TBD TBD 105,468 (Ellison, Catz and Hurd)
                   

Fiscal 2017 PSUs—Other NEOs

For Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler, the 2017 PSUs are earned based on a revenue growth metric linked to certain strategic lines of business for which they have responsibility and oversight.

Mr. Kurian’s 2017 PSUs are earned based on year-over-year growth in Oracle’s total revenues for its cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings measured on a U.S. GAAP basis.

Mr. Fowler’s 2017 PSUs are earned based on year-over-year growth in Oracle’s total revenues for its Oracle Engineered Systems and storage products measured on a U.S. GAAP basis.

25% of the 2017 PSUs are eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period. For both Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler, the number of PSUs that may be earned is capped at 110% of the target number of PSUs awarded.

Earned PSUs vest upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of achievement measured against the pre-established and quantifiable target levels for each performance metric. Upon vesting, each PSU is converted into one share of Oracle common stock.

Fiscal 2017 Stock OptionsWest

In fiscal 2017, a portion2020, Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West received long-term equity compensation in the form of our NEOs’ long-term incentive compensation consistedRSUs that vest in equal annual installments over four years from the date of time-based options to purchase shares of Oracle common stock.grant. The Compensation Committee believes stock options providethat RSUs serve as an effective performance incentivesincentive because our NEOs derive value from these awards only ifthey become more valuable as our stock price increases (which benefits all stockholders) and fully vest only if the NEOrecipient remains

34  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


employed through the date his or herfinal vesting date. Because RSUs have value to the recipient even in the absence of stock price appreciation, RSUs help retain and incentivize employees during periods of market volatility, and result in Oracle granting fewer shares of common stock than through stock options vest.of equivalent grant date fair value.

Ms. Daley received an annual award of 170,000 RSUs in fiscal 2020

Mr. Henley received an annual award of 100,000 RSUs in fiscal 2020

Mr. West received an annual award of 90,000 RSUs in fiscal 2020

Equity Awards and Grant Administration

The Board has designated the Compensation Committee as the administrator of the 2000 Equity Plan and the Directors’ Stock options givePlan. The Compensation Committee, among other things, selects award recipients under the recipients2000 Equity Plan, approves the rightform of grant agreements, determines the terms and restrictions applicable to purchase atthe equity awards and adopts sub-plans for particular subsidiaries or locations.

We have a specified price (the market pricepolicy of Oracle common stockgenerally granting equity awards on pre-established dates. The Board has delegated to an executive officer committee the date when the stock option was granted)authority to approve a specifiedcapped number of equity award grants to certain employees. The executive officer committee cannot grant equity to non-employees or to certain executives. Equity awards approved by either the Compensation Committee or the executive officer committee during a calendar month are typically granted together on a pre-established day of the following month.

The Compensation Committee and F&A Committee also monitor the dilution and “overhang” effects of our outstanding equity awards in relation to the total number of outstanding shares of Oracle common stock for a specified periodstock. We do not grant equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information, and we do not time (five years with respect to the fiscal 2017 stock options granted to Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd, and ten years with respect to the fiscal 2017 stock options granted to our other NEOs). An NEO can exercise this right for the remainderrelease of this specified period of time after the stock options vest (become exercisable) unless the NEO’s employment with Oracle terminates earlier. The fiscal 2017 stock options vest and become exercisable in equal annual installments over four years.material nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.

2. Annual Cash Bonuses

None of our NEOs received a cash bonus in fiscal 2020.

Performance-Based Cash BonusBonuses under the Executive Bonus Plan

Our stockholder-approved Executive Bonus Plan is intended to motivate our NEOssenior executives by rewarding them when our annual financial performance objectives are met or exceeded. In fiscal 2020, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Henley did not earn bonuses even though Oracle was profitable. Mr. Hurd was ineligible for a bonus because executives must be employed by Oracle on the payment date in order to receive a bonus.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   39


Under the Executive Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee assigns each participant aan annual target cash bonus opportunity and establishes the financial performance metric or metrics that must be achieved before an award actually will be paid to the participant for thatthe year.

NEOs’ Cash Bonus Opportunities

Consistent with fiscal 2016,prior years, the Compensation Committee selected year-over-year growth in our non-GAAP pre-tax profits as the financial performance metric for determining our NEOs’ annual cash bonuses for fiscal 20172020 (other than for Ms. Daley and Mr. Fowler,West, whose bonus arrangement isarrangements are described below). The Compensation Committee believes that growth in non-GAAP pre-tax profit is the most appropriate metric for the Executive Bonus Plan because management regularly uses this metric internally to understand, manage and evaluate our business performance and make operating decisions with a view to the creation of stockholder value. In addition, as a measure of profit,profitability, this metric requires our NEOs to manage multiple variables (i.e., revenues and operating expenses) in achieving the goal of growing our non-GAAP pre-tax profit, which the Board believes to be an important measure of Oracle’s financial performance and value creation for our stockholders.

For purposes of the Executive Bonus Plan, “non-GAAP“non-GAAP pre-tax profit” is defined as:

 

Oracle’s U.S. GAAP income before provision for income taxes;

 

  

Minus stock-based compensation expenses, acquisition-related and other expenses, restructuring expenses and amortization of intangible assets; and

 

  

Plus an adjustment to increase our U.S. GAAP income before provision for income taxes for the full amount of cloud SaaS and PaaS revenues, software license updates and software and hardware support revenues recognized from certain contracts assumed in acquisitions as if the acquired companies had remained independent entities during the applicable fiscal year.

The bonus formula for each NEO, other than Mr. Fowler, was calculated as follows and was subject to an individual bonus cap:

LOGO

The individual bonus percentage, determined at the beginning of fiscal 2017, was 0.2% for each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Kurian. Mr. Ellison’s bonus percentage wasreduced from the fiscal 2016 percentage (0.325%) for parity with the bonus percentages of Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Kurian.

For fiscal 2017, the target cash bonus opportunity for each NEO was set at $1,710,000, which was determined based on our internal profitability expectations for the fiscal year. Each NEO’s bonus opportunity was subject to a bonus cap of $3,420,000, or 200% of target.

Between fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017, our non-GAAP pre-tax profits grew by approximately $353 million, which did not meet our own internal expectations. Consequently, the bonuses paid to our NEOs were well below their target amounts. Each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Kurian received a bonus of $705,464 (representing 41% of the target bonus amount), calculated by multiplying approximately $353 million by 0.2%.

Under the bonus formula, if Oracle’s non-GAAP pre-tax profits do not grow year-over-year, then our NEOs will not receive any bonuses under the Executive Bonus Plan even if Oracle has been profitable, as was the case in fiscal 2016.profitable. Further, even where Oracle’s non-GAAP pre-tax profits grow year-over-year, if we do not meet our internal profitability expectations for the fiscal year, the bonuses paid to our NEOs are typicallywill be below their target cash bonus opportunities.target. The Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce or eliminate but not increase the award determined by the bonus formula.

Between fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, our non-GAAP pre-tax profits did not grow. Consequently, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Henley did not earn bonuses for fiscal 2020.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   35


Mr. Fowler’s Cash Bonus Opportunity for Ms. Daley and Mr. West

PriorMs. Daley and Mr. West were eligible to his departure, Mr. Fowler was responsiblereceive a discretionary bonus for our hardware products business. Consistent with our “results-aligned” compensation philosophy,fiscal 2020. At the beginning of fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee structured hisset a target cash bonus opportunity of $750,000 for Ms. Daley, subject to be contingent on the operating results of the portion of the business that he managed. The Compensation Committee believed the most important factor by which to measure his performance was the year-over-year improvement in hardware revenues relative to his ability to manage effectively the growth in expenses of the hardware products development organization that he oversaw. Mr. Fowler’sa $1,500,000 cap, and set a target cash bonus opportunity was based onof $450,000 for Mr. West, subject to a percentage of the amount by which hardware revenues growth between fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 exceeded the expense growth of the hardware products development organization between fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017.

Between fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017, the profitability of our hardware business as we internally measure it grew from the prior fiscal year.$900,000 cap. Oracle’s overall financial performance did not meet internal expectations required to fund a bonus pool. Consequently, neither Ms. Daley nor Mr. Fowler would have earnedWest received a cash bonus of $259,669. However, because Mr. Fowler resigned prior to the payment offor fiscal 2017 bonuses under the Executive Bonus Plan, he did not receive his bonus.

We have not disclosed the specific formula or performance target level for Mr. Fowler’s target cash bonus opportunity. Mr. Fowler’s bonus formula included, among other things, expense amounts for our hardware products development organization. We do not publicly disclose this information, as we believe it would provide insights into our operational strengths and weaknesses that would result in competitive harm to us.2020.

3. Base Salary

The base salaries of Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz have not increased in over eight years.Base salary represents the only fixed component of the three principal elements of our executive compensation program and is intended to provide a baseline amount of annual compensation for our NEOs. When setting base salary levels, the Compensation Committee considers the base salaries paid to NEOs in comparable positions at the companies in our compensation peer group, Oracle’s performance and the individual NEO’s performance. contributions to Oracle.

Mr. Ellison’s base salary is set at $1 consistent with the Compensation Committee’s view that his entire total direct compensation opportunity should be “at-risk.“at-risk. In addition, the base Ms. Catz’s salary of the other NEOs has not increasedis $950,000 unchanged in the last fiveover eight years. Mr. Henley’s salary is $650,000 unchanged in over a decade. Ms. Daley and Mr. West each received modest salary increases in fiscal 2019, with Ms. Daley’s salary increasing from $825,000 to $875,000 and Mr. West’s salary increasing from $495,000 to $530,000.

Limited Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

In fiscal 2017,2020, we provided our NEOs with certain limited perquisites and other personal benefits, as described below, each of which the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and in the best interests of Oracle and our stockholders. The amounts of all perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation TableSCT below.

40  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Residential Security

The Board has established a residential security program for the protection of our most senior executives based on an assessment of risk, which includes consideration of the executive’s position and work location. We require these security measures for Oracle’s benefit because of the importance of these executives to Oracle, and we believe these security costs are necessary and appropriate business expenses since these costs arise from the nature of the executives’ employment at Oracle.

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the residential security budget each year, which includes a review of the actual and credible threats made against one or more of our senior executives during the last completed fiscal year. For Mr. Ellison, Oracle pays for the annual costs of security personnel at his primary residence. Mr. Ellison paid for the initial procurement and installation of security equipment for his primary residence, and he pays for ongoing maintenance and upgrade fees for such equipment. Mr. Ellison also pays for all security costs for his other residences.

For Mr. Hurd, Oracle previously paid for the cost of the installation of a technical security system at his primary residence and pays the relatedresidence. In fiscal 2020, Oracle paid for annual service costs.costs and security personnel at Mr. Hurd’s primary residence for that portion of the fiscal year when he was our Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Catz was offered a security system paid for by Oracle but opted instead to maintain the existing security system at her residence, which she pays for directly.

Although we view the security services provided for our senior executives as an integral part of our risk management program and as necessary and appropriate business expenses, because they may be viewed as conveying a personal benefit to these individuals, we have reported the aggregate incremental costs to Oracle of these services in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation TableSCT below.

Aircraft Use

Our company-owned aircraft are considered a business tool to be used for essential business purposes only. Our policy regarding the use of company-owned aircraft provides that use of the aircraft for non-business travel is prohibited, subject to certain limited exceptions. We permit our NEOs to be accompanied by guests during business trips on private aircraft owned by us or leased by us from a company owned by Mr. Ellison on terms advantageous to Oracle. When we lease an aircraft, we lease the entire aircraft for

36  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


business travel and are not charged for use of the aircraft based on the number of passengers. Similarly, our owned aircraft are expected to be used for business travel. Therefore, wecompany-owned aircraft. We believe there is no aggregate incremental cost to Oracle as a result of our NEOs being accompanied by guests when traveling on Oracle business. However, in certain instances, a portion of the aircraft costs attributable to non-business passengers cannot be deducted by Oracle for corporate income tax purposes. When applicable, we disclose the amount of these incremental forgone tax deductions in the footnotes accompanying the Summary Compensation Table.SCT. In fiscal 2020, use of our company-owned aircraft did not result in a loss of a corporate income tax deduction.

Pension Benefits or Supplemental Retirement Benefits

During fiscal 2017,2020, other than the 401(k) Plan and our deferred compensation programs, we did not provide any pension or retirement benefits to our NEOs and do not believe that these types of benefits are necessary to further the objectives of our executive compensation program.

We offer the 1993 Deferred Compensation Plan (the Cash Deferred Compensation Plan) to certain employees, including eligible NEOs, under which participants may elect to defer all or a portion of their base salary and annual performance-based cash bonus. We also offer certain employees, including eligible NEOs, the ability to defer the settlement of their earned and vested RSUs and PSUs under the terms of the Oracle Corporation Stock Unit Award Deferred Compensation Plan (the RSU Deferred Compensation Plan). We offer these plans because we believe they are competitive elements of compensation for our NEOs. For a description of our Cash Deferred Compensation Plan and RSU Deferred Compensation Plan, see “Fiscal 2017 2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” on page 47.52.

Severance, and Change in Control and Death Benefits

Each of our NEOs is employed “at will.” None of our NEOs has an employment agreement with Oracle that provides for payments or benefits in the event of a termination of employment or in connection with a change in control of Oracle.

If Oracle is acquired, equity awards held by all ofRSUs and time-based stock options granted to our employees who have received such awards, including(including our NEOs,NEOs) under our Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the 2000 Equity Plan)Plan will become fully vested if (1) the equity awards are not assumed or if(2) the equity awards are assumed and the holder’s employment is terminated without cause within 12 months after the acquisition. This vesting acceleration provision is provided to all employees who participate in the plan and is not subject to any other material conditions or obligations.

See “Fiscal 2018 Performance-Based Stock Options” on pages 29

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   41


Pursuant to 30 for a descriptionthe terms of the treatment of the fiscal 2018 Performance OptionsPSO grant agreements, in the event of a change in control of Oracle, any unvested tranches subject to market capitalization goals and operational goals will be earned only to the extent any unmatched market capitalization goals have been met on or before the trading date immediately prior to the change in control. The unvested tranche subject to the stock price goal will only be earned if the stock price goal is achieved prior to the change in control.

In addition, if any employee of Oracle dies while employed by Oracle, the 2000 Equity Plan provides for two additional tranches of vesting of his or her time-based stock options (if any) upon his or her death. Oracle’s standard form of RSU grant agreement provides for one additional tranche of vesting of RSUs for all grantees, including executives. Further, pursuant to the terms of the PSO grant agreements, upon the applicable NEO’s death, his or her unvested PSOs remain outstanding and eligible to vest through the next vesting measurement date following his or her death.

Determination of Executive Compensation Amounts for Fiscal 20172020

 

Factors Considered in Setting Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Our NEOs

The Compensation Committee approved our NEOs’ fiscal 20172020 compensation and determined that the fiscal 20172020 compensation levels were appropriate and necessary to reward, retain and motivate our NEOs based on our executive compensation philosophy and the Compensation Committee’s subjective evaluations of:

 

the potential future contributions each NEOour NEOs can make to our success and each NEO’s critical roleour NEOs’ roles in executing our business and acquisition strategies;

 

our desired future financial performance in each NEO’s principal areas of responsibility and the degree to which we wish to provide incentives for him or her;

 

theeach NEO’s past performance, experience and level of responsibility;

 

the Compensation Committee’s belief that any onemany of the NEOs could lead another company and the goal of protecting against recruiting efforts by other companies;

 

the complexity of our business resultingand ongoing increases in increased workloads and responsibilities for our NEOs, particularly in light of Oracle’s transition to cloud-based product offerings;NEOs;

 

theeach NEO’s expected progress toward goals within his or her areas of responsibility;

each NEO’s skills, knowledge and experience;

 

the appropriate mix of compensation (i.e., short-term versus long-term, fixed versus variable) for theeach NEO; and

 

any other factors the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   37


The Compensation Committee does not have a set formula by which it determines which of these factors is more or less important, and the specific factors used and their weighting may vary among individual NEOs.NEOs and over time. When determining the size of the stock option and PSUequity awards, the Compensation Committee considers both the overall size of the awards and the potential value of the awards.

Compensation Decision-Making Process and the Role of Executive Officers

The Compensation Committee deliberates on, determines and approves our NEOs’ compensation based on the collective subjective judgment of its members, which is guided by their significant collective business experience, and their evaluation of the factors above. See “Board of Directors—Nominees for Directors—Director Qualifications” on page 68 for a discussion of the expertise and skills of each of our Compensation Committee members. None of our NEOs determines his or her own compensation, and none of our NEOs were present when the Compensation Committee deliberated on and approved its fiscal 2017 compensation decisions for him or her.compensation.

Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Mr. Ellison, Chairman and CTO

 

PSUs

A target award of 562,500 PSUs granted on June 30, 2016, 25% of which are eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period based on Oracle’s performance as measured against a relative revenue growth metric and a relative operating cash flow metric.

  

Stock Options Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

A stock option to purchase 2,250,000 shares of Oracle common stockNone granted on June 30, 2016, with an exercise price of $40.93 per share, vesting 25% each year over a four-year period, and with a five-year term.

Performance-

Based Performance-Based Cash Bonus

  

A cash bonus opportunity under the Executive Bonus Plan based on 0.2% multiplied by the growth in our non-GAAP pre-tax profits over the preceding fiscal year. Mr. Ellison received ano bonus payment of $705,464 in($0) for fiscal 2017.2020.

Annual Base Salary

  

$1 (unchanged since fiscal 2011)

42  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, among other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and an assessment of Mr. Ellison’s overall responsibility for business strategy, operations and corporate vision, with an emphasis onvision. The Compensation Committee emphasized the objectives of retaining his services and providing meaningful incentives for superior performance and engagement. The Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Ellison, as Oracle’s founderFounder who has guided the company for over 40 years, is invaluable. Although Mr. Ellison has a significant equity interest in Oracle, the Compensation Committee believes his annual compensation package is necessary to maintain the focus of his visionary drive and his active role in our operations, technology, strategy and growth. The Compensation Committee also believes that Mr. Ellison’s role as an executive at Oracle is distinct from his roles as a director and significant stockholder.

Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Ms. Catz, CEO

 

PSUs

A target award of 562,500 PSUs granted on June 30, 2016, 25% of which are eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period based on Oracle’s performance as measured against a relative revenue growth metric and a relative operating cash flow metric.

  

Stock Options Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

A stock option to purchase 2,250,000 shares of Oracle common stockNone granted on June 30, 2016, with an exercise price of $40.93 per share, vesting 25% each year over a four-year period, and with a five-year term.

Performance-Based Cash Bonus

  

A cash bonus opportunity under the Executive Bonus Plan based on 0.2% multiplied by the growth in our non-GAAP pre-tax profits over the preceding fiscal year. Ms. Catz received ano bonus payment of $705,464 in($0) for fiscal 2017.2020.

Annual Base Salary

  

$950,000 (unchanged since fiscal 2012)

In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, among other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and an assessment of Ms. Catz’s significant role and responsibilities with Oracle. As one of our CEOs,CEO, Ms. Catz sets our overall business and acquisition strategy and is responsible for executing that strategy. SheOracle’s long-term strategy, culture and financial performance. As our principal financial officer, she also has oversight and responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of our financial results and management of our legal affairs, among other responsibilities.results.

38  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Mr. Hurd, Former CEO

 

PSUs

A target award of 562,500 PSUs granted on June 30, 2016, 25% of which are eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period based on Oracle’s performance as measured against a relative revenue growth metric and a relative operating cash flow metric.

  

Stock Options Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

A stock option to purchase 2,250,000 shares of Oracle common stockNone granted on June 30, 2016, with an exercise price of $40.93 per share, vesting 25% each year over a four-year period, and with a five-year term.

Performance-Based Cash Bonus

  

A cash bonus opportunity under the Executive Bonus Plan based on 0.2% multiplied by the growth in our non-GAAP pre-tax profits over the preceding fiscal year. Mr. Hurd received ano bonus payment of $705,464 in($0) for fiscal 2017.2020.

Annual Base Salary

  

$950,000 (unchanged since fiscal 2012)

In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, among other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and an assessment of Mr. Hurd’s significant role and responsibilities with Oracle. As one of our CEOs,former CEO, Mr. Hurd iswas responsible for worldwide sales and marketing, consulting, support and Oracle’s industry-specific global business units. He also actsacted as a primary contact for our customers, among other responsibilities.

Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Mr. Kurian,Ms. Daley, Executive Vice President Product Developmentand General Counsel

 

PSUs

A target award of 500,000 PSUs granted on June 30, 2016, 25% of which are eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period based on the level of year-over-year growth in Oracle’s total revenues for its Cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings on a U.S. GAAP basis.

  

Stock Options Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

A stock option to purchase 2,000,000 sharesAn annual award of Oracle common stock granted on June 30, 2016, with an exercise price of $40.93 per share, vesting 25% each year over a four-year period, and with a ten-year term.170,000 RSUs

Performance-Based Cash Bonus

  

A target cash bonus opportunity under the Executive Bonus Plan based on 0.2% multiplied by the growth in our non-GAAP pre-tax profits over the preceding fiscal year. Mr. Kurianof $750,000, subject to a $1,500,000 cap. Ms. Daley received ano bonus payment of $705,464 in($0) for fiscal 2017.2020.

Annual Base Salary

  

$800,000 (unchanged since875,000 (increased from $825,000 in fiscal 2011)2019)

In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, its determination that Mr. Kurian makesamong other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendation of the CEO, and an assessment of Ms. Daley’s significant contributions torole and responsibilities overseeing all legal matters at Oracle and managing a large-scale multinational legal team. In particular, Ms. Daley plays a critical role in setting the strategy for Oracle’s overall software developmentlitigation and strategy, especially those related to our Oracle Cloudregulatory matters and Fusion productsprovides leadership in the areas of compliance and services.ethics, data protection and privacy, intellectual property and corporate governance, among other responsibilities.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   43


Fiscal 20172020 Compensation for Mr. Fowler, Former ExecutiveHenley, Vice President, SystemsChairman

 

PSUs

A target award of 187,500 PSUs granted on June 30, 2016, 25% of which was eligible to be earned each year over a four-year period based on the level of year-over-year growth in Oracle’s total revenues for its Oracle Engineered Systems and storage products on a U.S. GAAP basis.

  

Stock Options Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

A stock option to purchase 750,000 sharesAn annual award of Oracle common stock granted on June 30, 2016, with an exercise price of $40.93 per share, vesting 25% each year over a four-year period, and with a ten-year term.100,000 RSUs

Performance-Based Cash Bonus

  

A cash bonus opportunity under the Executive Bonus Plan based on 0.02% multiplied by the profitability ofgrowth in our hardware business. non-GAAP pre-tax profits over the preceding fiscal year. Mr. Fowler would have Henley received ano bonus of $259,669 inpayment ($0) for fiscal 2017 if he had not resigned from his position prior to the payment date of the fiscal 2017 bonuses.2020.

Annual Base Salary

  

$700,000650,000 (unchanged since Mr. Fowler became an NEO in fiscal 2012)for over a decade)

In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, its determination thatamong other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendation of the CTO, and an assessment of Mr. Fowler made significantHenley’s highly valued contributions to Oracle’s overall hardware product developmentstrategic vision, management and strategy, includingoperations. Mr. Henley meets regularly with significant Oracle customers and is instrumental in closing major commercial transactions worldwide. As Oracle’s former CFO and a seasoned executive with nearly 30 years of experience at Oracle, Mr. Henley also serves as a trusted adviser to our senior executives.

Fiscal 2020 Compensation for Mr. West, Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

 Long-Term Incentive Compensation

An annual award of 90,000 RSUs

 Cash Bonus

A target cash bonus opportunity of $450,000, subject to a $900,000 cap. Mr. West received no bonus payment ($0) for fiscal 2020.

 Annual Base Salary

$530,000 (increased from $495,000 in fiscal 2019)

In addition to the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved this compensation package based on, among other factors, competitive pay data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group, input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendation of the CEO, and an assessment of Mr. West’s critical role in overseeing the accuracy and integrity of Oracle’s consolidated financial statements. Mr. West has been with Oracle Engineered Systems products.since April 2007 and before that he spent 14 years with Arthur Andersen LLP, most recently as a partner, amongst other prior professional experiences.

Other Factors in Setting Executive Compensation

 

Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee selected and directly engaged Compensia, Inc. (Compensia), a national compensation consulting firm, as its compensation advisor for fiscal 20172020 to provide analysis and market data on executive and director compensation matters, both

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   39


generally and within our industry. Among other matters, Compensia also assisted the Compensation Committee with the ongoing design of the equity compensation program, with a comparison of our executive compensation policies and practices against a group of peer companies (as determined and identified below) and, with reviewing the annual risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices applicable to our NEOs and other employees. Theemployees, and reducing non-employee director compensation as described on pages 17 to 19. Compensia also prepared materials for use in orientation for new directors who join the Compensation Committee used Compensia’s input to assist in its independent determination of theCommittee. Compensia did not determine or recommend any amounts andor levels of our executive compensation for fiscal 2017.2020.

The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its external advisors. Consequently, the Compensation Committee is solely responsible for retaining and terminating Compensia,Compensia. Compensia reports directly to the Compensation Committee and Compensia did not provide any other services to Oracle during fiscal 2017. Neither of our CEOs nor the Chairman of the Board met2020. Our CEO did not meet independently with representatives of Compensia.Compensia nor did she consult with management’s outside compensation consultant on any executive compensation matters for fiscal 2020. The Compensation Committee has determined that the work resulting from Compensia’s engagement did not raise any conflicts of interest.

44  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Peer Company Executive Compensation Comparison

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with Compensia, annually establishes a group of peer companies, which are generally in the technology sector, for comparative purposes based on a number of factors, including:

 

their size and complexity;

 

their market capitalization;

 

their competition with us for talent;

 

the nature of their businesses;

 

the industries and regions in which they operate; and

 

the structure of their executive compensation programs (including the extent to which they rely on annual bonuses and other forms of variable, performance-based incentive compensation) and the availability of information about these programs.

For fiscal 2017,2020, the companies comprising the compensation peer group consisted of:

 

Accenture plc

    

eBay Inc.

International Business Machines Corporation

Alphabet Inc.

EMC Corporation*

Microsoft Corporation

Amazon.com, Inc.

Facebook, Inc.

 

QUALCOMM Incorporated

AppleAlphabet Inc.

    

Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company

 

salesforce.com, inc.

Cisco Systems,Amazon.com, Inc.

    

Intel Corporation

 

SAP SE

*

Apple Inc.

International Business Machines Corporation

Cisco Systems, Inc.

Removed from peer group following acquisition by Dell Inc.Microsoft Corporation

AlthoughIn determining fiscal 2020 executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, executive pay information drawn from this group of peer companies and from the Radford 20162019 Executive Compensation Survey for comparative purposes when setting executive compensation levels at Oracle during fiscal 2017, itpurposes. However, the Compensation Committee did not target total compensation oruse such information to tie any executive’s individual compensation element at ato specific level or attempt to attain a specified target percentile within the data drawn from the compensation peer group to determine executive compensation.percentiles.

Risk Assessment of Our Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

As part of its annual compensation-related risk review, the Compensation Committee considered, among others, the following factors which mitigate incentives for our executive officers to take inappropriate risks:

 

PSUsThe PSOs granted to our NEOs,Mr. Ellison and Ms. Catz are divided into seven equal tranches that are eligible to be earned based on the extent earned, vest over a four-year period. Stock options vest 25% each year over a four-year period.attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational goals within five fiscal years of the date of grant. Consequently, theMr. Ellison and Ms. Catz will only realize value of our NEOs’from their equity awards are significantly tied tothrough sustained long-term appreciation of our stock price and significant growth in our cloud business, which mitigates excessive short-term risk taking.

 

All annual performance-based cash bonuses are subject to a specified dollar cap that limits the maximum amount payable to an NEO and may be decreased in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, which protects against an NEO receiving a windfall or disproportionately large bonus relative to the Compensation Committee’s assessment of our actual financial performance. The cash bonus each of Ms. Daley and Mr. West is eligible to earn is also subject to a specified dollar cap set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year.

 

The financial metric used in the Executive Bonus Plan for each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Fowler,Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Henley is year-over-year growth in Oracle’s non-GAAP pre-tax profits. Our management regularly uses this metric to understand, manage and evaluate our business and make operating decisions. Using this metric for the annual performance-based cash bonus opportunities further aligns ourthese NEOs’ interests with our business goals.

 

40  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


We have adoptedmaintain a clawbackcompensation recovery (clawback) policy that allows us to recover or cancel any cash bonuses paid that are awarded as a result of achieving financial performance goals that are not met under any restated financial results.

 

Each of our senior officers is subject to robust stock ownership requirements as described in “Corporate Governance—Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Senior Officers” on page 19.25. Our senior officers would experience significant lost value in their holdings of Oracle common stock and potentially all of the value of their Oracle stock options and other equity awards if our stock price suffered an extended decline due to inappropriate or unnecessary risk taking.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   45


Tax and Accounting Considerations

In evaluating potential compensation alternatives, the Compensation Committee considers the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the Code). Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers unless, among other things, such compensation is performance-based and has been approved by stockholders. Generally, we design our executive compensation program to permit our Compensation Committee to be able to grant compensation intended to be eligible for deductibility to the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code and the relevant income tax regulations. We may from time to time, however, pay compensation to our NEOs that may not be deductible ifofficers. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award compensation that is not deductible as it believes that doing soit is in the best interests of Oracleour stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and our stockholders.retaining key executives.

Accounting considerations also play a role in the design of our executive compensation program. Accounting rules require us to expense the grant date fair values of our equity awards (that is, the value of our equity awards based on U.S. GAAP), which reduces the amount of our reported profits under U.S. GAAP. Because of this stock-based expensing and the impact of dilution to our stockholders, we closely monitor the number, share amounts and the fair values of the equity awards that are granted each year.

20162019 Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 

At our annual meeting of stockholders in November 2016,2019, we conducted our annual advisory vote on the fiscal 20162019 compensation of our NEOs (commonly known as a “say-on-pay”(a “say-on-pay” vote). The compensation of our NEOs received support from approximately 45%58% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal. Following this result, proposal, up from the prior year approval of 54%. While we were pleased to achieve these majority votes, we would like to continue to increase stockholder support for our NEO compensation. To that end, the Compensation Committee and Board have continuedcontinues to engage in substantiveregular discussions with our majorprincipal unaffiliated stockholders to better understandregarding their concerns and views on our executive compensation program.

After considering stockholder feedbackmatters and the results of our 2016 say-on-pay vote, the Compensation Committee made significant changescontinues to our fiscal 2018 executivetake such input into account in making compensation program. In fiscal 2018, in lieu of PSUs and time-based stock options, the Compensation Committee granted each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Kurian an equity award consisting entirely of Performance Options that may be earned only upon the attainment of a combination of stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals. The Compensation Committee believes the Performance Options address our stockholders’ executive compensation concerns by reducing compensation levels and better aligning pay with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Specifically:

Long-term incentive compensationdecisions (see page 36 for these NEOs is now 100% performance-based;details).

The Performance Options will be earned only if Oracle both (1) significantly grows its cloud business and (2) returns value to stockholders; and

The Performance Options will result in a decrease in equity compensation value, when their grant date fair value is annualized over the five-year performance period.

See “Significant Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback” on page 29 and “Proxy Statement Summary—Stockholder Outreach and Board Responsiveness” on page 3 for further information.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   41


Other Compensation Policies

 

Compensation Recovery (Clawback) Policy

We have adopted a clawback policy for our executive officers providing that if Oracle restates its reported financial results, we will seek to recover or cancel any cash bonuses paid that were awarded as a result of achieving financial performance goals that are not met under the restated financial results. When the SEC adopts final clawback policy rules under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we will revise our policy to comply with such rules.

Equity Awards and Grant Administration

Our Board has designated the Compensation Committee as the administrator of the 2000 Equity Plan and the Directors’ Stock Plan. The Compensation Committee, among other things, selects award recipients under the 2000 Equity Plan, approves the form of grant agreements, determines the terms and restrictions applicable to the equity awards and adopts sub-plans for particular subsidiaries or locations.

We have a policy of generally granting equity awards on pre-established dates. The Compensation Committee holds regular meetings on a scheduled date each month to consider and approve equity award grants (other than the annual grants described below), including grants to new hires and promoted employees. In accordance with the terms of the 2000 Equity Plan, the Board has delegated to an executive officer committee the authority to approve a capped number of equity award grants to certain employees. The executive officer committee cannot grant equity to non-employees or to certain executives. Equity awards approved by either the Compensation Committee or the executive officer committee during a calendar month are typically granted together on a pre-established day of the following month.

The Compensation Committee and F&A Committee also monitor the dilution and “overhang” effects of our outstanding equity awards in relation to the total number of outstanding shares of Oracle common stock. We do not grant equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information, and we do not time the release of material nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.

Because we believe equity awards are an important part of our compensation program, we also grant equity awards on an annual basis to key employees, including our executive officers. The Compensation Committee generally approves these annual equity award grants during the ten business day period following the second trading day after the announcement of our fiscal year-end earnings in an effort to make our annual grants during the time when potential material information regarding our financial performance is most likely to be available to our stockholders and the market.

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

Submitted by:

 

    Renée J. James,George H. Conrades, Chair

    Naomi O. Seligman, Vice Chair

    George H. ConradesCharles W. Moorman IV

    Leon E. Panetta

Dated: September 26, 2017

42  LOGO   201746  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Fiscal 20172020 Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table provides summary information concerning cash, equity and other compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our NEOs in fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.

 

Name and Principal Position (1)  Fiscal
Year
   Salary
($)
  Stock Awards
(2) (3) ($)
  Option Awards
(2) ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
(4) ($)
   Total
($)
  Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock Awards
(3) ($)
 Option Awards
(4) ($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 All Other
Compensation
(5) ($)
 Total
($)
 

Lawrence J. Ellison(1)

   2017   1  22,190,625  16,863,075  705,464   1,513,042    41,272,207  

 

2020

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,716,114

 

 

 

1,716,115

 

Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

   2016   1  21,870,000  18,103,275     1,545,258    41,518,534  

 

2019

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,662,827

 

 

 

1,662,828

 

   2015   1  30,352,500  31,739,400     1,547,635    63,639,536 

Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

 

2018

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,700,000

 

 

 

3,612,553

 

 

 

1,619,089

 

 

 

108,931,643

 

   2017   950,000  22,190,625  16,863,075  705,464   20,801    40,729,965  

 

2020

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,055

 

 

 

964,055

 

Chief Executive Officer

   2016   950,000  21,870,000  18,103,275     20,537    40,943,812  

 

2019

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,981

 

 

 

965,981

 

   2015   950,000  27,625,625  24,647,250     20,795    53,243,670  

 

2018

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,700,000

 

 

 

3,612,553

 

 

 

19,780

 

 

 

108,282,333

 

Mark V. Hurd(2)

   2017   950,000  22,190,625  16,863,075  705,464   123,115    40,832,279  

 

2020

 

 

356,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

370,791

 

 

 

727,444

 

Chief Executive Officer

   2016   950,000  21,870,000  18,103,275     198,621    41,121,896 

Former Chief Executive Officer

 

 

2019

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,531,646

 

 

 

2,481,646

 

   2015   950,000  27,625,625  24,647,250     22,253    53,245,128  

 

2018

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,700,000

 

 

 

3,612,553

 

 

 

32,470

 

 

 

108,295,023

 

Thomas Kurian

   2017   800,000  19,725,000  14,515,200  705,464   14,344    35,760,008 

President, Product Development

   2016   800,000  19,440,000  15,490,400     12,745    35,743,145 
   2015   800,000  20,235,000  15,571,800     12,871    36,619,671 

John F. Fowler (5)

   2017   700,000    7,396,875    5,443,200     19,294    13,559,369 

Former Executive Vice President, Systems

   2016   700,000    7,290,000    5,808,900     19,624    13,818,524 
   2015   700,000  10,117,500    7,785,900     18,898    18,622,298 

Dorian E. Daley

 

 

2020

 

 

875,000

 

 

 

 

 

9,256,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,422

 

 

 

10,139,922

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

 

2019

 

 

825,000

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

6,766,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,291

 

 

 

7,999,791

 

Jeffrey O. Henley

 

 

2020

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

 

 

5,445,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,814

 

 

 

6,103,814

 

Vice Chairman

 

 

2019

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,556,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,615

 

 

 

4,214,615

 

William Corey West

 

 

2020

 

 

530,000

 

 

 

 

 

4,900,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,442

 

 

 

5,438,942

 

Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

(1)

The titles presentedWe have included Mr. Ellison as an NEO for eachfiscal 2020 on a voluntary basis. Under applicable SEC rules, we were not required to include Mr. Ellison as an NEO are asfor fiscal 2020, but we chose to do so in the interest of the end of fiscal 2017. Mr. Fowler resigned from his position effective as of August 2, 2017.transparency.

 

(2)

Mr. Hurd passed away during fiscal 2020, on October 18, 2019.

(3)

The amounts reported do not reflect whether the NEO has actually realized or will realize an economic benefit from the awards. As required by SEC rules, the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columnsthis column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of PSUsRSUs (for Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and stock options, respectively,Mr. West) granted during the relevant fiscal years computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” on page 32 for a discussion of these awards. For information on the valuation assumptions used in our stock-based compensation computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 2017.

For information on the valuation assumptions used in our computations, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West” on page 39 for a discussion of these awards. The amounts reported do not reflect whether the NEO has actually realized or will realize an economic benefit from the awards.

 

(4)

In addition, in connection with Mr. Ellison’s change in position in fiscal 2015 from CEO to Chairman and CTO, the Compensation Committee reduced his fiscal 2015 PSU target award to 562,500 PSUs and cancelled 750,000 of the shares subject to his fiscal 2015 stock option grant. As required by SEC rules, theThe amounts reported in these columns reflect the grant date fair values of Mr. Ellison’s original fiscal 2015 PSU target award and original fiscal 2015 stock option grant, respectively. The grant date fair values of Mr. Ellison’s fiscal 2015 equity awardsnet of cancelled equity were as follows:

(a)

2015 PSU grant date fair value: $22,764,375

(b)

2015 stock option grant date fair value: $23,804,550

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   43


(3)

The grant date fair values of the PSUs were calculated assuming achievement of target levels of performance, the performance outcome judged to be probable at the time of grant. The maximum values of the fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 PSUs, assuming achievement of the highest level of performance (150% of targetthis column for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd and 110%for fiscal 2018 represent the grant date fair values of target for Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler), were:

  Name  

Maximum Value of  

2017 PSUs ($)  

  

Maximum Value of  

2016 PSUs ($)  

   

Maximum Value of  

2015 PSUs ($)  

   

  Lawrence J. Ellison

  33,285,938   32,805,000    45,528,750 (a)  

  Safra A. Catz

  33,285,938   32,805,000    41,438,438  

  Mark V. Hurd

  33,285,938   32,805,000    41,438,438  

  Thomas Kurian

  21,697,500   21,384,000    22,258,500  

  John F. Fowler

    8,136,563     8,019,000    11,129,250  

(a)

ReflectsPSOs computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718, valued based on the maximum value of Mr. Ellison’s original fiscal 2015 PSU target award, prior to the reduction of his fiscal 2015 PSU target by 187,500 PSUs. The maximum value of Mr. Ellison’s fiscal 2015 PSU awardnet of cancelled equity, assumingprobable achievement of the highest levelperformance goals at the time of grant. Assuming maximum achievement of the performance was $34,146,564.goals, the grant date fair value of the PSOs granted to each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd would be $175,150,000. The amount reported in this column for fiscal 2019 for Mr. Henley represents the grant date fair values of time-based stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

For information on the valuation assumptions used in our computations, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” beginning on page 38 and “Executive Summary—Five-Year Performance-Based Stock Options” on page 34 for a discussion of these awards. The amounts reported do not reflect whether the NEO has actually realized or will realize an economic benefit from the awards.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   47


(4)(5)

For fiscal 2017,2020, the amounts reported in this column include:

 

 (a)

Company matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan of $5,100 for each of Ms. Catz, Mr. HurdMs. Daley and Mr. Fowler. Similar to our otherHenley. Our employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Plan and we match 50% of an eligible salary deferral up to the first 6% of such deferrals, not to exceed $5,100 in a calendar year and subject to a multi-year vesting schedule.

 

 (b)

Flexible credits used toward covering the premiums for cafeteria-style benefit plans, including life insurance and long-term disability benefits, in the amount of $5,943$1,580 for Mr. Ellison, $15,500$8,613 for Ms. Catz, $14,264$1,242 for Mr. Hurd, $11,443$2,980 for Ms. Daley, $2,839 for Mr. KurianHenley and $13,993$8,100 for Mr. Fowler.West. All Oracle employees are eligible to receive flexible credits.

 

 (c)

Security-related costs and expenses of $1,503,502$1,709,456 for Mr. Ellison’s residence and $103,550$369,296 for Mr. Hurd’s residence. Pursuant to a residential security program, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Limited Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits—Residential Security” on page 36,41, our most senior executives are required to maintain home security systems. We believe these security costs and expenses are necessary and appropriate business expenses.

 

 (d)

A patent awardLegal counsel fees of $2,700 which$5,078 for Mr. Kurian received pursuant to Oracle’s employee patent award program.

(e)

Ellison, $342 for each of Ms. Catz, Ms. Daley and Mr. West, $253 for Mr. Hurd and $875 for Mr. Henley. We have hiredhire legal counsel to assist our executives with complying with reporting obligations under applicable laws in connection with their personal political campaign contributions. In fiscal 2017, Mr. Ellison received $3,597 in such services and Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd, Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler each received $201 in such services.

 

 (f)(e)

The following may be deemed to be “personal benefits” for our NEOs although we believe there was no aggregate incremental cost to us during fiscal 2017: We2020: we permit our NEOs to be accompanied by guests on private aircraft leased or owned by Oracle, which are expected to be used for business travel. This use in fiscal 20172020 did not result in a loss of a corporate income tax deduction.

 

(5)

Upon his resignation, Mr. Fowler forfeited his outstanding unvested stock options and his outstanding unearned and unvested PSUs. Because Mr. Fowler resigned prior to the payment of fiscal 2017 bonuses under the Executive Bonus Plan, he did not receive a bonus for fiscal 2017.

44  LOGO   201748  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 20172020

 

The following table shows equity and non-equity awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2017.2020. The equity awards identified in the table below are also reported in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2017 2020 Year-End table.

 

       Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
      

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under

    Equity Incentive Plan Awards    

  

All Other Option

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(3) (#)

  Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  

Grant Date  
Fair Value  
of Stock   

and Option  
Awards  
(4) ($)  

          

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

   

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
or Units

(2) (#)

   

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards

($)

 
Name 

Grant

Date

 Award Type Threshold
($)
 Target
(1) ($)
 Maximum
(1) ($)
   Threshold
(#)
 Target
(2) (#)
 Maximum
(2) (#)
   

Grant

Date

   Award Type  Threshold
($)
   Target
(1) ($)
   Maximum
(1) ($)
 

Lawrence J. Ellison

  6/30/2016  PSUs             562,500   843,750       22,190,625       

Cash Bonus

  

 

 

  

 

820,586

 

  

 

1,641,172

 

    

Safra A. Catz

    

Cash Bonus

  

 

 

  

 

820,586

 

  

 

1,641,172

 

    

Mark V. Hurd

    

Cash Bonus

  

 

 

  

 

820,586

 

  

 

1,641,172

 

    

Dorian E. Daley

  

 

6/27/2019

 

  

RSUs

        

 

170,000

 

  

 

9,256,500

 

Jeffrey O. Henley

  

 

6/27/2019

 

  

RSUs

        

 

100,000

 

  

 

5,445,000

 

  6/30/2016  Options         2,250,000   40.93   16,863,075       

Cash Bonus

  

 

 

  

 

82,059

 

  

 

164,117

 

    
  Cash Bonus    $1,710,000  $3,420,000        

Safra A. Catz

  6/30/2016  PSUs         562,500   843,750     22,190,625   
  6/30/2016  Options         2,250,000   40.93   16,863,075   
  Cash Bonus    $1,710,000  $3,420,000        

Mark V. Hurd

  6/30/2016  PSUs         562,500   843,750     22,190,625   
  6/30/2016  Options         2,250,000   40.93   16,863,075   
  Cash Bonus    $1,710,000  $3,420,000        

Thomas Kurian

  6/30/2016  PSUs         500,000   550,000     19,725,000   
  6/30/2016  Options         2,000,000   40.93   14,515,200   
  Cash Bonus    $1,710,000  $3,420,000        

John F. Fowler (5)

  6/30/2016  PSUs         187,500   206,250     7,396,875   
  6/30/2016  Options         750,000   40.93   5,443,200   
   Cash Bonus    $73,000  $3,420,000               

William Corey West

  

 

6/27/2019

 

  

RSUs

           

 

90,000

 

  

 

4,900,500

 

 

(1)

The target and maximum plan award amounts reported in these columns are derived fromdetermined based on our internal profitability expectations for the fiscal year multiplied by the individual’s bonus percentage under the Executive Bonus Plan for fiscal 2017.Plan. The maximum plan award amounts are equal to 200% of the applicable target. The actual payout amountsamount for fiscal 20172020 under the Executive Bonus Plan arewas $0 for each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Henley, as reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan CompensationCompensation” column of the Summary Compensation TableSCT above.

(2)

The PSUs reported in these columns were granted under our 2000 Equity Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation”Annual Cash Bonuses” beginning on page 3239 for a discussion of the material features of these awards.our Executive Bonus Plan for fiscal 2020.

 

(3)(2)

The stock optionsRSUs reported in this column were granted under our 2000 Equity Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation”The RSUs vest 25% per year over four years on page 32 for a discussionthe anniversary of the material featuresdate of these awards.

(4)

The amounts reported do not reflect whether the NEO has actually realized or will realize an economic benefit from the awards. As required by SEC rules, the amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of the PSUs (at target) and stock options granted during fiscal 2017 computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. For information on the valuation assumptions used in our stock-based compensation computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.

(5)

Upon his resignation, Mr. Fowler forfeited his outstanding unvested stock options and his outstanding unearned and unvested PSUs.grant.

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   45LOGO   49


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2017 2020 Year-End

 

The following table provides information on the outstanding PSOs, PSUs, RSUs and time-based stock options and PSUs held by our NEOs as of May 31, 2017.2020.

 

         Option Awards (1)       Stock Awards 
   Name  

Grant

Date

   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
   Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
       Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(2) (#)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(4) ($)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(3) (#)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(4) ($)
 

   Lawrence J. Ellison

   6/30/2016    0    2,250,000   40.93   6/30/2021     105,468    4,787,193    421,875    19,148,906 
   7/2/2015    562,500    1,687,500   40.36   7/2/2020     70,312    3,191,462    281,250    12,765,938 
   7/24/2014    1,125,000    1,125,000   40.47   7/24/2024     70,312    3,191,462    140,625    6,382,969 
   7/1/2013    5,250,000    1,750,000   30.11   7/1/2023          
   7/5/2012    7,000,000    0   29.72   7/5/2022          
   6/29/2011    7,000,000    0   32.43   6/29/2021          
   7/1/2010    7,000,000    0   21.55   7/1/2020          
   7/2/2009    7,000,000    0   21.04   7/2/2019          
   7/3/2008    7,000,000    0   20.73   7/3/2018          

   Safra A. Catz

   6/30/2016    0    2,250,000   40.93   6/30/2021     105,468    4,787,193    421,875    19,148,906 
   7/2/2015    562,500    1,687,500   40.36   7/2/2020     70,312    3,191,462    281,250    12,765,938 
   10/5/2014    250,000    250,000   38.89   10/5/2024     15,625    709,219    31,250    1,418,438 
   7/24/2014    1,125,000    1,125,000   40.47   7/24/2024     70,312    3,191,462    140,625    6,382,969 
   7/1/2013    3,750,000    1,250,000   30.11   7/1/2023          
   7/5/2012    5,000,000    0   29.72   7/5/2022          
   6/29/2011    5,000,000    0   32.43   6/29/2021          
   7/1/2010    5,000,000    0   21.55   7/1/2020          
   7/2/2009    5,000,000    0   21.04   7/2/2019          

   Mark V. Hurd

   6/30/2016    0    2,250,000   40.93   6/30/2021     105,468    4,787,193    421,875    19,148,906 
   7/2/2015    562,500    1,687,500   40.36   7/2/2020     70,312    3,191,462    281,250    12,765,938 
   10/5/2014    250,000    250,000   38.89   10/5/2024     15,625    709,219    31,250    1,418,438 
   7/24/2014    1,125,000    1,125,000   40.47   7/24/2024     70,312    3,191,462    140,625    6,382,969 
   7/1/2013    3,750,000    1,250,000   30.11   7/1/2023          
   7/5/2012    5,000,000    0   29.72   7/5/2022          
   6/29/2011    5,000,000    0   32.43   6/29/2021          
   9/8/2010    2,350,000    0   24.14   9/8/2020          

   Thomas Kurian

   6/30/2016    0    2,000,000   40.93   6/30/2026     137,500    6,241,125    412,500    18,723,375 
   7/2/2015    500,000    1,500,000   40.36   7/2/2025     137,500    6,241,125    275,000    12,482,250 
   7/24/2014    1,000,000    1,000,000   40.47   7/24/2024     137,500    6,241,125    137,500    6,241,125 
   7/1/2013    1,895,700    1,000,000   30.11   7/1/2023          
   7/5/2012    2,500,000    0   29.72   7/5/2022          
   7/1/2010    2,950,000    0   21.55   7/1/2020          

   John F. Fowler (5)

   6/30/2016    0    750,000   40.93   6/30/2026     23,437    1,063,805    140,625    6,382,969 
   7/2/2015    187,500    562,500   40.36   7/2/2025     23,437    1,063,805    93,750    4,255,313 
   7/24/2014    500,000    500,000   40.47   7/24/2024     31,250    1,418,438    62,500    2,836,875 
   7/1/2013    1,500,000    500,000   30.11   7/1/2023          
   7/5/2012    2,000,000    0   29.72   7/5/2022          
   6/29/2011    1,250,000    0   32.43   6/29/2021          
    7/31/2007    40,895    0   53.01   7/30/2017                         
           Option Awards (2)      Stock Awards (2) 
  Name 

Grant

Date

      Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  

Equity

Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(3) (#)

  

Option
Exercise

Price
($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
      Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(4) (#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(5) ($)
  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested

(6) (#)

  

Equity
Incentive

Plan

Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested

(5) ($)

 

  Lawrence J.

 

 

7/20/2017

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,500,000

 

 

 

51.13

 

 

 

7/20/2025

 

     

  Ellison

 

 

6/30/2016

 

  

 

1,687,500

 

 

 

562,500

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.93

 

 

 

6/30/2021

 

    

 

140,624

 

 

 

7,561,353

 

 

 

7/2/2015

 

  

 

2,250,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.36

 

 

 

7/2/2020

 

     
 

 

7/24/2014

 

  

 

2,250,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.47

 

 

 

7/24/2024

 

     
 

 

7/1/2013

 

  

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30.11

 

 

 

7/1/2023

 

     
 

 

7/5/2012

 

  

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

29.72

 

 

 

7/5/2022

 

     
 

 

6/29/2011

 

  

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

32.43

 

 

 

6/29/2021

 

     
 

 

7/1/2010

 

  

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

21.55

 

 

 

7/1/2020

 

     

  Safra A. Catz

 

 

7/20/2017

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,500,000

 

 

 

51.13

 

 

 

7/20/2025

 

     
 

 

6/30/2016

 

  

 

1,687,500

 

 

 

562,500

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.93

 

 

 

6/30/2021

 

    

 

140,624

 

 

 

7,561,353

 

 

 

10/5/2014

 

  

 

500,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

38.89

 

 

 

10/5/2024

 

     
 

 

7/24/2014

 

  

 

2,250,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.47

 

 

 

7/24/2024

 

     
 

 

7/1/2013

 

  

 

5,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30.11

 

 

 

7/1/2023

 

     
 

 

7/5/2012

 

  

 

5,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

29.72

 

 

 

7/5/2022

 

     
 

 

6/29/2011

 

  

 

5,000,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

32.43

 

 

 

6/29/2021

 

     

  Mark V. Hurd (1)

 

 

7/20/2017

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,500,000

 

 

 

51.13

 

 

 

7/20/2025

 

     
 

 

7/5/2012

 

  

 

2,733,083

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

29.72

 

 

 

10/18/2020

 

     
 

 

9/8/2010

 

  

 

200,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

24.14

 

 

 

9/8/2020

 

     

  Dorian E. Daley

 

 

6/27/2019

 

        

 

170,000

 

 

 

9,140,900

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6/27/2018

 

        

 

121,875

 

 

 

6,553,219

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

7/10/2017

 

        

 

81,250

 

 

 

4,368,813

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6/30/2016

 

  

 

243,750

 

 

 

81,250

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.93

 

 

 

6/30/2026

 

  

 

20,313

 

 

 

1,092,230

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

7/2/2015

 

  

 

325,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.36

 

 

 

7/2/2025

 

     
 

 

7/24/2014

 

  

 

112,500

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.47

 

 

 

7/24/2024

 

     

  Jeffrey O.

 

 

6/27/2019

 

        

 

100,000

 

 

 

5,377,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

  Henley

 

 

6/27/2018

 

  

 

100,000

 

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

43.45

 

 

 

6/27/2028

 

     
 

 

7/10/2017

 

  

 

200,000

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

49.62

 

 

 

7/10/2027

 

     
 

 

6/30/2016

 

  

 

300,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.93

 

 

 

6/30/2026

 

     
 

 

7/2/2015

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.36

 

 

 

7/2/2025

 

     
 

 

7/24/2014

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

40.47

 

 

 

7/24/2024

 

     
 

 

7/1/2013

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30.11

 

 

 

7/1/2023

 

     
 

 

7/5/2012

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

29.72

 

 

 

7/5/2022

 

     
 

 

6/29/2011

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

32.43

 

 

 

6/29/2021

 

     
 

 

7/1/2010

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

21.55

 

 

 

7/1/2020

 

     

  William Corey

 

 

6/27/2019

 

        

 

90,000

 

 

 

4,839,300

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

  West

 

 

6/27/2018

 

        

 

55,313

 

 

 

2,974,180

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

7/10/2017

 

        

 

35,625

 

 

 

1,915,556

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6/30/2016

 

        

 

15,625

 

 

 

840,156

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

7/1/2013

 

  

 

200,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30.11

 

 

 

7/1/2023

 

     
  

 

7/5/2012

 

     

 

200,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

29.72

 

 

 

7/5/2022

 

                    

 

(1)

AllMr. Hurd’s vested equity awards transferred to his estate upon his death. For Mr. Hurd’s unvested equity: (a) in accordance with the 2000 Equity Plan (and consistent with how equity is treated for all Oracle employees at death), the last remaining tranche of Mr. Hurd’s unvested stock options was accelerated resulting in 562,500 stock options vesting (please see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for more

50  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


information); (b) in accordance with the PSU grant agreement, all of Mr. Hurd’s unvested PSUs were forfeited upon his death on October 18, 2019; and (c) in accordance with his PSO grant agreement, his unvested PSOs were subject to the same vesting terms through the next vesting measurement date following his death. On August 4, 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that no performance measures had been achieved and Mr. Hurd’s PSOs were cancelled as of that date.

(2)

All time-based stock options and RSUs vest or vested 25% per year over four years on each anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the applicable NEO’s service through the applicable vesting dates, except that the stock option of Mr. Fowler granted in 2007 was granted originally by Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Sun). This stock option was assumed by Oracle upon its acquisition of Sun and it vested 20% per year over five years on each anniversary date of the grant, subject to Mr. Fowler’s service through the applicable vesting dates.

46  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(2)

Reflects the number of 2017 PSUs, 2016 PSUs and 2015 PSUs earned for the performance period that ended on May 31, 2017. This earned portion of the first tranche of the 2017 PSUs, the second tranche of the 2016 PSUs and the third tranche of the 2015 PSUs vested on August 1, 2017, when the Compensation Committee certified the performance results.grant.

 

(3)

For Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. HurdThe amounts in this column reflect unearned and Mr. Fowler, reflects thetarget number of 2017 PSUs, 2016 PSUs and 2015 PSUsunvested PSOs. The PSOs are divided into seven equal tranches that have not yet beenare eligible to be earned or vested because the targets of such awards were not exceeded in fiscal 2017. For Mr. Kurian, reflects themaximum number of 2017 PSUs, 2016 PSUs and 2015 PSUs that have not yet been earned or vested because the targets of such awards were exceeded in fiscal 2017. Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd may earn from 0% to 150% of the target number of shares over a four-year period based on Oracle’s financial performance relative to the performance of the PSU Comparator Companies. Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler may earn from 0% to 110% of the target number of shares over a four-year period based on the growth in revenueattainment of certain strategic linesstock price, market capitalization and operational goals within five fiscal years of business they oversee.the date of grant. Mr. Hurd’s PSOs were forfeited on August 4, 2020, when the Compensation Committee certified that no performance conditions were met for the PSO performance period ending May 31, 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” on page 38 and “Executive Summary—Five-Year Performance-Based Stock Options” on page 34 for a discussion of the material features of these awards, including the vesting criteria.

 

(4)

For Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West, this column reflects unvested RSUs, which vest in equal annual installments over four years. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West” on page 39 for a discussion of the material features of these awards, including the vesting criteria.

(5)

Value calculated using the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 31, 201729, 2020 ($45.3953.77 per share).

 

(5)(6)

Upon his resignation,For Mr. FowlerEllison and Ms. Catz, this column reflects the target number of unearned 2017 PSUs, which did not vest and were forfeited his outstanding unvested stock optionson August 4, 2020, when the Compensation Committee certified that no performance conditions were met for the 2017 PSU performance period ending May 31, 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and his outstanding unearned and unvested PSUs.Analysis—Elements of Our Compensation Program—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” on page 38 for a discussion of the material features of these awards, including the vesting criteria.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 20172020

 

The following table provides information on our NEOs’ exercise of stock options and the vesting of our NEOs’ PSUs or RSUs, as applicable, during fiscal 2017.2020.

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards Option Awards     Stock Awards
Name  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
  Value Realized on Exercise
(1) ($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
  Value Realized on Vesting
(2) ($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (1) (#)
 Value Realized on Exercise
(1) (2) ($)
    Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
 

Value Realized on Vesting 

(3) ($) 

Lawrence J. Ellison

  7,000,000  140,944,500  281,248  11,514,293 

 

  

374,622

 

21,091,219

Safra A. Catz

  5,000,000  121,363,380  312,498  12,793,668 

2,250,000

 

27,158,350

  

374,622

 

21,091,219

Mark V. Hurd

  1,050,000    22,859,130  312,498  12,793,668 

  400,000

 

 11,961,260

  

374,622

 

21,091,219

Thomas Kurian

      275,000       11,258,500 (3)

John F. Fowler

     750,000      7,427,830    54,687         2,238,886 (3)

Dorian E. Daley

 

  200,000

 

  3,902,510

  

 121,875

 

7,058,594

Jeffrey O. Henley

 

 

  

 

William Corey West

 

  150,000

 

  3,748,180

   

  67,500

 

 3,902,858

 

(1)

The amounts included in these columns for Mr. Hurd represent stock options that were exercised by Mr. Hurd prior to his death. Following Mr. Hurd’s death, his estate exercised time-based stock options covering an aggregate of 19,716,917 shares prior to the end of fiscal 2020, which are not included in this table.

(2)

The value realized on exercise is calculated as the difference between the market price of Oracle common stock at the time of exercise and the applicable exercise price of the stock options multiplied by the number of exercised shares. The value realized on exercise is not necessarily indicative of value actually received by the NEO, as the NEO may choose to hold (rather than sell) some or all of the shares acquired upon the exercise of options.

 

(2)(3)

The value realized on vesting equals the closing market price of Oracle common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of vested shares.

(3)

Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler deferred receipt of their earned and vested 2015 PSU awards, and Mr. Kurian deferred receipt of his earned and vested 2016 PSU awards, under the RSU Deferred Compensation Plan. The actual value of the PSUs realized upon settlement may be different than the value reflected in this table. The value of the deferred PSUs realized on vesting is also reflected innot necessarily indicative of value actually received by the “Executive Contributions in FY 2017” columnNEO, as the NEO may choose to hold (rather than sell) some or all of the Fiscal 2017 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table below.shares acquired upon vesting.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   51


Fiscal 2017 2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 

Employees (including eligible NEOs) earning an annual base salary of $215,000 or moreOur NEOs and certain other highly compensated employees are eligible to enroll in our Cash Deferred Compensation Plan and RSU Deferred Compensation Plan.

Cash Deferred Compensation Plan

Under the Cash Deferred Compensation Plan, employees may elect to defer annually the receipt of a portion of their compensation and thereby defer taxation of these deferred amounts until actual payment of the deferred amounts in future years. Participants may elect to defer base salary, bonus and commissions earned during a given year. The maximum amount of compensation permitted to be deferred is the amount remaining after all deductions for other benefits and taxes are first deducted from the gross payment. Participants may defer payment until age 59 1/2 or until termination of employment, subject to earlier payment in the event of a change in control of Oracle or death. Distributions may be made, at the participant’s option, in a lump sum payment or in installments over a period of five or ten years.

Participants may receive market returns on their deferred compensation amounts based on the performance of a variety of mutual fund-type investments selected by them. Almost all of the investment options in our Cash Deferred Compensation Plan are identical, subject to certain asset class variations, to the investment options in our 401(k) Plan.

RSU Deferred Compensation Plan

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   47


Under the RSU Deferred Compensation Plan, employees may elect to defer the receipt of either 0% or 100% of their earned and vested RSUs and PSUs and thereby defer taxation of the awards. Participants may elect to defer receipt for five or ten years from the grant date of the award, or until termination of employment, subject to earlier payment in the event of death and certain other circumstances. Distributions may be made, at the participant’s option, in a lump sum payment or in installments over a period of five or ten years. Dividend equivalents are credited to participants’ accounts after deferred RSUs and PSUs have vested.

The table below provides information on the non-qualified deferred compensation of our NEOs in fiscal 2017.2020. None of the NEOs participate in the RSU Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

Name  Executive
Contributions in
FY 2017 ($)
   Registrant
Contributions in
FY 2017 ($)
  

Aggregate

Earnings

in FY 2017 (3) ($)

   Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions ($)
  Aggregate
Balance at
FY 2017-end ($)
   Executive
Contributions in
FY 2020 ($)
  Registrant
Contributions in
FY 2020 ($)
  

Aggregate

Earnings

in FY 2020 ($)

  Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions ($)
  Aggregate
Balance at
FY 2020-end ($)

Lawrence J. Ellison (1)

         3,619,232      22,530,428 

Lawrence J. Ellison

Cash Deferred Compensation (1)

      4,276,765    30,215,986

Safra A. Catz

                  

  

  

  

  

Mark V. Hurd

                  

  

  

  

  

Thomas Kurian (2)

   11,319,000      2,133,475      19,045,869 

John F. Fowler (2)

   1,286,250      335,740      2,893,216 

Dorian E. Daley

  

  

  

  

  

Jeffrey O. Henley

Cash Deferred Compensation (2)

  

312,000

  

  

  498,441

  

  

  3,030,748

William Corey West

  

  

  

  

  

 

(1)

Mr. Ellison is not currently eligible to participate in the Cash Deferred Compensation Plan or the RSU Deferred Compensation Plan because his base salary is $1. Amounts shown for Mr. Ellison relate to contributions made when he was eligible to participate in the Cash Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

(2)

ReflectsMr. Henley participates in the value of earned and vested 2015 PSU awards Mr. Kurian and Mr. Fowler deferred, and earned and vested 2016 PSU awards Mr. Kurian deferred, under the RSUCash Deferred Compensation Plan. All contributionsThe amount shown are attributable toin the value“Executive Contributions in FY 2020” column represents a portion of the deferred PSUs realized on vestingbase salary reported for Mr. Henley in the SCT for fiscal 2017. All2020. The amount shown in the “Aggregate Earnings in FY 2020” column is not included in the SCT for fiscal 2020 because such earnings were not preferential or above-market. The amount shown are attributable to credited dividend equivalents and an increase or decrease in our stock price as measured on May 31, 2017. No amounts shown werethe “Aggregate Balance at FY 2020-end” column for Mr. Henley includes $564,879 reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensationSCT for fiscal 2017. The grant date fair values of the NEOs’ 2015 PSUs and the 2016 PSUs were previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016.2019.

 

(3)

None of the earnings in this column are included in the Summary Compensation Table because such earnings are not preferential or above market.

52  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

Typically, we have entered into an employment offer letter with each of our NEOs upon hire that provides the executive is employed “at will.” None of these employment offer letters with our NEOs provide for payments or benefits upon a termination of employment or in connection with a change in control of Oracle. Only our broad-based equity plan and the Performance OptionsPSOs provide for payments upon on a termination of employment or a change in control, as described below.

No “Single-Trigger” Change in Control Benefits Under Our Equity Plan and Equity Awards

Under the 2000 Equity Plan, the vesting of all outstanding equity awards (includingPSUs, RSUs and time-based stock options, PSUs and RSUs), including those held by our NEOs, will accelerate only if both of the following events occur:

 

Oracle is acquired; and

 

either the equity awards are not assumed, or the equity awards are assumed and the recipient’s employment is terminated without cause within 12 months following the acquisition.

48  LOGO   2017 Annual MeetingPursuant to the terms of Stockholdersthe PSO grant agreements, in the event of a change in control, any unvested tranches subject to market capitalization goals and operational goals will be earned to the extent any unmatched market capitalization goals have been met on or before the trading date immediately prior to the change in control. The unvested tranche subject to the stock price goal will only be earned if the stock price goal is achieved prior to the change in control.


The following table provides information on the intrinsic value as of May 31, 2017, the final29, 2020 (the last trading day ofduring our fiscal 2017,year) of the unearned PSUs, unvested “in-the-money”RSUs and “in-the-money” time-based stock options and unearned PSUs held by our NEOs whichthat would accelerate under the circumstances described in the preceding paragraph.paragraphs. The intrinsic values of the unearned PSUs and the unvested RSUs were calculated by multiplying the target number of unearned PSUs or unvested RSUs, as applicable, by the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 29, 2020 ($53.77 per share). The intrinsic value of the stock options werewas calculated asby multiplying the number of unvested shares multiplied by the spread, i.e., the amount by which the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 31, 2017 ($45.39 per share)29, 2020 exceeded the exercise price of the related stock option. The table excludes the intrinsic valuesvalue of the PSUs were calculatedunearned PSOs as none of the target numberPSOs would have been earned under the circumstances described in the preceding paragraphs based on performance through the end of PSUs granted multiplied by the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 31, 2017.fiscal 2020.

 

   Name  

Intrinsic Value of Unvested  

Equity Awards ($)  

  Lawrence J. Ellison

  108,244,844  

14,783,853

  Safra A. Catz

  105,066,719  

14,783,853

  Mark V. HurdDorian E. Daley

  105,066,719  

22,198,412

  Thomas KurianJeffrey O. Henley

    87,728,750  

10,587,000

  John F. Fowler (1)William Corey West

    36,841,719  

10,569,192

Death Benefits

If any employee of Oracle dies while employed by Oracle, the 2000 Equity Plan provides for two additional tranches of vesting of his or her time-based stock options (if any) upon his or her death. Oracle’s standard form of RSU grant agreement provides for one additional tranche of vesting of RSUs for all grantees, including executives. Pursuant to the terms of the PSO grant agreements, upon the applicable NEO’s death, his or her unvested PSOs are subject to the same vesting terms through the next vesting measurement date following his or her death. Pursuant to the terms of the PSU grant agreements, upon death all PSUs are forfeited.

The following table provides the intrinsic value as of May 29, 2020 (the last trading day during our fiscal year) of unvested RSUs and “in-the-money” time-based stock options held by our NEOs that would accelerate on death. The intrinsic values of the unvested RSUs were calculated by multiplying the accelerated RSUs by the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 29, 2020 ($53.77 per share). The intrinsic value of the stock options was calculated by multiplying the number of accelerated shares by the amount by which the closing market price of Oracle common stock on May 29, 2020 exceeded the exercise price of the related option. The table excludes (1) the unvested PSUs because they terminate at death, and (2) the intrinsic value of the unearned PSOs as none of the PSOs would have

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   53


been earned under the circumstances described in the preceding paragraphs based on performance through the end of fiscal 2020.

 

(1)
   Name

Upon his resignation, Mr. Fowler forfeited his outstanding unvested stock options and his outstanding unearned and unvested PSUs.Intrinsic Value of Unvested  

Equity Awards ($)  

  Lawrence J. Ellison

7,222,500

  Safra A. Catz

7,222,500

  Dorian E. Daley

8,789,491

  Jeffrey O. Henley

5,522,250

  William Corey West

3,999,144

See “Fiscal 2018 Performance-Based Stock Options”Mr. Hurd’s Death Benefits

Mr. Hurd’s vested equity awards transferred to his estate upon his death. For Mr. Hurd’s unvested equity: (a) in accordance with the 2000 Equity Plan (and consistent with how equity is treated for all Oracle employees at death), the last remaining tranche of Mr. Hurd’s unvested stock options was accelerated resulting in 562,500 stock options vesting, which resulted in $7,661,250 in intrinsic value being realized; (b) in accordance with the PSU grant agreement, all of Mr. Hurd’s unvested PSUs were forfeited upon his death on pages 29October 18, 2019; and (c) in accordance with his PSO grant agreement, his unvested PSOs were subject to 30 for a descriptionthe same vesting terms through the next vesting measurement date following his death. On August 4, 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that no performance measures had been achieved and Mr. Hurd’s PSOs were cancelled as of that date. The intrinsic value of Mr. Hurd’s stock options that vested was calculated by multiplying the number of vested shares by the amount by which the closing market price of Oracle common stock on October 18, 2019 exceeded the exercise price of the treatment of the fiscal 2018 Performance Options in the event of a change in control.related option.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information regarding our equity compensation plans as of May 31, 20172020 (shares in millions).

 

Name  Number of
Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (#)
 

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights ($)

 Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (#) (1)
Plan Category Number of
Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (#)
 

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights ($)

 Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (#) (1)

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

  381 24.95 270 (2) 276  24.73 257 (2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

          14 (3) 10.89 —                 1 (3)  21.59 —    

Total

        395 (4)       24.44 (4) 270            277 (4)        24.71 (4) 257    

 

(1)

Excludes the shares listed under the column heading “Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights.”

 

(2)

Includes approximately 217212 million shares available for future issuance under the 2000 Equity Plan, approximately 21 million shares available for future issuance under the Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan, and approximately 5144 million shares available for future issuance under the ESPP, including the shares subject to purchase during the offering period, which commenced on April 1, 20172020 (the exact number of which will not be known until September 30, 2020, the purchase date on September 29, 2017)end of the offering period). Under the 2000 Equity Plan, each share issued pursuant to an option reduces the number of shares available for future issuance by one share, and each share issued pursuant to full-value awards (including RSUs and PSUs) reduces the number of shares available for future issuance by 2.5 shares.

 

(3)

Includes stock options and RSUs that were assumed in connection with our acquisitions. No additional awards were or can be granted under the plans pursuant to which these awards were originally issued.

 

(4)

Of the approximately 395277 million shares to be issued, approximately 312176 million reflect shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options (including PSOs) with a weighted average exercise price of $30.91$38.86 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.993.54 years. The remaining portion represents RSUs and PSUs, which have no purchase price. PSOs and PSUs are reflected at target.

 

201754  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   49


CEO PAY RATIO

In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee (the median employee).

For fiscal 2020, our ratio of CEO to median employee annual total compensation is 11 to 1. The fiscal 2020 total compensation of Ms. Catz was $964,055. The fiscal 2020 total compensation of our median employee was $87,402.

To identify our median compensated employee, we used the base salaries of our May 31, 2020 employee population (other than our CEO) and the currency exchange rates then in effect, annualized for all permanent employees who did not work for the entire year. As of May 31, 2020, we had 136,177 employees, of which 129,381 were considered in identifying the median employee after excluding less than 5% of our total employees from the following jurisdictions (in accordance with SEC rules): Argentina (647), Colombia (874), Egypt (454), Hungary (434), Indonesia (145), Kazakhstan (14), Malaysia (564), Philippines (2,676), Pakistan (73), Russia (387), Sri Lanka (26), Ukraine (432) and Vietnam (70).

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

 

From time to time, we enter into transactions with entities in which an executive officer, director, 5% or more beneficial owner of our common stock or an immediate family member of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. As set forth in its charter, the Independence Committee reviews and approves each related person transaction or series of similar transactions exceeding $120,000, including material amendments thereto.

Prior to approving any transaction, the Independence Committee must be informed or have knowledge of:

 

the related person’s relationship or interest; and

 

the material facts of the proposed transaction, and any material amendments thereto.

The proposed transaction, and any material amendments thereto, must be on terms that, when taken as a whole, are fair to Oracle.

We annually survey our non-employee directors and executive officers to identify any entities they are affiliated with that may enter into a transaction with Oracle that wouldmay require disclosure as a related person transaction. We prepare a list of related person entities, which we post internally for reference by our sales force and our purchasing groups. On a quarterly basis, we also review and update this list with Mr. Ellison’s advisors, as almost allmany of the entities on this list are direct or indirect investments of Mr. Ellison. Potential transactions are compared against this list by management to determine if they require review and approval by the Independence Committee. With respect to sales of products and services, we also compare transactions posted to our general ledger against this list to determine if any related person transactions occurred without pre-approval and the reason pre-approval was not obtained, whether inadvertent or otherwise.

For sales of products and services to be approved by the Independence Committee, we provide the Independence Committee with data indicating that the proposed discounts and terms are consistent with the discounts and terms provided to unrelated customers. For purchases, we provide the Independence Committee with data points showing that the rates or prices are comparable to the rates or prices we could have obtained from an unrelated vendor or are consistent with pricing the vendor uses with other unrelated parties.

Mr. Ellison has entered into a written price protection agreement with us that applies to any related person transaction involving a purchase of goods or services from an entity in which Mr. Ellison has a direct or indirect material interest and with which we enter into a transaction while Mr. Ellison is one of our executive officers or Chairman of ourthe Board. Under this agreement, if we present Mr. Ellison with reasonable evidence of a lower price or rate for the same goods or services offered by the related company, which would have been available to us at the time we entered into the applicable transaction, then Mr. Ellison will reimburse us for the difference. This agreement expires three years after the date on which Mr. Ellison is neither an executive officer of Oracle nor Chairman. The Independence Committee may approve certain other transactions where it can conclude that such transactions are otherwise on terms that are fair to us.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   55


The Independence Committee also reviews and monitors ongoing relationships with related persons to ensure they continue to be on terms that are fair to us. On an annual basis, the Independence Committee receives a summary of all transactions with related persons, including transactions that did not require approval. Total related person transaction revenues were 0.02%less than 0.01% of our total revenues and total related partyperson operating expenses were 0.01%approximately 0.1% of our total operating expenses in fiscal 2017.2020.

Sales of Products and Services

In the ordinary course of our business, we sell products and services to companies in which Mr. Ellison or a member of his immediate family directly or indirectly has or had a controllingmaterial interest. In fiscal 2017,2020, the total amount of all purchases by these companies was approximately $1.3 million. Below we describe$900,000. Listed below are our transactions with such companies that purchased more than $120,000 in products and services from us in fiscal 2017.2020.

 

NetSuite Inc. – In fiscal 2017, prior to the completion of our acquisition of NetSuite Inc. (NetSuite), NetSuite purchased approximately $1.1 million in cloud SaaS and PaaS products, support and other services from us. Information regarding Mr. Ellison’s ownership interest in NetSuite appears in “Acquisition of NetSuite Inc.” below.

In addition, in fiscal 2017, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (Cypress)Annapurna Releasing LLC purchased approximately $5.5 million$415,000 in cloud SaaS PaaS and IaaS products, support and services from us. Our former director, Ray Bingham, was appointed Executive Chairman of Cypress in August 2016.products.

 

50  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of StockholdersLanai Resorts LLC purchased approximately $246,000 in hardware, cloud SaaS products, software licenses and support.


The Ronin Project, Inc. purchased approximately $125,000 in cloud IaaS and PaaS products.

Purchases of GoodsProducts and Services

From time to time, we purchase goodsproducts and services from companies in which Mr. Ellison or a member of his immediate family directly or indirectly has a controllingmaterial interest. In fiscal 2017,2020, the total amount of all purchases from these companies was approximately $1.3$1.8 million. Below we describeListed below are our transactions with such companies from which we purchased more than $120,000 in goodsproducts and services in fiscal 2017.2020.

 

Desert Champions, LLC – In fiscal 2017, we paid Desert Champions, LLC, a company wholly owned by Mr. Ellison, $1.2

Oracle paid Desert Champions, LLC approximately $1.1 million in management fees, tickets, merchandise, advertising and other marketing-related costs in connection with the 2016 and 2017 BNP Paribas Open tennis tournament and BNP Paribas Collegiate Tennis Challenge Presented by Oracle.

Acquisition of NetSuite Inc.

On November 7, 2016, we completed our acquisition of NetSuite, a provider of cloud-based enterprise resource planning software and related applications. The total preliminary purchase price for NetSuite was approximately $9.1 billion. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2017 for additional information on the preliminary NetSuite purchase price.

Mr. Ellison was an affiliate of NetSuite’s largest stockholder, NetSuite Restricted Holdings LLC (a single member LLC investment entity whose interests are beneficially owned by a trust controlled by Mr. Ellison), which owned approximately 40% of the issued and outstanding NetSuite Shares. Mr. Ellison’s children, David and Margaret Ellison, owned approximately 7% of the issued and outstanding NetSuite Shares directly and indirectly by trust. Our Board appointed a Special Committee (comprised solely of directors who are independent of the management of Oracle, Mr. Ellison, his family members and any affiliated entities, and NetSuite) to which it delegated the full and exclusive power, authority and discretion of the Board to evaluate, assess and approve the NetSuite transaction on its behalf. The Special Committee engaged its own independent legal counsel and its own independent financial advisor to advise it on the transaction. The financial advisor provided the Special Committee with a fairness opinion in connection with tennis tournaments sponsored by Oracle.

Oracle paid F50 League LLC $470,000 for tickets to SailGP sailing tournament races used for marketing purposes.

Oracle leased aircraft for executive business travel from a Wing and a Prayer, LLC for approximately $254,000.

Transactions with F50 League LLC

In fiscal 2020, Oracle entered into an agreement providing for an in-kind exchange with the transaction. After extensive deliberations,SailGP sailing league (operated by Mr. Ellison’s company F50 League LLC) with the Special Committee concluded thatfollowing terms: Oracle received a SailGP sponsorship package, including branding rights and customer hospitality experiences, valued at approximately $3.3 million; and SailGP received Oracle products, services and office space valued at approximately $1.6 million.

Transactions with Universal Tennis LLC

In fiscal 2020, Oracle paid Universal Tennis LLC, a tennis ranking company in which Mark Hurd was an investor, $625,000 in accordance with a sponsorship agreement. Under the transaction terms were fairsponsorship agreement, Oracle also provided Universal Tennis LLC with Oracle software valued at approximately $20,000.

Transactions with Ampere Computing LLC

In fiscal 2020, Oracle paid Ampere Computing LLC (Ampere) approximately $445,000 for hardware used for development and testing purposes and placed a $25 million pre-payment order for Ampere processors. Renée J. James, an Oracle director, is the Chairman and CEO of Ampere, a developer of high-performance semiconductors for hyperscale cloud, storage, and edge computing. Oracle has appointed one director to Ampere’s board. Oracle andholds less than 20% of the transaction was in the best interestsoutstanding equity of Oracle and its stockholders. The Special Committee unanimously approved the transaction on behalf of Oracle and the Board. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017 for additional information on our acquisition of NetSuite.Ampere.

Compensation of Related Persons Employed by Oracle

Steven Janicki, Vice President, UnifiedGlobal IT Communications and Experience, is Mr. Ellison’s half-brother. In fiscal 2017,2020, Mr. Janicki received a base salary of $255,000.$260,000. Mr. Janicki also received a stock option grant exercisable for 4,225 shares of Oracle common stock, a tenurean equity award of $747875 RSUs and $11,197$3,934 in flexible credits used toward cafeteria-style benefit plans in fiscal 2017.2020.

 

201756  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   51


LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Derivative Litigation Concerning Oracle’s NetSuite Acquisition

On May 3 and July 18, 2017, a stockholdertwo alleged stockholders filed separate derivative lawsuit was filedlawsuits in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The derivative suit is brought by an alleged stockholder of Oracle,Delaware, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf,behalf. Thereafter, the court consolidated the two derivative cases and designated the July 18, 2017 complaint as the operative complaint. The consolidated lawsuit was brought against Oracle, our Chairman ofall the Boardthen-current members and CTO in his capacities as a director, officer and an alleged controlling stockholder, one former member of our CEOs (who is also a director), three other directors,Board of Directors, and Oracle as a nominal defendant. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing Oracle to agree to purchase NetSuite at an excessive price. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, an order rescinding or reforming the NetSuite transaction, unspecified monetary damages (including interest), attorneys’ fees and costs, and disgorgement of various unspecified profits, fees, compensation, and benefits. On July 19, 2017, defendants moved to dismiss this complaint.

On July 18, 2017, a second stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, brought by another alleged stockholder of Oracle, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf. The suit is brought against all current members and one former member of our Board, and Oracle as a nominal defendant. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing Oracle to agree to purchase NetSuiteInc. (NetSuite) at an excessive price. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, unspecified monetary damages (including interest), and attorneys’ fees and costs.

On August 9, 2017, the court consolidated the two derivative cases, and vacated the scheduling order relating to defendants’ The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, the first case. In a September 7, 2017 order,which the court appointed plaintiff’s counseldenied on March 19, 2018.

On May 4, 2018, our Board established a Special Litigation Committee (the SLC) to investigate the allegations in this derivative action. Three non-employee directors served on the SLC. On August 15, 2019, the SLC filed a letter with the court, stating that the SLC believed that plaintiff should be allowed to proceed with the derivative litigation on behalf of Oracle. After the SLC advised the Board that it had fulfilled its duties and obligations, the Board withdrew the SLC’s authority, except that the SLC maintained certain authority to respond to discovery requests in the second caselitigation.

After plaintiff filed its initial complaint, plaintiff filed several amended complaints. Plaintiff filed its most recent amended complaint on February 18, 2020. The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty against our CEO, our CTO, the estate of Mark Hurd (our former CEO who passed away on October 18, 2019), and two other members of our Board of Directors. Oracle is named as lead plaintiffs’ counsela nominal defendant. The complaint also asserts an aiding-and-abetting claim against NetSuite’s former CEO and designatedNetSuite’s former CTO. The two former NetSuite officers moved to dismiss the complaint, which the court granted on June 22, 2020. Our CEO and CTO answered the latest complaint on March 3, 2020, and Oracle filed an answer on the same day. On February 20, 2020, the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss. No hearing has been scheduled for this motion. On July 24, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a further amended complaint. The court has not yet ruled on this motion. On September 8, 2020, the defendants who moved to dismiss on February 20, 2020, moved to dismiss the proposed amended complaint. No hearing date has been set for this motion.

On April 20, 2020, after our CEO and CTO indicated that they might challenge plaintiff’s standing to pursue this matter, an additional plaintiff moved to intervene in this case. On April 29, 2020, the court granted that plaintiff’s motion to intervene. On May 7, 2020, our CEO and CTO filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking to have the plaintiff that filed the July 18, 2017 complaint dismissed from the case for lack of standing, arguing that this plaintiff had not continuously owned Oracle stock during the relevant time period. On July 9, 2020, the court appointed the recent intervenor as co-lead plaintiff, and ruled that the operative complaint.motion should be held in abeyance unless and until there were questions about the co-lead plaintiff’s standing. The parties have proposed a briefing schedule to the court for the defendants’ response to this complaint.are conducting discovery.

While Oracle continues to evaluate these claims, we do not believe this litigation will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Securities Class Action and Derivative Litigation Concerning Oracle’s Cloud Business

On August 10, 2018, a putative class action, brought by an alleged stockholder of Oracle, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against us, our CTO, our SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEthen-two CEOs, two other Oracle executives, and one former Oracle executive. As noted above, Mr. Hurd, one of our then-two CEOs, passed away on October 18, 2019. On March 8, 2019, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants made or are responsible for false and misleading statements regarding Oracle’s cloud business. Plaintiff further alleges that the former Oracle executive engaged in insider trading. Plaintiff seeks a ruling that this case may proceed as a class action, and seeks damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and unspecified declaratory/injunctive relief. On April 19, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. On December 17, 2019, the court granted this motion, giving plaintiffs an opportunity to file an amended complaint, which plaintiff filed on February 17, 2020. On April 23, 2020, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which is scheduled for hearing on September 24, 2020. We believe that we have meritorious defenses against this action, and we will continue to vigorously defend it.

On February 12, 2019, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The derivative suit is brought by two alleged stockholders of Oracle, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf, against all members of our Board, and Oracle as a nominal defendant. Plaintiffs claim that the alleged actions described in the

 

Section 16(a)2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   57


August 10, 2018 class action discussed above caused harm to Oracle, and that Oracle’s Board members violated their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, reasonable inquiry, and good faith by failing to prevent this alleged harm. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants’ actions constitute gross mismanagement, waste, and securities fraud. Plaintiffs seek a ruling that this case may proceed as a derivative action, a finding that defendants are liable for breaching their fiduciary duties, an order directing defendants to enact corporate reforms, attorneys’ fees and costs, and unspecified equitable relief. On April 26, 2019, the Securities Exchange Actcourt approved a stay of 1934 (Exchange Act) requiresthis action, which will be lifted if the class action discussed above is dismissed, if the motion to dismiss the class action is denied, or if either party voluntarily chooses to lift the stay.

On May 8, 2019, a second derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The derivative suit is brought by an alleged stockholder of Oracle, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf, against our CTO, our then-two Chief Executive Officers, one former Oracle executive, officers and directorsOracle as a nominal defendant. Plaintiff claims that the alleged actions described in the August 10, 2018 class action discussed above caused harm to Oracle, and any persons who beneficially own more than 10%plaintiff raises further allegations of impropriety relating to Oracle’s stock buybacks and acquisition of NetSuite. Plaintiff asserts claims for violation of securities laws, violation of fiduciary duties, contribution and indemnification. Plaintiff seeks a ruling that the case may proceed as a derivative action, and seeks damages, declaratory and other equitable relief, attorneys’ and expert fees and costs. On June 4, 2019, the court issued an order finding that this case was related to the derivative case above and staying the case under the court’s prior stay order. On July 8, 2019, plaintiffs in the two derivative actions filed a consolidated complaint. The actions remain stayed.    

While Oracle continues to evaluate these claims, we do not believe this litigation will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Derivative Litigation Concerning Oracle’s Board Composition and Hiring Practices

On July 2 and 10, 2020, two alleged stockholders filed derivative lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf, and thereafter, filed a consolidated complaint on August 21, 2020, against all members of our common stock (collectively, Reporting Persons)Board, and Oracle as a nominal defendant, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, monetary damages, interest, corporate governance changes, disgorgement, restitution, punitive damages, and an award of attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and costs. Plaintiffs allege that: (a) defendants breached their fiduciary duties by permitting Oracle to file reportsviolate anti-discrimination laws and Oracle’s own policies, failing to ensure sufficient diversity on the board, failing to ensure an independent board chairman, rehiring Ernst & Young LLP as Oracle’s auditors, and by breaching a Settlement Agreement with Hewlett-Packard; (b) defendants made false and misleading statements in Oracle’s proxy statements; (c) defendants received unjust compensation and were unjustly enriched; (d) defendants aided and abetted this conduct; and (e) our CTO and CEO are liable for abuse of ownershipcontrol.

On July 30, 2020, a third stockholder filed a derivative lawsuit in the same court, against all members of our Board, and Oracle as a nominal defendant, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, corporate governance changes, monetary damages, interest, disgorgement, and an award of attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and costs. Plaintiff alleges that defendants: (a) breached their fiduciary duties by opposing stockholder proposals regarding a pay equity report; (b) wasted corporate assets; (c) made false and misleading statements in ownership with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulationsOracle’s 2019 proxy statement; and (d) were unjustly enriched.

While Oracle continues to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Asevaluate these claims, we do not believe this litigation will have a matter of practice, we assist our executive officers and non-employee directors in preparing initial ownership reports and reporting ownership changes and we typically file these reports on their behalf.

Based solelymaterial impact on our reviewfinancial position or results of the copies of any Section 16(a) forms received by us or written representations from the Reporting Persons, we believe that, in fiscal 2017, all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable filing requirements except that, inadvertently, Form 4s were filed one day late on January 31, 2017 on behalf of Thomas Kurian and John Fowler to report the accrual of dividend equivalents with respect to deferred earned PSUs.

NO INCORPORATION BY REFERENCEoperations.

 

In our filings with the SEC, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that we are referring you to information that has previously been filed with the SEC and the information should be considered as part of the particular filing. As provided under SEC regulations, the “Report of the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” and the “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors” contained in this proxy statement specifically are not incorporated by reference into any other filings with the SEC and are not deemed to be “Soliciting Material.” In addition, this proxy statement includes several website addresses. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites is not part of this proxy statement.

52  LOGO   201758  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

At our Annual Meeting, stockholders will elect directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until the director’s successor is elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. Each nominee has agreed to be named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. If any nominee for any reason is unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominee as the proxy holder may determine, unless the Board, in its discretion, reduces the number of directors serving on the Board.

Directors

The following directors are being nominated for election by our Board, including our CEOsCEO and our other executive officers on our Board: Jeffrey S. Berg, Michael J. Boskin, Safra A. Catz, Bruce R. Chizen, George H. Conrades, Lawrence J. Ellison, Hector Garcia-Molina,Rona A. Fairhead, Jeffrey O. Henley, Mark V. Hurd, Renée J. James, Charles W. Moorman IV, Leon E. Panetta, andWilliam G. Parrett, Naomi O. Seligman.Seligman and Vishal Sikka.

For details regarding Board qualifications and the specific experiences, qualifications and skills of each of our director nominees, see “Board of Directors—Nominees for Directors” on page 6.8.

Required Vote

Directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. Our majority voting policy for directors in our Corporate Governance Guidelines states that in an uncontested election, if any director nominee receives an equal or greater number of votes WITHHELD from his or her election as compared to votes FOR such election (a Majority Withheld Vote) and no successor has been elected at such meeting, the director nominee must tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote.

The Governance Committee will promptly consider the resignation offer and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that led to the Majority Withheld Vote, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Governance Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers appropriate and relevant.

The Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. Thereafter, the Board will promptly publicly disclose in a report furnished to the SEC its decision regarding the tendered resignation, including its rationale for accepting or rejecting the tendered resignation. The Board may accept a director’s resignation or reject the resignation. If the Board accepts a director’s resignation, or if a nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is not an incumbent director, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board, in each case pursuant to our Bylaws. If a director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected, or his or her earlier resignation or removal.

Full details of our majority voting policy for directors are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, available atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the election of each of the nominated directors.

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   53LOGO   59


PROPOSAL NO. 2

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

WePursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs (a “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote). We currently hold our say-on-pay vote annually.annually and we expect the next say on pay vote will occur in 2021. In deciding how to vote on this proposal, we urge you to consider the following factors, as well as the information contained in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26.32.

Pay-for-PerformanceExecutive Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is designed to be results-aligned. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation our NEOs realize should be aligned with Oracle’s financial performance and stock price. As a result, when our stockholders are rewarded, our NEOs are also rewarded. Similarly, when Oracle does not achieve its desired results, our NEOs realize less value from their incentive compensation opportunities. In fiscal 2017, an average of97% of our NEOs’ total compensation (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 43) wasat-risk.Highlights

 

LOGO

CEO Compensation at a Glance

  Our CEO’s compensation is predominantly performance-based

  In fiscal 2020, Ms. Catz earned less than $1 million in total compensation, consisting of:

$950,000 in salary, and

$14,055 in other compensation

  The Compensation Committee’s independent consultant provided data showing market pay in the range of $20-$35 million for similarly situated CEOs

  During fiscal 2020, Ms. Catz received:

•  No increase in her salary

•  No bonus

No new equity grant and

No performance-based equity vesting based on fiscal 2020 performance

  Fiscal 2017 NEO Compensation Outcomes Tied to Performance
  

 

Performance Stock Units

Fiscal 2020

LOGO Below target relative cash flow growth =LOGO Below target payoutNamed Executive Officers (NEOs)

 

Stock Options  Lawrence J. Ellison, Chairman and CTO*

LOGO Increase in stock price =LOGO Increase in intrinsic value

 

Annual Performance-Based Bonus  Safra A. Catz, CEO*

  Mark V. Hurd, Former CEO*

  Dorian E. Daley, Executive Vice President and General Counsel

  Jeffrey O. Henley, Vice Chairman

  William Corey West, Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

* We have included Mr. Ellison as an NEO for fiscal 2020 on a voluntary basis in the interest of transparency. Ms. Catz also serves as our principal financial officer. Mr. Hurd passed away on October 18, 2019.

 

LOGO Below target non-GAAP pre-tax profit =LOGO Below target bonus payment

Year-Over-Year Decreases in Reported Compensation

Over the past five fiscal years, although our absolute total stockholder return has increased, we have reduced reported aggregate compensation for our Chairman and CTO and CEOs. The aggregate compensation of our Chairman and CTO (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table) has decreased 57% from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017. The aggregate reported compensation of our CEOs has decreased 23% from fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 and 21% from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017. In the same period (fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017), our five-year absolute total stockholder return was 83%.

 

 

Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd

 

Below is an excerpt of our fiscal 2020 SCT showing the
total compensation for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and
Mr. Hurd. See page 47 for the full SCT and related footnotes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Ms. Daley, Mr. Henley and Mr. West

 

 

LOGO

 
   Name 

Fiscal
Year

 

  

Salary ($)

 

  

All Other
Compensation ($)

 

  

Total ($)

 

     
 

 Lawrence J. Ellison

 

 

2020

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1,716,114        

 

 

 

1,716,115

 

   
 

 Safra A. Catz

 

 

2020

 

 

 

   950,000

 

 

 

14,055        

 

 

 

964,055

 

   
 

 Mark V. Hurd

 

 

2020

 

 

 

356,653

 

 

 

370,791        

 

 

 

727,444

 

   
          

 

LOGO

54  LOGO   201760  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Significant Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback

Moreover, after taking into account shareholder feedback, in fiscal 2018 we granted each currently employed NEO an equity award consisting entirely of Performance Options that may be earned only upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals over a five-year performance period. When the grant date fair value of Performance Options is annualized over the five-year performance period, it represents a47% decreasefrom fiscal 2017 equity award values for Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd.

LOGO

Compensation Best Practices

 

LOGOLOGO Best Practices We Employ

 

LOGO     LowLOGO    High proportion of compensation for CEO and CTO is performance-based and aligned with stockholders

LOGO    Caps on maximum payout of bonuses and performance-based equity awards

LOGO    Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO    Disciplined dilution rates from equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO    Compensation recovery (clawback) policy for cash bonuses in the event of a financial restatement

 

LOGO     Robust stock ownership guidelines

LOGO     Caps on maximum payout of bonus and PSU awards

LOGOLOGO    Annual risk assessment of compensation programs

 

LOGOLOGO    Independent compensation consultant and independent compensation committee

 

LOGO     High proportion of NEO compensation is at-riskLOGO    Anti-hedging policy applicable to all employees and performance-baseddirectors

LOGO    Anti-pledging policy with limited exceptions

  

LOGOLOGO Practices We Avoid

 

LOGOLOGO  No severance benefit plans or agreementsarrangements except as provided under our equity incentive plan to employees generally or as required by law

 

LOGOLOGO  No single-trigger change in control vesting of equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO  No change in control acceleration of performance-based cash bonuses

LOGO  No minimum guaranteed vesting for performanceperformance-based equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO  No discretionary cash bonuses for NEOsCEO and CTO

 

LOGOLOGO  No “golden parachute” tax gross-ups for NEOs

 

LOGOLOGO  No payout or settlement of dividends andor dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards

 

LOGOLOGO  No supplemental executive retirement plans, executive pensions or excessive retirement benefits

 

LOGOLOGO  No repricing, cash-out or exchange of “underwater” stock options without stockholder approval

 

Required Vote

We are asking our stockholders to support the compensation of our NEOs and our compensation philosophy as described in this proxy statement. You may vote FOR or AGAINST the following resolution, or you may ABSTAIN. This advisory vote on NEO compensation will be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of Oracle common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting.

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in Oracle’s Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables.”

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   55


Your vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on Oracle, the Board or the Compensation Committee, and will not be interpreted as overruling a decision by, or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for, the Board or the Compensation Committee. Nevertheless, our Board and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and view this vote as one of the modes of communication with stockholders. As in prior years, the Board and Compensation Committee will review and consider the outcome of this vote in determining future compensation arrangements.arrangements for our NEOs.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory approval of the compensation of our NEOs.

 

56  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   61


PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs. This non-binding, advisory vote must be submitted to stockholders at least once every six years. Commonly known as a “say-on-frequency” proposal, this vote gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on whether future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs should occur once every year, every two years or every three years.

Our Board has determined that an annual non-binding advisory vote on NEO compensation is the most appropriate alternative for Oracle and our stockholders. Our Board believes that continuing to provide our stockholders with the ability to express their views on the compensation of our NEOs annually aligns with our practice of regularly engaging with stockholders to obtain feedback on corporate governance and executive compensation matters. The Board therefore recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the non-binding, advisory vote on NEO compensation.

Required Vote

You have four choices for voting on the following resolution. You can choose whether future advisory votes on NEO compensation should be conducted every ONE YEAR, TWO YEARS or THREE YEARS. You may also ABSTAIN from voting. The frequency that receives the greatest number of votes cast by stockholders on this matter at the Annual Meeting will be considered the advisory vote of our stockholders.

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders indicate, by their vote on this resolution, whether future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers should occur every year, every two years or every three years.”

Your vote on this proposal is advisory, and therefore not binding on Oracle or the Board, and will not be interpreted as overruling a decision by, or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for, the Board. Nevertheless, our Board values the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of holding future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote to hold future advisory votes everyONE YEAR on the compensation of our NEOs.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   57


PROPOSAL NO. 4

APPROVAL OF THE ORACLE CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 LONG-TERM2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

We are asking our stockholders to approve an amendment and restatement of the Oracle Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Equity Plan”), including approval of 90 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan. The 2020 Equity Plan was approved by our Board on August 6, 2020, subject to stockholder approval. If the 2020 Equity Plan is approved by our stockholders, the 2020 Equity Plan will become effective on the date of our Annual Meeting (the “Effective Date”).

The 2020 Equity Plan is intended to replace the Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the 2000 Equity Plan)“Prior Plan”), which will expire under its terms on the date of our Annual Meeting. No additional stock awards will be granted under the Prior Plan once it has expired. All outstanding stock awards granted under the Prior Plan will continue to (1) increasebe subject to the numberterms and conditions of the Prior Plan and the applicable agreements evidencing such stock awards, provided that certain shares subject to outstanding stock awards that would have become available for issuance after the Effective Date under the terms of common stock reservedthe Prior Plan may become available for issuance under the 20002020 Equity Plan by 330,000,000 shares, (2) clarify or revise certain other provisions ofPlan.

Reasons to Approve the 20002020 Equity Plan and (3) approve the material terms of the performance goals under which certain performance-based awards can be granted in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)), including the addition of new performance criteria.

The 2000 Equity Plan allows us to grant equity awards to our employees, officers, directors (excluding non-employee directors), consultants and advisers. Our Board approved the amendment and restatement of the 2000 Equity Plan (as amended and restated, the Amended 2000 Equity Plan), subject to the approval of our stockholders, on August 1, 2017.

We designed the Amended 2000 Equity Plan to reflect strong equity plan governance practices. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan has a number of features intended to address stockholder concerns related to equity plans, including:

No repricing. Prohibits stock option and stock appreciation right (SAR) repricing without stockholder consent.

No buyout or exchange of underwater awards. Prohibits the cancellation of underwater stock options and SARs in exchange for cash or another award without stockholder consent.

No liberal share counting. Prohibits the reuse of shares withheld or delivered to satisfy the exercise price of a stock option or SAR or to satisfy tax withholding requirements.

Fungible shares. Stock options and SARs reduce the share reserve on a one-for-one basis, but full value awards, such as restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs), reduce the share reserve on a 2.5-for-one basis.

No evergreen provision. Provides for a limited number of shares for grant and does not provide for any annual increase of available shares for future issuance.

No single-trigger change of control. Awards generally do not accelerate upon a change of control unless the acquiring company does not assume the awards, or if awards are assumed and the acquiring company terminates the holder’s employment within 12 months following the consummation of the change of control.

Minimum vesting requirement. Future awards granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will have a minimum one-year vesting period from the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions summarized below.

Limits on dividends and dividend equivalents. Prohibits the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any award until the underlying shares or units vest, which is consistent with our current practice.

No discounted awards. Requires the exercise price of stock options and SARs to be not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

Clawback provision. Awards granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will be subject to any applicable laws providing for the clawback of incentive compensation; any clawback policy adopted by Oracle; and any clawback provisions that may be included in the award agreement.

Summary of the Proposal

Purpose of the Increase in Shares Reserved for Issuance

The Amended 2000 Equity Plan would increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan by 330,000,000 shares. As of August 31, 2017, a total of 65,096,385 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under the 2000 Equity Plan. We believe that the current share reserve amount is insufficient to meet our future needs with respect to attracting, motivating and retaining key executives and employees in a competitive market for talent. If the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan is not approved, we mayit will not become effective and Oracle will not have a stock-based compensation plan in place to grant stock awards to employees following the Annual Meeting. We consider equity compensation to be unablea vital element of our employee compensation program and believe that the continued ability to grant stock awards at competitive levels is in the best interest of Oracle and its stockholders. The Board believes the 2020 Equity Plan is a critical incentive and retention tool as we continue to offer competitive equity packagescompete for talent.

We believe the number of shares reserved under the 2020 Equity Plan will be sufficient to attractenable us to grant stock awards under the 2020 Equity Plan for approximately the next two years, based on historical grant and retain employees,forfeiture levels, the recent market prices of Oracle shares, and we may need to consider other compensation alternatives.the anticipated use of stock awards as an incentive and retention tool.

The table below shows the stock awards that were outstanding under the Prior Plan and the 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”), as well as outstanding stock awards that were assumed in connection with our acquisitions, in each case, as of the Record Date of September 8, 2020. On that date, the closing price of Oracle shares as reported on NYSE was $55.32 per share.

 

58  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


As of August 31, 2017, the following equity awards were outstanding:

  Shares underlying
outstanding stock
options (#)
   Weighted avg.
exercise price of
per share
   Weighted avg.
remaining term
   Shares underlying
outstanding RSUs
and PSUs (#)
   Shares available
for future grant (#)
   Shares underlying
outstanding stock
options (#)
   Weighted avg.
exercise price of
per share
   Weighted avg.
remaining term
   Shares underlying
outstanding
RSUs and
deferred vested
PSUs (#)
   Shares available
for future grant (#)
 

2000 Equity Plan

   345,486,293   $35.27    5.46 years    88,262,983    65,096,385 

Prior Plan

  

 

136,429,674

 

  

$

38.92

 

  

 

3.42 years

 

  

 

113,895,582

 

  

 

130,487,146

 

Directors’ Stock Plan

   1,891,875   $32.74    4.89 years    110,047    1,525,633   

 

684,375

 

  

$

37.92

 

  

 

3.28 years

 

  

 

74,584

 

  

 

1,268,343

 

Assumed Awards*

   5,157,087   $26.22    5.82 years    8,045,099       

 

878,200

 

  

$

24.86

 

  

 

3.83 years

 

  

 

23,170

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   352,535,255   $35.12    5.46 years    96,418,129    66,622,018   

 

137,992,249

 

  

$

38.82

 

  

 

3.42 years

 

  

 

113,993,336

 

  

 

131,755,489

 

 

*

Includes stock options and RSUsrestricted stock units (RSUs) that were assumed in connection with our acquisitions. No additional stock awards were or can be granted under the plans pursuant to which these awards were originally issued. If any of these assumed awards are forfeited, the related shares cannot be re-used for additional equitystock awards.

In fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee granted each of Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz and Mr. Hurd and Mr. Kurian an equitya stock award consisting entirely of performance-based stock options (PSOs) that may be earned only upon the attainment of rigorous stock price, market capitalization and operational performance goals (see “Executive Compensation—Fiscal 2018 Performance-Based Stock Options”(See page 34 for details on page 29)the PSOs). These awards arePSOs were intended to represent five years of equity compensation and were granted with the expectation that no additional equitystock awards will be granted to these NEOs until 2022 at the earliest.We do not intend to grant Mr. Hurd passed away on October 18, 2019. In connection with his death, Mr. Hurd’s PSOs were forfeited on August 4, 2020, when the Compensation Committee certified that no performance conditions were met for the PSO performance period ending May 31, 2020. As of the date of this proxy statement, none of these NEOsPSOs have vested for any equity awards using shares from the requested share increase. The requested shares are expected to be sufficient to fund grants to all other eligible employees through 2020.of our NEOs.

Dilution, Burn Rate and Equity Overhang.

62  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


We recognize that equitystock awards dilute existing stockholders. Both the Compensation and F&A Committees regularly review our long-term incentive compensation program to ensure that we balance our employee compensation objectives with our stockholders’ interest in limiting dilution from equitystock awards. As of May 31, 2017,2020, our cumulative potential dilution since June 1, 20142017 has been a weighted average annualized rate of 1.2%1.5% per year. OurFor details on the calculation of our cumulative potential dilution, is calculated as the average annualized new equity awards granted undersee Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 13 to our active equity plans (the 2000 Equity Plan and the Directors’ Stock Plan, but excluding the ESPP) (the Active Equity Plans) plus equity awards assumedconsolidated financial statements in acquisitions, net of equity awards cancelled and forfeited, divided by the weighted average outstanding Oracle shares during the calculation period, excluding the effects of our stock repurchase program.Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020.

The Compensation Committee also regularly reviews our burn rate and equity overhang activity. The following table provides detailed information regarding our burn rate and equity overhang activity for the last three fiscal years. EffectsThe effects of our stock repurchase program are excluded from these calculations.

 

  Fiscal 2017 (%)   Fiscal 2016 (%)   Fiscal 2015 (%)   Fiscal 2020 (%) Fiscal 2019 (%) Fiscal 2018 (%) 

Gross Burn Rate (1)

   1.86    1.41    1.49   

 

1.65

 

 

1.76

 

 

3.07

Net Burn Rate (2)

   1.53    1.12    1.14   

 

1.11

 

 

0.90

 

 

2.62

Equity Overhang (3)

   12.91    15.22    16.39   

 

13.77

 

 

15.64

 

 

16.45

 

(1)

Gross Burn Rate is calculated as (a) the number of new equitystock awards granted under our Active Equity Plansthe Prior Plan and the Director Plan plus equitystock awards assumed in acquisitions, divided by (b) the total number of Oracle shares outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year.

 

(2)

Net Burn Rate is calculated as (a) the number of new equitystock awards granted under our Active Equity Plansthe Prior Plan and the Director Plan plus equitystock awards assumed in acquisitions, net of equitystock awards cancelled and forfeited, divided by (b) the total number of Oracle shares outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year.

 

(3)

Equity Overhang is calculated as (a) the number of equityshares subject to outstanding stock awards outstanding (including equitystock awards assumed in acquisitions) plus the number of shares available for grant under our Active Equity Plans,Prior Plan and the Director Plan, divided by (b) the number of equityshares subject to outstanding stock awards outstanding (including equitystock awards assumed in acquisitions), plus the number of shares available for grant under our Active Equity Plans,Prior Plan and the Director Plan, plus the total number of Oracle shares outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   59


The table below shows the number of shares subject to performance awards (all of which consisted of PSUs) granted (at target),at target, vested and forfeited within the last three fiscal years.years under the Prior Plan, which consisted of performance-based stock options and performance-based stock units.

 

    Number of Shares/Units 

  Non-vested at May 31, 20142017

  

0

5,500,000

  Granted (1)

  

2,875,000

69,000,000

  Vested (2)

  

(1,222,650

  Forfeited

(1,433,600

  Non-vested at May 31, 2018

71,843,750

  Granted (3)

0

  Vested

  

0

(1,988,839

  Forfeited

  

187,500

(14,375,000

  Non-vested at May 31, 20152019

  

2,687,500

55,479,911

  Granted (4)

  

2,375,000

0

  Vested

  

462,762

(1,129,464

  Forfeited

  

209,113

(854,911

  Non-vested at May 31, 20162020 (5)

  

4,390,625

53,495,536

 Granted

2,375,000

  Vested

1,235,931

  Forfeited

29,688

  Non-vested at May 31, 2017

5,500,000

Purpose of the Additional Revisions

The additional revisions in the Amended 2000 Equity Plan are intended to reflect developments in strong equity plan governance practices and clarify certain provisions of the plan. The material revisions in the Amended 2000 Equity Plan include:

Addition of minimum one-year vesting requirement for all awards. Under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan, all future awards granted under the plan will be subject to a minimum one-year vesting requirement following the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions summarized below.

 

(1)

ClarificationIncludes 66,500,000 PSOs granted to current NEOs (or NEOs at the time of dividendsgrant) of which (a) none have vested to date, and dividend equivalents provision. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan explicitly provides for(b) as of September 8, 2020, 31,500,000 have been forfeited. 14,000,000 PSOs were forfeited in September 2018 when Thomas Kurian left Oracle and 17,500,000 PSOs were forfeited on August 4, 2020 when the prohibitionCompensation Committee determined that no performance measures had been achieved following Mark Hurd’s death.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   63


(2)

Does not include 37,500 shares, which were issued in fiscal 2018 as a result of the paymentabove target vesting of dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any award granted under the plan until the underlying shares or units vest.PSUs based on fiscal 2017 performance.

 

(3)

ClarificationDoes not include 701,547 shares, which were issued in fiscal 2019 as a result of repricing provisions. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan clarifies the existing repricing provisions.above target vesting of PSUs based on fiscal 2018 performance.

 

(4)

InclusionDoes not include 314,402 shares, which were issued in fiscal 2020 as a result of additional performance criteria. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan adds the following performance criteria that may be used for future performance-based long-term stock awards: profit, EBITDA growth, market capitalization and market penetration. Approvalabove target vesting of the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will constitute approval of all of the material performance goals pursuant to which the Compensation Committee may grant awards to officers that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), including these new performance criteria.PSUs based on fiscal 2019 performance.

 

(5)

Clarification of performance criteria adjustments. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan clarifies thatIncludes the Compensation Committee may provide17,500,000 PSOs held by Mr. Hurd at the time of grant for the adjustment of the performance factors applicable to long-term stock awards.

Clarification of scope of change of control provisions.The Amended 2000 Equity Plan clarifies that the change of control provisions apply to long-term stock awards in addition to stock options and rights, and that the Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine the extent tofiscal year end, which performance has been achieved with respect to a performance-based award in a change of control.

Addition of a clawback provision.Awards granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will be subject to any applicable laws providing for the clawback of incentive compensation; any clawback policy adopted by Oracle; and any clawback provisions that may be included in the award agreement.were subsequently forfeited on August 4, 2020.

Stockholder approval of the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan will also enablesenable Oracle to grant awards that qualify for specific employer/employee tax and social treatment under French Finance Law for 201720182016-1917 2017-1837 of December 29, 2016,30, 2017 as amended, should Oracle in its discretion decide to grant such awards to employees in France who are eligible to participate in the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan.

Purpose of the Request for Approval Under Section 162(m)

We are also seeking stockholder approval of the material terms of the performance goals under which certain performance-based awards granted under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan may be paid. This approval is requested so that certain awards can

60  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


continueSubject to be eligible to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), and therefore be exempt from the $1 million annual limit on the amount that Oracle can deduct for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to the compensation paid to certain senior executives.

Summary of the Amended 2000 Equity PlanStockholder Approval

The description that follows is an overview of the material provisions of the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan and doeswill only become effective if it is approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If our stockholders do not purport to be a complete description of all ofapprove this Proposal No. 3, the provisions of the Amended 2000 Equity Plan. This description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan attached hereto as Appendix A.will not become effective.

Administration.The Amended 20002020 Equity Plan may be administered by the Board or by a committee designated by the Board to administer the plan. Combines Compensation and Corporate Governance Best Practices

The Board has designated the Compensation Committee as administrator of the Amended 2000 Equity Plan. The Compensation Committee may, among other things, select grantees, approve the form of grant agreements, determine the terms and restrictions applicable to equity awards, and adopt sub-plans for particular subsidiaries or locations. In accordance with the terms of the 20002020 Equity Plan the Board has delegatedincludes provisions that are designed to an executive officer committee the authority to approve up to 62,499 RSUs, 249,999 stock options, or a combination of 31,249 RSUsprotect our stockholders’ interests and 124,999 stock options, to a single individual during a fiscal year. The executive officer committee cannot grant equity to non-employees or to certain executives.

Eligibility. All employees, officers, directors who are also employees or consultants, independent consultants and advisers of Oracle (or any subsidiary or affiliate of Oracle) are eligible to receive awards under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan. Oracle may also grant equity awards under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan in connection with its assumption or replacement of equity awards issued by another company which Oracle acquires or with which Oracle combines. As of May 31, 2017, we had approximately 138,000 employees (including eight executive officers) and approximately 10,000 independent consultants and advisers. Oracle does not track advisers separately from independent consultants for plan or other purposes.

Types of Awards. The Compensation Committee currently grants stock options and long-term stock awards in the form of RSUs and PSUs under the 2000 Equity Plan. The Compensation Committee retains the flexibility to grant various types of awards under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan including each of the following:reflect corporate governance best practices, including:

 

  

Stock Options.Fungible Share Counting. Each stock option represents the rightThe 2020 Equity Plan provides that each share issued pursuant to purchase a specifiedfull value award reduces the number of shares of Oracle common stock at a fixedavailable for grant price. That grant price cannot be less thanunder the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of a stock option cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant. Stock options are exercisable only in accordance with terms established by the Compensation Committee. The purchase price of a stock option may be payable in cash, cancellation of indebtedness of Oracle to the participant, by surrender of common stock having a fair market value on the day of exercise equal to the applicable exercise price, pursuant to a broker-assisted cashless exercise, through any other method specifically approved by the Compensation Committee, or by any combination of the foregoing, in each such case to the extent permitted by applicable law. The Amended 20002020 Equity Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options that comply with the requirements of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. Stock options may not be repriced, directly or indirectly, without stockholder approval. Stock options are not transferable, other than to an employee’s immediate family for no consideration.by 2.5 shares.

 

  

Stock Purchase RightsNo Liberal Share Counting or Recycling. Shares used to satisfy the exercise price, purchase price or tax withholding obligation of an award, and Long-Term Stock Awards (including Stock Bonuses, RSUs and PSUs). The Compensation Committee may grant long-term stock awards (which includes stock bonuses, RSUs and PSUs) payable in shares cash or a combination thereof, based upon reasonable time or performance criteria asrepurchased by us with the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. A stock bonus is a right to receive sharesproceeds of Oracle common stock that isan option exercise, will not subject to time and/or performance restrictions, and can be granted only within the 5% exception to the minimum vesting requirements described below. An RSU entitles the holder to receive shares of Oracle common stock on a future date once certain vesting conditions (which may be time and/or performance conditions) are met. PSUs are RSUs with performance conditions. When the participant satisfies the conditions of the RSU or PSU award, we may settle the award in shares, cash or any combination of both, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion. Time-based RSUs must have a vesting period of no less than three years and PSUs must have a vesting period of no less than one year, except that up to 5% of the shares reserved andbecome available again for distributionissuance under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan may be granted without regard to these restrictions. Awards granted to employees who are or may become subject to Section 162(m) and that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) may be based on one or more of the following performance criteria: revenues, operating expenses, return on assets, return on net assets, asset turnover, return on equity, return on capital, market price appreciation of the Company’s stock, economic value added, total stockholder return, net income, pre-tax income, operating income, earnings per share, operating profit margin, net income margin, sales margin (including both growth rates and margin percentages), cash flow, market share, inventory turnover, sales growth, capacity utilization, profit, EBIDTA growth, market capitalization, market penetration or increase in customer base. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan also provides that the

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   61


Compensation Committee may provide at the time of grant for the adjustment of the performance factors applicable to long-term stock awards to include or exclude any objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring, infrequently occurring or one-time events affecting Oracle or its financial statements or changes in law, accounting principles or tax rules.Plan.

 

  

Stockholder Approval Required for Additional Shares. The 2020 Equity Plan does not contain an annual “evergreen” provision. The 2020 Equity Plan authorizes a fixed number of shares, so that stockholder approval is required to issue any additional shares.

No Single-Trigger Change of Control. Stock Appreciation Rightsawards do not accelerate upon a change of control unless the acquiring company does not assume the stock awards, or if such awards are assumed and the acquiring company terminates the participant’s employment within 12 months following the consummation of the change of control.

Disclosure of Change of Control Vesting Treatment. The 2020 Equity Plan discloses the specific vesting treatment for both time and performance-based stock awards in connection with a change of control.

Minimum Vesting Requirement. Stock awards granted under the 2020 Equity Plan will have a minimum one-year vesting period from the date of grant, provided that such requirement will not apply to (i) 5% of the shares initially reserved under the 2020 Equity Plan and (ii) awards assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition. The minimum vesting requirement will not prevent the acceleration of vesting under the 2020 Equity Plan in connection with a change of control of Oracle or a termination of employment or services.

No Dividends and Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents will not be paid or settled with respect to any stock award granted under the 2020 Equity Plan until the underlying shares or units vest, and no dividend equivalents or otherwise may be credited with respect to options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).

Repricing Not Allowed. The 2020 Equity Plan prohibits reducing the exercise price of stock options and SARs (including freestandingand cancelling “underwater” stock options and SARs for cash or another stock award without stockholder approval.

No Discounted Stock Options or SARs. All stock options and SARs granted in tandem with related options) entitleunder the holder upon2020 Equity Plan must have an exercise or strike price equal to receive an amount in any combination of cash or shares of common stock (as determined by the Compensation Committee) equal in value to the excess of the fair market value of the shares covered by such right over the grant price. The grant price for SARs will not be lessgreater than the fair market value of ourOracle common stock on the date the stock option or SAR is granted.

Awards Subject to Clawback. Stock awards are subject to clawback pursuant to any clawback policy adopted by us from time to time or required by law. In addition, if a participant’s employment is terminated for cause, the Compensation Committee may terminate a participant’s outstanding stock awards granted under the 2020 Equity Plan.

64  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Limit on Stock Awards. The 2020 Equity Plan limits the number of grant. No SARsshares that may be exercised more than ten years after the grant date. SARs may not be repriced, directly or indirectly, without stockholder approval.granted to any one participant during any one fiscal year.

Stock Options and SARs Will Expire After 7 Years. The 2020 Equity Plan provides for a term of seven (7) years for stock options and SARs unless the Compensation Committee provides otherwise.

Includes Best Practice Performance-Based Stock Award Provisions. While the enactment of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, the 2020 Equity Plan includes many best practice performance-based stock award provisions.

Prohibition on Loans and Transfer. The 2020 Equity Plan provides that no participant will be permitted to purchase shares via a promissory note, and in no event may any stock award be transferred for consideration to a third-party financial institution.

Description of the 2020 Equity Plan

Set forth below is a summary of the other principal features of the 2020 Equity Plan. The 2020 Equity Plan is set forth in its entirety as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, and all descriptions of the 2020 Equity Plan contained in this Proposal No. 3 are qualified by reference to Appendix A.

Limits onPurpose. The purpose of the 2020 Equity Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons that are important to our success, by offering them an opportunity to participate in our future performance through the grant of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SARs, performance-based stock awards and stock bonuses (each individually, an “award”).

Eligibility. Employees (including officers), consultants, independent contractors and advisors are eligible to participate in the 2020 Equity Plan. As of May 31, 2020, there were approximately 135,000 full-time employees (including 6 executive officers) and approximately 9,200 consultants eligible to receive awards under the 2020 Equity Plan. Since our executive officers may participate in the 2020 Equity Plan, each of them has an interest in this proposal. Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in the 2020 Equity Plan.

Types of Awards and Minimum Vesting. No individual Awards that may be granted in any yearare stock options (both nonstatutory stock options and SARs covering more than 25,000,000 shares of common stock. No individualincentive stock options (which may only be granted in any yearto employees)), SARs, restricted stock, purchase rights or long-termRSUs, performance-based stock awards covering more than 10,000,000 sharesand stock bonuses. Ninety-five percent (95%) of common stock. As described below under “Capital Changes,” if certain events occur, the Compensation Committee is required to adjust the number, type and/or price of shares subject to outstanding awards. The adjustments are designed to prevent dilution or enhancement of the benefits availableawards granted under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan.Plan must contain a minimum one-year vesting period from the date of grant; provided that, awards assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition are not subject to this minimum vesting requirement and the minimum vesting requirement will not prevent the acceleration of vesting under the 2020 Equity Plan or under policies or contracts that provide for acceleration of vesting in connection with a change of control or termination of employment or services.

Share Reserve/Outstanding Awards/Share Depletion RulesShares Reserved for Issuance.If the 2020 Equity Plan is approved by the stockholders approve Proposal 4,and becomes effective, the total number of shares reserved and available for distribution pursuant toauthorized under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan will be 1,023,313,015(i) 90 million shares which consists of (i) 693,313,015Oracle common stock, plus (ii) the number of shares that were previously approved by stockholdersremain unissued and (ii) 330,000,000 additional shares that will be added in connection with this amendment and restatementare available for grant under the Prior Plan as of the 2000 Equity Plan. AsEffective Date, plus (iii) the number of August 31, 2017, a total of 433,749,276 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance pursuantsubject to outstandingany awards granted under the 2000Prior Plan that are outstanding as of the Effective Date which, after the Effective Date, would have been available again for issuance under the terms of the Prior Plan had the 2020 Equity Plan andnot become effective, provided that shares subject to Prior Plan awards other than options or SARs will increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan by 2.5 times the number of shares subject to such forfeited awards. If the company substitutes or assumes outstanding awards granted by another company, whether in connection with an additional 65,096,385acquisition of such other company or otherwise, the number of shares weresubject to the substituted or assumed awards will not reduce the number of shares available for future grants. under the 2020 Equity Plan.

Share Conversion Ratio. Each share issued with respect to an awardawards granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan, other than stock options or SARs, will beis counted against the aggregate share limitreserve as 2.5 shares. SharesEach share issued with respect to a stock options and SARs areoption or SAR is counted against the aggregate share limitreserve as one share. The Amended 2000

Shares Returned to the Plan. Except as described in the next paragraph, shares subject to awards, and shares issued under any award granted under the 2020 Equity Plan prohibits Oracle from adding backwill again be available for grant and issuance in connection with subsequent awards to the number of shares remaining available for futureextent such shares: (a) are subject to issuance under the plan the following shares: (1) shares delivered to or withheld by Oracle to pay the exercise price of an award, (2) shares delivered to or withheld by Oracle for payment of taxes, (3) shares not issued as a result of the netupon exercise of a stock option or SAR granted under the 2020 Equity Plan but which cease to be subject to the option or (4)SAR right for any reason other than the exercise of the award or the withholding or tendering of shares to satisfy any related tax withholding obligations;

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   65


(b) are subject to awards granted under the 2020 Equity Plan that are forfeited or repurchased by us at the original issue price; or (c) are subject to awards granted under the 2020 Equity Plan that otherwise terminate without such shares being issued. To the extent an award is paid out in cash rather than shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of shares available for issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan.

Shares Not Returned to the Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of an award or to satisfy any tax withholding obligations in connection with an award, and shares repurchased by the company on the open market with the proceeds of a stock option exercise. However,exercise will not be available again for grant and issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan. In addition, the full number of shares subject to SARs granted under the 2020 Equity Plan that are to be settled by the issuance of shares will be counted against the number of shares available for issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan, regardless of the number of shares actually issued upon settlement of such SAR. Further, shares subject to awards that terminate, expire, are forfeitedassumed or lapsesubstituted in connection with an acquisition and shares subject to awards settled in cash maythat are cancelled or exchanged under an exchange program will not be usedavailable again for futuregrant and issuance under the 2020 Equity Plan.

Administration. Our Compensation Committee will administer the 2020 Equity Plan, except when the Board decides to directly administer the 2020 Equity Plan, and will have the authority to, among other things, construe and interpret the plan and any agreement or document executed pursuant to the plan, grant awards and determine their terms, and make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan. However, to the extent permitted by applicable law and listing requirements, the Compensation Committee or the Board may delegate to one or more of our officers, the authority to (a) designate employees who are not officers to be recipients of awards and determine the number of shares to be subject to such awards granted to such designated employees, subject to certain restrictions that are set forth in the 2020 Equity Plan and (b) take any and all actions on behalf of the Compensation Committee other than any actions that affect the amount or form of compensation of officers or have material tax, accounting, financial, human resource or legal consequences to us or our affiliates.

Per Share Exercise Price. The per-share exercise price of stock options and SARs granted under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan.Plan must be equal to at least the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date of the option or SAR.

Capital ChangesNo Repricing Without Prior Stockholder Approval. Without prior stockholder approval, (i) the exercise price of a stock option or SAR may not be reduced (repriced) and (ii) a stock option or SAR may not be cancelled in exchange for another option or SAR with a lower exercise price, cash or another award if the exercise price of such cancelled stock option or SAR exceeds the fair market value of a share on the date of such cancellation (in each case, other than in connection with a change of control or certain capitalization events).

Number of Shares Per Calendar Year and Incentive Stock Option Limit. No person is eligible to receive more than 25,000,000 shares in any fiscal year pursuant to the grant of one or more options or SARs under the 2020 Equity Plan, and no person is eligible to receive more than 10,000,000 shares in any fiscal year pursuant to the grant of one or more awards other than stock options or SARs under the 2020 Equity Plan. No more than 25,000,000 shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options. No incentive stock options may be granted after the 10th anniversary of the date the 2020 Equity Plan was adopted by the Board.

Vesting and ExercisabilityIf. Awards become vested and exercisable, as applicable, within such periods, or upon such events, as determined by the administrator and as set forth in the related award agreement. Vesting may be based on the passage of time in connection with services performed for us or upon achievement of performance goals or other criteria, subject to the minimum one-year vesting requirement described above. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the maximum term of each option and SAR is seven years from the date of grant, and options cease vesting on the date of termination of service or the death or disability of the service provider and generally expire three months after the termination of the service provider’s service to us or up to 12 months following the date of death or disability. SARs become exercisable as they vest and are settled in shares or cash, as determined by the administrator, having a value at the time of exercise equal to (1) the number of shares deemed exercised, times (2) the amount by which our stock price on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price of SARs. RSUs are settled in shares or cash, depending on the terms upon which they are granted, and only to the extent that they are vested. Shares issued pursuant to a restricted stock award remain subject to our right to repurchase or reacquire them to the extent they are unvested. In addition, the 2020 Equity Plan allows us to reduce, suspend or extend the vesting of awards in the event a participant has a change in status from a full-time employee to a part-time employee or takes an extended leave of absence.

Method of Exercise. The exercise price of options and the purchase price, if any, of other stock awards may be paid by (a) cash or check, or (b) where expressly approved by the administrator and permitted by applicable law:

66  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


cancellation of indebtedness, surrender of shares, waiver of compensation due or accrued for services to us or an affiliate, broker assisted same-day sales, a combination of the foregoing or any other method permitted by applicable law, provided that no participant will be permitted to execute a promissory note as partial or full consideration for the purchase of shares.

Adjustment of Shares. Except as would result in taxation under Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”), the number of outstanding shares of Oracle’s common stock is changedadjusted by a stock dividend, an extraordinary cash dividend that has a material effect on the price of Oracle common stock, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification or similar change in theour capital structure, of Oracle not involving payment ofwithout consideration, then (a) the number of shares of common stock availablereserved for equity awards in the aggregateissuance and individuallyfuture grant under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan, (b) the exercise prices of and number of shares subject to outstanding stock options and SARs, (c) the number of shares deliverable under eachsubject to other outstanding awards, (d) the maximum number of shares that may be issued as incentive stock option, long-term stock award, SARoptions, and stock purchase right, and(e) the exercise, base or purchase price per share for each outstanding stock option, SAR or stock purchase rightmaximum number of shares that may be issued to an individual in any one fiscal year, will be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by theour Board or our stockholders of Oracle and in compliance with applicable laws.

Insecurities laws; provided that in the event the adjustment would result in a fraction of a share, we have the right to round up or down to the nearest whole share or settle such fraction of a share in cash, taking into consideration applicable laws and accounting guidance.

Performance Awards. Our Compensation Committee may grant awards subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria. Our Compensation Committee determines the terms surrounding performance awards, including the required levels of performance with respect to specified business criteria (including any adjustment(s) thereto that will be applied in determining the achievement of such performance criteria), the corresponding amounts payable upon achievement of such levels of performance, and the termination and forfeiture provisions; provided that all performance criteria must be determined when the achievement of such criteria remains substantially uncertain and the Compensation Committee determines that any dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split up, spinoff, combination, repurchase or exchange of Oracle’s securities or other similar corporate transaction affectsmust certify in writing the extent to which such performance criteria have been timely achieved and the extent to which the shares such that an adjustment issubject to awards have been earned.

As determined by the Compensation Committee, to the extent applicable, the performance criteria may be appropriatemeasured (i) in absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms, (iii) on a per-share basis, (iv) against the performance of the company as a whole or one or more identifiable business units, products, ecosystems, lines of business or segments, (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, and/or (vi) on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis. The performance criteria may differ from participant to prevent enlargementparticipant and from award to award and may include: asset turnover; billings; bookings; capacity utilization; cash flow, operating cash flow, or diminutioncash flow or operating cash flow per share (before or after dividends); contract value; customer growth; data center openings or closings; earnings per share; EBIDTA, including EBITDA growth; economic value added; gross profit margin; intellectual property (e.g., patents)/product development; inventory turnover; market share; mergers and acquisitions or divestitures; net income margin; net income; net or gross sales; operating expenses; operating income; operating profit margin; pre-tax income; profit; profits; return on assets; return on capital; return on equity; return on net assets; return on sales; revenues (including recurring revenues); sales growth; sales margin (including both growth rates and margin percentages); stock price, including market price appreciation of benefitsour stock; total stockholder return (on a relative or absolute basis); or any other factor (such as individual business objectives, unit-specific operational metrics or individual performance goals) the committee so designates, provided that such objectives do not result in adverse accounting, tax, reporting or other consequences.

No Dividends and Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents will not be paid or settled with respect to any award granted under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan unless and until the underlying shares or units vest, and no dividends or dividend equivalents may be credited with respect to options or SARs.

Transferability. Unless determined otherwise by the Compensation Committee, a stock award granted under the 2020 Equity Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will make such adjustmentsor by the laws of descent or distribution. If the Compensation Committee makes a stock award transferable, including, without limitation, by instrument to an inter vivos or testamentary trust in outstandingwhich the awards and shares available for future awards, as it determinesare to be appropriate.passed to beneficiaries upon death or by gift to a permitted transferee, such award will contain such additional terms and conditions as the administrator deems appropriate; provided, however, that in no event may any award be transferred for consideration to a third-party financial institution.

No “Single-Trigger” Change of Control. The Amended 2000 Equity Plan does not provide for “single-trigger” accelerated vesting Unless otherwise provided in an agreement with us or one of any outstanding awards uponour affiliates, or by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan). In order for, the vesting of awards to accelerate following a change of control, the acquiring company must notacquiror may either assume the outstanding awards or ifsubstitute equivalent awards. If an award is assumed the participant’s employment or other association with our successor must besubstituted awards and a participant is terminated without cause within 12 months followingafter the consummation of such

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   67


change of control, the assumed or substituted award will accelerate and vest in full upon such termination. If the acquiror fails to assume or substitute awards issued under the 2020 Equity Plan, all awards will accelerate and vest in full at or prior to the effective date of the change of control. The definitionHowever, in the event of a change of control, inany award subject to performance goals will vest based on the Amended 2000 Equity Plan requires angreater of target performance or the actual changelevel of controlperformance, and any such award that is assumed or substituted will continue to occur.be subject to any service requirements applicable to such award.

No RepricingClawback of Stock Awards. The Amended 20002020 Equity Plan provides that awards will be subject to clawback or recoupment pursuant to any compensation clawback or recoupment policy that may be adopted by the Compensation Committee. In addition, if a participant’s employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the 2020 Equity Plan), the Compensation Committee may not (1) reducerequire the exercise or base price of any previously granted stock option or SAR, (2) cancel any previously granted stock option or SAR in exchange for another stock option or SAR with a lower exercise or base price, (3) cancel any previously granted stock option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the exercise or base pricecancellation of the stock option or SAR exceeds the fair market value of a

62  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


share of common stock on the date of such cancellation (other than in connection with a change of control or certain capital changes), or (4) engage in any action that would be considered a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles.participant’s outstanding awards.

Minimum Vesting RequirementStockholder Approval. Stockholder approval is required for All Awards.All awards granted undercertain types of amendments to the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan, will have a minimum vesting periodincluding any increase in the number of one-year measured from the date of grant; provided, however, that up to 5% of the shares available for future distributionissuance.

Amendment or Termination of 2020 Equity Plan. Our Board may at any time terminate or amend the 2020 Equity Plan or any form of stock award agreement under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan, on the date the amendment and restatement becomes effective may be granted without such minimum vesting requirement. Further, this minimum vesting requirement will not limit (1) Oracle’s ability to grant awards that contain rights to accelerated vesting on a termination of employment or service (or to otherwise accelerate vesting), or (2) any rights to accelerated vesting in connection with a change of control. In addition, this minimum vesting requirement will not apply to awards assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition.

Dividends and Dividend Equivalents.The Compensation Committee may credit any holder of an award granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan with dividends or dividend equivalents in an amount equal to the value of all dividends paid on one share of common stock for each share represented by the award. However, any such dividends or dividend equivalents may not be paid until the underlying share or unit vests. The value of dividends or dividend equivalents payable with respect to awards that do not vest must be forfeited.

Clawback/Recoupment.An award granted under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will be subject to any provisions of applicable laws providing for the recoupment or clawback of incentive compensation; any provisions as may be reflected in a recoupment or clawback policy adopted by Oracle; and any recoupment, clawback or similar provisions that may be included in the applicable award agreement.

Amendment and Termination. Unless it is terminated earlier, the Amended 2000 Equity Plan will terminate on the date of Oracle’s Annual Meeting in 2020. The Board may amend or terminate the Amended 2000 Equity Plan at any time and in any respect, except that the Board cannot, without the approval of the stockholders of Oracle, amend the Amended 2000 Equity Plan in any manner that requiresrequired stockholder approval pursuant to tax or regulatory requirements with which the Compensation Committee deems it necessary or desirable to comply. No amendment of the Amended 2000 Equity Plan may adversely affect any outstanding rights or unexercised options or SARs without the participant’s consent. Subject to the specific terms of the Amended 2000 Equity Plan, the Compensation Committee may amend the terms of any award at any time.

Fair Market Value of Shares. The fair market value of our shares on any relevant date under the Amended 2000 Equity Plan is generally the last reported sale price per share on that date on the New York Stock Exchange. The last reported sale price of our shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on September 18, 2017 was $48.33 per share.approval.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Information

The following is a general summary under current law of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to participants who are citizens or individual residents of the United States relating to the types of equitystock awards that may be granted under the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan. This summary deals withdescribes only the general tax principles and is provided only for general information. Certain kinds of taxes, such as foreign taxes, state and local income taxes, payroll taxes and the alternative minimum tax, are not discussed.

 

  

Nonqualified Stock Options. The grant of a nonqualified stock option will not be a taxable event. The optionee generally will recognize ordinary income upon exercise of the option, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares received at the time of exercise (including option shares withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations) over the exercise price of the option, and generally Oracle will be allowed a deduction in this amount, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m). or any other tax rule. Upon disposition of the shares received upon exercise, the optionee will recognize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending upon the length of time he or she held such shares. The amount of long-term or short-term capital gain or loss recognized by the optionee upon disposition of the shares will be an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the optionee’s basis in the shares (which basis is ordinarily the fair market value of the shares on the date the option was exercised).

 

  

Incentive Stock Options. Neither the grant nor the exercise of an incentive stock option will be a taxable event for regular tax purposes, except that the alternative minimum tax may apply atto the time of exercise. The optionee will recognize long-term capital gain or loss on a disposition of shares acquired upon exercise of the option provided the optionee does not dispose of such shares within two years from the date the option was granted or within one year after the shares were transferred to the optionee. For purposes of determining such gain or loss, the optionee’s basis in such shares will, in general, be the exercise price of such option. If the optionee satisfies both of the holding periods described above, then Oracle will not be allowed a deduction by reason of the exercise of the option. If the optionee disposes of the shares acquired upon exercise before satisfying both of the holding period requirements discussed above (a disqualifying disposition)“disqualifying disposition”), his or her gain recognized on the disqualifying

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   63


disposition will be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized upon the disposition of the shares) and the exercise price of such option, and generally Oracle will be entitled to a deduction in this amount, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m). or any other tax rule. The gain (if any) in excess of the amount recognized as ordinary income on a disqualifying disposition will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the length of time the recipient held the shares.

 

  

SARs.The grant of a SAR will not be a taxable event. The recipient of a SAR generally will recognize ordinary income upon exercise of the SAR, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the exercised shares at the time of exercise (including shares withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations) over the exercise or base price of the SAR, and generally Oracle will be allowed a deduction in this amount, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m). or any other tax rule. Upon disposition of any shares received upon exercise, the recipient will recognize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending upon the length of time he or she held such shares. The amount of long-term or short-term capital gain or loss recognized by the recipient upon

68  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


disposition of the shares will be an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the recipient’s basis in the shares (which basis is ordinarily the fair market value of the shares on the date the SAR was exercised).

 

  

Restricted Stock Purchase Rights/Stock Bonuses. The grant of arestricted stock purchase right or stock bonus will not be a taxable event until the award vests, unless the award is vested upon grant or in the case ofparticipant timely files an award that is subject to vesting, the participant electselection under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be taxed at the time of grant. In such circumstances the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of purchase or grant less the amount paid for such shares (if any). Any gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares generally will be a capital gain or loss. If the stock purchase right or bonus is subject to vesting and the recipient does not make an 83(b) election, the recipient will upon vesting recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of vesting less the amount paid for such shares (if any). Any gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares generally will be a capital gain or loss. Oracle generally will be allowed a deduction for the compensation income recognized by the recipient, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m).

Stock Bonuses. The grant of a stock bonus is generally taxable upon grant, and the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant, and generally Oracle will be entitled to a deduction in this amount, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m). Any gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares generally will be a capital gain or loss. A recipient who makes a proper election to defer the payment of a stock bonus will not recognize income with respect to the shares, and Oracle will not be entitled to a corresponding deduction, until the end of the deferral period. At the end of the deferral period, the recipient will recognize ordinary compensation income, and Oracle will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m) or any other tax rule, equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock issued at that time.

 

  

RSUs and PSUs.The grant of an award of RSUs or PSUs will not be a taxable event. The recipient of the award generally will recognize ordinary compensation income in each year in which the units vest in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock received, and generally Oracle will be entitled to a deduction in this amount, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m). or any other tax rule. A recipient’s basis for determining gain or loss on a subsequent disposition of these shares of common stock will be the amount the recipient must include in income when the units vest. Any gain or loss recognized on a disposition of the shares of common stock generally will be short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on the length of time the recipient holds the shares. A recipient who makes a proper election to defer the settlement of RSUs will not recognize income with respect to the units, and Oracle will not be entitled to a corresponding deduction, until the end of the deferral period. At the end of the deferral period, the recipient will recognize ordinary compensation income, and Oracle will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to any limitations under Section 162(m), or any other tax rule, equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock issued at that time.

New Plan Benefits

All awards made under the Amended 2000The 2020 Equity Plan are discretionary, so it isdoes not possible to determine theprovide for set benefits that will be received by participants in the future. The Compensation Committee hasor amounts of awards and we have not approved any awards that are conditioned on stockholder approval of the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan.

64  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting The basis for participation in the 2020 Equity Plan is the Compensation Committee’s decision, in its sole discretion, that an award to an eligible participant will further the 2020 Equity Plan’s stated purpose described above. In exercising its discretion, the Compensation Committee will consider the recommendations of Stockholders


Historical Plan Benefits

The following table sets forth, for eachmanagement and the purposes of the individuals and groups indicated, the total number of shares of Oracle common stock subject to equity awards that have been granted (even if not currently outstanding) under the 2000 Equity Plan, for the period from October 16, 2000 (the date the 2000 Equity Plan became effective) through August 31, 2017, a nearly 17-year period.

Name and positionShares subject to equity awards (#) (1)

Lawrence J. Ellison,Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

  92,275,000

Safra A. Catz,Chief Executive Officer

  73,012,500

Mark V. Hurd,Chief Executive Officer

  51,562,500

Thomas Kurian,President, Product Development

  52,383,707

John F. Fowler, Former Executive Vice President, Systems

  11,126,485

All current executive officers as a group

294,497,066

All current directors who are not executive officers as a group (2)

Each nominee for election as a director (3)

225,600,000

Each associate of any directors, executive officers or director nominees

Each other person who received or is to receive 5 percent of awards under the 2000 Equity Plan

All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group

891,698,466

(1)

Includes shares subject to equity awards that have been forfeited or cancelled.

(2)

Non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 20002020 Equity Plan.

(3)

Represents grants made to Mr. Ellison, Ms. Catz, Mr. Hurd and Mr. Henley.

For more information regarding Oracle’s equity compensation plans, including the Directors’ Stock Plan and the ESPP, please see “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

Required Vote

Approval of the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting. If approved by stockholders, the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan will become effective on the date of the Annual Meeting. If stockholders do not approve this proposal, the amendment and restatement2020 Equity Plan will not become effective and Oracle will not have a stock-based compensation plan in place to grant stock awards to employees following the 2000 Equity Plan will continue in its current form.Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the approval of the Amended 20002020 Equity Plan.

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   65LOGO   69


PROPOSAL NO. 54

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Our F&A Committee is responsible for overseeing the engagement, independence, compensation, retention and services of our independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our consolidated financial statements. The F&A Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as our independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2017.2021. Representatives of EY will be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

EY has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. In conjunction with the mandated rotation of EY’s lead engagement partner, the F&A Committee is involved in the selection of EY’s lead engagement partner. The F&A Committee also periodically considers whether there should be a rotation of independent registered public accounting firms because the F&A Committee believes that it is important for the registered public accounting firm to maintain independence and objectivity. In deciding to engage EY, our F&A Committee reviewed, among other factors, registered public accounting firm independence issues raised by commercial relationships we have with the other major accounting firms. We have no commercial relationship with EY that would impair its independence. Consequently, at this time, the F&A Committee does not believe that a rotation of registered public accounting firms is merited and believes that the continued retention of EY to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Oracle and its stockholders.

The F&A Committee reviews audit and non-audit services performed by EY, as well as the fees charged by EY for such services. In its review of non-audit service fees, the F&A Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the registered public accounting firm’s independence. Additional information concerning the F&A Committee and its activities with EY can be found in the following sections of this proxy statement: “Board of Directors—Committees, Membership and Meetings” and “Report of the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.”

Pre-approval Policy and Procedures. We have a policy that outlines procedures intended to ensure that our F&A Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided to us by EY. The current policy provides for (1) general pre-approval of audit and audit-related services which do not exceed certain aggregate dollar thresholds approved by the F&A Committee, and (2) specific pre-approval of all other permitted services and any proposed services which exceed these same dollar thresholds. Throughout the year, the F&A Committee reviews updates regarding the nature and extent of services provided by EY.

The term of any general pre-approval is twelve months from the date of pre-approval, unless the F&A Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. The F&A Committee will annually review and pre-approve a dollar amount for each category of services that may be provided by EY without requiring further approval from the F&A Committee. The policy describes the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services that have this general pre-approval, and the F&A Committee may add to, or subtract from, the list of general pre-approved services from time to time.

In connection with this pre-approval policy, the F&A Committee will consider whether the categories of pre-approved services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The F&A Committee will also consider whether the independent registered public accounting firm may be best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with our business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance our ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor is necessarily determinative.

The F&A Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services. It may determine, for each fiscal year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit related and tax services and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services classified as “all other fees.”

The F&A Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit fees of EY during fiscal 2017.2020.

 

66  LOGO   201770  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Ernst & Young Fees

The following table sets forth approximate aggregate fees billed to us by EY for fiscal 20172020 and fiscal 2016:2019:

 

Name  2017   2016 
  2020   2019 

Audit Fees (1)

  $25,504,472   $23,374,610   

$

24,342,290

 

  

$

26,520,352 

 

Audit Related Fees (2)

   1,968,398    1,338,242   

 

4,195,685

 

  

 

2,115,207 

 

Tax Fees (3)

   305,250    395,041   

 

3,254,567

 

  

 

3,810,118 

 

All Other Fees (4)

   98,000    27,421   

 

8,000

 

  

 

— 

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total Fees

  $27,876,120   $25,135,314   $ 31,800,542   $ 32,445,677  

 

(1)

Audit fees consisted of audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory audits or accounting consultations.

 

(2)

Audit related fees for fiscal 2017 and 2016 consisted of services with respect to the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16, related to our managedand our acquired entities’ cloud services businesses and acquired entities.offerings.

 

(3)

Tax fees for fiscal 2017 and 2016 consisted principally of tax compliance and advisory services for Oracle and entities acquired by Oracle.

 

(4)

All other fees for fiscal 2017 and 2016 consisted principally of general training and advisory services.

Required Vote

The ratification of the selection of EY requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on this matter at our Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP.EY.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   67


REPORT OF THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Review of Oracle’s Audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 20172020

The F&A Committee has reviewed and discussed with our management our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017.2020.

The F&A Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP (EY), our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)(the PCAOB) and the U.S. Securities and Commission (the SEC).

The F&A Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLPEY required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’sEY’s communications with the F&A Committee concerning independence and the F&A Committee has discussed the independence of Ernst & Young LLPEY with that firm.

Based on the F&A Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the F&A Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017,2020, for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

 

Submitted by:

 

Michael J. Boskin, Chair

 

Jeffrey S. Berg

Bruce R. Chizen

 

   Renée J. JamesRona A. Fairhead

Dated: June 26, 2017

68  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   71


PROPOSAL NO. 6

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS REPORT

The New York State Common Retirement Fund, 59 Maiden Lane—30th Floor, New York, NY 10038, has represented that it has beneficially owned the requisite amount of Oracle common stock for more than one year and has notified us that a representative will present the proposal below (the Political Contributions Report Proposal) at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors opposes the following Political Contributions Report Proposal for the reasons stated after the proposal.

Resolved, that the shareholders ofOracle (“Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a public report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

1. Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

2. Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:

a. The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

b. The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company’s website within 12 months from the date of the annual meeting.

Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders of Oracle, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. These include any activities considered intervention in any political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations; independent expenditures; or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state or local candidates.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders and critical for compliance with federal ethics laws. Moreover, the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision recognized the importance of political spending disclosure for shareholders when it said, “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.” Gaps in transparency and accountability may expose the company to reputational and business risks that could threaten long-term shareholder value.

Relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s political spending. For example, the Company’s payments to trade associations used for political activities are undisclosed and unknown. In some cases, even management does not know how trade associations use their company’s money politically. The proposal asks the Company to disclose all of its political spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax exempt organizations used for political purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies that support political disclosure and accountability and present this information on their websites.

The Company’s Board and its shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to be able to fully evaluate the political use of corporate assets. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   69


Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 6

We believe it is our responsibility to communicate Oracle’s support for laws and policies that are in the best interests of our company, employees, partners, customers, suppliers and stockholders. Oracle conducts business in over 195 countries and territories, necessitating compliance with a complex web of international laws, rules and regulations. Proposed changes to these laws, rules, regulations and policies can have a significant effect on our operating results and stockholder value. Accordingly, we believe it is necessary and appropriate to engage in the political process to further our company’s long-term interests. Our current practices, described below, provide ample transparency and accountability with respect to our political contributions.

Our political contributions and lobbying activities are governed by extensive laws and regulations, including those requiring public disclosure of such contributions and activities. Our Public Sector Legal & Compliance group, which reports directly to our General Counsel, monitors our compliance with these laws and regulations. As required by law, certain information about our political activities is publicly available. We also voluntarily disclose information about our political contributions on our investor relations website. Specifically:

Our voluntary 2016 Political Contributions report, available atinvestor.oracle.com under “Financial Reporting,” discloses our political contributions under U.S. state and local laws and our donations to organizations operating under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code. This report, which is provided to the F&A Committee on an annual basis, also includes information regarding the oversight of our political activities and the Oracle Political Action Committee (PAC).

Our U.S. federal lobbying disclosure reports are available atdisclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx andwww.senate.gov/legislative/lobbyingdisc.htm.

We file similar publicly available lobbying reports with state and local agencies as required by law.

The Federal Election Commission reports of the Oracle PAC, which detail the PAC’s political contributions and expenditures, are available atwww.fec.gov/data.

Each trade group we belong to is subject to public disclosure obligations with respect to its lobbying and political contributions and expenditures.

We are committed to the highest ethical standards, and we have procedures in place to ensure that our political contributions and lobbying activities are subject to appropriate oversight. Our public policy agenda is developed and advanced by our Government Affairs department, which reports to one of our CEOs. The Government Affairs department focuses its efforts on public policy issues that are relevant to the long-term interests of our company and stockholders. In addition, we belong to a number of trade associations that advocate on behalf of policy issues that are important to our business. While we do not always share or agree with all of the views espoused by such trade associations, we believe they are often helpful for the purpose of building a consensus among organizations with similar interests and advocating in favor of those interests. We regularly review the costs and benefits of our memberships in trade associations.

We believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary given Oracle’s existing disclosure and reporting practices and could result in competitive harm without providing commensurate benefit to our stockholders. The requested report could put our company at a disadvantage relative to our competitors, who are not required to disclose this information, by revealing confidential information about our long-term strategies and priorities. In addition, disclosure regarding our trade association membership dues may misrepresent our public policy agenda, as trade associations operate on an independent basis and we do not always agree with all positions taken by such trade associations. Any additional political contribution reporting requirements that go beyond those required under existing law should be applicable to all participants engaged in the political process, rather than to us alone, as the proposal requests.

Finally, we note that Oracle’s political contributions are not financially material to the company. In fiscal 2017, Oracle’s total expenses relating to political contributions were insignificant when compared to the company’s total operating costs. Accordingly, we believe additional disclosure regarding Oracle’s political contributions is unnecessary.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 6.

Required Vote

The adoption of the Political Contributions Report Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on the matter at our Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 6.

70  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


PROPOSAL NO. 75

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING PAY EQUITY REPORT

 

Pax World Mutual Funds, 30 Penhallow Street, Suite 400, Portsmouth, NH 03801, hasalong with co-sponsor the Comptroller of the City of New York as custodian and trustee of five retirement and pension funds, have represented that iteach has beneficially owned the requisite amount of Oracle common stock for more than one year and hashave notified us that a representative will present the proposal below (the Pay Equity Report Proposal) at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors opposes the following Pay Equity Report Proposal for the reasons stated after the proposal.

Proposal 5—Pay Equity Report

Whereas:

The median income for women working full time in the U.S. is reported to be 80% of that of their male counterparts. AtWomen of all racial and ethnic groups earn less than men of the current ratesame group. Differences in experience, education, role, etc. may account for some of progress, it will be decades beforethis gap, but an analysis by Glassdoor finds that even controlling for these factors, an unexplained gap of 4.9% remains between men and women reach pay parity.

A 2016 Glassdoor study revealed thatin the U.S., and the adjusted gender pay gap for women in the information technology industry is 5.9%, even after adding statistical controls.higher than average, at 5.4%.

The business case for gender diversity is well-established; a growing bodyMcKinsey reports that women comprise 40% of evidencethe technology software industry’s workforce and remain underrepresented at every level, comprising just 19% of the C-Suite. At Oracle, women comprise 30% of employees and just 24% of leadership positions.

Research links greater board and managerial diversity with better company financial performance. Credit Suisse has found that more diversity in management coincides withperformance, better corporate performanceproblem solving and higher stock market valuations.increased innovation. Morgan Stanley recently found that gender diversity is linked to better returns for tech companies. Research also shows that greaterMcKinsey states “a lack of gender diversity brings increased innovation, better problem solving, stimulated group performancecarries with it a major opportunity cost, both for individual tech companies and enhanced company reputation.

Yet Mercer’s research indicatesthe entire sector.” Mercer finds that current female hiring, promotion and retention are insufficient to create gender equality over the next decade.

Women comprise 29% of Oracle’s employees, but only 23% of its leadership positions.

Mercer has found a link between pay equity and greater gender diversity. Activelyactively managing pay equity “is associated with higher current female representation at the professional through executive levels and a faster trajectory to improved representation.” Among the best practices highlighted by McKinsey to achieve greater gender equality in the workplace is “tracking

Oracle does not report on pay equity among its U.S. employees. In contrast, Apple, Microsoft, eBay, and eliminatingsalesforce.com publish information on their gender pay gaps.”

Regulatory risks associated with pay equity exist. The Paycheck Fairness Act, introduced in Congress, would improve company-level transparencypractices and strengthen penalties for equal pay violations. At the state level, California, Massachusetts, New York and Maryland recently enacted significant changes to their equal pay laws.

Technology peers Apple, Microsoft and eBay, among others, have publicly committed to pay equity and published the results of gender pay assessments.

Companies that exhibit significant pay disparities by gender, race or ethnicity face regulatory, litigation and reputational risk. Multiple states have adopted strong equal pay laws. Large employers in the U.K.— including Oracle UK—must disclose their gender pay gaps annually.

The case for greater pay equity reporting and oversight at Oracle is compelling. Oracle faces two separate legal actions alleging pay discrimination:

A U.S. Department of Labor lawsuit alleges systematic discrimination against female and minority employees at Oracle.

A class action lawsuit brought by three former employees alleges that women software engineers are routinely paid less than men in similar jobs at Oracle.

Resolved:

Shareholders request that Oracle prepare a report by April 2018 (at reasonable costannually to the board and omitting proprietary and confidential information),shareholders, identifying whether there exists a gendergender/racial pay gap exists among its employees, and if so, outline the steps being taken to reduce the gap.gap and support advancement opportunities for women and minorities. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has defineddefines the gender pay gap as the difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings. The report should be prepared by April 2021 at reasonable cost and omit proprietary information.

Supporting Statement:

A report adequate for investors to assess the Company’sOracle’s strategy and performance would include the percentage pay gap between male and female employees across race and ethnicity (including base, bonus and equity compensation), a discussion of policies to address any gaps and quantitative reduction targets, and the methodology used to identify pay disparities.

Supporting Statement:

With evidence linking pay equitydisparities and a discussion of policies, programs and goals to greater diversityeliminate disparities and strong links between management diversity, financial performancepromote equal opportunities for women and more robust decision-making, companies would be well served by understanding the equity attributes of their pay, at all levels of the corporation, by gender as well as other facets of diversity, such as race and ethnicity. Amid increasing regulatory and investor interest, it is apparent that companies should understand, manage, and report on pay equityminorities to shareholders.advance to senior roles.

 

201772  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   71


Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 5

As a global company with approximately 135,000 employees and customers in over 175 countries, we are committed to ensuring that we do not discriminate on the basis of gender or race in our compensation programs, and we are further committed to diversity and inclusion in our workforce. We make every effort to attract, invest in and develop the talents of employees who reflect the diversity of our customers and the communities in which we do business. We believe a diverse workforce enables us to better anticipate and meet our customers’ changing needs in a fast-paced global economy and deliver greater value to our stockholders.

Pay equity is a serious societal and global issue. Oracle promotes equality through our hiring, pay and promotions practices and processes. Specifically:

   New jobs are posted publicly for anyone to apply.

   Hiring and promotion pay decisions are based on a variety of non-discriminatory factors, including consideration of the job itself and the pay range associated with it, as well as the skills, experience, education and expertise the individual brings to Oracle—not race or gender.

   Our compensation framework aims to achieve equity, as well as recognition of each employee’s particular knowledge, skills, abilities, performance, experience, and contributions to the company.

   Inquiries about candidates’ prior salary history are prohibited. This policy has been in effect in Oracle’s U.S. offices prior to the enactment of state laws in California and elsewhere prohibiting this practice.

Diversity and inclusion in our workforce starts at the top. Thirty-six percent of our Board members are women or come from a diverse background (four of our 14 Board members are women, including our CEO). Since 2006, Oracle Women’s Leadership (OWL), a leadership and professional development program, has sought to develop, engage and empower current and future generations of Oracle women leaders. Each of our more than 80 worldwide OWL communities is led by a senior Oracle woman leader and focuses on professional development, networking and community outreach at the local level. OWL’s global events are open to all Oracle employees, promoting diversity and inclusion across our workforce. Oracle also has additional employee resource groups (ERGs), which are a vital part of our culture and allow employees to connect with the diverse and inclusive communities that make up who we are as a company. Our ERGs include, among others, the African-American Business Leadership for Excellence, Oracle Latinos Alliance, Oracle Professional Asian Leadership, Oracle Diverse Abilities Network and Military and Veteran Employment Network. More information about diversity and inclusion at Oracle, including gender, race and ethnicity data for Oracle’s workforce, is available at www.oracle.com/corporate/careers/culture/diversity.html.

In addition to fostering diversity and inclusion at Oracle, we support efforts to build a future pipeline of diverse talent in the technology industry globally. Oracle has committed to invest more than $3 million in direct and in-kind funds to immerse girls worldwide in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) through the U.S. government’s Let Girls Learn initiative. Under this commitment, Oracle is offering more than 65 direct educational events and support conferences, summer computing camps and codefests for girls, with the aim of inspiring them to explore and pursue opportunities in STEM fields. In addition, Oracle Education Foundation and Oracle Volunteers are teaching girls coding, electrical engineering and project management through workshops at Design Tech High School, an innovative public high school housed in a new facility that Oracle constructed on the campus of its headquarters. Oracle has also partnered with the Anita Borg Institute for Women in Technology, the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women, the Level Playing Field Institute, the Society of Women Engineers, the Women of Color STEM Conference, the United Negro College Fund Scholars Program, Lesbians Who Tech, and the National Society of Black Engineers Jr., among other organizations that foster the advancement of underrepresented groups in the technology industry.

We believe the creation and publication of a pay equity report as requested by this proposal would be costly and time-consuming and, in light of our long-standing efforts in this area, would not lead to meaningful gains in support of workforce diversity and gender and racial pay equity.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 5.

Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 7

As a global company with approximately 138,000 employees and customers in more than 195 countries and territories, Oracle believes that a diverse workforce is critical to driving creativity, innovation and growth. We make every effort to attract, invest in and develop the talents2020 Annual Meeting of employees who reflect the diversity of our customers and the communities in which we do business. We believe a diverse workforce enables us to better anticipate and meet our customers’ changing needs in a fast-paced global economy and deliver greater value to our stockholders. We are also committed to pay equity for all of our employees and ensuring that we do not discriminate on the basis of gender or any protected category in the full range of our compensation decisions.Stockholders  LOGO   73

Diversity and inclusion in our workforce starts at the top. Thirty-three percent of our Board members are women or come from a diverse background (three of our 12 Board members are women, including one of our CEOs). Since 2006, Oracle Women’s Leadership (OWL), a leadership and professional development program, has sought to develop, engage and empower current and future generations of Oracle women leaders. Each of our 75 worldwide OWL communities is led by a senior Oracle woman leader and focuses on professional development, networking and community outreach at the local level. OWL’s global events are open to all Oracle employees, promoting inclusion across our workforce.

We offer all of our employees unconscious bias training, which examines how our biases could hamper our efforts to retain a strong and highly engaged workforce. Our unconscious bias training program is intended to increase self-awareness of unconscious bias in the employee recruitment and selection process and educate participants on how unconscious bias affects our opinions, employment-related decisions and assumptions.

In addition to fostering diversity and inclusion at Oracle, we support efforts to build a future pipeline of diverse talent in the technology industry globally. Oracle has committed to invest more than $3 million in direct and in-kind funds to immerse girls worldwide in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) through the U.S. government’s Let Girls Learn initiative. Under this commitment, Oracle will offer more than 65 direct educational events and support conferences, summer computing camps and codefests for girls, with the aim of inspiring them to explore and pursue opportunities in STEM fields. In addition, Oracle Education Foundation and Oracle Volunteers are teaching girls coding, electrical engineering and project management through workshops at Design Tech High School (d.tech), an innovative public high school that will soon move into a new facility that Oracle is building at its headquarters. Oracle has also partnered with the Anita Borg Institute for Women in Technology, the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women, the Level Playing Field Institute, the Society of Women Engineers, the Women of Color STEM Conference, the United Negro College Fund Scholars Program, Lesbians Who Tech, and the National Society of Black Engineers Jr., among other organizations that foster the advancement of underrepresented groups in the technology industry.

Additional information regarding Oracle’s diversity and inclusion efforts is available in Oracle’s 2016 Corporate Citizenship Report (www.oracle.com/corporate/citizenship) and on Oracle’s Careers webpage (www.oracle.com/us/corporate/careers/diversity). The Board does not believe that this stockholder proposal would enhance Oracle’s existing commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 7.


Required Vote

The adoption of the Pay Equity Report Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on the matter at our Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 7.5.

 

72  LOGO   201774  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


PROPOSAL NO. 86

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING PROXY ACCESS REFORMINDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIR

 

Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021, has represented that he has beneficially owned the requisite amount of Oracle common stock for more than one year and has notified us that a representative will present the proposal below (the Proxy Access ReformIndependent Board Chair Proposal) at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Steiner has appointed John Chevedden and/or Mr. Chevedden’s designee to act on his behalf regarding the Proxy Access ReformIndependent Board Chair Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes the following Proxy Access ReformIndependent Board Chair Proposal for the reasons stated after the proposal.

Proposal 8 – Shareholder Proxy Access Reform6—Independent Board Chairman

RESOLVED: Shareholders askrequest that our Board of Directors adopt a policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require that the boardChairman of directorsthe Board be an independent member of the Board. Although it would be better to amend its proxy access bylaws (primarily foundhave an immediate transition to an independent Board Chairman, the Board would have the discretion to phase in Section 1.12 of our bylaws) and any other associated bylaw sections and other documents, to include the following changesthis policy for the purposenext Chief Executive Officer transition.

If the Board determines that a Chairman, who was independent when selected, is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chairman who satisfies the requirements of decreasing the averagepolicy within a reasonable amount of Company common stocktime. Compliance with this policy is temporarily waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman.

It is important to have an Independent Board Chairman to build up the average member of a nominating group would have to hold for 3-years to satisfy the aggregate ownership requirements to form a nominating group and increasing the potential nominees:

1. No limitation shall be placed on the number of stockholders that can aggregate their common shares to achieve the 3% “Required Shares” to become an “Eligible Stockholder” to nominate a “Proxy Access Nominee” or nominees.

2. The number of “Proxy Access Nominees” eligible to appear in proxy materials shall be one quarteroversight role of the Directors. The following directors then serving or two, whichever is greater.received from 23% to 28% in negative votes at the 2019 annual meeting:

Even if the 20 largest public pension funds were able to aggregate their shares, they would not meet the 3% criteria for a continuous 3-years at most companies examined by the Council of Institutional Investors. Additionally many of the largest investors of major companies are routinely passive investors who would be unlikely to be part of the proxy access shareholder aggregation process.Bruce Chizen (Lead Director)

Our current limit of 20 shareholders also excludes most retail shareholders from having any role. Also shareholders can benefit from a more meaningful number of director positions available for proxy access via this proposal. These features will combine to give shareholders a more meaningful shareholder proxy access structure.Charles Moorman

Of course this proposal cannot address all the shortcomings in our current corporate governance. However current shortcomings should at least be an added incentive to vote in favor of this one step forward. Examples of current corporate governance shortcomings include this information published in 2016:

Directors Over age 70 - 7

Directors With Over 15yrs Tenure - 6

Directors With negative vote higher than 40%:

George Conrades

Jeffrey Berg

Naomi Seligman

Leon Panetta

The 23% to 28% in negative votes are worse than they seem since Mr. Lawrence Ellison, who controls 35% of the vote, is assumed to have voted in favor of these directors. These directors also controlled 100% of the Executive Pay Committee, 75% of the Nomination Committee and 50% of the Audit Committee.

Meanwhile Ms. Safra Catz, CEO, received $191 million in total realized pay in 2019. Plus 4 insider directors

Additional concerns:there is a long history of shareholders rejecting the excessive Oracle executive pay:

 

Many Directors with high Negative Votes
2015

51% Rejection

2016

55% Rejection

2017

50% Rejection

2018

46% Rejection

2019

42% Rejection

Entrenched long-tenured Board overdue for Board refreshment

Board Integrity

Directors with distracting high work loads elsewhere

Audit Committee Directors with distracting high work loads elsewhere

Excessive Severance Vesting

Inadequate Expense Recognition

Related Party Transactions

Only 4 board meetingsMost companies have rejection rates of 5% to 10%. The 42% to 55% rejection is worse than it seems because Mr. Ellison, who controls 35% of the vote, is assumed to have voted in a year

Returning to the core topicfavor of this excessive executive pay.

This proposal topic won 44%-support at a previous Oracle annual meeting. This 44%-support represented majority support from non-insider shares.

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:yes:

Shareholder Proxy Access Reform – Independent Board Chairman—Proposal 86

 

20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   73LOGO   75


Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 8

In June 2016, our Board adopted amendments to our Bylaws to implement proxy access. We believe our proxy access bylaw strikes the appropriate balance between providing stockholders with a fair and useful proxy access process and guarding against certain risks associated with proxy access. This stockholder proposal seeks the adoption of provisions that would disrupt that balance.

Under our proxy access bylaw, a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) owning at least 3% of Oracle’s outstanding shares continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in Oracle’s annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board.

The Board spent significant time evaluating the adoption of a proxy access bylaw. In crafting the bylaw, the Board considered a variety of views on proxy access, including the Council of Institutional Investors’ Proxy Access Best Practices and the feedback received from extensive discussions with our stockholders and independent advisors with expertise in corporate governance. A number of our stockholders have expressed support for proxy access provisions limiting the number of stockholders in a nominating group to 20 and limiting the number of proxy access nominees to up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, and the Board believes those limitations are in the best interest of all stockholders.

The changes requested by this stockholder proposal would upset the carefully considered and balanced approach reflected in our existing proxy access bylaw. Specifically:

 

The proposal requests an increase in the number of permitted proxy access nominees to the greater of two individuals or 25% of the Board. Consistent with many other companies that have adopted proxy access, we limited the maximum number of permitted proxy access nominees to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board to provide stockholders with the opportunity to pursue meaningful representation on Board, without risking excessive disruption to the Board’s continuity and operations or the mix of knowledge, experience and skills of the Board. We believe this limit also helps address concerns that a stockholder could use proxy access to begin the process of effecting a change in control or to pursue special interests that are not widely supported by our stockholders.

The proposal requests removal of the limitation on the number of stockholders that can aggregate their shares to meet the 3% ownership threshold and would place no limit on the size of the group. We believe the 20-stockholder aggregation limit in our proxy access bylaw is a reasonable limitation to control the administrative burden of confirming and monitoring share ownership within a nominating group and prevent the use of proxy access by a group that includes stockholders that do not have a substantial economic stake in Oracle. A 20-stockholder aggregation limit is endorsed by many institutional investors and is common among companies that have adopted proxy access. A group of investment funds under common management and investment control counts as a single stockholder for this purpose, as do any two or more funds under common management and funded primarily by a single employer, or that are a part of a family of funds.

In addition to proxy access, we have instituted a number of corporate governance best practices to promote Board accountability and provide stockholders with access to the Board, including:

Annual election of all directors and a director majority voting policy;

An active stockholder outreach and engagement program;

Ongoing review and refreshment of Board membership (with two new directors added in the past three years);

A single class of voting stock and no supermajority voting provisions;

Separation of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles;

Stockholders’ ability to propose director nominees for consideration by the Governance Committee and communicate with any director in writing;

Stockholders’ right to call a special meeting (subject to meeting a 20% ownership threshold); and

Stockholders’ right to act by written consent.

We also note that a number of the proponent’s assertions regarding our corporate governance are inaccurate or unsubstantiated. Contrary to the proponent’s claim, we have an active and engaged Board that meets frequently. Our full Board held eight meetings in fiscal 2017 and seven meetings in fiscal 2016 (not four, as the proponent inaccurately states). Our four standing committees (Compensation, Finance & Audit, Governance and Independence) held a total of 31 meetings in fiscal 2017 and 33 meetings in fiscal 2016. We believe our Board acts with integrity and in accordance with its fiduciary duties to act in the best interest of our company and stockholders.

74  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


None of our NEOs are entitled to severance, change in control or termination payments or benefits, other than potential acceleration of vesting of equity awards under our broad-based equity plan. This potential acceleration benefit is not “single-trigger” and applies to all employees who participate in the plan. We do not believe this is “excessive.” Further, we are perplexed by the proponent’s unsubstantiated claim of “inadequate expense recognition.”

We believe that our proxy access bylaw, together with our existing corporate governance practices, help ensure that our Board is accessible and accountable to stockholders. Our proxy access bylaw was designed to be consistent with market practice, and we believe it strikes the appropriate balance between the risks and benefits of proxy access. Accordingly, we do not believe that the changes requested by this proposal are necessary or in the best interest of our stockholders.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 8.

Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 6

The Board believes it is important to preserve flexibility to determine the most appropriate leadership structure based on an assessment of Oracle’s needs and circumstances at any given time. The Board believes our company and our stockholders benefit from this flexibility, as our directors are well positioned to determine our leadership structure given their in-depth knowledge of our leadership team, our strategic goals, and the opportunities and challenges we face. Moreover, our lead independent director role, as well as our other corporate governance practices, already provide the independent leadership and management oversight requested by this proposal.

As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines), the Board does not have a policy mandating the separation of the roles of Chair and CEO. The Board elects our Chair and appoints our CEO, and these positions may be held by the same person or by different people. Currently, the roles of Chair and CEO are filled by separate individuals: Mr. Ellison, Oracle’s founder and CTO, serves as Chairman, and Ms. Catz serves as CEO. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the Chair and CEO is appropriate at this time because it allows our CEO to focus primarily on Oracle’s business strategy, operations and corporate vision. The Board further believes it is valuable for Mr. Ellison to serve as Chairman because his familiarity with and knowledge of our technologies and product offerings are unmatched. With over 40 years of experience at Oracle, Mr. Ellison is uniquely positioned to lead the Board in its oversight of our company’s business and strategic direction.

We do not believe that a policy requiring an independent chair is necessary to ensure that the Board provides independent and effective oversight of Oracle’s business and management. Our Guidelines provide that on an annual rotating basis, the chair of the F&A Committee, the Compensation Committee or the Governance Committee serves as the lead independent director at executive sessions of the Board. The lead independent director serves as a liaison between our independent directors and our executive directors and performs additional duties as the Board determines. Currently, Michael Boskin serves as the lead independent director.

As required by our Guidelines, a majority of the Board and each member of the F&A Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee and the Independence Committee are “independent” under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules, which ensures that oversight of critical matters—such as the integrity of Oracle’s financial statements, the compensation of our executive officers, the selection and evaluation of directors, and the development of corporate governance principles—is entrusted to independent directors. The Board and each of its committees have unrestricted access to officers and employees of Oracle and have the authority to ask such questions and conduct investigations, and to retain legal, accounting, financial or other outside advisors, as they deem necessary or appropriate to fulfill their duties. In addition, as required by our Guidelines, our non-employee directors meet in executive sessions without management on a regular basis, and our independent directors meet in executive session at least once a year.

The proposal’s rigid approach to board leadership is not the practice of the majority of companies in the S&P 500. According to the 2019 Spencer Stuart Board Index, approximately 66% of companies in the S&P 500 do not have an independent board chair. We believe that rather than taking a “one-size-fits-all” approach to board leadership, the Board’s fiduciary duties are best fulfilled by retaining flexibility to determine the leadership structure that serves the best interests of Oracle and our stockholders, taking into account Oracle’s needs and circumstances at any given time.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 6.

Required Vote

The adoption of the Proxy Access ReformIndependent Board Chair Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on the matter at our Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST adoption of Proposal No. 8.6.

 

201776  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   75


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20182021 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Our Bylaws contain procedures governing how stockholders may submit proposals or director nominations to be considered at our annual meetings. The SEC has also adopted regulations (Exchange Act Rule 14a-8) that govern the inclusion of stockholder proposals in our annual proxy materials.

The table below summarizes the requirements for stockholders who wish to submit proposals or director nominations for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders should carefully review our Bylaws and Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 to ensure that they have satisfied all of the requirements necessary to submit proposals or director nominations to be considered at our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders. Our Bylaws are posted on our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.corpgov.

 

    

Proposals for inclusion in

20182021 proxy statement

 

Director nominations for inclusion in
20182021 proxy statement (proxy access)

 

Other proposals/nominations to be
presented at 20182021 annual meeting*

Type of Proposal or

Nomination

  

SEC rules permit stockholders to submit proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement by satisfying the requirements described in Exchange Act Rule 14a-8.

 

A stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders meeting the ownership requirements described in Section 1.12 of our Bylaws may submit director nominees (constituting up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the Board) for inclusion in our proxy statement by satisfying the requirements described in Section 1.12 of our Bylaws.

 

 

Stockholders may present proposals or director nominations directly at the annual meeting (but not for inclusion in our proxy statement) by satisfying the requirements described in Section 1.11 of our Bylaws.

When Proposal or

Nomination Must Be

Received by Oracle

  

No later than the close of business on May 31, 2018.21, 2021. However, if we did not hold an annual meeting the previous year, or if the date of our annual meeting has changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the previous year’s meeting, we will announce a stockholder’s written notice will be timely if it is delivered within a reasonable time beforenew deadline in our public filings with the mailing of the proxy statement.SEC.

 

No earlier than May 1, 2018April 21, 2020 and no later than the close of business on May 31, 2018.21, 2021. However, if our annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the previous year’s meeting, a stockholder’s written notice will be timely if it is delivered by the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the announcement of the date of the meeting.

 

No earlier than May 31, 201821, 2021 and no later than the close of business on June 30, 2018.20, 2021. However, if our annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the previous year’s meeting, a stockholder’s written notice will be timely if it is delivered by the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the announcement of the date of the meeting.

 

Where to Send

Proposal or

Nomination

  

By Mail: Dorian Daley, Executive Vice President, General Counsel andCorporate Secretary, Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Mailstop 5op7, Redwood City, CaliforniaCA 94065

 

By Email:Corporate_Secretary@oracle.com, with a confirmation copy sent by mail

 

Our offices in California are currently closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic so we encourage you to communicate via email at this time; however, we continue to check physical mail on a periodic basis.

What Must Be

Included with Proposal

or Nomination

 

  

The information required by Exchange Act Rule 14a-8

 

The information required by our Bylaws

 

The information required by our Bylaws

 

*

If stockholders do not comply with the Bylaw notice deadlines in this column, we reserve the right not to submit the stockholder proposals or nominations to a vote at our annual meeting. If we are not notified of a stockholder proposal or nomination by June 30, 2018,20, 2021, then the management personnel who have been appointed as proxies may have the discretion to vote for or against such stockholder proposal or nomination, even though such proposal or nomination is not discusseddisclosed in the proxy statement.

Under our Bylaws, if the number of directors to be elected to the Board is increased and we do not make a public announcement specifying the size of the increased Board at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s written notice of nominees for any new position will be considered timely if it is delivered to our Corporate Secretary by the 10th day following the announcement.

 

76  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   77


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

 

Q:

Who is soliciting my vote?

 

 

A:

The Board of Directors of Oracle is soliciting your vote at the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Q:

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

 

 

A:

You will be voting on the following items of business:

 

the election of directors (Proposal 1);

 

an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 2);

 

an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 3);

the approval of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal 4)3);

 

the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20182021 (Proposal 5)4); and

 

up to threetwo stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting (Proposals 6 to 8)5 and 6).

If any other business properly comes before the meeting, you will be voting on those items as well.

 

Q:

What are the Board of Directors’ recommendations?

 

 

A:

The Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:

 

  

for the election of each of the directors (Proposal 1);

 

  

for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 2);

 

  

one year with respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 3);

for the approval of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term2020 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal 4)3);

 

  

for the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLPEY as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20182021 (Proposal 5)4);

 

  

against the stockholder proposals (Proposals 6 to 8)5 and 6); and

 

  

for or against other matters that come before the Annual Meeting, if any, as the proxy holders deem advisable.

 

Q:

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

A:

The Board set September 18, 20178, 2020 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. All stockholders who owned Oracle common stock at the close of business on September 18, 20178, 2020 may vote at the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

 

 

A:A.

OnlyAll stockholders as of the record date and any stockholder’s spouse or duly appointed proxy, may attend.No guests will be allowed to attend the virtual 2020 Annual Meeting. We will also make the Annual Meeting viewable to any guests interested in Oracle’s business. Guests will not be able to vote shares or ask questions during the meeting.

Q:

Can stockholders ask questions during the Annual Meeting?

 

A.

Yes. We will answer stockholder questions submitted in advance of, and questions submitted live during, the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may submit a question in advance of the meeting at www.proxyvote.com after logging in with the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on their proxy card (if they requested printed materials), or on the instructions that accompanied their proxy materials. Questions may be submitted during the Annual Meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020. We will endeavor to answer as many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits that comply with the meeting rules of conduct. We reserve the right to edit any inappropriate language and to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or Oracle’s business. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition in the interest of time and fairness to all stockholders.

78  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Q:

What do I need to attend the Annual Meeting and when should I arrive?

 

 

A:

TheThis year’s Annual Meeting will be held atin a virtual format only. The accompanying proxy materials and the Oracle Conference Center, 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California. Admissionmeeting’s website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 include instructions on how to participate in the meeting and how you may vote your shares of Oracle’s stock. Stockholders may vote and submit questions while connected to the Annual Meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m.on the Internet. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you must enter the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card (if you requested or received printed materials), Pacific Time.or on the voting instruction forms that accompanied your proxy materials.

In orderWe encourage you to be admitted toaccess the Annual Meeting you should:

arrive shortly after 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time, to ensure that you are seated by the commencement of the Annual Meeting at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time;

be prepared to comply with security requirements, which include security guards searching all bags and attendees passing through a metal detector, among other security measures;

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   77


leave your camera at home because cameras, transmission, broadcasting and other recording devices, including certain smart phones,before it begins. You may not be permitted inaccess the meeting rooms; and

bring photo identification, such as a driver’s license,and proof of ownership of Oracle stocksite 15 minutes before the meeting on the record date, September 18, 2017, such as the Notice, a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on September 18, 2017, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee.

Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present a properly executed legal proxy and a copy of the proof of ownership.

November 4, 2020. If you do not provide photo identification and comply withhave difficulty accessing the other procedures outlined above for attending the Annual Meeting in person, wemeeting, please call 1-800-586-1548 (toll free) or 303-562-9288 (international). We will be unablehave technicians available to admit you to attend in person.assist you.

 

Q:

Can I watchWill the Annual Meeting be recorded and available on the Internet?

 

 

A:

Yes, in order to maximize access for our stockholders, our Annual Meeting will be webcast on November 15, 2017. You are invited to visitwww.oracle.com/investor, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, to view the live webcasta recording of the Annual Meeting. An archived copy of the webcast alsomeeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020 and on our website atwww.oracle.com/investor following the Annual Meeting through November 22, 2017.11, 2020.

 

Q:

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a paper copy of proxy materials?

 

 

A:

We are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 2017,2020, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice, which was mailed to most of our stockholders, will instruct you as toexplains how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as todescribes how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. Any request to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until you revoke it.

 

Q:

Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?

 

 

A:

No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by Internet and how to request paper copies of the proxy materials.

 

Q:

Why didn’t I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

 

 

A:

Stockholders who previously elected to access proxy materials over the Internet will not receive the Notice in the mail. You should have received an email with links to the proxy materials and online proxy voting. Additionally, if you previously requested paper copies of the proxy materials or if applicable regulations require delivery of the proxy materials, you will not receive the Notice.

If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials or the Notice by mail, you can eliminate all such paper mailings in the future by electing to receive an email that will provide Internet links to these documents. Opting to receive all future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producingprinting and mailing documents to your home or business and help us conserve natural resources. To request electronic delivery, please go towww.astproxyportal.com/ast/17983,www.oracle.com/investor or the website provided on your proxy card or voting instruction card.

 

Q:

How many votes do I have?

 

 

A:

You will have one vote for each share of Oracle common stock you owned at the close of business on the record date, provided those shares were either held directly in your name as the stockholder of record or were held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee.

 

78  LOGO   20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   79


Q:

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and beneficial owner?

 

 

A:

Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice or proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us to vote electronically or to vote in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting. If you have requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice or these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting, unless you request, complete and deliver a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee. If you requested printed proxy materials, your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee regarding how to vote your shares.

 

Q:

How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?

 

 

A:

Each share of Oracle common stock is entitled to one vote. There is no cumulative voting. We had 4,173,486,2893,010,888,041 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the record date, September 18, 2017.8, 2020.

 

Q:

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

 

 

A:

A majority of the shares entitled to vote as of the record date must be present in personon the virtual meeting platform or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a “quorum.” Shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you properly cast your vote in person, electronically or telephonically, or a proxy card has been properly submitted by you or on your behalf. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

Q:

How many votes are required to elect directors (Proposal 1)?

 

 

A:

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. This means that the 1214 individuals nominated for election to the Board who receive the most FOR votes (among votes properly cast in person, electronically, telephonically or by proxy) will be elected.

While directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast, our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a majority voting policy for directors. This policy states that in an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives an equal or greater number of votes WITHHELD from his or her election as compared to votes FOR such election and if no successor has been elected at such meeting, the director nominee must tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote. The Governance Committee is required to make recommendations to the Board with respect to any such tendered resignation. The Board will act on the tendered resignation within 90 days from the certification of the vote and will publicly disclose its decision, including its rationale.

Only votes FOR or WITHHELD are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a director nominee. If you withhold authority to vote with respect to the election of some or all of the nominees, your shares will not be voted with respect to those nominees indicated. For a WITHHELD vote, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum and will have a similar effect as a voteagainstthat director nominee under our majority voting policy for directors.

Full details of our majority voting policy are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines available on our website atwww.oracle.com/goto/corpgov.

 

201780  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   79


Q:

How many votes are required to adopt the other proposals (Proposals 2 through 8)6)?

 

 

A:

ProposalProposals 2 and proposals 4 through 86 will be approved if such items receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Oracle common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. If your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting but you abstain from voting on any of these matters, your shares will be counted as present and entitled to vote on a particular matter for purposes of establishing a quorum, and the abstention will have the same effect as a voteagainst that proposal.

For the advisoryYour vote regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs (Proposal 3), you may vote to have such advisory votes every “ONE YEAR,” “TWO YEARS” or “THREE YEARS,” or you may “ABSTAIN.” The frequency receiving the greatest number of votes cast by stockholders will be considered the advisory vote of our stockholders. If you elect to abstain from voting on this proposal, the abstention will not have any effect on the advisory vote.

Your votes on ProposalsProposal 2 and 3 (vote on NEO compensationcompensation), Proposal 4 (selection of Ernst & Young LLP) and vote oneach of the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs)stockholder proposals are advisory, which means the result of the votes are non-binding on Oracle, the Board and the committees of the Board. Although the votes are non-binding, the Board and its committees value the opinions of our stockholders and will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation and the frequency of conducting future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs.these matters.

 

Q:

What if I don’t give specific voting instructions?

 

 

A:

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record and you indicate when voting by Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board, or you return a signed proxy card but do not indicate how you wish to vote, then your shares will be voted:

 

in accordance with the recommendations of the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement; and

 

as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

If you indicate a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon on your proxy card, the shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions on such matter.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. In very limited circumstances, brokers have the discretion to vote on matters deemed to be routine. Under applicable law, brokers generally do not have discretion to vote on most matters. For example, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, the broker could vote your shares for the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 5)4) because that is deemed to be a routine matter, but the broker likely could not vote your shares for any of the other proposals on the agenda for the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.

If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker and the broker has indicated that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular proposal, your shares will be considered“broker non-votes” with regard to that matter. Broker non-votes will be considered as represented for purposes of determining a quorum but generally will not be considered as entitled to vote with respect to a particular proposal. Broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to a particular proposal. Thus, a broker non-vote will makehelp with obtaining a quorum, more readily obtainable, but the broker non-vote will not otherwise affectcount toward the outcome of the vote on a proposal that requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote.

 

Q:

Can I change my vote after I voted?

 

 

A:

Yes. Even if you voted by telephone or on the Internet or if you requested paper proxy materials and signed the proxy card or voting instruction card in the form accompanying this proxy statement, you retain the power to revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. You can revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by giving written notice to the Corporate Secretary of Oracle, specifying such revocation. You may change your vote by a later-dated vote by telephone or on the Internet or timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy or by voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting. However, please note that if you would like to vote at the Annual Meeting and you are not the stockholder of record, you must request, complete and deliver a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee.

 

80  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Q:

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?

 

 

A:

It generally means that some of your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all Notices, proxy cards and voting instruction cards you receive.

 

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   81


Q:

Who pays for the proxy solicitation and how will Oracle solicit votes?

 

 

A:

We will bear the expense of printing, mailing and distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and other employees may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, electronic communications or otherwise. They will not be paid any additional compensation for such solicitation. We will request brokers and nominees who hold shares of our common stock in their names to furnish proxy materials to beneficial owners of the shares. We will reimburse such brokers and nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. We have also retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to solicit proxies and to separately prepare a stockholder vote analysis of certain proposals for an aggregate fee of approximately $50,000, plus customary costs and expenses.

 

Q:

Is a list of stockholders available?

A:

The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available to stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting for any purpose relevant to the Annual Meeting. This list can be viewed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, at our principal executive offices at 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California. Please contact Oracle’s Corporate Secretary to make arrangements.

Q:

Who will count the votes?

 

 

A:

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLCBroadridge Financial Services has been appointed as the inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting. All votes will be tabulated by aA representative of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. This representativeBroadridge Financial Services will also separately tabulate affirmativevotes cast by proxy or electronically before and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.during the meeting.

 

Q:

How do I find out the voting results?

 

 

A:

Preliminary voting results willmay be announced at the Annual Meeting, and final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. After the Form 8-K is filed, you may obtain a copy by visiting our website or contactingwww.oracle.com/investor, calling our Investor Relations Department by calling 650-506-4073, byat 1-650-506-4073, writing to Investor Relations Department, Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California 94065, or by sending an email toinvestor_us@oracle.com.

 

Q:

What if I have questions about lost stock certificates or I need to change my mailing address?

 

 

A:

Stockholders may contact our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, by calling 1-888-430-9892, by emailinghelp@astfinancial.com, or by writing to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219. Also see our transfer agent’s website atwww.astfinancial.com to get more information about these matters.

 

Q:

What if I need to change my email address?

 

 

A:

Opting to receive all future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producingprinting and mailing documents to your home or business and help us conserve natural resources. If you need to change the email address that we use to mail proxy materials to you or if you wish to sign up to receive future mailings via email, please go towww.astproxyportal.com/ast/17983, or the website provided on your proxy card or voting instruction card, to request completeto receive materials solely by electronic delivery in the future and supply the appropriate email address.

 

Q:

Who should I contact if I have questions?

 

 

A:

Stockholders with questions or who need assistance in voting their shares may call our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at (888) 750-5834.1-888-750-5834. Banks and brokers may call collect at 1-212-750-5833.

 

201782  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   81


NO INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

In our filings with the SEC, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that we are referring you to information that has previously been filed with the SEC and the information should be considered as part of the particular filing. As provided under SEC regulations, the “Report of the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” and the “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors” contained in this proxy statement specifically are not incorporated by reference into any other filings with the SEC and are not deemed to be “Soliciting Material.” In addition, this proxy statement includes several website addresses or references to additional company reports found on those websites. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites, including the information contained in those reports, is not part of this proxy statement and is not incorporated by reference.

OTHER BUSINESS

 

The Board does not presently intend to bring any other business before the meeting, and, so far as is known to the Board, no matters are to be brought before the meeting except as specified in the notice included in this proxy statement. As to any business that may properly come before the meeting, however, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies.

HOUSEHOLDING

 

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, ifIf stockholders have the same address and last name, do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials and have requested householding in the past, they will receive only one copy of our printed annual report and proxy statement unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure reduces our printing costs and postage fees and conserves natural resources. Each stockholder who participates in householding will continue to have access to and use separate voting instructions.

If any stockholders in your household wish to receive a separate annual report and proxy statement, they may call our Investor Relations Department at 650-506-4073 or write to Investor Relations Department, Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California 94065. They may also send an email to our Investor Relations Department atinvestor_us@oracle.com. See alsowww.oracle.com/investor. Other stockholders who have multiple accounts in their names or who share an address with other stockholders can authorize us to discontinue mailings of multiple annual reports and proxy statements by contacting Investor Relations.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

DORIAN DALEYLOGO

Brian S. Higgins

Executive Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary

All stockholders are urged to vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone or, if you requested paper copies of the proxy materials, complete, sign, date and return the proxy card or voting instruction card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

 

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   83


Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements

We do not as a matter of course make public forecasts as to our total shares outstanding and utilization of various stock awards due to the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and estimates. In particular, the forecasts set forth in Proposal No. 3 (Approval of the Oracle Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan) includes embedded assumptions which are highly dependent on the public trading price of Oracle stock and other factors, which we do not control. These forecasts reflect various assumptions regarding our future operations. The inclusion of the forecasts set forth in Proposal No. 3 should not be regarded as an indication that these forecasts will be predictive of actual future outcomes, and the forecasts should not be relied upon as such.

Statements in this proxy statement relating to Oracle’s future plans, expectations, beliefs, intentions and prospects, such as statements regarding the numberour intentions related to future grants of equity awards we expect to grant in the future andcertain of our expectations regarding our future stock price, market capitalization, revenue and margin growth,named executive officers, are “forward-looking statements” and are subject to material risks and uncertainties. Many factors could affect our current expectations and our actual results, and could cause actual results to differ materially. A detailed discussion of these factors and other risks that affect our business is contained in our SEC filings, including our most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors.” You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our expectations only as of the date of this proxy statement. We undertake no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

 

82  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


APPENDIX A

ORACLE CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED

2000 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(as of [November 15, 2017])

SECTION 1. Purpose. This Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) is established as a compensatory plan to enable Oracle Corporation (the Company) to provide an incentive to eligible employees, officers, independent consultants, directors who are also employees or consultants, and advisers whose present and potential contributions are important to the continued success of the Company; to afford such persons an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company; and to enable the Company to continue to enlist and retain in its employ the best available talent for the successful conduct of its business. It is intended that this purpose will be effected through the granting of (a) stock options, (b) stock purchase rights, (c) stock appreciation rights and (d) long-term stock awards.

SECTION 2. Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions shall apply:

(a)

“Affiliate” of any person means any entity that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such person, where “control” (including the terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”) means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to cause the direction of the management and policies of the entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

 

(b)

“Applicable Laws” means the legal requirements relating to the administration of stock plans under U.S. state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or consolidated stock price reporting system on which prices for the Common Stock are quoted at any given time, and the analogous applicable laws of any other country or jurisdiction where Options, Rights or Long-Term Stock Awards or shares of Restricted Stock are granted under the Plan.

(c)

“Award Document” any grant notice, agreement or other document between the Company and a Participant evidencing the terms and conditions of an award granted under the Plan.

(d)

“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(e)

“Change of Control” shall mean the first to occur of:

(i)

an individual, corporation, partnership, group, associate or other entity or “person”, as such term is defined in Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than the Company or any employee benefit plan(s) sponsored by the Company, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities ordinarily having the right to vote at elections of directors;

(ii)

individuals who constitute the Board of Directors of the Company on the effective date of the Plan (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any Approved Director, as hereinafter defined, shall be, for purposes of this subsection (ii), considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board. An “Approved Director”, for purposes of this subsection (ii), shall mean any person becoming a director subsequent to the effective date of the Plan whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee of the Company for director), but shall not include any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of an individual, corporation, partnership, group, associate or other entity or “person” other than the Board; or

(iii)

the consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation involving the Company other than with a wholly-owned subsidiary and other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 65% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (B) a sale, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-1


(f)

“Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(g)

“Committee” means the Committee or Committees referred to in Section 5 of the Plan. If at any time no Committee shall be in office, then the functions of the Committee specified in the Plan shall be exercised by the Board.

(h)

“Common Stock” or “Shares” means the Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company.

(i)

“Company” means Oracle Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware, or any successor corporation.

(j)

“Covered Employee” means an individual who is either a “covered employee” or expected by the Committee to be a “covered employee,” in each case within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.

(k)

“Exchange Act” means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(l)

“Disability” means a disability, whether temporary or permanent, partial or total, within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, as determined by the Committee.

(m)

“Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:

(i)

if such Common Stock shall then be listed on a national securities exchange (including the New York Stock Exchange), the last reported sale price or, if no such reported sale takes place on any such day, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on the principal national securities exchange (including the New York Stock Exchange) on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to trading, or

(ii)

if such Common Stock shall not be listed on the New York Stock Exchange nor listed or admitted to trading on another national securities exchange, then the average of the closing bid and asked prices, as reported by The Wall Street Journal for the over-the-counter market, or

(iii)

if none of the foregoing is applicable, then the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company in its discretion.

(n)

“Grant” shall mean an instrument or agreement evidencing an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award granted hereunder, in written or electronic form, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by the recipient thereof.

(o)

“Insider” means an executive officer or director of the Company or any other person whose transactions in Common Stock are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

(p)

“Long-Term Stock Award” means an award under Section 9 below. A Long-Term Stock Award includes stock bonus and unit awards. A stock bonus is a right to receive shares of Common Stock that is subject to time and/or performance restrictions. A unit award shall be similar to the stock bonus award, except that no shares of Common Stock are actually awarded at grant; the recipient is granted a right to receive shares of Common Stock in the future once certain time and/or performance factors are met.

(q)

“Option” means any option to purchase shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to Section 6 below.

(r)

“Parent” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if, at the time of the granting of an award under the Plan, each of such corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

(s)

“Participant” means an individual who has been granted an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award under the Plan.

(t)

“Plan” means this 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as hereinafter amended from time to time.

(u)

“Purchase Agreement” shall have the meaning specified in Section 8.

(v)

“Restricted Stock” means shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to a grant of Stock Purchase Rights under Section 8 below.

(w)

“Right” means and includes Stock Appreciation Rights and Stock Purchase Rights granted pursuant to the Plan.

A-2  LOGO   2017

84  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(x)

“Stock Appreciation Right” or“SAR” means an award made pursuant to Section 7 below, which right permits the recipient to receive cash equal to the difference between the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the date of grant of the Stock Appreciation Right and the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the date of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.

(y)

“Stock Purchase Right” means an award made pursuant to Section 8 below, which right permits the recipient to purchase Common Stock pursuant to a restricted stock purchase agreement entered into between the Company and the Participant.

(z)

“Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of granting an award under the Plan, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

(aa)

“Substitute Awards” shall mean an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award granted in assumption of or in substitution for, outstanding options or other awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines.

SECTION 3. Eligibility.

APPENDIX A

 

(a)

Awards may be granted to employees, officers, directors who are also employees or consultants, independent consultants and advisers of the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company (provided such consultants, and advisers render bona fide services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction)

ORACLE CORPORATION

2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(As approved by the stockholders on [November 4, 2020])

1.PURPOSE. The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to the success of the Company, and its Affiliates, by offering them an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance through the grant of Awards. Capitalized terms not defined elsewhere in the text are defined in Section 27 of this Plan.

2.SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.

2.1        Number of Shares Available. ISOs (hereinafter defined in Section 6 hereof) may be granted only to employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) of the Company or of a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company.

(b)

A Participant may be granted more than one award under this Plan.

(c)

Holders of options and other awards granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder in connection with such acquisition or combination transaction.

SECTION 4. Stock Subject to Sections 2.5 and 2.6 and any other applicable provisions hereof, the aggregate number of Shares that are available for grant and issuance under the Plan is equal to the sum of: (i) 90 million Shares, plus (ii) the number of Shares that remain unissued and available for grant under the 2000 Plan on the date the Company’s stockholders approve the Plan (the “Approval Date”), plus (iii) the number of Shares subject to any stock awards granted under the 2000 Plan that are outstanding as of the Approval Date which, after the Approval Date, would have been available again for issuance under the terms of the 2000 Plan had this Plan not become effective (“Forfeited Prior Plan Awards”), provided that Shares subject to Forfeited Prior Plan Awards other than Options or SARs will increase the number of Shares that are available for grant and issuance under the Plan by 2.5 times the number of Shares subject to such Forfeited Prior Plan Awards.

2.2        Share Conversion Ratio. Any Shares that are subject to Options, SARs or other Awards that are not Full-Value Awards shall be counted against the numerical limits of Section 2.1 as one Share for every Share subject thereto. Any Shares subject to Full-Value Awards on the date of grant shall be counted against the numerical limits of Section 2.1 as 2.5 Shares for every one Share subject thereto. To the extent that a Share that was subject to an Award that counted as 2.5 Shares against the Plan reserve pursuant to the preceding sentence is recycled back into the Plan under Section 2.3, the Plan shall be credited with 2.5 Shares.

2.3        Lapsed, Returned Awards. Except as otherwise may be provided for herein, Shares subject to Awards, and Shares issued under the Plan under any Award, will again be available for grant and issuance in connection with subsequent Awards under this Plan to the extent such Shares: (a) are subject to issuance upon exercise of an Option or SAR granted under this Plan but which cease to be subject to the Option or SAR for any reason other than due to the exercise of the Option or SAR or the withholding or tendering of shares to satisfy any related tax withholding obligations; (b) are subject to Awards granted under this Plan that are forfeited or are repurchased by the Company at the original issue price; or (c) are subject to Awards granted under this Plan that otherwise terminate without such Shares being issued. Except with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock that are forfeited rather than vesting, Shares that have actually been issued under the Plan under any Award will not be returned to the Plan and will not become available for future distribution under the Plan. To the extent an Award under the Plan is paid out in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan. The full number of Shares subject to a SAR granted under the Plan that are to be settled by the issuance of Shares shall be counted against the number of Shares available for award under the Plan, regardless of the number of Shares actually issued upon settlement of such SAR. Shares used to pay the exercise price or Purchase Price of an Award, to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an Award and Shares repurchased by the Company from the Participant with the proceeds of an Option exercise will not become available for future grant or sale under the Plan. The Shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and issued Shares or treasury Shares. For the avoidance of doubt, Shares that otherwise become available for grant and issuance because of the provisions of this Section 2.3 shall not include Shares subject to Awards that were granted pursuant to Section 2.7 hereof or Shares subject to Awards that are cancelled or exchanged (other than for cash) under an Exchange Program.

2.4        Minimum Share Reserve. At all times the Company shall reserve and keep available a sufficient number of Shares as shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all outstanding Awards granted under this Plan.

2.5        Limitations. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.6, no more than 25,000,000 Shares shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs. No ISOs may be granted after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the earlier of (i) the date the Plan is adopted by the Board, or (ii) the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.6, no Participant shall be granted within any fiscal year of

 

(a)

The total number of Shares reserved and available for distribution pursuant to the Plan shall be 1,023,313,015 Shares, which consists of (i) 693,313,015 Shares that were previously approved by stockholders (of which 65,096,385 Shares remain available for future distribution as of August 31, 2017); and (ii) 330,000,000 additional Shares added in connection with this amendment and restatement of the Plan on [November 15, 2017] (the “2017 Amendment Date”).

(b)

For purposes of Section 4, the aggregate number of Shares issued under this Plan at any time shall equal only the number of Shares actually issued upon exercise or settlement of an award (other than a Substitute Award). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Shares subject to an award under the Plan may not again be made available for issuance under the Plan if such Shares are: (i) Shares that were subject to a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right and were not issued upon the net settlement or net exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right, (ii) Shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of an Option, (iii) Shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the withholding taxes related to an award, or (iv) Shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of an Option exercise. Shares which are subject to awards which terminate, expire, are forfeited or lapse and Shares subject to awards settled in cash shall not count as Shares issued under this Plan and may be utilized again with respect to awards granted under the Plan.

(c)

Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of Shares available for distribution hereunder.

(d)

Each Share awarded as a Stock Purchase Right or Long-Term Stock Award (other than a Substitute Award) shall be counted against the share reserve set forth in Section 4(a) above, and upon forfeiture shall also count for purposes of Section 4(b), as 2.5 Shares.

(e)

Options and SARs on no more than 25,000,000 Shares and Long-Term Stock Awards and Stock Purchase Rights on no more than 10,000,000 Shares may be granted to any individual in any year under this Plan.

(f)

(i)

In the event that the Common Stock of the Company is split or reverse-split, whether by stock dividend, combination, reclassification or similar method not involving payment of consideration, the number of Shares

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-3

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-1


available for award under this Plan, in aggregate and individually as set forth in Sections 4(a) and 4(e), the number of Shares deliverable under each Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award outstanding hereunder and the per Share exercise price of each outstanding Option or Right shall automatically be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by the Board or the stockholders of the Company and compliance with Applicable Laws;provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any award denominated in Shares shall always be a whole number.

the Company, one or more Options or SARs, which in the aggregate are for more than 25,000,000 Shares under the Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.6, no Participant shall be granted within any fiscal year of the Company, one or more Awards other than Options or SARs, which in the aggregate are for more than 10,000,000 Shares under the Plan.

(ii)

In the event that the Committee shall determine that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Common Stock or other securities of the Company, or other similar corporate transaction or event other than an event described in Section 4(f)(i) affects the Common Stock such that an adjustment is determined by the Committee to be appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust any or all of (i) the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property) which thereafter may be made the subject of awards under the Plan, including the aggregate and individual limits specified in Section 4, (ii) the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding awards, and (iii) the grant, purchase, or exercise price with respect to any award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding award;provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any award denominated in Shares shall always be a whole number.

SECTION 5. Administration.

2.6        Adjustment of Shares. Except as would result in taxation under Section 409A of the Code, if the number of outstanding Shares is adjusted by a stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend that has a material effect on the price of the Shares, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification or similar change in the capital structure of the Company, without consideration, then (a) the number of Shares reserved for issuance and future grant under the Plan set forth in Section 2.1, (b) the Exercise Prices of and number of Shares subject to outstanding Options and SARs, (c) the number of Shares subject to other outstanding Awards, (d) the maximum number of Shares that may be issued as ISOs set forth in Section 2.5, and (e) the maximum number of Shares that may be granted pursuant to Awards to a Participant in any one fiscal year set forth in Section 2.5, shall be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by the Board or the stockholders of the Company and in compliance with applicable securities laws; provided that in the event the adjustment would result in a fraction of a Share, the Company reserves the right to round up or down to the nearest whole Share or settle such fraction of a Share in cash, taking into consideration applicable laws and accounting guidance.

2.7        Assumption or Substitution of Awards by the Company. The Company, from time to time, also may substitute or assume outstanding awards granted by another company, whether in connection with an acquisition of such other company or otherwise, by either: (a) assuming such award under this Plan or (b) granting an Award under this Plan in substitution of such other company’s award. Such assumption or substitution will be permissible if the holder of the substituted or assumed award would have been eligible to be granted an Award under this Plan if the other company had applied the rules of this Plan to such grant. In the event the Company assumes an award granted by another company, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, the Purchase Price or the Exercise Price, as the case may be, and the number and nature of Shares issuable upon exercise or settlement of any such Award will be adjusted appropriately. In the event the Company elects to grant a new Option in substitution rather than assuming an existing option, such new Option may be granted with a similarly adjusted Exercise Price. Any awards that are assumed or substituted under this Plan shall not reduce the number of Shares authorized for grant under the Plan or authorized for grant to a Participant in any fiscal year.

3.        ELIGIBILITY, MINIMUM VESTING AND CHANGE IN TIME COMMITMENT.

3.1        ISOs may be granted only to Employees. All other Awards may be granted to Employees (including Employees who are Directors) and Consultants of the Company or any Affiliate; provided such Consultants render bona fide services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction.

3.2        All Awards granted under the Plan must be subject to a minimum one-year vesting period following grant, with no portion of any Award vesting prior to the end of such one-year vesting period; provided, however, that up to 5% of the Shares available for future distribution under this Plan may be granted pursuant to Awards without such minimum vesting requirement and such requirement shall not prevent the acceleration of vesting pursuant to Sections 4 and 19 hereof or under policies or contracts that provide for acceleration of vesting in connection with a Change of Control or termination of employment or services. In addition, any awards assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition under Section 2.7 shall not be subject to this minimum vesting requirement.

3.3        In the event a Participant’s regular level of time commitment in the performance of his or her services for the Company and any an Affiliate of the Company is reduced (for example, and without limitation, if the Participant is an Employee of the Company and the Employee has a change in status from a full-time Employee to a part-time Employee or takes an extended leave of absence) after the date of grant of any Award to the Participant, subject to applicable law, the Committee or an authorized Officer of the Company has the right in its sole discretion to (x) make a corresponding reduction in the number of Shares or cash amount subject to any portion of such Award that is scheduled to vest or become payable after the date of such change in time commitment, (y) in lieu of or in combination with such a reduction, suspend and/or extend the vesting or payment schedule applicable to such Award, except that in no event may an Award be exercised after the expiration of the term set forth in the applicable Award Agreement; or (z) not act and thereby, retain the original vesting schedule and number of Shares. In the event of any such reduction, suspension or extension, the Participant will have no right with respect to any portion of the Award that is so reduced, suspended or extended.

 

(a)

The Plan shall be administered by one or more Committees designated by the Board to administer the Plan, constituted in such a manner as to satisfy the Applicable Laws.

(b)

Once appointed, the Committee shall continue to serve until otherwise directed by the Board. From time to time, the Board may change the size of the Committee, appoint additional members thereof, remove members (with or without cause), appoint new members in substitution therefor, fill vacancies, however caused, and remove all members of the Committee and thereafter directly administer the Plan, all to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.

(c)

As used herein, except in Sections 18 and 20, references herein to the Board shall mean the Board or the Committee, whichever is then acting with respect to the Plan.

(d)

The Committee shall have the authority to construe and interpret the Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, and any such interpretation shall be final and binding on all persons having an interest in any award under this Plan. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, subject to the general purposes, terms, and conditions of the Plan, and to the direction of the Board, the Committee shall have full power to implement and carry out the Plan including, but not limited to, the following:

(i)

to select the employees, officers, consultants, directors and advisers of the Company and/or its Subsidiaries and Affiliates to whom Options, Rights and Long-Term Stock Awards, or any combination thereof, may from time to time be granted hereunder;

(ii)

to determine whether and to what extent Options, Rights and Long-Term Stock Awards, or any combination thereof, are granted hereunder;

(iii)

to determine the number of Shares to be covered by each such award granted hereunder;

(iv)

to approve forms of grant or agreement, or other forms for communicating to Participants that they have been granted an award under the Plan, for use under the Plan;

(v)

to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any award granted hereunder;

(vi)

to determine the form of payment, if any, that will be acceptable consideration for exercise of an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award granted under the Plan;

A-4  LOGO   2017

A-2  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(vii)

to determine whether, or to what extent and under what circumstances Common Stock and other amounts payable with respect to an award under this Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Participant (including providing for and determining the amount (if any) of any deemed earnings on any deferred amount during any deferral period);

4.        ADMINISTRATION.

(viii)

to delegate to another committee of the Board or to members of management certain of its powers hereunder to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws;

4.1        Committee Composition; Authority. This Plan will be administered by the Committee or by the Board acting as the Committee. Subject to the general purposes, terms and conditions of this Plan, and the direction of the Board, the Committee will have full power to implement and carry out this Plan. The Committee will have the authority to:

(ix)

to determine the terms and restrictions applicable to Long-Term Stock Awards, Stock Purchase Rights and the Restricted Stock purchased by exercising such Rights; and

(a)        construe and interpret this Plan, any Award Agreement and any other agreement or document executed pursuant to this Plan;

(x)

to adopt sub-plans applicable to particular Subsidiaries, Affiliates or locations, which sub-plans may take precedence over other provisions of this Plan, with the exception of Section 4(a), but unless otherwise superseded by the terms of such sub-plan, the provisions of this Plan shall govern the operation of such sub-plan.

(b)        prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan or any Award;

(e)

In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as directors, members of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Company against any reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees actually and necessarily incurred, which they or any of them may incur by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any option or other award granted thereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement of any claim related thereto, (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding that such director is liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his or her duties; provided that within 60 days after institution of any such action, suit or proceeding a director shall in writing offer the Company the opportunity, at its own expense, to handle the defense of the same.

(c)        select persons to receive Awards;

(f)

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, up to 5% of the Shares reserved and available for distribution under this Plan (as set forth in Section 4) may be granted without regard to any of the restrictions set forth in Sections 9(a)(ii) and 20(b)(ii).

(d)        determine the form and terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder. Such terms and conditions include, but are not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Awards may vest and be exercised (which may be based on Performance Goals), any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Committee will determine;

(g)

Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, all awards granted under the Plan after the 2017 Amendment Date shall have a minimum vesting period of one-year measured from the date of grant; provided, however, that up to 5% of the Shares available for future distribution under this Plan as of the 2017 Amendment Date may be granted without such minimum vesting requirement. Nothing in this Section 5(g) shall limit the Company’s ability to grant awards that contain rights to accelerated vesting on a termination of employment or service (or to otherwise accelerate vesting), or limit any rights to accelerated vesting in connection with a Change of Control. In addition, the minimum vesting requirement set forth in this Section 5(g) shall not apply to Substitute Awards.

SECTION 6. Stock Options. The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Options to eligible Participants and shall determine whether such Options shall be Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) within the meaning of the Code, Nonqualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”) or any other type of Option which may exist from time to time. Each Option shall be evidenced by a Grant which shall expressly identify the Option as an ISO or as NQSO (or other type of Option, as applicable), and be in such form and contain such provisions as the Committee shall from time to time deem appropriate. Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee may, at any time, or from time to time, authorize the Company, with the consent of the respective recipients, to issue new Options.

The Committee shall determine the number of Shares subject to the Option, the exercise price of the Option, the period during which the Option may be exercised, and all other terms and conditions of the Option, subject to the following:

(e)        determine the number of Shares or other consideration subject to Awards;

(f)        determine the Fair Market Value in good faith, if necessary;

(g)        subject to Section 16, determine whether Awards will be granted singly, in combination with, in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to, other Awards under this Plan or any other incentive or compensation plan of the Company or any Affiliate of the Company;

(h)        grant waivers of Plan or Award conditions;

(i)        determine the vesting, exercisability and payment of Awards;

(j)        correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement;

(k)        determine whether an Award has been earned;

(l)        subject to Section 16, determine the terms and conditions of any, and to institute any Exchange Program;

(m)        reduce or waive any criteria with respect to Performance Goals;

(n)        adjust Performance Goals to take into account changes in law or in accounting or tax rules, or such other extraordinary, unforeseeable, nonrecurring or infrequently occurring events or circumstances as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to avoid windfalls or hardships;

(o)        waive any conditions or rights under, amend any term of, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate, any Award granted under this Plan, prospectively or retroactively; provided, however, that no such action shall materially impair the rights of any affected Participant or holder or beneficiary under any Award theretofore granted under the Plan without the consent of any relevant Participant or holder or beneficiary of an Award; and

(p)        make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan.

4.2        Delegation to an Officer. To the extent permitted by applicable law and listing requirements, the Committee or the Board may delegate to one or more officers of the Company who may be (but are not required to be) Insiders (“Officers), the authority to do any of the following (i) designate Employees who are not Insiders to be recipients of Awards, (ii) determine the number of Shares to be subject to such Awards granted to such designated Employees, and (iii) take any and all actions on behalf of the Committee other than any actions that affect the amount or form of compensation of Insiders or have material tax, accounting, financial, human resource or legal consequences to the Company or its Affiliates; provided, however, that the Committee or Board resolutions regarding any delegation with respect to (i) and (ii) will specify the total number of Shares that may be subject to the Awards granted by such Officer and that such Officer may not grant an Award to himself or herself. Any Awards will be granted on the form of Award Agreement most recently approved for use by the Committee or the Board, unless otherwise provided in the resolutions approving the delegation authority.

 

(a)

Form of Option Grant. Each Option granted under this Plan shall be evidenced by a Grant in such form (which need not be the same for each Participant) as the Committee shall from time to time approve, which Grant shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan.

(b)

Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Option shall be the date on which the Committee makes the determination to grant such Option unless otherwise specified by the Committee. The Grant representing the Option will be delivered to Participant with a copy of this Plan within a reasonable time after the granting of the Option.

(c)

Exercise Price. The exercise price of an Option shall be determined by the Committee on the date the Option is granted and may not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date the Option is granted.

(d)

Exercise Period. Subject to Section 5(g), Options shall be exercisable within the times or upon the events determined by the Committee as set forth in the Grant;provided, however, that no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date the Option is granted. The Committee may attach such conditions to the

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-5

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-3


Shares issued upon exercise of an Option as it shall determine, and may provide in any grant for Option exercise restrictions to be waived in consideration of equivalent transfer or forfeiture provisions to be applied to such underlying Shares.

4.3        Committee Interpretation and Discretion. Any determination made by the Committee with respect to any Award shall be made in its sole discretion at the time of grant of the Award or, unless in contravention of any express term of the Plan or Award, at any later time, and such determination shall be final and binding on the Company and all persons having an interest in any Award under the Plan. Any dispute regarding the interpretation of the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be submitted by the Participant to the Company for review. Any Officer of the Company, including but not limited to Insiders and the Company’s Secretary and Assistant Secretary, shall have the authority to review and resolve disputes with respect to Awards held by Participants who are not Insiders, and such resolution shall be final and binding on the Company and the Participant. Only the Committee shall have the authority to review and resolve disputes with respect to Awards held by Participants who are Insiders, and such resolution shall be final and binding on the Company and the Participant.

4.4        Administration of Awards Subject to Performance Goals. The Committee will, in its sole discretion, determine the Performance Goals, if any, applicable to any Award (including any adjustment(s) thereto that will be applied in determining the achievement of such Performance Goals) on or prior to the Determination Date. The Performance Goals may differ from Participant to Participant and from Award to Award. The Committee shall determine and approve the extent to which such Performance Goals have been timely achieved and the extent to which the Shares subject to such Award have thereby been earned.

4.5        Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Awards granted to Participants who are Insiders must be approved by two or more “non-employee directors” of the Board (as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 16 of the Exchange Act).

4.6        Documentation. The Award Agreement for a given Award, the Plan and any other documents may be delivered to, and accepted by, a Participant or any other person in any manner (including electronic distribution or posting) determined by the Company.

5.OPTIONS. The Committee may grant Options to Participants and will determine whether such Options will be Incentive Stock Options within the meaning of the Code (“ISOs”) or Nonqualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”), the number of Shares subject to the Option, the Exercise Price of the Option, the period and circumstances during which the Option may be exercised, and all other terms and conditions of the Option, subject to the following:

5.1        Option Grant. Each Option granted under this Plan will identify the Option as an ISO or an NQSO. An Option may (but need not) be awarded or vest based on, among other things, satisfaction of such Performance Goals during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s individual Award Agreement. If the Option vests based on the satisfaction of Performance Goals, then the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for each Option; (y) select the Performance Criteria to be used to measure the performance; and (z) determine what additional vesting conditions, if any, should apply. Performance Periods may overlap, and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to Options that are subject to different Performance Goals and other criteria.

5.2        Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Option will be the date on which the Committee makes the determination to grant such Option, or a specified future date. The Award Agreement and a copy of this Plan will be delivered to the Participant within a reasonable time after the granting of the Option.

5.3        Exercise Period. Options may be exercisable within the times or upon the conditions as set forth in the Award Agreement governing such Option; provided, however, that no Option will be exercisable after the expiration of seven (7) years from the date the Option is granted, unless the Committee provides otherwise; and provided further that no ISO granted to a person who, at the time the ISO is granted, directly or by attribution owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Affiliate of the Company (“Ten Percent Stockholder”) will be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date the ISO is granted. The Committee also may provide for Options to become exercisable at one time or from time to time, periodically or otherwise, in such number of Shares or percentage of Shares as the Committee determines.

5.4        Exercise Price. The Exercise Price of an Option will be determined by the Committee when the Option is granted; provided that: (i) the Exercise Price of an Option will be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant and (ii) the Exercise Price of any ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder will not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant, except in each case, with respect to an Option that is assumed or substituted under Section 2.7. Payment for the Shares purchased may be made in accordance with Section 10 of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement and in accordance with any procedures established by the Company.

 

(e)

Limitations on ISOs. The terms of any ISO granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.

(f)

Limitations on Transfer. Options granted under this Plan, and any interest therein, shall not be transferable or assignable by the Participant, and may not be made subject to execution, attachment or similar process, otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant;provided, however, that in the Committee’s sole discretion, the terms of any NQSOs granted under the Plan may permit the transfer of the vested portion of such NQSO by a Participant for no consideration to or for the benefit of one or more members of the Participant’s immediate family, including to a trust for the benefit of the Participant’s immediate family.

(g)

Notice. Options may be exercised only by delivery to the Company or its representative of a stock option exercise instrument in a form approved by the Committee from time to time (which may be in written, electronic or other form selected by the Committee from time to time and need not be the same for each Participant), stating the number of Shares being purchased, the restrictions imposed on the Shares, if any, and such representations and agreements regarding Participant’s investment intent and access to information, if any, as may be required by the Company to comply with the Applicable Laws, together with payment in full of the exercise price for the number of Shares being purchased or adequate provision therefor, in accordance with Section 6(h).

(h)

Payment. Payment for Shares purchased upon exercise of an Option may be made in cash (by check) or, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in its sole discretion: (i) by cancellation of indebtedness of the Company to the Participant; (ii) by surrender of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the applicable exercise price of the Options; (iii) pursuant to a broker-assisted “cashless exercise” arrangement; (iv) through any other method specifically approved by the Committee; or (v) by any combination of the foregoing, in each such case to the extent permitted by Applicable Law.

(i)

Limitations on Exercise. In addition to exercise restrictions or other vesting provisions set forth in any Grant, unless the Committee shall otherwise determine, and except in the case of a Substitute Award, the exercisability of an Option following termination of the Participant’s employment shall be subject to this Section 6(i).

(i)

If the Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company for any reason except death or disability, such Participant’s Options may be exercised to the extent (and only to the extent) that they would have been exercisable upon the date of termination of the Participant’s employment, within three (3) months after the date of termination (or such shorter time period as may be specified in the Grant), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Option;provided, however, that if the Participant is an officer or principal stockholder within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the three (3) month period set forth in this Section 6(i)(i) shall be extended (but in no event beyond the original expiration date specified in the Grant) by the number of days equivalent to any “No Trading” period under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy during which the Participant is prohibited from trading in the Company’s Common Stock during such period.

(ii)

If the Participant’s employment with the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company is terminated because of the Disability of the Participant, or if the Participant dies within three (3) months of his termination of employment, the Participant’s Options may be exercised to the extent (and only to the extent) that they would have been exercisable on the date of termination of the Participant’s employment, by the Participant (or the Participant’s legal representative) within twelve (12) months after the date of termination of employment (or such shorter time period as may be specified in the Grant), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options.

(iii)

If the Participant’s employment with the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company is terminated because of the death of the Participant, the Participant’s Options may be exercised to the extent (and only to the extent) that they would have been exercisable on the first vesting date occurring after such death as may be specified in the Grant and on the next subsequent vesting date, by the Participant’s legal representative within twelve (12) months after the date of death (or such shorter period as may be specified in the Grant), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options.

A-6  LOGO   2017

A-4  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(iv)

A Participant’s employment relationship shall be considered to have terminated, and the Participant to have ceased to be employed by his or her employer, on the earliest of:

5.5        Method of Exercise. Any Option granted hereunder will be exercisable according to the terms of the Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share. An Option will be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (i) notice of exercise (in such form as the Committee may specify from time to time) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and (ii) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised (together with applicable withholding taxes). Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Committee and permitted by the Award Agreement and the Plan. Shares issued upon exercise of an Option will be issued in the name of the Participant. Until the Shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder will exist with respect to the Shares. The Company will issue (or cause to be issued) such Shares promptly after the Option is exercised. No adjustment will be made and no dividend equivalent will be credited to a Participant for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 2.6 of the Plan. Exercising an Option in any manner will decrease the number of Shares thereafter available, both for purposes of the Plan and for sale under the Option, by the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised.

(A)

the date on which the Company,

5.6        Termination. The exercise of an Option will be subject to the following (except as may be otherwise provided in an Award Agreement):

(a)        If the Participant is Terminated for any reason except for the Participant’s death or Disability, then the Participant may exercise such Participant’s Options only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the Termination Date no later than three (3) months after the Termination Date (or such shorter time period as may be determined by the Committee), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options.

(b)        If the Participant is Terminated because of the Participant’s death (or the Participant dies within three (3) months after the Participant’s Termination Date pursuant to Section 5.6(a)), then the Participant’s Options may be exercised only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the Termination Date and must be exercised by the Participant’s legal representative, or authorized assignee, no later than twelve (12) months after the Termination Date (or such shorter time period as may be determined by the Committee), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options.

(c)        If the Participant is Terminated because of the Participant’s Disability, then the Participant’s Options may be exercised only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the Termination Date and must be exercised by the Participant (or the Participant’s legal representative or authorized assignee) no later than twelve (12) months after the Termination Date (or such shorter time period as may be determined by the Committee) but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options (with any exercise of an ISO beyond (a) three (3) months after the Termination Date when the Termination is for a Disability that is not a “permanent and total disability” as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, or (b) twelve (12) months after the Termination Date when the Termination is for a Disability that is a “permanent and total disability” as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, deemed to be exercise of an NQSO).

5.7        Limitations on Exercise. The Committee may specify a minimum number of Shares that may be purchased on any exercise of an Option, provided that such minimum number will not prevent any Participant from exercising the Option for the full number of Shares for which it is then exercisable.

5.8        Limitations on ISOs. With respect to Awards granted as ISOs, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which such ISOs are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Affiliate) exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), such Options will be treated as NQSOs. For purposes of this Section 5.8, ISOs will be taken into account in the order in which they were granted. The Fair Market Value of the Shares will be determined as of the time the Option with respect to such Shares is granted. In the event that the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder are amended after the Approval Date to provide for a different limit on the Fair Market Value of Shares permitted to be subject to ISOs, such different limit will be automatically incorporated herein and will apply to any Options granted after the effective date of such amendment.

5.9        Modification or Extension. Subject to Section 409A of the Code (to the extent Section 409A of the Code is applicable to the holder of the Options), the Committee may modify or extend outstanding Options, provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of a Participant, materially impair any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, as appropriate, delivers to the Participant notice in a form prescribed by the Company that the Company, or such other entity, is thereby terminating the employment relationship (regardless of whether the notice or termination is lawful or unlawful or is in breach of any contract of employment),

(B)

the date on which the Participant delivers notice in a form prescribed by the Company, to the Company, or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, as appropriate, that he or she is terminating the employment relationship (regardless of whether the notice or termination is lawful or unlawful or is in breach of any contract of employment),

(C)

the date on which the Participant ceases to provide services to the Company, or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, as appropriate, except where the Participant is on an authorized leave of absence, or

(D)

the date on which the Participant ceases to be considered an “employee” under Applicable Law.

The Committee shall have discretion to determine whether a Participant has ceased to be employed by the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, as appropriate, and the effective date on which such employment terminated or whether such Participant is on an authorized leave of absence.

 

(v)

In the case of a Participant who is a director, consultant, or adviser, the Committee will have the discretion to determine whether the Participant is “employed by the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company” pursuant to the foregoing Sections.

(vi)

The Committee may specify a reasonable minimum number of Shares that may be purchased on any exercise of an Option, provided that such minimum number will not prevent the Participant from exercising the full number of Shares as to which the Option is then exercisable.

(j)

Modification of Options; No Repricing. The Committee shall have the power to modify outstanding Options, provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of the holder, impair any rights under any Option previously granted. The Committee shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the exercise price of any previously granted Option, (ii) cancel any previously granted Option in exchange for another Option with a lower exercise price, (iii) cancel any previously granted Option in exchange for cash or another award if the exercise price of such previously granted Option exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, or (iv) engage in any action that would be considered a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles, in each case, other than in connection with a Change of Control or the adjustment provisions set forth in Section 4(f).

SECTION 7. Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Stock Appreciation Rights to eligible Participants. The following provisions apply to such Stock Appreciation Rights.

(a)

Grant of Stock Appreciation Right. The Stock Appreciation Right shall entitle the holder upon exercise to an amount for each Share to which such exercise relates equal to the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of a Share over (y) the base or exercise price of the Common Stock (which shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of grant) as set forth in the applicable Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may place limits on the amount that may be paid upon exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right. No Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted.

(b)

Forfeiture of Option. If a Stock Appreciation Right is granted in tandem with an Option, upon exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right, the related Option shall no longer be exercisable and shall be deemed canceled to the extent of such exercise.

(c)

Form of Payment. The Company’s obligation arising upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right may be paid in Common Stock or in cash, or in any combination of Common Stock and cash, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine.

(d)

Other Provisions. Subject to Section 5(g), the Grant evidencing a Stock Appreciation Right shall contain such other terms, provisions and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The provisions of such Grants need not be the same with respect to each recipient.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-7

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-5


(e)

Modification of SARs; No Repricing.

Participant’s rights under any Option previously granted. Any outstanding ISO that is modified, extended, or otherwise altered will be treated in accordance with Section 424(h) of the Code.

6.        RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS.

6.1        Awards of Restricted Stock. A Restricted Stock Award is an award to an eligible person of Shares that are subject to restrictions (“Restricted Stock”). The Committee will determine the number of Shares of Restricted Stock that may be issued to or purchased by the Participant, the Purchase Price, if any, the restrictions under which the Shares will be subject and all other terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Award, subject to the Plan. All Restricted Stock shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement.

6.2        Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for a Restricted Stock Award, if any, will be determined by the Committee and may be less than Fair Market Value on the date the Restricted Stock Award is granted. Payment of the Purchase Price must be made in accordance with Section 10 of the Plan, the applicable Award Agreement and in accordance with any procedures established by the Company.

6.3        Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted Stock Awards will be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may impose or are required by law. These restrictions may be based on completion of a specified period of service with the Company or an Affiliate and/or upon completion of Performance Goals, if any, during any Performance Period as set out in advance in the Participant’s Award Agreement. Prior to the grant of a Restricted Stock Award, the Committee shall determine: (a) the nature, length and starting date of any restriction period for the Restricted Stock Award; (b) the restrictions on Unvested Shares; and (c) the number of Shares that may be awarded to the Participant. If the Unvested Shares of Restricted Stock are being awarded or earned upon the satisfaction of Performance Goals, then the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for each Unvested Share; and (y) select the Performance Criteria to be used to measure the performance, if any. Performance Periods may overlap, and a Participant may participate simultaneously with respect to Restricted Stock Awards that are subject to different Performance Periods and having different Performance Goals and other criteria.

6.4        Termination of Participant. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such Participant’s Termination Date (unless determined otherwise by the Committee).

7.        STOCK BONUS AWARDS.

7.1        Awards of Stock Bonuses. A Stock Bonus Award is an award of Shares to an eligible person without a Purchase Price that is not subject to any restrictions. All Stock Bonus Awards may but are not required to be made pursuant to an Award Agreement.

7.2        Terms of Stock Bonus Awards. The Committee will determine the number of Shares to be awarded to the Participant under a Stock Bonus Award.

7.3        Form of Payment to Participant. Payment may be made in the form of cash, whole Shares, or a combination thereof, based on the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the Stock Bonus Award on the date of payment, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.

8.        STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.

8.1        Awards of SARs. A Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”) is an award to a Participant that may be settled in cash, or Shares (which may consist of Restricted Stock), having a value equal to (a) the difference between the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise over the Exercise Price multiplied by (b) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is being settled (subject to any maximum number of Shares that may be issuable as specified in an Award Agreement). All SARs shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement.

8.2        Terms of SARs. The Committee will determine the terms of each SAR including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares subject to the SAR; (b) the Exercise Price and the period and circumstances during which the SAR may be exercised and settled; (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement of the SAR; and (d) the effect of the Participant’s Termination on each SAR. The Exercise Price of the SAR will be determined by the Committee when the SAR is granted and may not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant. A SAR may be awarded or may vest based on, among other things, satisfaction of Performance Goals, during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s individual Award Agreement. If the SAR vests based on the satisfaction of Performance Goals, then the Committee shall have the power to modify outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights, provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of the holder, impair any rights under any Stock Appreciation Rights previously granted. The Committee shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the base price or exercise price of any previously granted Stock Appreciation Right, (ii) cancel any previously granted Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for another Stock Appreciation Right with a lower base or exercise price, (iii) cancel any previously granted Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another award if the base or exercise price of such previously granted Stock Appreciation Right exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, or (iv) engage in any action that would be considered a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles, in each case, other than in connection with a Change of Control or the adjustment provisions set forth in Section 4(f).

SECTION 8. Stock Purchase Rights.

 

(a)

Rights to Purchase. Stock Purchase Rights to purchase Restricted Stock may be issued either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other awards granted under the Plan. After the Committee determines that it will offer Stock Purchase Rights under the Plan, it shall advise the offeree in writing of the terms, conditions and restrictions related to the offer, including the number of Shares that such person shall be entitled to purchase, the price to be paid, and the time within which such person must accept such offer, which shall in no event exceed 60 days from the date the Stock Purchase Right was granted. The offer shall be accepted by execution of a Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) in the form determined by the Committee.

(b)

Repurchase Option. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the Purchase Agreement shall grant the Company a repurchase option exercisable upon the voluntary or involuntary termination of the purchaser’s employment with the Company for any reason (including death or Disability). The purchase price for Shares repurchased pursuant to the Purchase Agreement shall be the original price paid by the purchaser and may be paid by cancellation of any indebtedness of the purchaser to the Company. Subject to Section 5(g), the repurchase option shall lapse at such rate as the Committee may determine.

(c)

Other Provisions. The Purchase Agreement shall contain such other terms, provisions and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The provisions of Purchase Agreements need not be the same with respect to each purchaser.

SECTION 9. Long-Term Stock Awards.

(a)

Administration.

(i)

Subject to Section 5(g), Long-Term Stock Awards are stock bonus or stock unit awards that may be granted either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Plan. The Committee shall determine the nature, length, price (if any) and starting and ending dates of any restriction period (the “Restriction Period”) for each Long-Term Stock Award, and shall determine the time and/or performance factors which must be met for a Long-Term Stock Award, the maximum amount payable under the Award and any targets for partial or full payment under such Award, and the extent to which a Long-Term Stock Award has been earned. Long-Term Stock Awards may vary from Participant to Participant and between groups of Participants. A Long-Term Stock Award performance factor, if any, shall be based upon the achievement of performance goals by the Company, Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate, a business unit or units of the Company, or upon such individual performance factors or upon such other criteria as the Committee may deem appropriate. Restriction Periods may overlap and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to Long-Term Stock Awards that are subject to different Restriction Periods and different time and/or performance factors. Long-Term Stock Awards shall be confirmed by, and be subject to the terms of, a Long-Term Stock Award agreement. The terms of such agreements need not be the same with respect to each Participant.

(ii)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Restriction Period for any Long-Term Stock Award shall be no less than (A) three years if the Long-Term Stock Award vests or is earned based on the passage of time and continued employment with or service to the Company (or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate) or (B) one year if the Long-Term Stock Award vests or is earned on the basis of the achievement of performance goals.

(iii)

At the beginning of each Restriction Period, the Committee shall determine, for each Long-Term Stock Award subject to such Restriction Period, the number of Shares to be awarded to the Participant or as to which the restrictions shall lapse at the end of the Restriction Period, if and to the extent that the relevant measures of time and/or performance for such Long-Term Stock Award are met. Such number of Shares may be fixed or may vary in accordance with such time and/or performance or other criteria as may be determined by the Committee.

A-8  LOGO   2017

A-6  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


(iv)

No Long-Term Stock Award may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during its Restriction Period,provided, however, that a Long-Term Stock Award held by a Participant may be transferred either for or without consideration, during its Restriction Period if the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall approve.

will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for each SAR; (y) select from among the Performance Criteria to be used to measure the performance; and (z) determine what additional vesting conditions, if any, should apply. Performance Periods may overlap, and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to SARs that are subject to different Performance Goals and other criteria.

(b)

Qualified Performance-Based Long-Term Stock Awards. In the case of any Long-Term Stock Awards made to any person who is or may become a Covered Employee during the Restriction Period before payment of the award, the Committee may grant Long-Term Stock Awards that are intended to comply with the requirements of Code section 162(m) (“Qualified Performance-Based Long-Term Stock Awards”). In such case, the Committee shall condition the grant or vesting, as applicable, of the stock bonus or unit upon the attainment of certain objectively determinable performance goals established by the Committee that are conditioned upon the satisfaction by the Company, Parent, Subsidiary, or Affiliate, or a business unit or units of the Company, of one or more of the following performance criteria (the “Qualified Performance Criteria”) during a specified period of no less than three months: revenues, operating expenses, return on assets, return on net assets, asset turnover, return on equity, return on capital, market price appreciation of the Company’s stock, economic value added, total stockholder return, net income, pre-tax income, operating income, earnings per share, operating profit margin, net income margin, sales margin (including both growth rates and margin percentages), cash flow, market share, inventory turnover, sales growth, capacity utilization, profit, EBIDTA growth, market capitalization, market penetration or increase in customer base. As determined by the Committee, Qualified Performance Criteria shall be derived from financial statements of the Company prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis, or, for Qualified Performance Criteria that cannot be so derived, under an objective and non-discretionary methodology established by the Committee prior to the issuance of a Qualified Performance Based Long-Term Stock Award to a Covered Employee, the Committee shall make all calculation of actual payments and shall certify in writing, prior to the payment of such Long-Term Stock Awards, the extent, if any, to which the specified performance goals have been met.

8.3        Exercise Period and Expiration Date. A SAR will be exercisable within the times or upon the occurrence of events determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement governing such SAR. The SAR Agreement shall set forth the expiration date; provided that no SAR will be exercisable after the expiration of seven (7) years from the date the SAR is granted unless the Committee provides otherwise. The Committee may also provide for SARs to become exercisable at one time or from time to time, periodically or otherwise (including, without limitation, upon the attainment during a Performance Period of Performance Goals), in such number of Shares or percentage of the Shares subject to the SAR as the Committee determines. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such Participant’s Termination Date (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules of Section 5.6 also will apply to SARs.

(c)

Adjustment of Awards. The Committee may provide at the time of grant for the adjustment of the performance factors applicable to Qualified Performance-Based Long-Term Stock Awards to include or exclude any objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring, infrequently occurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law, accounting principles or tax rules. In the case of any Qualified Performance-Based Long-Term Stock Award, the Committee may not increase the Common Stock that would otherwise be payable upon achievement of the stated performance goal or goals, but may reduce or eliminate the maximum Common Stock award due upon attainment of the stated performance goals, basing such cutback either upon subjective performance criteria, individual performance evaluations, or any other standards that are provided in the terms of the Long-Term Stock Award.

8.4        Form of Settlement. Upon exercise of a SAR, a Participant will be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying (i) the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Exercise Price; times (ii) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Committee, the payment from the Company for the SAR exercise may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof.

(d)

Termination. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Long-Term Stock Award agreement, if a Participant terminates his or her employment or his or her consultancy during a Restriction Period because of death or Disability, the Committee may provide for an earlier payment in settlement of such award in such amount and under such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate.

8.5        Termination of Participation. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such Participant’s Termination Date (unless determined otherwise by the Committee).

Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Long-Term Stock Award agreement, if a Participant terminates employment or his or her consultancy during a Restriction Period for any other reason, then such Participant shall not be entitled to any payment with respect to the Long-Term Stock Award subject to such Restriction Period, unless the Committee shall otherwise determine.

9.        RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.

(e)

Form of Payment. The earned portion of a Long-Term Stock Award may be paid currently or on a deferred basis with such interest or earnings equivalent as may be determined by the Committee. Payment shall be made in the form of cash, whole Shares, including Restricted Stock, or a combination thereof, either in a lump sum payment or in installments, all as the Committee shall determine.

SECTION 10. Withholding Taxes.

9.1        Awards of Restricted Stock Units. A Restricted Stock Unit Award is an award to a Participant of units (“RSUs”), each of which shall correspond to a Share that may be settled in cash, or by issuance of a Share (which may consist of Restricted Stock). All RSUs shall be granted pursuant to an Award Agreement.

9.2        Terms of RSUs. The Committee will determine the terms of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares subject to the Restricted Stock Unit Award; (b) the time or times during which the RSUs may be settled; and (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement, and the effect of the Participant’s Termination on the RSUs. A Restricted Stock Unit Award may be awarded or vest based on, among other things, satisfaction of such Performance Goals during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s Award Agreement. If RSUs vest based upon satisfaction of Performance Goals, then the Committee will: (w) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for the RSUs; (x) select from among the Performance Criteria to be used to measure the performance; (y) determine what additional vesting conditions, if any, should apply; and (z) determine the number of Shares deemed subject to the Restricted Stock Unit Award. Performance Periods may overlap and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to Restricted Stock Unit Awards that are subject to different Performance Periods and different Performance Goals and other criteria.

9.3        Form and Timing of Settlement. Payment of vested RSUs shall be made as soon as practicable after the date(s) determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle vested RSUs in cash, Shares, or a combination of both. The Committee may also permit a Participant to defer payment under a Restricted Stock Unit Award to a date or dates after the RSUs are vested provided that the terms of the Restricted Stock Unit Award and any deferral satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code (and/or other applicable tax laws that may be applicable to the Participant).

9.4        Termination of Participant. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such Participant’s Termination Date (unless determined otherwise by the Committee).

10.        PAYMENT FOR SHARE PURCHASES.

Payment from a Participant for Shares purchased pursuant to this Plan may be made in cash or by check or, where expressly approved for the Participant by the Committee and where permitted by law (and to the extent not otherwise set forth in the applicable Award Agreement):

(a)        by cancellation of indebtedness of the Company to the Participant;

(b)        by surrender of Shares held by the Participant that have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which said Award will be exercised or settled;

 

(a)

Withholding Generally. The Company shall have the right to withhold or require the recipient to remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, or local withholding tax requirements arising in connection with the grant, exercise or settlement of any award under the Plan prior to the delivery of any certificate or certificates for Shares or other amounts hereunder.

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-7


(c)        by waiver of compensation due or accrued to the Participant for services rendered or to be rendered to the Company or an Affiliate of the Company;

(d)        by consideration received by the Company pursuant to a broker-assisted or other form of cashless exercise program implemented by the Company in connection with the Plan;

(e)        by any combination of the foregoing; or

(f)        by any other method of payment as is permitted by applicable law.

11.        TAXES.

11.1        Taxes Generally. Whenever a taxable or tax withholding event occurs in relation to an Award granted under this Plan, the Participant shall be responsible for any U.S. federal, state, and local and any non-U.S. income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, fringe benefits tax, payment on account or other tax-related items that are applicable to the Participant as a result of participation in the Plan.

11.2        Withholding Arrangements. The Committee, in its sole discretion and pursuant to such procedures as it may specify from time to time, may require or permit a Participant to satisfy any withholding obligation the Company or an Affiliate may have with respect to such tax-related items, in whole or in part, by (without limitation) (i) paying cash, (ii) using proceeds from the sale of Shares delivered pursuant to the exercise or settlement of the Award, (iii) electing to have the Company withhold otherwise deliverable cash or Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld under applicable tax laws, subject to applicable accounting guidance, or (iii) delivering to the Company already-owned Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld under applicable tax laws, subject to applicable accounting guidance. The Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or delivered will be determined based on such methodology that the Company deems to be reasonable and in accordance with applicable law.

12.TRANSFERABILITY. Unless determined otherwise by the Committee, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. If the Committee makes an Award transferable, including, without limitation, by instrument to an inter vivos or testamentary trust in which the Awards are to be passed to beneficiaries upon the death of the trustor (settlor) or by gift to a Permitted Transferee, such Award will contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate; provided, however, that in no event may any Award be transferred for consideration to a third-party financial institution.

13.        PRIVILEGES OF STOCK OWNERSHIP; RESTRICTIONS ON SHARES.

13.1        Stockholder and Dividend Rights. No Participant will have any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to any Shares until the Shares are issued to the Participant. Any Participant who holds Shares issued under the Plan shall have the same voting, dividend and other rights as the Company’s other stockholders; provided however, that in the case of any unvested Award or unvested portion thereof (including but not limited to Unvested Shares of Restricted Stock), the Participant shall not be entitled to any dividends and other distributions paid or distributed by the Company on an equivalent number of vested Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the Committee’s discretion, such Participant may be credited with dividends and other distributions in the case of any Unvested Shares of Restricted Stock, provided that such dividends and other distributions (or any related earnings or interest on such dividends or distributions, if the Committee in its sole discretion provides for such payments) shall not be paid or distributed to the Participant unless, until and only to the extent such Shares vest. The value of dividends and other distributions (or any related earnings or interest, if applicable) payable or distributable with respect to any Unvested Shares of Restricted Stock that do not vest shall be forfeited.

13.2        Dividend Equivalent Rights. Subject to applicable law, the Committee in its sole discretion may credit to each Participant who holds an Award other than Restricted Stock, Options and SARs, in the form of dividend equivalents or otherwise, an amount equal to the value of all dividends and other distributions (whether in cash or other property) paid or distributed by the Company on an equivalent number of Shares, which may either be paid in cash or increase the number of Shares subject to the Award; provided, however, that such Participant will not be paid any such dividend equivalents (or any related earnings or interest on such dividends or distributions, if the Committee in its sole discretion provides for such payments) unless, until and only to the extent that the underlying Award vests. The value of dividend equivalents (or any related earnings or interest, if applicable) payable with respect any Award or any portion thereof that does not vest shall be forfeited.

 

(b)

Stock Withholding. When a Participant incurs tax liability in connection with the exercise or vesting of any Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award, which tax liability is subject to tax withholding under applicable tax laws, and the

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO

A-8  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


13.3        No Dividend or Dividend Equivalent Rights on Options or SARs. For the avoidance of doubt, no dividends, dividend equivalents or similar entitlements may be credited with respect to Options and SARs.

14.CERTIFICATES AND BOOK ENTRIES. All certificates or book entries for Shares or other securities delivered under this Plan will be subject to such stop transfer orders, legends and other restrictions as the Committee may deem necessary or advisable, including restrictions under any applicable U.S. federal and state or foreign securities or other laws, or any rules, regulations and other requirements of the SEC or any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the Shares may be listed or quoted.

15.ESCROW; PROHIBITION ON LOANS. To enforce any restrictions on a Participant’s Shares, the Committee may require the Shares to be held in book entry form with the restrictions on such Shares duly noted or, alternatively, require the Participant to deposit with the Company or an agent designated by the Company (or place under the control of the Company or its designated agent) all certificates representing Shares, together with stock powers or other instruments of transfer approved by the Committee, appropriately endorsed in blank, for the purpose of holding in escrow (or controlling) such certificates until such restrictions have lapsed or terminated, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends referencing such restrictions to be placed on the certificates or note in the Company’s direct registration system for stock issuance and transfer such restrictions and accompanying legends with respect to the book entries. No Participant will be permitted to execute a promissory note as partial or full consideration for the purchase of Shares.

16.STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF REPRICING. The Committee shall not without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the Exercise Price of any previously granted Option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for another Option or SAR with a lower Exercise Price or (iii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the Exercise Price of such Option or SAR exceeds the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a Change of Control or the adjustment provisions set forth in Section 2.6.

17.SECURITIES LAW AND OTHER REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. An Award will not be effective unless such Award is in compliance with all applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws and any foreign securities, exchange control and other laws, the rules and regulations of any governmental body and the requirements of any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the Shares may then be listed or quoted, as they are in effect on the date of grant of the Award and also on the date of exercise or other issuance. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan, the Company will have no obligation to issue or deliver certificates or establish book entries for Shares under this Plan prior to: (a) obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and/or (b) completion of any registration or other qualification of such Shares under any U.S. state or federal law or any foreign law or the ruling or other decision of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable. The Company will be under no obligation to register the Shares with the SEC or to effect compliance with the registration, qualification or listing requirements of any state securities laws or foreign securities, exchange control or other laws, stock exchange or automated quotation system, and the Company will have no liability for any inability or failure to do so.

18.NO OBLIGATION TO EMPLOY. Nothing in this Plan or any Award granted under this Plan will confer or be deemed to confer on any Participant any right to continue in the employ of, or to continue any other relationship with, the Company or any Affiliate or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate Participant’s employment or other relationship at any time.

19.        CHANGE OF CONTROL.

19.1        Assumption or  Substitution of Awards. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement or any other written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Participant or unless otherwise expressly provided by the Committee at the time of grant of an Award, in the event of a Change of Control, any or all outstanding Awards may be assumed or substituted by the surviving or acquiring corporation for equivalent Awards, which assumption or substitution shall be binding on all Participants. If an Award is assumed or substituted as set forth above, and the Participant’s employment is terminated by the surviving or acquiring corporation without Cause within twelve (12) months after the consummation of such Change of Control, such assumed or substituted Award shall accelerate and, if applicable, become immediately and fully exercisable, and any repurchase or resale restrictions applicable to any such Award shall automatically lapse, upon such termination.

19.2        No Assumption or Substitution of Awards. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement or any other written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Participant or unless otherwise

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-9


Participant is obligated to pay the Company an amount required to be withheld under applicable tax laws, the Committee may permit or require the Participant to satisfy the withholding tax obligation

expressly provided by the Committee at the time of grant of an Award, in the event such surviving or acquiring corporation does not agree to assume or substitute any Awards, as provided above, pursuant to a Change of Control, then notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan to the contrary, all unvested Awards that are not assumed or substituted, whether subject to time or performance-based vesting conditions, will vest in full at or prior to the effective time of the Change of Control as determined by the Committee, contingent upon the closing of the Change of Control; provided, however, that any payout in connection with a terminated Award shall comply with Section 409A of the Code to the extent necessary to avoid taxation thereunder. In addition, in the event such surviving or acquiring corporation refuses to assume or substitute any Options and/or SARs, the Company will notify the Participants who are holders of such Options and/or SARs in writing or electronically that such Awards will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and such Awards will terminate upon the expiration of such period.

19.3        Performance Goals. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement or any other written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Participant or unless otherwise expressly provided by the Committee at the time of grant of an Award, in the event of a Change of Control, any Award subject to Performance Goals shall either vest based on: (i) target performance being deemed to have been achieved or (ii) the actual level of performance for the applicable Performance Period as determined by the Committee, depending on whichever of (i) or (ii) results in a greater number of Shares that vest; provided however, that any Award subject to Performance Goals, which is assumed or substituted pursuant to Section 19.1, shall continue to be subject to any service requirement that applies to such Award.

20.GOVERNING LAW. This Plan and all Awards granted hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware in the United States, without regard to such state’s conflict of laws rules.

21.AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN. The Board may at any time terminate or amend this Plan in any respect, including, without limitation, amend any form of Award Agreement or instrument to be executed pursuant to this Plan; provided, however, that the Board will not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, amend this Plan in any manner where stockholder approval is necessary or required as determined by the Committee; provided further, that a Participant’s Award shall be governed by the version of this Plan then in effect at the time such Award was granted unless such Plan amendment will not adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any outstanding Award in a material way.

22.NON-U.S. PARTICIPANTS. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, to comply with the laws in countries outside the United States in which the Company and its Affiliates operate or in which Participants work or reside, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (i) determine which Participants outside the United States will be eligible to participate in the Plan; (ii) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Participants outside the United States; (iii) establish sub-plans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures and rules, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable, including adoption of rules, procedures or sub-plans applicable to particular Affiliates or Participants in particular locations; providedthat no such sub-plans and/or modifications shall take precedence over Section 2 of the Plan or otherwise require stockholder approval; and (iv) take any action, before or after an Award is granted, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee is specifically authorized to adopt rules, procedures and sub-plans with provisions that limit or modify rights on eligibility to receive an Award under the Plan or on death, disability, retirement or other termination of employment, available methods of exercise or settlement of an Award, payment of income, social insurance contributions and payroll taxes, the shifting of employer tax or social insurance contribution liability to the Participant, the withholding procedures and handling of any Share certificates or other indicia of ownership. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable laws.

23.NONEXCLUSIVITY OF THE PLAN. Neither the adoption of this Plan by the Board, the submission of this Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval, nor any provision of this Plan will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of stock awards and bonuses otherwise than under this Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

24.INSIDER TRADING POLICY. Each Participant who receives an Award shall comply with any policy adopted by the Company from time to time covering transactions in the Company’s securities by Employees, officers and/or directors of the Company.

A-10  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


25.OTHER POLICIES. Each Award may be subject to the terms and conditions of any other policy (and any amendments thereto) adopted by the Company from time to time, which may include any policy related to the vesting or transfer of equity awards. Whether any such policy will apply to a particular Award may depend, among other things, on when the Award was granted, whom the Award was granted to, and the type of Award.

26.ALL AWARDS SUBJECT TO ANY COMPANY CLAWBACK OR RECOUPMENT POLICY. All Awards shall be subject to clawback or recoupment pursuant to any compensation clawback or recoupment policy that may be adopted by the Committee from time to time thereafter or required by law during the term of Participant’s employment or other service with the Company or its Affiliates that is applicable to executive officers, employees, or other service providers of the Company and its Affiliates.In addition to any other remedies available under such policy and applicable law, the Committee may also require the cancellation of a Participant’s outstanding Awards if such Participant’s employment is terminated for Cause.

27.DEFINITIONS. As used in this Plan, and except as elsewhere defined herein, the following terms will have the following meanings:

2000 Plan” means the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

Affiliate” means any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company.

Award” means any award under the Plan, including any Option, Restricted Stock Award, Stock Bonus Award, Stock Appreciation Right or Restricted Stock Unit Award.

Award Agreement” means, with respect to each Award, the written or electronic agreement between the Company and the Participant setting forth the terms and conditions of the Award, which shall be in substantially a form (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan.

Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

Cause” will have the meaning ascribed to such term in any written agreement between the Participant and the Company or an Affiliate defining such term and, in the absence of such agreement, such term means, with respect to a Participant, a good faith and reasonable determination by the Company that the Participant has, during the term of his or her employment with the Company or an Affiliate: (a) been convicted of, or pleaded nolo contendere to, (1) any felony or (2) any other lesser crime involving fraud, embezzlement, or misappropriation; (b) engaged in gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his or her duties; (c) breached any material provision of any agreement entered into with the Company or an Affiliate; (d) misappropriated any (1) material property of the Company or an Affiliate or (2) opportunity of the Company or an Affiliate; (e) failed to materially comply with any written policy or procedure of the Company or an Affiliate; or (f) engaged in an act or omission that results in financial or other harm to the Company or an Affiliate. The determination as to whether a Participant is being terminated for Cause will be made in good faith by the Company and will be final and binding on the Participant.

Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or those persons to whom administration of the Plan, or part of the Plan, has been delegated as permitted by law.

Company” means Oracle Corporation, or any successor corporation.

Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.

Consultant” means any person, including an advisor or independent contractor, engaged by the Company or an Affiliate to render services to such entity.

Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(a)        an individual, corporation, partnership, group, associate or other entity or “person”, as such term is defined in Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than the Company or any employee benefit plan(s) sponsored by the Company, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities ordinarily having the Company withhold from the Shares otherwise to be delivered that number of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld, determined on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined;provided, however, that the Company shall not allow withholding of Shares (i) upon exercise or vesting of any Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award in an amount which exceeds the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdiction including, without limitation, for federal, state, local and payroll tax purposes, and subject to compliance with Applicable Laws, or (ii) if such withholding is not permitted under Applicable Laws. Any elections by a Participant to have Shares withheld for this purpose shall be made in accordance with procedures established by the Committee from time to time.

SECTION 11. Change of Control. Unless specifically provided to the contrary in any Grant or Purchase Agreement, upon a Change of Control, (a) unless outstanding Options, Rights and Long-Term Stock Awards are effectively assumed by the surviving or acquiring corporation or otherwise remain outstanding, such Options, Rights and Long-Term Stock Awards shall become fully vested and, if applicable, exercisable, and any repurchase or resale restrictions applicable to any award granted hereunder shall automatically lapse and such Options, Rights or Long-Term Stock Awards shall expire on the consummation of such Change of Control transaction at such times and on such conditions as the Committee shall determine and (b) if an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award is effectively so assumed or remains outstanding, and the Participant’s employment is terminated (within the meaning of Section 6 hereof) by the surviving or acquiring corporation without cause within twelve (12) months after the consummation of such Change of Control transaction, such Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award shall accelerate and, if applicable, become immediately and fully exercisable, and any repurchase or resale restrictions applicable to any such award shall automatically lapse, upon such termination. In the event of a Change of Control, the Committee may deem performance of a Long-Term Stock Award subject to performance restrictions to have been achieved at the target or any other level of performance.

SECTION 12. Employment Relationship. Nothing in the Plan or any award made hereunder shall interfere with or limit in any way the right to vote at elections of directors;

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-11


(b)        individuals who constitute the Board of Directors of the Company on the effective date of the Plan (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any Approved Director, as hereinafter defined, shall be, for purposes of this subsection (b), considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board. An “Approved Director”, for purposes of this subsection (b), shall mean any person becoming a director subsequent to the effective date of the Plan whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee of the Company for director), but shall not include any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of an individual, corporation, partnership, group, associate or other entity or “person” other than the Board; or

(c)        the consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation involving the Company other than with a wholly-owned subsidiary and other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 65% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (B) a sale, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing definition or any other provision of the Plan, the term Change in Control will not include a sale of assets, merger or other transaction effected exclusively for the purpose of changing the domicile of the Company and the definition of Change in Control (or any analogous term) in an individual written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Participant will supersede the foregoing definition with respect to Awards subject to such agreement; provided, however, that if no definition of Change in Control or any analogous term is set forth in such an individual written agreement, the foregoing definition will apply. To the extent required for compliance with Section 409A of the Code, in no event will a Change in Control be deemed to have occurred if such transaction is not also a “change in the ownership or effective control of” the Company or “a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of” the Company as determined under Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) (without regard to any alternative definition thereunder). The Committee may, in its sole discretion and without a Participant’s consent, amend the definition of “Change in Control” to conform to the definition of “Change in Control” under Section 409A of the Code, and the regulations thereunder.

Determination Date” means any time when the achievement of the Performance Goals associated with the applicable Performance Period remains substantially uncertain; provided, however, that without limiting the foregoing, that if the Determination Date occurs on or before the date on which 25% of the Performance Period has elapsed, the achievement of such Performance Goals shall be deemed to be substantially uncertain.

Director” means a member of the Board.

Disability” means total and permanent disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code in the case of ISOs and in the case of other Awards, a Participant’s disability, as determined by the Social Security Administration or the long-term disability plan maintained by the Company; provided however, that in the case of Participants residing outside the United States, “Disability” shall have such meaning as determined by the Committee for purposes of the Plan taking into consideration the provisions of applicable laws.

Employee” means any person, including Officers and Directors, employed by the Company or any Affiliate of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.

Exchange Act” means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Exchange Program” means a program pursuant to which outstanding Awards are surrendered, cancelled or exchanged for cash, the same type of Award or a different Award (or combination thereof).

Exercise Price” means, with respect to an Option, the price at which a holder may purchase the Shares issuable upon exercise of an Option and with respect to a SAR, the price at which the SAR is granted to the holder thereof.

A-12  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of a Share determined as follows:

(a)        Except as otherwise determined by the Committee as permitted hereunder, if, on such date, the Shares are listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing price of a Share as quoted on such national or regional securities exchange or market system constituting the primary market for the Shares, as reported in any such source as the Company deems reliable, and, if there is no such closing price on the date of determination, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing price of a Share on the next trading day following the day of determination.

(b)        Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, determine the Fair Market Value on the basis of the closing, high, low or average sale price of a Share or the actual sale price of a Share received by a Participant, on such date, the preceding trading day, the next succeeding trading day or an average determined over a period of trading days; provided, however, that, for purposes of determining the exercise price of Options or SARs, the Fair Market Value shall not be less than the Fair Market Value determined under (a). The Committee may vary its method of determination of the Fair Market Value for different purposes under the Plan.

(c)        If, on such date, the Shares are not listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be as determined by the Committee in good faith.

Full-Value Awards” means any Awards that result in the Company transferring the full value of any underlying Share granted pursuant to an Award, but shall not include Options and SARs.

Insider” means an officer or director of the Company or any other person whose transactions in the Company’s Common Stock are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Option” means an award of an option to purchase Shares pursuant to Section 5 of the Plan.

Parent” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if each of such corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

Participant” means a person who holds an Award under this Plan.

Performance Goals” means one or more performance goals (or combined goals) established by the Committee for the Performance Period based upon the performance criteria selected by the Committee. Any criteria used may be measured, as applicable, (i) in absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms, including, but not limited to, the passage of time (such as year over year growth) and/or against another company, a comparison group of companies or index designated by the Committee, (iii) on a per-share basis, (iv) against the performance of the Company as a whole or one or more identifiable business units, products, ecosystems, lines of business or segments of the Company, (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, and/or (vi) on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis. The performance goals may include, but are not limited to, the following measures (such criteria, the “Performance Criteria”):

asset turnover;

billings;

bookings;

capacity utilization;

cash flow, operating cash flow, or cash flow or operating cash flow per share (before or after dividends);

contract value;

customer growth;

data center openings or closings;

earnings per share;

EBITDA, including EBITDA growth;

economic value added;

gross profit margin;

intellectual property (e.g., patents)/product development;

inventory turnover;

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-13


market share;

mergers and acquisitions or divestitures;

net income margin;

net income;

net or gross sales;

operating expenses;

operating income;

operating profit margin;

pre-tax income;

profit;

profits;

return on assets;

return on capital;

return on equity;

return on net assets;

return on sales;

revenues (including recurring revenues);

sales growth;

sales margin (including both growth rates and margin percentages);

stock price, including market price appreciation of the Company’s stock;

total stockholder return (on a relative or absolute basis); or

Any other factor (such as individual business objectives, unit-specific operational metrics or individual performance goals) the Committee so designates, provided that such objectives do not result in adverse accounting, tax, reporting or other consequences.

Performance Period” means the period of time selected by the Committee over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant’s right to and the payment of an Award. Performance Periods may be of varying and overlapping duration, at the sole discretion of the Committee.

Permitted Transferee” means any child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, or sister-in-law (including adoptive relationships) of the Participant, any person sharing the Participant’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trust in which these persons (or the Participant) have more than 50% of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the Participant) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the Participant) own more than 50% of the voting interests.

Plan” means this Oracle Corporation2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

Purchase Price” means the price to be paid for Shares acquired under the Plan, other than Shares acquired upon exercise of an Option or SAR.

Restricted Stock Award” means an award of Shares pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan.

Restricted Stock Unit Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan.

SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities Act” means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Shares” means shares of the Company’s Common Stock and any successor security.

Stock Appreciation Right” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 8 of the Company or of any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate to terminate any Participant’s employment or consulting relationship at any time, with or without cause, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate.

SECTION 13. General Restriction. Each award shall be subject to the requirement that, if, at any time, the Committee shall determine, in its discretion, that the listing, registration, or qualification of the Shares subject to such award upon any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any government regulatory body, is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, such award or the issue or purchase of Shares thereunder, such award may not be exercised or paid in whole or in part unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent, or approval shall have been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Committee. The Committee shall be under no obligation to obtain or seek such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval.

SECTION 14. Rights as a Stockholder/Dividends and Distributions. The holder of an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares covered by the Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award until the Shares subject to such award have been entered upon the records of the duly authorized transfer agent of the Company. The Committee in its sole discretion may credit to each holder of an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award, in the form of dividend equivalents or otherwise, an amount equal to the value of all dividends and other distributions (whether in cash or other property) paid or distributed by the Company on the equivalent number of shares of Common Stock;provided,however, that such holder will not be paid any dividends or other distributions (or any related earnings or interest on such dividends or distributions, if the Committee in its sole discretion provides for such payments) unless and until the underlying Option, Right, Share or unit vests. The value of dividends or other distributions (or any related earnings or interest, if applicable) payable with respect to Options, Rights, Shares or units that do not vest shall be forfeited.

SECTION 15. Clawback/Recoupment. An award granted under the Plan will be subject to any provisions of Applicable Laws providing for the recoupment or clawback of incentive compensation; any provisions as may be reflected in a recoupment or clawback policy adopted by the Company; and any recoupment, clawback or similar provisions that may be included in the applicable Award Document.

SECTION 16. Limitations on Assignment of Awards. Except as otherwise provided in Section 6(f) and 9(a) hereof, no awards made hereunder shall be assignable or transferable by the Participant except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and as otherwise consistent with the specific Plan provisions relating thereto or as the Committee in its sole discretion shall approve either for or without consideration. During the life of the Participant, an Option, Right or Long-Term Stock Award shall be exercisable only by him or her, or by a transferee as permitted by Section 6(f) or 9(a) hereof and any award agreement.

A-10  LOGO   2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


SECTION 17. Nonexclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan by the Board, the submission of the Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval, nor any provisions of the Plan shall be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including without limitation, arrangements providing for the granting of Options otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

SECTION 18. Adoption and Stockholder Approval. This Plan shall become effective on the date that it is adopted by the Board of the Company and approved by the stockholders of the Company, in any manner permitted by applicable corporate law.

SECTION 19. Term of Plan. Awards may be granted pursuant to this Plan from time to time prior to the expiration hereof, which shall occur on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2020.

SECTION 20. Amendment or Termination of Plan.

 

(a)

Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law and unless otherwise expressly provided in a Grant or Purchase Agreement or in the Plan, the Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time,provided, however, that no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made without (i) stockholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement for which or with which the Board deems it necessary or desirable to qualify or comply, or (ii) the consent of the affected Participant, if such action would adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any outstanding award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Committee or its delegee may amend the Plan and/or adopt subordinate arrangements, policies and programs in each case subject to the authority set forth in Section 4 hereof, in such manner as may be necessary to enable the Plan to achieve its stated purposes in any jurisdiction outside the United States in a tax-efficient manner and in compliance with local rules and regulations by adopting schedules of provisions to be applicable to awards granted in such jurisdiction.

A-14  LOGO   2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Stock Bonus Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan.

Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

Termination” or “Terminated” means, for purposes of this Plan with respect to a Participant, that the Participant has for any reason ceased to provide services as an Employee, Consultant or Director. An employee will not be deemed to have ceased to provide services in the case of (i) leaves of absence covered by such policies that are approved by the Committee, (ii) transfers between the Company, an Affiliate, or their successors, or (iii) a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders service to the Company or an Affiliate as an Employee, Consultant or Director. The Committee or an authorized representative of the Company will have sole discretion to determine whether a Participant has ceased to provide services and the effective date on which the Participant ceased to provide services, and such determination may take into consideration whether the Participant continues to actively provide services to the Company or an Affiliate (the “Termination Date”). In addition, to the extent required for exemption from or compliance with Section 409A of the Code, the determination of whether there has been a Termination will be made, and such term will be construed, in a manner that is consistent with the definition of “separation from service” as defined under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h) (without regard to any alternative definition thereunder).

Unvested Shares” means Shares that have not yet vested or are subject to a right of repurchase or reacquisition in favor of the Company (or any successor thereto).

 

(b)

The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any term of, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate, any award theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively, without the consent of any relevant Participant or holder or beneficiary of an award,provided, however, that (i) no such action shall impair the rights of any affected Participant or holder or beneficiary under any award theretofore granted under the Plan and (ii) the Committee may not materially amend a Long-Term Stock Award without the approval of stockholders.

SECTION 21. Section 409A of the Code. With respect to awards that are subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, and the provisions of the Plan and any Award Document shall be interpreted in a manner that satisfies the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, and the Plan shall be operated accordingly. If any provision of the Plan or any term or condition of any award would otherwise frustrate or conflict with this intent, the provision, term or condition will be interpreted and deemed amended so as to avoid this conflict.

SECTION 22. Governing Law. The Plan and each Award Document shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without application of the conflicts of law principles thereof.

2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-11

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  LOGO   A-15


 

LOGO

Oracle Corporation 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

November 15, 2017

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time

Oracle Corporation Conference Center

350 Oracle Parkway

Redwood City, California 94065

 

 

4290-PS17

LOGO

Oracle Corporation

2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

November 4, 2020

10:00 a.m. Pacific Time

LOGO

C20582

 

 

LOGO




LOGO

ORACLE CORPORATION ATTN: LUIS MONTANO 500 ORACLE PARKWAY REDWOOD SHORES, CA 94065
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D22335-P43899
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
ORACLE CORPORATION
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1. Election of Directors
Nominees: 01) Jeffrey S. Berg 02) Michael J. Boskin 03) Safra A. Catz 04) Bruce R. Chizen 05) George H. Conrades 06) Lawrence J. Ellison 07) Rona A. Fairhead 08) Jeffrey O. Henley 09) Renee J. James 10) Charles W. Moorman IV 11) Leon E. Panetta 12) William G. Parrett 13) Naomi O. Seligman 14) Vishal Sikka
For All Withhold All Except For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:
2. Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers.
3. Approve the Oracle Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.
4. Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
For Against Abstain
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposals:
5. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Report.
6. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Independent Board Chair.
For Against Abstain
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date
Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.
D22336-P43899
ORACLE CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Stockholders November 4, 2020 10:00 AM
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Lawrence J. Ellison, Jeffrey O. Henley and Brian S. Higgins, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common stock of ORACLE CORPORATION that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 AM, PST on November 4, 2020, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ORCL2020, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side


LOGO

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF ORACLE CORPORATION November 15, 2017 GO GREEN e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access. NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL: The Proxy Statement, Form of Proxy Card, and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/17983 Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. 212343333300000000000 111517 The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2,4, and 5, ONE YEAR on Proposal 3, and AGAINST 6,7, and 8. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE 1. Election of Board of Directors: FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below) NOMINEES: Jeffrey S. Berg Michael J. Boskin Safra A. Catz Bruce R. Chizen George H. Conrades Lawrence J. Ellison Hector Garcia-Molina Jeffrey O. Henley Mark V. Hurd Renée J. James Leon E. Panetta Naomi O. Seligman 2. Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers. 1 YEAR 2 YEARS 3 YEARS ABSTAIN 3. Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advsory Votes on the Compensation of Named Executive Officers. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 4. Approval of the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. 5. Ratification of the Selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2018. 6. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions Report. 7. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Report. 8. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Proxy Access Reform. INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.


LOGO

ORACLE CORPORATION

Annual Meeting of Stockholders - November 15, 2017 10:00 A.M. Pacific Time

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints LAWRENCE J. ELLISON, JEFFREY O. HENLEY and DORIAN DALEY, or any of them, as proxies, each with the power of substitution, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all the shares of common stock of ORACLE CORPORATION that the stockholder is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time on November 15, 2017, in the Oracle Corporation Conference Center, 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations (i.e., FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2, 4 and 5, ONE YEAR on Proposal 3, and AGAINST Proposals 6, 7 and 8). In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or continuation thereof.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)

1.1

14475